Somaclonal variations for crop improvement: Selection for disease resistant variants in vitro
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.2018.5.2.382Keywords:
Somaclonal variations, biotechnology, crop improvement, in vitro selection, disease resistance, culture filtrate, pathotoxinsAbstract
Somaclonal variations (SV) are genetic or epigenetic changes induced in plant cell and tissue culture. Induction of somaclonal variation, is an alternate approach to conventional breeding and transgenic approaches to introduce desirable genetic variability in the gene pool. SVs that occur spontaneously in culture induce changes in a range of plant characters. However, the probability of improving a key agronomic trait such as disease resistance can be cumbersome when left to chance alone. The efficiency of developing disease resistant SVs is better with the imposition of an appropriate in vitro selection pressure. Selection agents that have been applied include pathogen elicitors, pathogen culture filtrate and purified pathotoxins. This method of SV selection has been successful in enhancing disease resistance in several crops and it is an accepted biotechnological approach with tremendous potential for crop improvement.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
References
1. Vanderplank JE. Plant diseases: Epidemics and control. Academic Press, New York and London, 349pp.1963.
2. Oerke EC. Crop losses to pests. Agricultural Sci. 2006;144:31-43. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859605005708
3. Bandillo N, Raghavan C, Muyco PA, Sevilla MAL, LobinaI T, Ermita CJD, Tung CW, Mccouch S, Thomson M, Mauleon R, Singh RK, Gregorio G, Redoña E, Leung H. Multi-parent advanced generation inter-cross (magic) populations in rice: progress and potential for genetics research and breeding. Rice. 2013; 6: 11. https://doi.org/10.1186/1939-8433-6-11
4. Estrella H, Simpson J, Trujillo M. Transgenic plants: an historical perspective. Methods Mol Biol. 2005; 286: 3-32. https://doi.org/10.1385/1-59259-827-7:003
5. Jhansi RS, Usha R. Transgenic plants: types, benefits, public concerns and future. Pharmacy Research. 2013;6:879-883. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jopr.2013.08.008
6. Larkin PJ, Scowcroft SC. Somaclonal variation- a novel source of variability from cell culture for plant improvement. Theor. Appl. Genet. 1981; 60: 197–214. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02342540
7. Qin-Mei W, Li W. An evolutionary view of plant tissue culture: somaclonal variation and selection. Plant Cell Rep. 2012; 31: 1535-1547.
8. Meins F. Heritable variation in plant cell ann. Rev. Plant Physiol. 1983; 34:327-46.
9. Lee M, Phillips RL. The chromosomal basis of somaclonal variations. An Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol. 1988; 39: 413-37.
10. Phillips RL, Kaepppler SM, Peschke VM. Do we understand somaclonal variation?.Progress in plant cellular and molecular biology. Kluwer Acad. Publ, Dordrecht. 1990; 131-141.
11. Krishna H, Alizadeh M, Singh D, Singh U, Chauhan N, Eftekhari M, Sadh RK. Somaclonal variations and their applications in horticultural crops improvement. 3 Biotech. 2016; 6: 54. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13205-016-0389-7
12. Li R, Bruneau AH, Qu R. Tissue culture-induced morphological somaclonal variation in st.augustinegrass [Stenotaphrum secundatum (walt.) kuntze]. Plant Breed. 2010; 129: 96-99. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0523.2009.01647.
13. Rastogi J, Siddhant, Bubber P, Sharma BL. Somaclonal variation: a new dimension for sugarcane improvement. GERF Bulletin of Biosciences. 2015; 6: 5-10.
14. Egan BT. Chlorotic streak: diseases of sugarcane: major diseases edited by Ricaud C, Egan BT, Gillaspie AG, Hughes CG. Elsevier Science Publication. embryogenesis. Plant Breed. 1989; 121: 269-271.
15. Moyer JW, Collins WW. Scarlet sweet potato. Hort Sci. 1983; 18: 111-112.
16. Sarkar AN. Integrated horticulture development in eastern himalayas. M. D Publications. 1994.
17. Gupta R, Banerjee S, Mallavarapu GR, Sharma S, Khanuja SPS, Shasany AK, Kumar S. Development of a superior somaclone of rose-scented geranium and a protocol for inducing variants. Hort science. 2002; 37: 632–636.
18. Arun BA, Joshi K, Chand R, Singh BD. Wheat somaclonal variants showing earliness, improved spot blotch resistance and higher yield. Euphytica. 2003; 132: 235-241. https://doi:10.1023/A:1025097224408
19. Jalaja NC, Sreenivasan TV, Pawar SM, Bhoi PG, Garker RM. co 94012- a new sugarcane variety through somaclonal variation. Sugar Tech. 2006; 132-136. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02943647
20. Heinz DJ. Sugarcane improvement through induced mutations using vegetative propagules and cell culture techniques. In: induced mutations in vegetatively propagated plants. ProcPannel Vienna, Sept 1972. IAEA pp. 53–59. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2007.735.19
21. Carlson PS. Methionine sulfoximine-resistant mutants of tobacco. Science. 1973; 180: 1366–1368. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.180.4093.1366
22. Behnke M. General resistance to late blight of Solanum tuberosum plants regenerated from callus resistant to culture filtrates of Phytophthora infestans. Theor. Appl. Genet. 1980; 56: 151-152. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00286676
23. Lestari EG. In vitro selection and somaclonal variation for biotic and abiotic stress tolerance. Biodiversitas. 2006; 7: 297–301. https://doi.org/10.13057/biodiv/d070320
24. Dehgahi R, Subramaniam S, Zakaria L, Joniyas A. Review of research on in vitro selection of Dendrobium sonia-28, against Fusarium proliferatum. Int. J. Sci. Res. in Agricultural Sciences. 2016; 3: 050-061. http://dx.doi.org/10.12983/ijsras
25. Kintzios S, Koliopoulos A, Karyoti E, Drossopoulos J, Holevas CD, Grigoriu A, Panagopoulos. In vitro reaction of sunflower (Helianthus annus l.) to the toxin (s) produced by Alternaria alternata, the causal agent of brown leaf spot. Phytopathol. 1996; 144: 465–470. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0434.1996.tb00325
26. Thanutong P, Furusawa I, Yamamoto M. Resistant tobacco plants from protoplast derived calluses for their resistance to pseudomonas and alternaria toxins. Theor. Appl. Genet. 1983; 66: 209–215. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00251145
27. Penna S, Vitthal SB, Yadav PV. In vitro mutagenesis and selection in plant cultures and their prospects for crop improvement. Bioremediation, Biodiversity and Bioavailability. 2012; 6: 6-14.
28. Gengenbach BG, Green CE, Donovan CM. Inheritance of selected pathotoxin resistance in maize plants regenerated from cell cultures. Proc Natl. Acad. Sci. 1977; 74: 5113-5117.
29. Behnke M. Selection of potato callus for resistance to culture filtrates of Phytophthora infestans and regeneration of resistant plants. Theor. Appl. Genet. 1979; 55: 69-71. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00285192
30. Shahin EA, Spivey R. A single dominant gene for fusarium wilt resistance in protoplast-derived tomato plants. Theor. Appl. Genet. 1986; 73: 164-169. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00289270
31. Shepard JF, Bidney D, Shahin E. Potato protoplasts in crop improvement. Science. 1980; 208: 17-24. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.208.4439.17
32. Burg HCJ, Ramulu KS, Bredemeijer GMM, Roest S, Dhijkuis P, Hoogen JJV, Houwing A. Patterns of phenotypic and tuber protein variation in plants derived from protoplast of potato (Solanum tuberosum l. cv bintje). Plant Sci. 1989; 64: 113-124. https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-9452(89)90157
33. Ling DH, Vidhyasekharan P, Borromeo ES, Zapata FJ, Mew TW. In vitro screening of rice germplasm for resistance to brown spot disease using Phytotoxin. Theor. Appl. Genet. 1985; 71: 133-135. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00278266
34. Cerato C, Manici LM, Borgatti S, Alicchio R, Ghedini R, Ghinelli A. Resistance to late blight [Phytophthora infestans (mont.) de bary] of potato plants regenerated from in vitro selected calli. Potato Research. 1993; 36: 341-351. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02361801
35. Venkatachalam P, Rao KS, Kishore PBK,Jayabalan N. Regeneration of late leaf spot resistant groundnut plants from Carcosporidium personatum culture filtrate treated callus. Curr. Sci. 1998; 74: 61-65. http://www.jstor.org/stable/24100665
36. Rao S, Basavaraj K, Kaviraj CP. In vitro selection of pigeon pea cell lines and regeneration of plantlets from tolerant callus to culture filtrate of Fusarium odum Buttler. Plant Cell Biotech. Mol Bio. 2006; 7(1&2): 69-72.
37. Thakur M, Sharma D, Sharma S. In vitro selection and regeneration of carnation (Dianthus cayophyllus l.) plants resistant to culture filtrate of Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. dianthi. Plant Cell Rep. 2002; 20: 825–828. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00299-001-0412-1
38. Saxena G, Verma PC, Rahman L, Banerjee S, Shukla RS, Kumar S. Selection of leaf blight-resistant Pelargonium graveolens plants regenerated from callus resistant to a culture filtrate of Alternaria alternate. Crop Protection. 2008; 27: 558–565. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2007.08.013
39. Rao S, Ramgopal S. Effect of Alternaria helianthi culture filtrate on callus and regeneration of plantlets from tolerant callus in sunflower (Helianthus annuus l.). Indian Journal of Biotechnology. 2010;9: 187: 191. http://nopr.niscair.res.in/handle/123456789/7798
40. Bhardwaj SV, Thakur T, Sharma R, Sharma P. In vitro selection of resistant mutants of ginger (Zingiber officinalerosc.) against wilt pathogen (Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. Zingiber itrujillo). Plant Dis Res. 2012; 27: 194–199.
41. Gostimsky SA, Kokaeva ZG, Konovalov FA. Studying plant genome variation using molecular markers. Russ J Genet. 2005; 41:3 78–88. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11177-005-0101-1
42. Nayak S, Debata BK, Srivastava VK, Sangwan NS. Evaluation of agronomically useful somaclonal variants in jamrosa (a hybrid cymbopogon) and detection of genetic changes through RAPD. Plant Sci. 2003; 164: 1029–1035. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-9452(03)00090-6
43. Kumar N, Modi AR, Singh AS, Gajera BB, Patel AR, Patel MP, Subhash N. Assessment of genetic fidelity
of micropropagated date palm Phoenix dactylifera L.) plants by RAPD and ISSR markers assay. Physiol. Mol Biol. 2010; 6: 207?213. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12298-010-0023-9
44. Saravanan S, Sarvesan R, Vinod MS. Identification of DNA elements in somaclonal variants of Rauvolfia serpentine (L.) arising from indirect organogenesis as evaluated by ISSR analysis. Indian J. of Sci. and Tech. 2011; 4: 1241-1245.
45. Bairu MW, Aremu AO, Staden JV. Somaclonal variation in plants: causes and detection methods. Plant Growth Regul. 2011; 63: 147–173. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10725-010-9554-x
46. Sharma NK, Skidmore DI. In vitro expression of partial resistance to Phytophthora palmivora by shoot cultures of papaya. Plant Cell Tiss. Org. 1988; 14: 187-196. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00043409
47. Song HS, Lim SM, Widholm JM. Selection and regeneration of soybeans resistant to the pathotoxic culture filtrates of Septoria glycines. Phytopathol. 1977; 84: 948-951.
48. Ganesan M, Jayabalan N. Isolation of disease tolerant cotton (Gossypium hirsutuml. cv. svpr 2) plants by screening somatic embryos with fungal culture filtrate. Plant Cell Tiss. Org. 2006; 87: 273-284. http://www.jstor.org/stable/41998136
49. Chawla HS, Wenzel G. In vitro selection of barley and wheat for resistance against Helminthosporium sativum. Theor. Appl. Genet. 1987; 74: 841-845. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00247566
50. Fujime F, Fujime G. Use of culture filtrates of Pyrenochaeta lycopersici in tests for selecting tolerant varieties of tomato. J. Plant Pathol. 2003; 85: 131-133. http://www.jstor.org/stable/41998136
51. Hartman CL, Mccoy TJ, Knous TR. Selection of alfalfa (Medicago sativa) cell lines and regeneration of plants resistant to the toxin(s) produced by Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. medicaginis. Plant Sci.Lett. 1984; 34: 183-219. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4211(84)90141
52. McCoy TJ. Tissue culture selection for disease resistant plants. Iowa State J. Res. 1988; 62: 503-521.
53. Vidysekaran P, Ling DH, Borromeo ES, Zapata FJ, Mew TW. Selection of brown spot- resistant rice plant from Helminthosporium oryzae toxin- resistant cultures. Annals of Applied Biol. 1990; 117: 515-523. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7348.1990.tb04818
54. Vos JE, Berjak MHS, Watt MP, Toerien AJ. In vitro selection and commercial release of guava wilt resistant rootstocks. Acta. Horticulturae. 1998; 513: 69-79. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.1998.513.7
55. Bajpai A, Chandra R, Mishra M, Tiwari RK. Regenerating Psidium spp. for screening wilt resistance rootstock under in vitro conditions. Acta Horticulturae. 2007; 735: 145-154.
56. Maier FJ, Oettler G. Selection for the fusarium toxin deoxynivalenol in callus culture of triticale. In Third European Fusarium Seminar, IHARR, Poland. 1992; 43-49.
57. Mohanraj D, Padmanaban P, Karunakaran M. Effect of pytotoxin of Colletrichum falcatum went. (Physalophora tucumanensis) on sugarcane in tissue culture. Acta. phytopathologicaet.
entomologica Hungarica 2003;38:21-28.
58. Behnke M. Selection of dihaploid potato callus for resistance to culture filtrate of Fusarium oxysporum. Pflanzenzuchtg. 1980; 85: 254-258.
59. Jayasankar S, Litz RE. Characterization of embryogenic mango cultures selected for resistance to Colletotrichum gloeosporioides culture filtrate and phytotoxin. Theor. Appl. Genet. 1998; 96: 823-831. https://doi.org/10.1007/s001220050808
60. Deng ZN, Gentile A, Domina F, Nicolosi E, Tribulato E. Selecting lemon protoplasts for insensitivity to Phoma tracheiphila toxin and regenerating tolerant plants. J. Am. Soc.Hortic Sci. 1995; 120: 902–905.
61. Zhang LQ, Cheng ZH, Khan MA, Zhou YL. In vitro selection of resistant mutant garlic lines by using crude pathogen culture filtrate of Sclerotium cepivorum australas. Plant Pathol. 2012; 41: 211–217. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13313-011-0109-z
62. Devarumath RM, Nandy S, Rani V, Marimuthu S, Muraleedharan N, Raina SN. RAPD, ISSR and RFLP fingerprints as useful markers to evaluate genetic intergrity of diploid and triploid elite tea clones representing Camellia sinensis (China type) and C. assamica ssp. assamica (Assam type). Plant Cell Rep. 2002; 21: 166–173.
63. Orbovic V, Syvertsen JP, Bright D, Clief VDL, Graham JH. Growth of citrus seedlings and their susceptibility to Phytophthora root rot are affected by PO3 and PO4 sources of phosphorus. Plant Nutr. 2008; 31: 774–787.
64. Sanchez TLF, Quiroz FF, Loyola VV, Infante D. Culture-induced variation in plants of Coffea arabica cv. Caturrarojo, regenerated by direct and indirect somatic embryogenesis. Mol Biotechnol. 2003; 23: 107–115.
65. Bhattacharya S, Dey T, Bandopadhyay T, Ghosh P. Genetic polymorphism analysis of somatic embryo-derived plantlets of Cymbopogon ?exuosus through RAPD assay. Plant Biotechnol Rep. 2008; 2: 245–252.
66. Biswas MK, Dutt M, Roy UK, Islam R, Hossain M. Development and evaluation of in vitro somaclonal variation in strawberry for improved horticultural traits. Sci. Hort. 2009; 122: 409–416.
67. Gesteira AS, Otoni WC, Barros EG, Moreira MA. RAPD – based detection of genomic instability in soybean plants derived from somatic. Plant Breed. 2002; 121: 269-271. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1439-0523.2002.00708.x
68. Jin S, Mushke R, Zhu H, Tu L, Lin Z, Zhang Y, Zhang X. Detection of somaclonal variation of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) using cytogenetics, ?ow cytometry and molecular markers. Plant Cell Rep. 2008; 27: 1303–1316.
69. Li X, Yu X, Wang N, Feng Q, Dong Z, Liu L, Shen J, Liu B. Genetic and Epigenetic instabilities induced by tissue culture in wild barely (Hordeum brevisubulatum (Trin) Link). Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ culture. 2007; 90: 153-168.
70. Campbell B, LeMare S, Piperidis G, Godwin I. IRAP, a retrotransposon-based marker system for the detection of somaclonal variation in barley. Mol Breed. 2010; 27: 103-206. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11032-010-9422-4
71. Sheidai M, Aminpoor H, Noormohammadi Z, Farahani F. Genetic variation induced by tissue culture in Banana (Musa acuminate L.) cultivar Cavandish Dwarf Masoud. Geneconserve. 2009; 9: 1-10.
72. James AC, Pereza ES, Herrera VA, Martinez O. Application of the ampli?ed fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) and the methylation-sensitive ampli?cation polymorphism (MSAP) techniques for the detection of DNA polymorphism and changes in DNA methylation in micropropagated bananas. In: Jain SM, Swennen R (eds) Banana improvement: cellular, molecular biology, and induced mutations. Science Publishers. 2004; 287–306.
73. Asif MJ, Othman RY. Characterization of Fusarium wilt-resistant and fusarium wilt-susceptible somaclones of banana cultivar rastali (Musa AAB) by random ampli?ed polymorphic DNA and retrotransposon markers. Plant Mol Biol. Rep. 2005; 23: 241–249.
74. Ghag SB, Shekhawat UKS, Ganapathi TR. Characterization of fusarium wilt resistant somaclonal variants of banana cv. rasthali by cDNA-RAPD. MolBiol Rep. 2014; 41(12): 7929–7935. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11033-014-3687-3
75. Sultana R, Tahira F, Tayyab H, Khurram B, Shiekh R. RAPD characterization of somaclonal variation in indica basmati rice. Pak J Bot. 2005; 37: 249–262.
76. Ngezahayo F, Dong Y, Liu B. Somaclonal variation at the nucleotide sequence level in rice (Oryza sativa L.) as revealed by RAPD and ISSR markers, and by pairwise sequence analysis.Theor.Appl Genet. 2007; 48: 329–336.
77. Hsu TW, CTsai WC, Wang DP, Lin S, Hsiao YY, Chen WH, Chen HH. Differential gene expression analysis by cDNAAFLP between ?ower buds of Phalaenopsis Hsiang Fei cv. H. F. and its somaclonal variant. Plant Sci. 2008; 175: 415–422.
78. Kuznetsova OI, Ash OA, Hartina GA, Gostimskij SA. RAPD and ISSR analyses of regenerated pea Pisum sativum L. plants. Russ J. Genet. 2005; 41: 60–65.
79. Heinz DJ, Mee GWP. Morphologic, cytogenetic and enzymatic variation in Saccharum species hybrid clones derived from callus tissue. Amer J. Bot. 1971; 58: 257-262
80. De la PR, Gonza´lez A, Ruiz M, Polanco C. Somaclonal variation in rye (Secalecereale L.) analyzed using polymorphic and sequenced AFLP markers. In vitro Cell DevBiol Plant. 2008; 44: 419–426.
81. Aversano R, Savarese S, Nova JMD, Frusciante L, Punzo M, Carputo D. Genetic stability at nuclear and plastid DNA level in regenerated plants of Solanum species and hybrids. Euphytica. 2009; 165: 353–361. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-008-9797-z
82. Albani MC, Wilkinson MJ. Inter simple sequence repeat polymerase chain reaction for the detection of somaclonal variation. Plant Breed. 1998; 117: 573–575.
83. Sharma S, Bryan G, Win?eld M, Millam S. Stability of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) plants regenerated via somatic embryos, axillary bud proliferated shoots, microtubers and true potato seeds: a comparative phenotypic, cytogenetic and molecular assessment. Planta. 2007; 226: 1449–1458.
84. Zhang M, Wang H, Dong Z, Qi B, Xu K, Liu B. Tissue culture induced variation at simple sequence repeats in sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.) is genotype-dependent and associated with down-regulated expression of a mismatch repair gene, MLH3. Plant Cell Rep. 2010; 29: 51–59.
85. Rodr?´guez LC, Bravo H, Wetten A, Wilkinson M. Detection of somaclonal variation during cocoa somatic embryogenesis characterised using cleaved ampli?ed polymorphic sequence and the new freeware Artbio. Mol Breeding. 2010; 25: 501–516.
2. Oerke EC. Crop losses to pests. Agricultural Sci. 2006;144:31-43. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859605005708
3. Bandillo N, Raghavan C, Muyco PA, Sevilla MAL, LobinaI T, Ermita CJD, Tung CW, Mccouch S, Thomson M, Mauleon R, Singh RK, Gregorio G, Redoña E, Leung H. Multi-parent advanced generation inter-cross (magic) populations in rice: progress and potential for genetics research and breeding. Rice. 2013; 6: 11. https://doi.org/10.1186/1939-8433-6-11
4. Estrella H, Simpson J, Trujillo M. Transgenic plants: an historical perspective. Methods Mol Biol. 2005; 286: 3-32. https://doi.org/10.1385/1-59259-827-7:003
5. Jhansi RS, Usha R. Transgenic plants: types, benefits, public concerns and future. Pharmacy Research. 2013;6:879-883. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jopr.2013.08.008
6. Larkin PJ, Scowcroft SC. Somaclonal variation- a novel source of variability from cell culture for plant improvement. Theor. Appl. Genet. 1981; 60: 197–214. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02342540
7. Qin-Mei W, Li W. An evolutionary view of plant tissue culture: somaclonal variation and selection. Plant Cell Rep. 2012; 31: 1535-1547.
8. Meins F. Heritable variation in plant cell ann. Rev. Plant Physiol. 1983; 34:327-46.
9. Lee M, Phillips RL. The chromosomal basis of somaclonal variations. An Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol. 1988; 39: 413-37.
10. Phillips RL, Kaepppler SM, Peschke VM. Do we understand somaclonal variation?.Progress in plant cellular and molecular biology. Kluwer Acad. Publ, Dordrecht. 1990; 131-141.
11. Krishna H, Alizadeh M, Singh D, Singh U, Chauhan N, Eftekhari M, Sadh RK. Somaclonal variations and their applications in horticultural crops improvement. 3 Biotech. 2016; 6: 54. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13205-016-0389-7
12. Li R, Bruneau AH, Qu R. Tissue culture-induced morphological somaclonal variation in st.augustinegrass [Stenotaphrum secundatum (walt.) kuntze]. Plant Breed. 2010; 129: 96-99. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0523.2009.01647.
13. Rastogi J, Siddhant, Bubber P, Sharma BL. Somaclonal variation: a new dimension for sugarcane improvement. GERF Bulletin of Biosciences. 2015; 6: 5-10.
14. Egan BT. Chlorotic streak: diseases of sugarcane: major diseases edited by Ricaud C, Egan BT, Gillaspie AG, Hughes CG. Elsevier Science Publication. embryogenesis. Plant Breed. 1989; 121: 269-271.
15. Moyer JW, Collins WW. Scarlet sweet potato. Hort Sci. 1983; 18: 111-112.
16. Sarkar AN. Integrated horticulture development in eastern himalayas. M. D Publications. 1994.
17. Gupta R, Banerjee S, Mallavarapu GR, Sharma S, Khanuja SPS, Shasany AK, Kumar S. Development of a superior somaclone of rose-scented geranium and a protocol for inducing variants. Hort science. 2002; 37: 632–636.
18. Arun BA, Joshi K, Chand R, Singh BD. Wheat somaclonal variants showing earliness, improved spot blotch resistance and higher yield. Euphytica. 2003; 132: 235-241. https://doi:10.1023/A:1025097224408
19. Jalaja NC, Sreenivasan TV, Pawar SM, Bhoi PG, Garker RM. co 94012- a new sugarcane variety through somaclonal variation. Sugar Tech. 2006; 132-136. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02943647
20. Heinz DJ. Sugarcane improvement through induced mutations using vegetative propagules and cell culture techniques. In: induced mutations in vegetatively propagated plants. ProcPannel Vienna, Sept 1972. IAEA pp. 53–59. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2007.735.19
21. Carlson PS. Methionine sulfoximine-resistant mutants of tobacco. Science. 1973; 180: 1366–1368. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.180.4093.1366
22. Behnke M. General resistance to late blight of Solanum tuberosum plants regenerated from callus resistant to culture filtrates of Phytophthora infestans. Theor. Appl. Genet. 1980; 56: 151-152. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00286676
23. Lestari EG. In vitro selection and somaclonal variation for biotic and abiotic stress tolerance. Biodiversitas. 2006; 7: 297–301. https://doi.org/10.13057/biodiv/d070320
24. Dehgahi R, Subramaniam S, Zakaria L, Joniyas A. Review of research on in vitro selection of Dendrobium sonia-28, against Fusarium proliferatum. Int. J. Sci. Res. in Agricultural Sciences. 2016; 3: 050-061. http://dx.doi.org/10.12983/ijsras
25. Kintzios S, Koliopoulos A, Karyoti E, Drossopoulos J, Holevas CD, Grigoriu A, Panagopoulos. In vitro reaction of sunflower (Helianthus annus l.) to the toxin (s) produced by Alternaria alternata, the causal agent of brown leaf spot. Phytopathol. 1996; 144: 465–470. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0434.1996.tb00325
26. Thanutong P, Furusawa I, Yamamoto M. Resistant tobacco plants from protoplast derived calluses for their resistance to pseudomonas and alternaria toxins. Theor. Appl. Genet. 1983; 66: 209–215. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00251145
27. Penna S, Vitthal SB, Yadav PV. In vitro mutagenesis and selection in plant cultures and their prospects for crop improvement. Bioremediation, Biodiversity and Bioavailability. 2012; 6: 6-14.
28. Gengenbach BG, Green CE, Donovan CM. Inheritance of selected pathotoxin resistance in maize plants regenerated from cell cultures. Proc Natl. Acad. Sci. 1977; 74: 5113-5117.
29. Behnke M. Selection of potato callus for resistance to culture filtrates of Phytophthora infestans and regeneration of resistant plants. Theor. Appl. Genet. 1979; 55: 69-71. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00285192
30. Shahin EA, Spivey R. A single dominant gene for fusarium wilt resistance in protoplast-derived tomato plants. Theor. Appl. Genet. 1986; 73: 164-169. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00289270
31. Shepard JF, Bidney D, Shahin E. Potato protoplasts in crop improvement. Science. 1980; 208: 17-24. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.208.4439.17
32. Burg HCJ, Ramulu KS, Bredemeijer GMM, Roest S, Dhijkuis P, Hoogen JJV, Houwing A. Patterns of phenotypic and tuber protein variation in plants derived from protoplast of potato (Solanum tuberosum l. cv bintje). Plant Sci. 1989; 64: 113-124. https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-9452(89)90157
33. Ling DH, Vidhyasekharan P, Borromeo ES, Zapata FJ, Mew TW. In vitro screening of rice germplasm for resistance to brown spot disease using Phytotoxin. Theor. Appl. Genet. 1985; 71: 133-135. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00278266
34. Cerato C, Manici LM, Borgatti S, Alicchio R, Ghedini R, Ghinelli A. Resistance to late blight [Phytophthora infestans (mont.) de bary] of potato plants regenerated from in vitro selected calli. Potato Research. 1993; 36: 341-351. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02361801
35. Venkatachalam P, Rao KS, Kishore PBK,Jayabalan N. Regeneration of late leaf spot resistant groundnut plants from Carcosporidium personatum culture filtrate treated callus. Curr. Sci. 1998; 74: 61-65. http://www.jstor.org/stable/24100665
36. Rao S, Basavaraj K, Kaviraj CP. In vitro selection of pigeon pea cell lines and regeneration of plantlets from tolerant callus to culture filtrate of Fusarium odum Buttler. Plant Cell Biotech. Mol Bio. 2006; 7(1&2): 69-72.
37. Thakur M, Sharma D, Sharma S. In vitro selection and regeneration of carnation (Dianthus cayophyllus l.) plants resistant to culture filtrate of Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. dianthi. Plant Cell Rep. 2002; 20: 825–828. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00299-001-0412-1
38. Saxena G, Verma PC, Rahman L, Banerjee S, Shukla RS, Kumar S. Selection of leaf blight-resistant Pelargonium graveolens plants regenerated from callus resistant to a culture filtrate of Alternaria alternate. Crop Protection. 2008; 27: 558–565. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2007.08.013
39. Rao S, Ramgopal S. Effect of Alternaria helianthi culture filtrate on callus and regeneration of plantlets from tolerant callus in sunflower (Helianthus annuus l.). Indian Journal of Biotechnology. 2010;9: 187: 191. http://nopr.niscair.res.in/handle/123456789/7798
40. Bhardwaj SV, Thakur T, Sharma R, Sharma P. In vitro selection of resistant mutants of ginger (Zingiber officinalerosc.) against wilt pathogen (Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. Zingiber itrujillo). Plant Dis Res. 2012; 27: 194–199.
41. Gostimsky SA, Kokaeva ZG, Konovalov FA. Studying plant genome variation using molecular markers. Russ J Genet. 2005; 41:3 78–88. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11177-005-0101-1
42. Nayak S, Debata BK, Srivastava VK, Sangwan NS. Evaluation of agronomically useful somaclonal variants in jamrosa (a hybrid cymbopogon) and detection of genetic changes through RAPD. Plant Sci. 2003; 164: 1029–1035. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-9452(03)00090-6
43. Kumar N, Modi AR, Singh AS, Gajera BB, Patel AR, Patel MP, Subhash N. Assessment of genetic fidelity
of micropropagated date palm Phoenix dactylifera L.) plants by RAPD and ISSR markers assay. Physiol. Mol Biol. 2010; 6: 207?213. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12298-010-0023-9
44. Saravanan S, Sarvesan R, Vinod MS. Identification of DNA elements in somaclonal variants of Rauvolfia serpentine (L.) arising from indirect organogenesis as evaluated by ISSR analysis. Indian J. of Sci. and Tech. 2011; 4: 1241-1245.
45. Bairu MW, Aremu AO, Staden JV. Somaclonal variation in plants: causes and detection methods. Plant Growth Regul. 2011; 63: 147–173. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10725-010-9554-x
46. Sharma NK, Skidmore DI. In vitro expression of partial resistance to Phytophthora palmivora by shoot cultures of papaya. Plant Cell Tiss. Org. 1988; 14: 187-196. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00043409
47. Song HS, Lim SM, Widholm JM. Selection and regeneration of soybeans resistant to the pathotoxic culture filtrates of Septoria glycines. Phytopathol. 1977; 84: 948-951.
48. Ganesan M, Jayabalan N. Isolation of disease tolerant cotton (Gossypium hirsutuml. cv. svpr 2) plants by screening somatic embryos with fungal culture filtrate. Plant Cell Tiss. Org. 2006; 87: 273-284. http://www.jstor.org/stable/41998136
49. Chawla HS, Wenzel G. In vitro selection of barley and wheat for resistance against Helminthosporium sativum. Theor. Appl. Genet. 1987; 74: 841-845. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00247566
50. Fujime F, Fujime G. Use of culture filtrates of Pyrenochaeta lycopersici in tests for selecting tolerant varieties of tomato. J. Plant Pathol. 2003; 85: 131-133. http://www.jstor.org/stable/41998136
51. Hartman CL, Mccoy TJ, Knous TR. Selection of alfalfa (Medicago sativa) cell lines and regeneration of plants resistant to the toxin(s) produced by Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. medicaginis. Plant Sci.Lett. 1984; 34: 183-219. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4211(84)90141
52. McCoy TJ. Tissue culture selection for disease resistant plants. Iowa State J. Res. 1988; 62: 503-521.
53. Vidysekaran P, Ling DH, Borromeo ES, Zapata FJ, Mew TW. Selection of brown spot- resistant rice plant from Helminthosporium oryzae toxin- resistant cultures. Annals of Applied Biol. 1990; 117: 515-523. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7348.1990.tb04818
54. Vos JE, Berjak MHS, Watt MP, Toerien AJ. In vitro selection and commercial release of guava wilt resistant rootstocks. Acta. Horticulturae. 1998; 513: 69-79. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.1998.513.7
55. Bajpai A, Chandra R, Mishra M, Tiwari RK. Regenerating Psidium spp. for screening wilt resistance rootstock under in vitro conditions. Acta Horticulturae. 2007; 735: 145-154.
56. Maier FJ, Oettler G. Selection for the fusarium toxin deoxynivalenol in callus culture of triticale. In Third European Fusarium Seminar, IHARR, Poland. 1992; 43-49.
57. Mohanraj D, Padmanaban P, Karunakaran M. Effect of pytotoxin of Colletrichum falcatum went. (Physalophora tucumanensis) on sugarcane in tissue culture. Acta. phytopathologicaet.
entomologica Hungarica 2003;38:21-28.
58. Behnke M. Selection of dihaploid potato callus for resistance to culture filtrate of Fusarium oxysporum. Pflanzenzuchtg. 1980; 85: 254-258.
59. Jayasankar S, Litz RE. Characterization of embryogenic mango cultures selected for resistance to Colletotrichum gloeosporioides culture filtrate and phytotoxin. Theor. Appl. Genet. 1998; 96: 823-831. https://doi.org/10.1007/s001220050808
60. Deng ZN, Gentile A, Domina F, Nicolosi E, Tribulato E. Selecting lemon protoplasts for insensitivity to Phoma tracheiphila toxin and regenerating tolerant plants. J. Am. Soc.Hortic Sci. 1995; 120: 902–905.
61. Zhang LQ, Cheng ZH, Khan MA, Zhou YL. In vitro selection of resistant mutant garlic lines by using crude pathogen culture filtrate of Sclerotium cepivorum australas. Plant Pathol. 2012; 41: 211–217. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13313-011-0109-z
62. Devarumath RM, Nandy S, Rani V, Marimuthu S, Muraleedharan N, Raina SN. RAPD, ISSR and RFLP fingerprints as useful markers to evaluate genetic intergrity of diploid and triploid elite tea clones representing Camellia sinensis (China type) and C. assamica ssp. assamica (Assam type). Plant Cell Rep. 2002; 21: 166–173.
63. Orbovic V, Syvertsen JP, Bright D, Clief VDL, Graham JH. Growth of citrus seedlings and their susceptibility to Phytophthora root rot are affected by PO3 and PO4 sources of phosphorus. Plant Nutr. 2008; 31: 774–787.
64. Sanchez TLF, Quiroz FF, Loyola VV, Infante D. Culture-induced variation in plants of Coffea arabica cv. Caturrarojo, regenerated by direct and indirect somatic embryogenesis. Mol Biotechnol. 2003; 23: 107–115.
65. Bhattacharya S, Dey T, Bandopadhyay T, Ghosh P. Genetic polymorphism analysis of somatic embryo-derived plantlets of Cymbopogon ?exuosus through RAPD assay. Plant Biotechnol Rep. 2008; 2: 245–252.
66. Biswas MK, Dutt M, Roy UK, Islam R, Hossain M. Development and evaluation of in vitro somaclonal variation in strawberry for improved horticultural traits. Sci. Hort. 2009; 122: 409–416.
67. Gesteira AS, Otoni WC, Barros EG, Moreira MA. RAPD – based detection of genomic instability in soybean plants derived from somatic. Plant Breed. 2002; 121: 269-271. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1439-0523.2002.00708.x
68. Jin S, Mushke R, Zhu H, Tu L, Lin Z, Zhang Y, Zhang X. Detection of somaclonal variation of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) using cytogenetics, ?ow cytometry and molecular markers. Plant Cell Rep. 2008; 27: 1303–1316.
69. Li X, Yu X, Wang N, Feng Q, Dong Z, Liu L, Shen J, Liu B. Genetic and Epigenetic instabilities induced by tissue culture in wild barely (Hordeum brevisubulatum (Trin) Link). Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ culture. 2007; 90: 153-168.
70. Campbell B, LeMare S, Piperidis G, Godwin I. IRAP, a retrotransposon-based marker system for the detection of somaclonal variation in barley. Mol Breed. 2010; 27: 103-206. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11032-010-9422-4
71. Sheidai M, Aminpoor H, Noormohammadi Z, Farahani F. Genetic variation induced by tissue culture in Banana (Musa acuminate L.) cultivar Cavandish Dwarf Masoud. Geneconserve. 2009; 9: 1-10.
72. James AC, Pereza ES, Herrera VA, Martinez O. Application of the ampli?ed fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) and the methylation-sensitive ampli?cation polymorphism (MSAP) techniques for the detection of DNA polymorphism and changes in DNA methylation in micropropagated bananas. In: Jain SM, Swennen R (eds) Banana improvement: cellular, molecular biology, and induced mutations. Science Publishers. 2004; 287–306.
73. Asif MJ, Othman RY. Characterization of Fusarium wilt-resistant and fusarium wilt-susceptible somaclones of banana cultivar rastali (Musa AAB) by random ampli?ed polymorphic DNA and retrotransposon markers. Plant Mol Biol. Rep. 2005; 23: 241–249.
74. Ghag SB, Shekhawat UKS, Ganapathi TR. Characterization of fusarium wilt resistant somaclonal variants of banana cv. rasthali by cDNA-RAPD. MolBiol Rep. 2014; 41(12): 7929–7935. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11033-014-3687-3
75. Sultana R, Tahira F, Tayyab H, Khurram B, Shiekh R. RAPD characterization of somaclonal variation in indica basmati rice. Pak J Bot. 2005; 37: 249–262.
76. Ngezahayo F, Dong Y, Liu B. Somaclonal variation at the nucleotide sequence level in rice (Oryza sativa L.) as revealed by RAPD and ISSR markers, and by pairwise sequence analysis.Theor.Appl Genet. 2007; 48: 329–336.
77. Hsu TW, CTsai WC, Wang DP, Lin S, Hsiao YY, Chen WH, Chen HH. Differential gene expression analysis by cDNAAFLP between ?ower buds of Phalaenopsis Hsiang Fei cv. H. F. and its somaclonal variant. Plant Sci. 2008; 175: 415–422.
78. Kuznetsova OI, Ash OA, Hartina GA, Gostimskij SA. RAPD and ISSR analyses of regenerated pea Pisum sativum L. plants. Russ J. Genet. 2005; 41: 60–65.
79. Heinz DJ, Mee GWP. Morphologic, cytogenetic and enzymatic variation in Saccharum species hybrid clones derived from callus tissue. Amer J. Bot. 1971; 58: 257-262
80. De la PR, Gonza´lez A, Ruiz M, Polanco C. Somaclonal variation in rye (Secalecereale L.) analyzed using polymorphic and sequenced AFLP markers. In vitro Cell DevBiol Plant. 2008; 44: 419–426.
81. Aversano R, Savarese S, Nova JMD, Frusciante L, Punzo M, Carputo D. Genetic stability at nuclear and plastid DNA level in regenerated plants of Solanum species and hybrids. Euphytica. 2009; 165: 353–361. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-008-9797-z
82. Albani MC, Wilkinson MJ. Inter simple sequence repeat polymerase chain reaction for the detection of somaclonal variation. Plant Breed. 1998; 117: 573–575.
83. Sharma S, Bryan G, Win?eld M, Millam S. Stability of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) plants regenerated via somatic embryos, axillary bud proliferated shoots, microtubers and true potato seeds: a comparative phenotypic, cytogenetic and molecular assessment. Planta. 2007; 226: 1449–1458.
84. Zhang M, Wang H, Dong Z, Qi B, Xu K, Liu B. Tissue culture induced variation at simple sequence repeats in sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.) is genotype-dependent and associated with down-regulated expression of a mismatch repair gene, MLH3. Plant Cell Rep. 2010; 29: 51–59.
85. Rodr?´guez LC, Bravo H, Wetten A, Wilkinson M. Detection of somaclonal variation during cocoa somatic embryogenesis characterised using cleaved ampli?ed polymorphic sequence and the new freeware Artbio. Mol Breeding. 2010; 25: 501–516.
Downloads
Published
27-03-2018
How to Cite
1.
Anil VS, Lobo S, Bennur S. Somaclonal variations for crop improvement: Selection for disease resistant variants in vitro. Plant Sci. Today [Internet]. 2018 Mar. 27 [cited 2024 Dec. 22];5(2):44-5. Available from: https://horizonepublishing.com/journals/index.php/PST/article/view/382
Issue
Section
Mini Reviews
License
Copyright and Licence details of published articles
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Open Access Policy
Plant Science Today is an open access journal. There is no registration required to read any article. All published articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC Attribution 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
