This is an outdated version published on 08-06-2024. Read the most recent version.

Forthcoming

Biophysical and biochemical bases of resistance to Maruca vitrata F. in selected vegetable cowpea genotypes

Authors

Mirala Sruthi Department of Entomology, College of Agriculture, OUAT, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India https://orcid.org/0009-0001-3896-0491
Pravasini Behera Department of Entomology, College of Agriculture, OUAT, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India https://orcid.org/0009-0003-2564-1402
S. K. Mukherjee Department of Entomology, College of Agriculture, OUAT, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India https://orcid.org/0009-0009-2625-4862
T. Samal Department of Entomology, College of Agriculture, OUAT, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India https://orcid.org/0009-0000-3127-4117
P. Tripathy Department of Vegetable Science, College of Agriculture, OUAT, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India https://orcid.org/0009-0004-0252-442X
K. C. Samal College of Horticulture, Chiplima, OUAT, Odisha, India https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5327-7850

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.3698

Keywords:

Vegetable cowpea, Maruca vitrata, phenol content, total sugars, protein content, host plant resistance

Abstract

Host plant resistance is a crucial factor in mitigating the damages caused by Maruca vitrata, the most devastating pest of vegetable cowpea, commonly known as the legume pod borer. Understanding the biophysical and biochemical aspects of resistance is essential for developing methods to breed insect pest resistance in germplasm. To identify genotypes with diverse traits associated with resistance to this pest, we investigated the biophysical and biochemical traits implicated in conferring resistance to M. vitrata across ten accessions of vegetable cowpea, alongside resistant and susceptible check. Trichomes on pods emerged as a pivotal aspects of resistance in these genotypes, exhibiting a significant negative correlation with the percentage of seed damage inflicted by M. vitrata. In our study, genotypes with higher pod trichome density showed a reduction in seed damage caused by the pest. Additionally, a high phenol concentration and low levels of total sugars and proteins were associated with resistance to M. vitrata. Vegetable cowpea genotypes characterized by abundant pod trichomes and elevated phenol level hold promise for breeding efforts aimed at developing cultivars resistant to M. vitrata.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Coulibaly O, Alene AD, Manyong V, Sanogo D, Abdoulaye T, Chianu J et al. Situation and outlook for cowpea and soybean in sub-saharan Africa. 2009.

Singh B. Cowpea: The food legume of the 21st century. Vol. 164. John Wiley and Sons; 2020.

Jayathilake C, Visvanathan R, Deen A, Bangamuwage R, Jayawardana BC, Nammi S et al. Cowpea: An overview on its nutritional facts and health benefits. J Sci Food Agric. 2018;98(13):4793-806. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.9074

Gonçalves A, Goufo P, Barros A, Domínguez-Perles R, Trindade H, Rosa EAS et al. Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L. Walp), a renewed multipurpose crop for a more sustainable agri-food system: Nutritional advantages and constraints. J Sci Food Agric. 2016;96(9):2941-51. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.7644

Santos RA, Souza Filho APS, Cantanhede Filho AJ, Guilhon GMSP, Santos LS. Analysis of phenolic compounds from cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) by HPLC-DAD-MS/MS. Braz J Food Technol. 2021;24. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1981-6723.07720

Mekonnen TW, Gerrano AS, Mbuma NW, Labuschagne MT. Breeding of vegetable Cowpea for nutrition and climate resilience in sub-Saharan Africa: Progress, opportunities and challenges. Plants. 2022;11(12):1583. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/plants11121583

Dietz PA. Het katjand VI indertje (het verrmeende Toa-Toh-Motje). Meded Deli-Proefstu Medan. 1914;8:273-78.

Srinivasan R, Tamò M, Malini P. Emergence of Maruca vitrata as a major pest of food legumes and evolution of management practices in Asia and Africa. Annu Rev Entomol. 2021;66(1):141-61. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev-ento-021220-084539

Rathwa MG, Patel VN, Makwana AB. Estimation of yield losses due to spotted pod borer, Maruca testulalis in cowpea. International Journal of Chemical Studies. 2018;6(2):322-24.

Ofuya TI. Ecology and control of insect pests of stored legumes in Nigeria. In: Ofuya TI, Lale NES, editors. Biology. Dave Collins Publication. 2001; p. 24-58.

Fatokun CA. Breeding cowpea for resistance to insect pests: Attempted crosses between cowpea and Vigna vexillata. Challenges and Opportunities for Enhancing Sustainable Cowpea Production. 2002;52-61.

Sunitha V, Rao GVR, Lakshmi KV, Saxena KB, Rao VR, Reddy YVR. Morphological and biochemical factors associated with resistance to Maruca vitrata (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) in short duration pigeonpea. International Journal of Tropical Insect Science. 2008;28(1):45-52. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1742758408959646

Wubneh WY, Taggar GK. Role of morphological factors of pigeonpea in imparting resistance to spotted pod borer, Maruca vitrata Geyer (Lepidoptera: Crambidae). J Appl Nat Sci. 2016;8(1):218-24. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.31018/jans.v8i1.776

Halder J, Srinivasan S. Varietal screening and role of morphological factors on distribution and abundance of spotted pod borer. Maruca vitrata (Geyer) on cowpea. Annals of Pant Protection Sciences. 2011;19(1):7174.

Halder J, Srinivasan S, Muralikrishna T. Role of various biophysical factors on distribution and abundance of spotted pod borer, Maruca vitrata (Geyer) on mung bean. Annals of Plant Protection Sciences. 2006;14(1):49-51.

Halder J, Srinivasan S. Biochemical basis of resistance against Maruca vitrata (Geyer) in urd bean. Annals of Plant Protection Sciences. 2007;15(2):287-90.

Muchhadiya DV, Patel JJ, Garaniya NH, Patel DR. Morphological and biochemical basis of resistance against the pod borers Maruca vitrata F. and Helicoverpa armigera Hübner in cowpea. Entomon. 2023;48(1):63-68. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.33307/entomon.v48i1.844

Sadasivam S, Manickam A. Biochemical methods. New Delhi, India: New Age International Publishers; 2008.

Lowry OH, Rosebrough NJ, Farr AL, Randall RJ. Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent. J Biol Chem. 1951;193(1):265-75. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0021-9258(19)52451-6

Bray HG, Thorpe WV. Analysis of phenolic compounds of interest in metabolism. Methods Biochem Anal. 1954;1:27-52. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9780470110171.ch2

Gopinath PP, Parsad R, Joseph B, Adarsh VS. Grapes: General R-shiny based analysis platform empowered by statistics; 2020. Available:https://www.kaugrapes.com/home, Version 1.0.0. DOI:10.521/zendodo.4923220.

Lüdecke D. sjPlot: Data visualization for statistics in social science–R package ver. 2.8. 14. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=sjPlot.

Wei T, Simko V. R package "corrplot": Visualization of a correlation matrix (Version 0.88). 2021. https://github.com/taiyun/corrplot.

Agbim JU. Evaluation of cowpea genotypes for resistance to the legume pod borer, Maruca Vitrata (Fabricius) (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). Journal of Agriculture and Food Sciences. 2022;20(2):186-98. https://doi.org/10.4314/jafs.v20i2.12

Altaf H, Azizul H, Prodhan MZH. Effect of pods characteristics on pod borer (Helicoverpa armigera, Hubner) infestation in chickpea. SAARC Journal of Agriculture. 2008;6(1):51-60.

Thimmaiah KK, Naliniprabhakar AS, Panchal YC. Histochemical studies on proteins and polysaccharides in insect pest resistant and susceptible cotton genotypes. Karnataka Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 1997;10(2):562-64.

Sachan SK, Sachan GC. Relation of some biochemical characters of Brassica juncea (cotton) to susceptibility to Lipaphis crysimi Kaltenbach. Indian J Entomol. 1991;53(2):218-25.

Mohan S, Jayaraj S, Purushothaman D, Rangarajan AV. Can the use of Azospirillum biofertilizer control sorghum shootfly? Current Science. 1987;56(14):723-25.

Prasad YG, Anjani K. Resistance to serpentine leafminer (Liriomyza trifolii) in castor (Ricinus communis). The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 2001;71(5):351-52.

Senguttuvan T, Sujatha K. Biochemical basis of resistance in groundnut against leaf miner. International Arachis Newsletter. 2000;20:69-71.

Murkute GR, Dhage AR, Desai BB, Kale AA, Mote UN, Aher RP. Biochemical parameters associated with pod borer damage as influenced by maturity group and growth stages of pigeon pea Millsp. Legume Research. 1993;16:151-56.

MacFoy GA, Dabrowski ZT, Okech S. Studies on the legume pod-borer, Maruca testulalis (Geyer)—VI. Cowpea resistance to oviposition and larval feeding. Int J Trop Insect Sci. 1983;4(1-2):147-52. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s174275840000415x

Veeranna R. Phenol and tannin reduce the damage of cowpea pod borer Maruca testulalis. In: Lepidoptera: Pyralidae, Insect Environ. Geyer. 1998; p. 5-6.

Pearson EO. The insect pests of cotton in tropical Africa. London, Eastern press; 1958.

Johnson B. The influence of aphids on the glandular hairs of tomato plants. Plant Pathol. 1956;5(4):131-32. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3059.1956.tb00115.x

Schillinger JA, Gallun RL. Leaf pubescence of wheat as a deterrent to the cereal leaf beetle, Oulema melanoplus. Ann Entomol Soc Am. 1968;61(4):900-03. https://doi.org/10.1093/aesa/61.4.900

Chiang HS, Singh SR. Pod hairs as a factor in Vigna vexillata resistance to the pod-sucking bug, Clavigralla tomentosicollis. Entomol Exp Appl. 1988;47(2):195-99. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1570-7458.1988.tb01136.x

Jackai LEN, Oghiakhe S. Pod wall trichomes and their role in the resistance of two wild cowpea, Vigna vexillata, accessions to Maruca testulalis (Geyer) (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) and Clavigralla tomentosicollis Stal (Hemiptera: Coreidae). Bull Entom Res. 1989;79(4):595-605. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007485300018745

Yousuf HMB, Yasin M, Ali H, Naveed K, Riaz A, AlGarawi AM et al. Evaluation of different Kabuli chickpea genotypes against Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) in relation to biotic and abiotic factors. PeerJ. 2024;12(e16944):e16944. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.16944

Healy RA, Horner HT, Bailey TB, Palmer RG. A microscopic study of trichomes on gynoecia of normal and tetraploid clark cultivars of Glycine max and seven near-isogenic lines. Int J Plant Sci. 2005;166(3):415-25. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/428632

Downloads

Published

08-06-2024

Versions

10-06-2024 (2)
08-06-2024 (1)

How to Cite

Sruthi M, Behera P, Mukherjee SK, Samal T, Tripathy P, Samal KC. Biophysical and biochemical bases of resistance to Maruca vitrata F. in selected vegetable cowpea genotypes. Plant Sci. Today [Internet]. 2024 Jun. 8 [cited 2024 Nov. 23];. Available from: https://horizonepublishing.com/journals/index.php/PST/article/view/3698

Download Citation

Issue

Early Access

Section

Research Articles

License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright and Licence details of published articles

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

Open Access Policy

Plant Science Today is an open access journal. There is no registration required to read any article. All published articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC Attribution 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).