Medicinal plants used in traditional bone setting by the Khasi tribe of Meghalaya, India

Lakhon M Hinge; Risso Ana; Imlikumba; Duman Talom; Inubo  Rochill; Amal  Bawri; Robindra  Teron

doi:10.14719/pst.4081

Authors

Lakhon M Hinge North Eastern Institute of Ayurveda and Folk Medicine Research, Pasighat 791 102, Arunachal Pradesh, India https://orcid.org/0009-0003-0070-8981
Risso Ana North Eastern Institute of Ayurveda and Folk Medicine Research, Pasighat 791 102, Arunachal Pradesh, India https://orcid.org/0009-0000-5669-7204
Imlikumba North Eastern Institute of Ayurveda and Folk Medicine Research, Pasighat 791 102, Arunachal Pradesh, India https://orcid.org/0009-0008-5580-8003
Duman Talom North Eastern Institute of Ayurveda and Folk Medicine Research, Pasighat 791 102, Arunachal Pradesh, India https://orcid.org/0009-0005-6229-941X
Inubo Rochill North Eastern Institute of Ayurveda and Folk Medicine Research, Pasighat 791 102, Arunachal Pradesh, India https://orcid.org/0009-0009-0347-2226
Amal Bawri North Eastern Institute of Ayurveda and Folk Medicine Research, Pasighat 791 102, Arunachal Pradesh, India https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1120-1994
Robindra Teron North Eastern Institute of Ayurveda and Folk Medicine Research, Pasighat 791 102, Arunachal Pradesh, India https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9443-2418

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.4081

Keywords:

ethnobotany, Khasi tribe, medicinal plants, traditional bone setting

Abstract

Meghalaya is one of the 8 states of Northeastern India; it is known for its scenic beauty, unique culture, vibrant traditions and rich bio-diversity. Traditional bone setting is a field of study that focuses on ancient methods of treating bone fractures and joint dislocations, often practiced by traditional healers. This ancient art of healing fractures and musculoskeletal injuries has been passed down through generations, blending indigenous knowledge with practical experience. Conservation initiatives should also encourage the local communities to ensure sustainable practices that benefit both nature and people. The purpose of this study was to identify, document and preserve knowledge about the medicinal plants used in traditional bone settings by the Khasi tribe of Meghalaya. The data for the ethnobotanical study were collected by interviewing the traditional bone setters through a pre-structured questionnaire. Through extensive field surveys and interviews with 115 traditional bone setters, a total of 85 medicinal plant species (belonging to 44 families) were recorded. The Zingiberaceae family contributed the most species with 11 species, followed by Asteraceae with 7 plant species and Urticaceae with 6 species, Acanthaceae, Fabaceae, Rubiaceae, Amaranthaceae and Plantiginaceae with 3 species each, while other species were represented by 2 and 1 species. More scientific investigation is required to validate the folk claims/medicine and further research and validation of these practices could lead to the development of alternative or complementary therapies for bone-related ailments.

Downloads

References

Shanker D. Traditional bone setting, planning commission re-port on health systems. Trop Med Int Health. 2007;12:564-74. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3156.2007.01833

Singh P, Singh PP, Bindra S. Traditional bone setting: origin and practice. Int J Ther Appl. 2013;11:19-23.

Isaacs-Pullins S, Vaz M, Murthy H, Hughes D, Kallail KJ. A qualita-tive study of traditional bone setters in South India: a case se-ries. Kansas Journal of Medicine. 2022;15:394. https://doi.org/10.17161/kjm.vol15.18580

Thanni LO. Factors influencing patronage of traditional bone setters. West Afr J Med. 1999;19(3):220-4.

Ogunlusi JD, Okem IC, Oginni LM. Why patients patronize tradi-tional bone setters. Internet J Orthop Surg. 2007;4(2):1-7. https://doi.org/10.5580/1f53

Zhang X. Traditional medicine strategy 2002-2005. World Health Organization.

Maikhuri RK, Gangwar AK. Ethnobiological notes on the Khasi and Garo tribes of Meghalaya, northeast India. Econ Bot. 1993;47(4):345-57. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02907348

Kharmawphlang D. A walk through the sacred forests of Megha-laya. Glimpses from the NorthEast. 2009:9.

Neogi B, Prasad MN, Rao RR. Ethnobotany of some weeds of Khasi and Garo hills, Meghalaya, Northeastern India. Econ Bot. 1989;43(4):471 471-9. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02860219

Lyngdoh JP, Syiem D, Mao AA. Pattern of traditional medicine usage in East Khasi hills of Meghalaya. Indian J Tradit Knowl. 2014;13(1):164-70.

Khan ML, Menon S, Bawa KS. Effectiveness of the protected area network in biodiversity conservation: a case study of Meghalaya state. Biodivers Conserv. 1997;6:853-68. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018374630055

Upadhaya K, Thapa N, Lakadong NJ, Barik SK, Sarma K. Priority areas for conservation in northeast India: a case study in Megha-laya based on plant species diversity and endemism. Int J Ecol Environ Sci. 2013;39(2):125-36.

Dolui AK, Sharma HK, Marein TB, Lalhriatpuii TC. Folk herbal remedies from Meghalaya. Indian J Tradit Knowl. 2004;3(4):358-64.

Tynsong H, Tiwari BK, Lynser MB. Medicinal plants of Meghala-ya, India. ResearchGate. 2022.

Singh B, Borthakur SK. Wild medicinal plants used by tribal communities of Meghalaya. J Econ Taxon Bot. 2011;35(2):331-39.

Rao RR. Ethnobotany of Meghalaya: medicinal plants used by Khasi and Garo tribes. Econ Bot. 1981;35(1):4-9. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02859215

Kayang H, Kharbuli B, Myrboh B, Syiem D. Medicinal plants of Khasi hills of Meghalaya, India. Acta Hortic. 2005;675:75-0. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2005.675.9

Pegu J, Bawri A, Yam G, Talom D, Rochill I, Jamir I, Teron R. Tra-ditional remedies for diabetes used by the Ao (Naga) tribe in Mokokchung district, Nagaland, India. Plant Science Today. 2024 Jan 13;11(1):381-87. https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.2602

Hooker JD. The Flora of British India. Reeve and Co. London. Vols. 1-7:1872- 7.

Kanjilal UN, Kanjilal PC, Das A, De RN, Bor NL. Flora of Assam. Government Press. Shillong. Vol 1 1-5:1934 1934- 40.

Barooah C, Ahmed I. Plant diversity of Assam: a checklist of angiosperms and gymnosperms. Assam Science Technology and Environment Council, Guwahati. 2014.

Borthakur SK, Baro D, Bawri, Boro A. Flora of BTAD (Bodoland Territorial Area Districts, Assam). EBH Publishers (India); 2018 Vol. I-IV

World Flora Online [Internet]. WFO. [cited 2024 May 16]. Availa-ble from: http://www.worldfloraonline.org.

Jain SK, Rao RR. A hand book of field and herbarium method. Today and Tomorrow Publishers. New Delhi (India); 1977.

Shah A, Bharati AK, Ahmad J, Sharma MP. New ethnomedicinal claims from Gujjar and Bakerwals tribes of Rajouri and Poonch districts of Jammu and Kashmir, India. Journal of Ethnophar-macology. 2015;166:119-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2015.01.056

Friedman J, Yaniv Z, Dafni A, Palewitch D. A preliminary classifi-cation of the healing potential of medicinal plants, based on a rational analysis of an ethnopharmacological field survey among Bedouins in the Negev Desert, Israel. Journal of Eth-nopharmacology. 1986;16(2-3):275-87. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-8741(86)90094-2

Debbarma J, Deb D, Deb S, Datta BK. Traditional bone setting (TBS): An ethno ethno-orthopedic healing practice of Tripura, Northeast India.

Upadhya V, Hegde HV, Bhat S, Hurkadale PJ, Kholkute SD, Hegde GR. Ethnomedicinal plants used to treat bone fracture from North-Central Western Ghats of India. Journal of Eth-nopharmacology. 2012 Jul 13;142(2):557-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2012.05.051

Kaushik RK, Singh V, Sharma R, Gupta A, Jaiman A. Integrative approach to fracture healing: a review. J Clini Medi Kazakhstan. 2022;19(3):16-18.