Influence of tillage, residue and nitrogen placement on maize growth and yield under conservation agriculture

Authors

  • Akshay Glotra The Graduate School, Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 10012, India https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0710-7364
  • Shankar Lal Jat ICAR-Indian Institute of Maize Research, New Delhi 110012, India https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3816-2318
  • A K Singh ICAR-Indian Institute of Maize Research, New Delhi 110012, India
  • C M Parihar The Graduate School, Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 10012, India
  • Vijay Pooniya The Graduate School, Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 10012, India https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4771-3510
  • Sandeep Kumar The Graduate School, Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 10012, India
  • M C Meena The Graduate School, Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 10012, India https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2721-8125
  • Smruti Ranjan Padhan The Graduate School, Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 10012, India https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8230-0637
  • Ramniwas ICAR-Indian Institute of Maize Research, New Delhi 110012, India https://orcid.org/0009-0000-3246-8810
  • Manish Kakraliya The Graduate School, Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 10012, India
  • Abhijit Mandal The Graduate School, Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 10012, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.3662

Keywords:

conservation agriculture, growth parameters, Maize, nitrogen placement, residue retention, yield attributes, zero tillage

Abstract

Conservation agriculture (CA) is changing the paradigm in production and productivity of maize-wheat system, but proper residue management and quantification, and application of nitrogen (N) are the main bottlenecks. In this context a field experiment was conducted in split plot design consisting of three crop establishment practices (CEPs) in main plots i.e., ZT with residue retention (ZT + R), zero tillage (ZT), conventional tillage (CT) and 4 N placement methods (NPMs) i.e., Control (only P and K applied), RDN: Recommended Dose of N (Band placement of 1/3rd N at sowing followed by surface placement of 1/3rd N during each at V6 (emerged six leaves with the complete collar visible) and tasselling stage, improved RDN (band placement of 1/3rd N as basal dose followed by 1/3rd nitrogen as subsurface placement at V6 stage followed by 1/3rd nitrogen as surface band placement at tasselling stage) and improved 80 % RDN (Band placement of 30 % N as basal followed by subsurface placement of 30 % N in maize (at V6 stage) and surface band placement of 20 % N in maize (at tasselling stage). The ZT + R treatment resulted in significantly higher plant height (6.61-7.02 %) and dry matter accumulation (DMA) (7.50-7.73 %) during different crop growth stages in maize compared to CT. The NPM involving subsurface placement of N at the V6 stage, that is, improved RDN, significantly increased plant height (2.37-2.73 %) and DMA (1.85-4.13 %) as compared to RDN during different crop growth stages. Significantly higher NDVI and lower CTD values were reported under ZT+R across crop growth stages over the years. ZT + R in combination with improved RDN resulted in significantly higher stover and biological yield by 10.40 and 10.10 %, respectively, as compared to CT with RDN. The improved 80 % RDN saved 20 % N to achieve the same level of productivity as the RDN, emphasising the role of the subsurface placement of nitrogen. Therefore, residue retention in ZT with improved RDN can enhance maize productivity in the Indo-Gangetic Plain and similar agro-ecologies. This research contributes to bridging the gap in nitrogen management under conservation agriculture.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Kadam PV, Jat SL, Singh AK, Parihar CM, Mahala DM, Kumar B et al. Innovative approaches to enhance maize growth and yield via residue and nitrogen management in conservation agriculture practices. Maize Journal. 2022; 11 (2): 65–74. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v92i5.124789

Parihar CM, Jat SL, Singh AK, Kumar B, Pradhan S, Pooniya V et al. . Conservation agriculture in irrigated intensive maize-based systems of north-western India: Effects on crop yields, water productivity and economic profitability. Field Crops Research. 2016; 193: 104-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2016.03.013

Radheshyam, Jat SL, Parihar CM, Jat ML, Bijarniya D, Kumar M et al. Better crop establishment, residue recycling and diversification for sustaining non-basmati rice (Oryza sativa) in western IGP. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 2023; 93(6): 621–25. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v93i6.134894

Jat SL, Parihar CM, Singh AK, Nayak HS, Meena BR, Kumar B, Parihar MD, Jat ML. Differential response from N sources with and without residue management under conservation agriculture on crop yields, water–use and economics in maize–based rotations. Field Crops Research. 2019; 236: 96–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2019.03.017

Nayak HS, Parihar CM, Mandal BN, Patra K, Jat SL, Singh R, Singh VK, Jat ML, Garnaik S, Nayak J, Abdallah AM. Point placement of late vegetative stage nitrogen splits increase the productivity, N-use efficiency and profitability of tropical maize under decade long conservation agriculture. 2022; 133: 126417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2021.126417

Parihar CM, Jat SL, Singh AK, Majumdar K, Jat ML, Saharawat YS, Padhan S, Kuri BR. Bio-energy, water-use efficiency and economics of maize-wheat mungbean system under precision-conservation agriculture in semi-arid agroecosystem. Energy. 2017; 119: 245–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2016.12.068

Patra K, Parihar CM, Nayak HS, Rana B, Singh VK, Krishnan P, Pandey R, Mandal BN, Rathi N, Meena BR, Singh LK, Sidhu HS, Jat ML. Crop performance and nitrogen use-efficiency in maize under conservation agriculture coupled with sub-surface drip fertigation. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 2021; 91(3): 474-79. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v91i3.112544

Naik BM, Kumar M, Singh SK, Karthika M, Roy NK. Combined effect of tillage and nutrient management practices on kharif maize (Zea mays L.) yield and chlorophyll content Journal of Crop and Weed. 2022; 18(2):36-42. https://doi.org/10.22271/09746315.2022.v18.i2.1570

Raghavendra M, Singh YV, Das TK, Meena MC. Residual effect of crop residue and potassium management on greengram productivity, soil and canopy temperature depression in maize and wheat under zero tillage maize-wheat-greengram cropping system. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences. 2020; 9(9): 3639-48. https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2020.909.449

Padhan SR, Jat SL, Singh AK, Parihar CM, Pooniya V, Kumar S, Meena MC, Radheshyam, Kumar A, Darjee S. Nitrogen dose and placement in conservation agriculture for augmenting crop growth, productivity and profitability of Indian mustard (Brassica juncea). Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 2023; 93(12): 1326–32. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v93i12.140934

Das TK, Saharawat YS, Bhattacharyya R, Sudhishri S, Bandyopadhyay KK, Sharma AR, Jat ML. Conservation agriculture effects on crop and water productivity, profitability and soil organic carbon accumulation under a maize-wheat cropping system in the North-western Indo-Gangetic Plains. Field Crops Research. 2018; 215: 222-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2017.10.021

Published

02-12-2024

How to Cite

1.
Glotra A, Jat SL, Singh AK, Parihar CM, Pooniya V, Kumar S, Meena MC, Padhan SR, Ramniwas, Kakraliya M, Mandal A. Influence of tillage, residue and nitrogen placement on maize growth and yield under conservation agriculture. Plant Sci. Today [Internet]. 2024 Dec. 2 [cited 2024 Dec. 21];11(sp2). Available from: https://horizonepublishing.com/journals/index.php/PST/article/view/3662

Most read articles by the same author(s)