Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Plant Science Today (PST)

Review Articles

Vol. 12 No. 4 (2025)

Plant phenology in major forest types of India: A review

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.4174
Submitted
25 June 2024
Published
20-11-2025 — Updated on 04-12-2025
Versions

Abstract

Plant phenology has gained significant prominence due to its potential to assess the impacts of climate change on ecosystems. We documented the patterns of vegetative and reproductive phenology across major forest types in India, examined the factors influencing these patterns, identified knowledge gaps and suggested directions for future research. We collected data from published literature and followed the forest-type classification of Champion and Seth. The major forest types included in the study were moist tropical forests, dry tropical forests, montane subtropical forests, montane temperate forests, subalpine forests and alpine scrub. Summarising the phenology across Indian forest types proved to be difficult due to the lack of long-term, comparable datasets. In general, we identified that vegetative and reproductive phenology tended to be seasonal and driven by changes in abiotic variables. However, the influence of biotic factors remains largely unknown. We also highlighted the role of satellite remote sensing and near-surface remote sensing techniques in phenological research. Currently, the phenological responses of Indian forests to climate change are mainly unknown, necessitating studies that combine phenology, climate and biotic interactions. Finally, for India, we recommend establishing a phenology network that facilitates the effective integration of phenology data collected through multiple monitoring methods, thereby strengthening phenological studies shortly.

References

  1. 1. Adole T, Dash J, Atkinson PM. A systematic review of vegetation phenology in Africa. Ecol Inform. 2016;34:117–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoinf.2016.05.004
  2. 2. Piao S, Liu Q, Chen A, Janssens IA, Fu Y, Dai J, et al. Plant phenology and global climate change: current progresses and challenges. Glob Chang Biol. 2019;25(6):1922–40. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.14619
  3. 3. Vitasse Y, Delzon S, Dufrêne E, Pontailler JY, Louvet JM, Kremer A, et al. Leaf phenology sensitivity to temperature in European trees: Do within-species populations exhibit similar responses?. Agric For Meteorol. 2009;149:735–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2008.10.019
  4. 4. Daru BH, Kling MM, Meineke EK, van Wyk AE. Temperature controls phenology in continuously flowering Protea species of subtropical Africa. Appl Plant Sci. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1002/aps3.1232
  5. 5. Chapman CA, Chapman LJ, Struhsaker TT, Zanne AE, Clark CJ, Poulsen JR. A long-term evaluation of fruiting phenology: importance of climate change. J Trop Ecol. 2005;21:31–45. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266467404001993
  6. 6. Dunham AE, Razafindratsima OH, Rakotonirina P, Wright PC. Fruiting phenology is linked to rainfall variability in tropical rain forest. Biotropica. 2018;50(3):396–404. https://doi.org/10.1111/btp.12564
  7. 7. Laube J, Sparks TH, Estrella N, Menzel A. Does humidity trigger tree phenology? Proposal for an air humidity based framework for bud development in spring. New Phytol. 2014;202(2):350–55. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.12680
  8. 8. Tao Z, Ge Q, Wang H, Dai J. The important role of soil moisture in controlling autumn phenology of herbaceous plants in the inner Mongolian steppe. Land Degrad Dev. 2020;32:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.3827
  9. 9. Way DA, Montgomery RA. Photoperiod constraints on tree phenology, performance and mitigation in a warming world. Plant Cell Environ. 2015;38:1725–36. https://doi.org/10.1111/pce.12431
  10. 10. Meng L, Zhou Y, Gu L, Richardson AD, Peñuelas J, Fu Y, et al. Photoperiod decelerates the advance of spring phenology of six deciduous tree species under climate warming. Glob Chang Biol. 2021;27(12):2914–27. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.15575
  11. 11. Ju RT, Gao L, Wei SJ, Li B. Spring warming increases the abundance of an invasive specialist insect: links to phenology and life history. Sci Rep. 2017;7:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-14989-3
  12. 12. Silva JO, Espírito-Santo MM, Santos JC, Rodrigues PMS. Does leaf flushing in the dry season affect leaf traits and herbivory in a tropical dry forest?. Sci Nat. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00114-020-01711-z
  13. 13. Forrest JRK. Plant-pollinator interactions and phenological change: What can we learn about climate impacts from experiments and observations?. Oikos. 2015;124:4–13. https://doi.org/10.1111/oik.01386
  14. 14. Kehrberger S, Holzschuh A. How does timing of flowering affect competition for pollinators, flower visitation and seed set in an early spring grassland plant?. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-51916-0
  15. 15. Kimura K, Yumoto T, Kikuzawa K. Fruiting phenology of fleshy fruited plants and seasonal dynamics of frugivorous birds in four vegetation zones on Mt. Kinabalu, Borneo. J Trop Ecol. 2001;17(6):833–58. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266467401001626
  16. 16. Gordon SCC, Meadley Dunphy SA, Prior KM, Frederickson ME. Asynchrony between ant seed dispersal activity and fruit dehiscence of myrmecochorous plants. Am J Bot. 2019;106 (1):1–10. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajb2.1214
  17. 17. Liu Q, Fu YH, Zeng Z, Huang M, Li X, Piao S. Temperature, precipitation and insolation effects on autumn vegetation phenology in temperate China. Glob Chang Biol. 2016;22(2):644–55. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13081
  18. 18. Menzel A, Yuan Y, Maitu M, Sparks T, Scheifinger H, Gehrig H, et al. Climate change fingerprints in recent European plant phenology. Glob Chang Biol. 2020;26(4):2599–12. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.15000
  19. 19. Chen IC, Hill JK, Ohlemüller R, Roy DB, Thomas CD. Rapid range shifts of species associated with high levels of climate warming. Science. 2011. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1206432
  20. 20. Morisette JT, Richardson AD, Knapp AK, Fisher JI, Graham EA, Abatzoglou J, et al. Tracking the rhythm of the seasons in the face of global change: phenological research in the 21st century. Front Ecol Environ. 2009;7(5):253–60. https://doi.org/10.1890/070217
  21. 21. Rudolf VHW. The role of seasonal timing and phenological shifts for species coexistence. Ecol Lett. 2019;22(8):1324–38. https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.13277
  22. 22. Visser ME, Both C. Shifts in phenology due to global climate change: the need for a yardstick. Proc Royal Soc B. 2005;272(1581):2561–69. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2005.3356
  23. 23. Franco-Cisterna M, Ramos-Jiliberto R, de Espanés PM, Vázquez DP. Phenological shifts drive biodiversity loss in plant–pollinator networks. bioRxiv. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.04.03.023457
  24. 24. Sullivan MK, Fayolle A, Bush E, Ofosu-Bamfo B, Vleminckx J, Metz MR, et al. Cascading effects of climate change: new advances in drivers and shifts of tropical reproductive phenology. Plant Ecol. 2024;225(3):175–87. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11258-023-01377-3
  25. 25. McLaren KP, McDonald MA. Seasonal patterns of flowering and fruiting in a dry tropical forest in Jamaica. Biotropica. 2005;37(4):584–90. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7429.2005.00075.x
  26. 26. Williams-Linera G, Alvarez-Aquino C. Vegetative and reproductive tree phenology of ecological groups in a tropical dry forest in central Veracruz, Mexico. Bot Sci. 2016;94(4):745–56. https://doi.org/10.17129/botsci.682
  27. 27. White MA, De Beurs KM, Didan K, Inouye DW, Richardson AD, Jensen OP, et al. Intercomparison, interpretation and assessment of spring phenology in North America estimated from remote sensing for 1982–2006. Glob Chang Biol. 2009;15(10):2335–59. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2009.01910.x
  28. 28. Kowalski K, Senf C, Hostert P, Pflugmacher D. Characterizing spring phenology of temperate broadleaf forests using Landsat and Sentinel-2 time series. Int J Appl Earth Obs Geoinf. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2020.102172
  29. 29. Crimmins MA, Crimmins TM. Monitoring plant phenology using digital repeat photography. Environ Manag. 2008;41(6):949–58. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-008-9086-6
  30. 30. Songsom V, Koedsin W, Ritchie RJ, Huete A. Mangrove phenology and water influences measured with digital repeat photography. Remote Sens. 2021. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13020307
  31. 31. Primack RB, Gallinat AS, Ellwood ER, Crimmins TM, Schwartz MD, Staudinger MD, et al. Ten best practices for effective phenological research. Int J Biometeorol. 2023;67(10):1509–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00484-023-02502-7
  32. 32. Forest Survey of India. India State of Forest Report [ISFR] 2021 [Internet]. Dehradun: Ministry of Environment, Forests and Climate Change, Government of India; 2021 [cited 2025 Oct 28].
  33. 33. Singh JS, Chaturvedi RK. Diversity of ecosystem types in India: a review. Proc Indian Natn Sci Acad. 2017;83(3):569–94.
  34. 34. Eckstein D, Künzel V, Schäfer L. Global climate risk index 2021 [Internet]. Germanwatch e.V.; 2021. Available from: https://www.germanwatch.org/en/19777
  35. 35. Tewari VP, Verma RK, Von Gadow K. Climate change effects in the western Himalayan ecosystems of India: evidence and strategies. For Ecosyst. 2017;4:13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40663-017-0100-4
  36. 36. Kumar M, Kalra N, Khaiter P, Ravindranath NH, Singh V, Singh H, et al. PhenoPine: a simulation model to trace the phenological changes in Pinus roxhburghii in response to ambient temperature rise. Ecol Model. 2019;404:12–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2019.05.003
  37. 37. Champion HG, Seth SK. A revised survey of the forest types of India. Delhi Manager of Publications, Government of India; 1968
  38. 38. Bhat DM. Phenology of tree species of tropical moist forest of Uttara Kannada district, Karnataka, India. J Biosci. 1992;17(3):325–52.
  39. 39. Bhat DM, Murali KS. Phenology of understorey species of tropical moist forest of Western Ghats region of Uttara Kannada district in South India. Curr Sci. 2001;81(7):799–805.
  40. 40. Mishra RK, Upadhyay VP, Mohapatra PK, Bal S, Mohanty RC. Phenology of species of moist deciduous forest sites of Similipal Biosphere Reserve. Lyonia. 2006;11(1):5–17.
  41. 41. Bajpai O, Kumar A, Mishra AK, Sahu N, Behera SK, Chaudhary LB. Phenological study of two dominant tree species in tropical moist deciduous forest from the Northern India. Int J Bot. 2012;8(2):66–72. https://doi.org/10.3923/ijb.2012.66.72
  42. 42. Sundarapandian SN, Chandrasekaran S, Swamy PS. Phenological behaviour of selected tree species in tropical forests at Kodayar in the Western Ghats, Tamil Nadu, India. Curr Sci. 2005;88(5):805–10.
  43. 43. Newton PN. The structure and phenology of a moist deciduous forest in the Central Indian Highlands. Vege. 1988;75:3–16.
  44. 44. Nanda A, Suresh HS, Krishnamurthy YL. Phenology of tree species in a tropical evergreen forest of southern India. J Global Eco Environ. 2017;6(1):1–12.
  45. 45. Krishnan RM. Reproductive phenology of a wet forest understorey in the Western Ghats, South India. Global Ecol Biogeo. 2002;11(2):179–82. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1466-822X.2002.00276.x
  46. 46. Upadhyay VP, Mishra PK. Phenology of mangroves tree species on Orissa coast, India. Trop Ecol. 2010;51:289–95.
  47. 47. Arunprasath A, Gomathinayagam M. Reproductive phenology of true mangrove species in Pichavaram mangrove forests, Tamilnadu, India - A comparative account. J Environ Treat Tech. 2015;10:17–21.
  48. 48. Singh JS, Singh VK. Phenology of seasonally dry tropical forest. Curr Sci. 1992;63(11):683–89.
  49. 49. Yadav RK, Yadav AS. Phenology of selected woody species in a tropical dry deciduous forest in Rajasthan, India. Trop Ecol. 2008;49(1):25–34.
  50. 50. Nanda A, Suresh HS, Krishnamurthy YL. Phenology of a tropical dry deciduous forest of Bhadra Wildlife Sanctuary. Ecol Process. 2014;3(1):1–12.
  51. 51. Kunhikannan C, Rao NR. Phenological studies of trees of Tadoba National Park, Chandrapur, Maharashtra, India. Indian For. 2014;140(11):1074–80.
  52. 52. Shankar S, Ramakrishna A, Kumar MU, Sadasivaiah, B, Reddy MS, Rao NB. Phenological patterns of selected tree species in Amrabad Tiger Reserve, Telangana, India. Indian J Ecol. 2022;49(4):1258–63. https://doi.org/10.55362/IJE/2022/3654
  53. 53. Kushwaha CP, Tripathi SK, Singh GS, Singh KP. Diversity of deciduousness and phenological traits of key Indian dry tropical forest trees. Ann for Sci. 2010. https://doi.org/10.1051/forest/2009116
  54. 54. Murali KS, Sukumar R. Leaf flushing phenology and herbivory in a tropical dry deciduous forest, southern India. Oecologia. 1993;94(1):114–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00317311
  55. 55. Singh KP, Kushwaha CP. Diversity of flowering and fruiting phenology of trees in a tropical deciduous forest in India. Ann Bot. 2006;97(2):265–76. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcj028
  56. 56. Murali KS, Sukumar R. Reproductive phenology of a tropical dry forest in Mudumalai, southern India. J Ecol. 1994;82(4):759–67. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2261441
  57. 57. Selwyn MA, Parthasarathy N. Fruiting phenology in a tropical dry evergreen forest on the Coromandel Coast of India in relation to plant life-forms, physiognomic groups, dispersal modes and climatic constraints. Flora. 2007;202(5):371–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.flora.2007.04.001
  58. 58. Balasubramanian P, Bole PV. Fruiting phenology and seasonality in tropical dry evergreen forest in Pt. Calimere Wildlife Sanctuary. J Bombay Nat Hist Soc. 1993;90:163–77.
  59. 59. Jadeja BA, Nakar RN. Phenological studies of some tree species from Girnar Reserve Forest, Gujarat India. Plant archives. 2010;10(2):825–28.
  60. 60. Devi NL, Brearley FQ, Tripathi SK. Phenological diversity among sub-tropical moist forest trees of northeastern India. J Trop Ecol. 2023;39(e29). https://doi.org/10.1017/ S0266467423000184
  61. 61. Kikim A, Yadava PS. Phenology of tree species in subtropical forests of Manipur in northeast India. Trop Ecol. 2001;42(2):269–76.
  62. 62. Pao NT, Upadhaya K, Mir AH. Phenological behaviour of tree species in subtropical broadleaved humid forests of Jaintia Hills of Meghalaya, Northeast India. Int Res J Biol Sci. 2016;5(7):10–15.
  63. 63. Shukla RP, Ramakrishnan PS. Phenology of trees in a sub-tropical humid forest in north-eastern India. Vege. 1982;49:103–09. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00052764
  64. 64. Baruah U, Ramakrishnan PS. Phenology of the shrub strata of successional sub-tropical humid forests of North-eastern India. Vege. 1989;80:63–67. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00049141
  65. 65. Nakar RN, Jadeja BA. Flowering and fruiting phenology of some herbs, shrubs and under shrubs from Girnar Reserve Forest, Gujarat, India. Curr Sci. 2015;108(1):111-18.
  66. 66. Suresh HS, Sukumar R. Vegetative phenology of tropical montane forests in the Nilgiris, South India. J Nat Sci Found Sri Lanka. 2011;39(4):337–47. http://dx.doi.org/10.4038/jnsfsr.v39i4.3882
  67. 67. Sundriyal RC. Phenology of some temperate woody species of the Garhwal Himalaya. Int J Ecol Environ Sci. 1990;16:107–17.
  68. 68. Mohandass D, Hughes AC, Davidar P. Flowering and fruiting patterns of woody species in the tropical montane evergreen forest of southern India. Curr Sci. 2016;111(2):404–16.
  69. 69. Somasundaram S, Vijayan L. Plant diversity and phenological pattern in the montane wet temperate forests of the southern Western Ghats, India. For Stud China. 2010;12(3):116–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11632-010-0302-0
  70. 70. Anbarasu C, Balasubramanian P. Fruiting phenology of trees in the tropical montane evergreen forest (Shola) of Nilgiri Hills, Western Ghats. Int J Biol Tech. 2013;4:1–8.
  71. 71. Rawal R, Bankoti N, Samant SS, Pangtey YP. Phenology of tree layer species from the timber line around Kumaun in Central Himalaya India. Vege. 1991;93(2):109–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00033205
  72. 72. Ram J, Singh SP, Singh JS. Community level phenology of grassland above tree line in Central Himalaya. Arct Alp Res. 1988;20(3):325–32.
  73. 73. Pangtey YPS, Rawal RS, Bankoti NS, Samant SS. Phenology of high altitude of plants of Kumaun in Central Himalaya, India. Int J Biometerol. 1990;34(2):122–27.
  74. 74. Nautiyal MC, Nautiyal BP, Prakash V. Phenology and growth form distribution in an alpine pasture at Tungnath, Garhwal, Himalaya. Mt Res Dev. 2001;21(2):168–74. https://doi.org/10.1659/0276-4741(2001)021[0168:PAGFDI]2.0.CO;2
  75. 75. Ramaswami G, Sidhu S, Quader S. Using citizen science to build baseline data on tropical tree phenology. Curr Sci. 2021;121(11):1409–16.
  76. 76. Denny EG, Gerst KL, Miller-Rushing AJ, Tierney GL, Crimmins TM, Enquist CAF, et al. Standardized phenology monitoring methods to track plant and animal activity for science and resource management applications. Int J Biometeorol. 2014;58(4):591–601. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00484-014-0789-5
  77. 77. Lacerda DMA, Rossatto DR, Ribeiro-Novaes EKMD, Almeida Jr EBD. Reproductive phenology differs between evergreen and deciduous species in a Northeast Brazilian Savanna. Acta Bot Bras. 2018;32(3):367–75. https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-33062017abb0343
  78. 78. Du Y, Li D, Yang X, Peng D, Tang X, Liu H, et al. Reproductive phenology and its drivers in a tropical rainforest national park in China: Implications for Hainan gibbon (Nomascus hainanus) conservation. Glob Ecol Conserv. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2020.e01317
  79. 79. Azad MS, Kamruzzaman M, Ahmed S, Kanzaki M. Litterfall assessment and reproductive phenology observation in the Sundarbans, Bangladesh: A comparative study among three mangrove species. Trees, Forests and People. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tfp.2021.100068
  80. 80. Morellato LPC, Alberti LF, Hudson IL. Applications of circular statistics in plant phenology: a case studies approach. In: Hudson IL, Keatley MR, editors. Phenological research: methods for environmental and climate change analysis. Dordrecht: Springer; 2010. p. 339–59
  81. 81. Wadgymar SM, Ogilvie JE, Inouye DW, Weis AE anderson JT. Phenological responses to multiple environmental drivers under climate change: insights from a long-term observational study and a manipulative field experiment. New Phytol. 2018;218(2):517–29. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.15029
  82. 82. Nadia TL, Morellato LPC, Machado IC. Reproductive phenology of a northeast Brazilian mangrove community: Environmental and biotic constraints. Flora-Morphol Distrib Funct Ecol Plants. 2012;207(9):682–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.flora.2012.06.020
  83. 83. Novaes LR, Calixto ES, Oliveira ML, Lima LA, Almeida O, Torezan-Silingardi HM. Environmental variables drive phenological events of anemocoric plants and enhance diaspore dispersal potential: a new wind-based approach. Sci Total Environ. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139039
  84. 84. Garwood NC, Metz MR, Queenborough SA, Persson V, Wright SJ, Burslem DF, et al. Seasonality of reproduction in an ever-wet lowland tropical forest in Amazonian Ecuador. Ecology. 2023;104(9):e4133. https://doi.org/10.1002/ecy.4133
  85. 85. Ramaswami G, Datta A, Reddy A, Quader S. Tracking phenology in the tropics and in India: the impacts of climate change. In: Bhatt JR, Das A, Shanker K, editors. Biodiversity and Climate Change: An Indian Perspective. New Delhi, India: Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change, Government of India; 2018. p. 45–69
  86. 86. Zhao X, Zhou D, Fang J. Satellite-based studies on large-scale vegetation changes in China. J Integr Plant Biol. 2012;54(10):713–28. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7909.2012.01167.x
  87. 87. Jeganathan C, Dash J, Atkinson PM. Mapping the phenology of natural vegetation in India using a remote sensing-derived chlorophyll index. Int J Remote Sens. 2010;31:5777–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2010.512303
  88. 88. Prabakaran C, Singh CP, Panigrahy S, Parihar JS. Retrieval of forest phenological parameters from remote sensing-based NDVI time-series data. Curr Sci. 2013;105(6):795–802.
  89. 89. Jeganathan, C, Dash J, Atkinson PM. Remotely sensed trends in the phenology of northern high latitude terrestrial vegetation, controlling for land cover change and vegetation type. Remote Sens Environ. 2014;143:154–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2013.11.020
  90. 90. Punalekar S, Gupta PK, Oza MP, Singh RP, Sonakia A. Estimation of phenological parameters using remote sensing derived high temporal LAI data: A case study of forest region in central India. J Geomat. 2015;9:77–85.
  91. 91. Prakash SC, Mohapatra J, Pandya HA, Gajmer B, Sharma N, Shrestha DG. Evaluating changes in treeline position and land surface phenology in Sikkim Himalaya. Geocarto Int. 2018;35(5):453–69. https://doi.org/10.1080/10106049.2018.1524513
  92. 92. Deka J, Kalita S, Khan ML. Vegetation phenological characterization of alluvial plain Shorea robusta-dominated tropical moist deciduous forest of Northeast India using MODIS NDVI time series data. J Indian Soc Remote Sens. 2019;47(8):1287–93. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12524-019-00991-x
  93. 93. Ghosh S, Nandy S, Mohanty S, Subba R, Kushwaha SPS. Are phenological variations in natural teak (Tectona grandis) forests of India governed by rainfall?. A remote sensing-based investigation. Environ Monit Assess. 2019;191:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-019-7680-0
  94. 94. Mohapatra J, Singh CP, Tripathi OP, Pandya HA. Remote sensing of alpine treeline ecotone dynamics and phenology in Arunachal Pradesh Himalaya. Int J Remote Sens. 2019;40(20):7986–8009. https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2019.1608383
  95. 95. Singh B, Jeganathan C, Rathore VS. Improved NDVI-based proxy leaf-fall indicator to assess rainfall sensitivity of deciduousness in the central Indian forests through remote sensing. Sci Rep. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-74563-2
  96. 96. Dixon DJ, Callow JN, Duncan JMA, Setterfield SA, Pauli N. Satellite prediction of forest flowering phenology. Remote Sens Environ. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2020.112197
  97. 97. John A, Ong J, Theobald EJ, Olden JD, Tan A, HilleRisLambers J. Detecting montane flowering phenology with CubeSat imagery. Remote Sens. 2020. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12182894
  98. 98. Jose, K, Chaturvedi RK, Jeganathan C, Behera MD, Singh CP. Plugging the gaps in the global phenocam monitoring of forests—The need for a PhenoCam Network across Indian forests. Remote Sens. 2023. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15245642
  99. 99. Liu N, Garcia M, Singh A, Clare JD, Stenglein JL, Zuckerberg B, et al. Trail camera networks provide insights into satellite-derived phenology for ecological studies. Int J Appl Earth Obs Geoinf. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2020.102291
  100. 100. Brown TB, Hultine KR, Steltzer H, Denny EG, Denslow MW, Granados J, et al. Using phenocams to monitor our changing Earth: toward a global PhenoCam Network. Front Ecol Environ. 2016;14(2):84–93. https://doi.org/10.1002/fee.1222
  101. 101. Parihar JS, Goroshi S, Singh RP, Krishnayya NSR, Sirsayya MB, Kumar A, et al. Observation of forest phenology using field-based digital photography and satellite data. Curr Sci. 2013;105(12):1740–46.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.