Weeds in agricultural and non-agricultural systems: Media influence, impacts and trends for a better systematic control against alternate and collateral hosts of crop pests
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.4187Keywords:
Farming, integrated management, mass media, non-agricultural areas, weedAbstract
Weeds significantly impact agricultural productivity and environmental health by competing with crops for resources and acting as alternate hosts for pests. This study uniquely combines an ecological inventory with quantitative assessments to address weeds’ role in various ecosystems, including agricultural and non-agricultural areas such as roadsides and industrial sites. Methods included field surveys, species identification, and indices like informant consensus factor (ICF) and use value (UV) to measure weed prevalence, competition and adaptability. Results highlight that species like Cyperus rotundus and Echinochloa spp. pose substantial threats, causing up to 70% yield loss in specific regions, particularly in tropical irrigated crops. Additionally, weeds cause water loss, soil depletion, and habitat disruption in non-agricultural zones. This study emphasizes the need for integrated control strategies, combining cultural, mechanical, and chemical approaches. Media influence is also discussed, stressing its role in public perception and policy development for sustainable weed management. This work provides novel insights for enhancing agricultural resilience and environmental sustainability through improved weed control.
Downloads
References
Pimentel D, Zuniga R, Morrison D. Update on the environmental and economic costs associated with alien-invasive species in the United States. Ecol Econ. 2005;52:273-88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.10.002
Llewellyn RS, Ronning D, Ouzman J, Walker S, Mayfield A, Clarke M. Impact of weeds on Australian grain production: The cost of weeds to Australian grain growers and the adoption of weed management and tillage practices. Report for GRDC. CSIRO. 2016;112. www.grdc.com.au/ImpactOfWeeds
Gharde Y, Singh PK, Dubey RP, Gupta PK. Assessment of yield and economic losses in agriculture due to weeds in India. Crop Prot. 2018;107:12-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2018.01.007
Oerke EC. Crop losses to pests. J Agric Sci. 2006;144(1):31-43.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859605005708
Chauhan BS, Matloob A, Mahajan G, Aslam F, Florentine SK, Jha P. Emerging challenges and opportunities for education and research in weed science. Front Plant Sci. 2017;8:1537. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.01537
Schonbeck M. An ecological understanding of weeds. Available online at: https://eorganic.org/node/2314 2022(accessed September 18, 2022).
Bajwa AA, MahajanG, Chauhan BS. Nonconventional weed management strategies for modern agriculture. Weed Sci. 2015;63(4):723-47. https://doi.org/10.1614/WS-D-15-00064.1
Fahad S, Hussain S, Chauhan BS, Saud S, Wu C, Hassan S, et al. Weed growth and crop yield loss in wheat as influenced by row spacing and weed emergence times. Crop Prot. 2015;71:101-08. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2015.02.005
Shukuru BN, Archana TS. Effectiveness of transplant date and sowing density related to tillering capacity of rice (Oryza sativa L.). J Global Agric Ecol. 2021;12(4):31-42.https://ikprress.org/index.php/JOGAE/article/view/7401
Shukuru BN. Analysis of profitability and the level of agronomic and economic efficiencies among small-scale producers of rice in Ruzizi plain, eastern D.R. Congo. Asian J Plant Soil Sci. 2022a;7(1):185-95. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4072600
Kraehmer H, Jabran K, Mennan H, Chauhan BS. Global distribution of rice weeds – A review. Crop Prot. 2016;80:73-86.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2015.10.027
Krupinsky JM, Tanaka DL, Merrill SD, Liebig MA, Hanson JD. Crop sequence effects of 10 crops in the northern Great Plains. Agric Syst. 2006;88:227-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2005.03.011
Santín-Montanyá I, de Andrés EF, Zambrana E, Tenorio JL. The competitive ability of weed community with selected crucifer oilseed crops. In: Price A, Kelton J, Sarunaite L, editors. Herbicides, agronomic crops and weed biology. 2015;https://doi.org/10.5772/60849
Swanton C, Nkoa R, Blackshaw R. Experimental methods for crop–weed competition studies. Weed Sci. 2015;63(SP1):2-11. https://doi.org/10.1614/WS-D-13-00062.1
Guglielmini AC, Verdú AMC, Satorre EH. Competitive ability of five common weed species in competition with soybean. Int J Pest Manag. 2017;63(1),30-36. https://doi.org/10.1080/09670874.2016.1213459
Ramesh K, Matloob A, Aslam F, Florentine S, Chauhan BS. Weeds in a changing climate: vulnerabilities, consequences and implications for future weed management. Front Plant Sci. 2017;8:95. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.00095
Korres NE. Chapter 6 - Agronomic weed control: A trustworthy approach for sustainable weed management. In: Jabran K, Chauhan BS, editors. Non-chemical weed control. Academic Press; 2018. pp.97-114.https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-809881-3.00006-1
Chauhan BS. Grand challenges in weed management. Front Agron. 2020;1:3. https://doi.org/10.3389/fagro.2019.00003
Radosevich SR, Holt JS, Ghersa CM. Chapter 7- Weed and invasive plant management approaches, methods and tools, In: Ecology of weeds and invasive plants: Relationship to agriculture and natural resource management. Wiley-Interscience, 3rd edition, Hoboken, New Jersey, USA; 2017. pp. 259-306. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470168943.ch7
Naeem M, Farooq S, Hussain M. The impact of different weed management systems on weed flora and dry biomass production of barley grown under various barley-based cropping systems. Plants (Basel). 2022;11(6):718. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11060718
Kaur S, Kaur R, Chauhan BS. Understanding crop-weed-fertilizer-water interactions and their implications for weed management in agricultural systems. Crop Prot. 2018;103:65-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2017.09.011
McWhorter CG. Future needs in weed science. Weed Sci. 1984;32(6):850-55. https://www.jstor.org/stable/4044053
Bridges DC. Impact of weeds on human endeavors. Weed Technol. 1994;8(2):392-95. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3988124
Rao AN, Wani SP, Ahmed S, Ali HH. Chapter 10- An overview of weeds and weed management in rice of South Asia. In: Rao AN, Matsumoto H, editors. Weed management in rice in the Asian-Pacific region, Asian-Pacific Weed Science Society (APWSS), First edition, The Weed Science Society of Japan, Japan and Indian Society of Weed Science, India; 2017. pp. 247-81.
Garrity DP, Soekardi M, van Noordwijk M, de la Cruz R, Pathak PS, Gunasena HPM, et al. The Imperata grasslands of tropical Asia: area, distribution and typology. Agrofor Syst. 1996;36:3-29. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00142865
MacDonald GE. Cogongrass (Imperata cylindrica)—Biology, ecology and management. CRC Crit Rev Plant Sci. 2004;23(5):367-80.https://doi.org/10.1080/07352680490505114
Rodenburg J, Johnson DE. Chapter 4 - Weed management in rice?based cropping systems in Africa. In: Donald L Sparks, editors. Advances in agronomy. Academic Press; 2009;103:149-218. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2113(09)03004-1
Shukuru BN, Archana TS, Bisimwa EB, Birindwa DR, Sharma S, Kurian JA, Casinga CM. Screening of cultivars against cassava brown streak disease and molecular identification of the phytopathogenic infection-associated viruses. Arch Phytopathol Pflanzenschutz. 2022;55(16):1899-929. https://doi.org/10.1080/03235408.2022.2123590
Shukuru BN, Archana TS, Kangela AM. Rapid screening for resistance of maize inbred and hybrid lines against Southern corn leaf blight. J Phytopathol. 2023;171(6):452-69. https://doi.org/10.1111/jph.13202
Shukuru BN, Sharma S, Birindwa J-C. Characterization of the 31 genotypes cultivated under the threat of cassava brown streak disease. J Agric Vet Sci. 2021;14(12):45-53. http://ssrn.com/abstract=3995371
Wong ACS, Massel K, Lam Y, Hintzsche J, Chauhan BS. Biotechnological road map for innovative weed management. Front in Plant Sci. 2022;13:887723. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.887723
Chauhan BS, Johnson DE. The role of seed ecology in improving weed management strategies in the tropics. Adv Agron. 2010;105:221-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2113(10)05006-6
Ghersa CM. Agroecological basis for managing biotic constraints. In: Christou P, Savin R, Costa-Pierce BA, Misztal I, Whitelaw CBA, editors. Sustainable food production. Springer, New York, NY; 2013. 18-30.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5797-8_196
Matloob A, Khaliq A, Chauhan BS. Chapter Five - Weeds of direct-seeded rice in Asia: Problems and opportunities. In: Donald L Sparks, editors. Advances in agronomy. Academic Press. 2015;130:291-336. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.agron.2014.10.003
Kayani S, Ahma, M, Zafar M, Sultana S. Ethnobotanical studies of weeds as traditional medicine in the Palas Valley of Kohistan. Pakistan J Ethnopharmacol. 2024;284:114748. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2023.114748
Rehman N, Shah SM, Khan M, Malik K. Ethnobotanical use of medicinal weeds in the Shawal Valley of North Waziristan, Pakistan. Front Plant Sci. 2023;14:1187305. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2023.1187305
Manzoor M, Baig A, Mir F, Bashir H. Traditional uses of medicinal plants in the Kashmir Himalayas. BMC Complement Med Ther. 2003;23(5):24. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12906-023-03825-y
Gillani A, Mehmood T, Ashraf M, Yousaf Z. Weeds of medicinal value: An ethnobotanical study in the North Pakistan region. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2024;20(1):62. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13002-024-00562-5
Gillani A, Mehmood T, Ashraf M, Yousaf Z. Indigenous medicinal plant uses and significance in the Kashmir Himalayas. Ethnobot Res Appl. 2024;22:82. https://doi.org/10.17348/era.22.82
Mirzaman Z, Khadim N, Nawab H. Potential of medicinal weeds for pharmacological applications in rural healthcare. Phytotherapy Research. 2023;37(4):1128-37. https://doi.org/10.1002/ptr.7383
Zhou J, Deckard EL, Ahrens WH. Factors affecting germination of hairy nightshade (Solanum sarrachoides) seeds. Weed Sci. 2005;53(1):41-45.https://doi.org/10.1614/WS-04-100R1
Travlos I, Gazoulis I, Kanatas P, Tsekoura A, Zannopoulos S, Papastylianou P. Key factors affecting weed seeds' germination, weed emergence and their possible role for the efficacy of false seedbed technique as weed management practice. Front Agron. 2020;2:1. https://doi.org/10.3389/fagro.2020.00001
Shrestha A, Clements DR, Upadhyaya MK. Persistence strategies of weeds. In: Upadhyaya MK, Clements DR, Shrestha A, editors. Persistence strategies of weeds; 2022. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119525622.ch1
Shukuru BN. Current trends in rice production and consumption: Rice cultivation and traits and analysis of agronomic and economic efficiencies for sustainable rural development. Lambert Academic Publisher, Chisinau: Moldova. 2022b;152.
Singh S, Singh M. Effect of temperature, light and pH on germination of twelve weed species. Indian Journal of Weed Science. 2009;41(3 and 4):113-26. Available online at: https://www.isws.org.in/IJWSn/File/2009_41_Issue-3&4_113-126.pdf . (Accessed October 20, 2022)
Qasem JR. Weed seed dormancy: The ecophysiology and survival strategies. In (Ed.). Seed dormancy and germination; 2019.https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.88015
Shukuru BN, Archana TS, Kumar D, Singh S, Kumar G. Chapter 15- Phyllosphere endophytic bacteria: diversity and biotechnological potential. In: Plant endophytes and secondary metabolites, microbiome research in plants and soil; 2024. 269-94. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-443-13365-7.00019-1
Nagashima H, Hikosaka K. Plants in a crowded stand regulate their height growth so as to maintain similar heights to neighbours even when they have potential advantages in height growth. Ann Bot. 2011;108(1):207-14. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcr109
Mccombs M. The agenda-setting role of the mass media in the shaping of public opinion. University of Texas at Austin; 2011. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/237394610_The_Agenda-Setting_Role_of_the_Mass_Media_in_the_Shaping_of_Public_Opinion
Miranda SM, Young A, Yetgin E. Are social media emancipatory or hegemonic? Societal effects of mass media digitization in the case of the sopa discourse. Management Information Systems Research Center, University of Minnesota. MIS Quarterly. 2016;40(2):303-30. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26628908
Abbas T, Zahir ZA, Naveed M, Kremer RJ. Chapter Five - Limitations of existing weed control practices necessitate development of alternative techniques based on biological approaches. In: Sparks DL, editors. Advances in agronomy. Academic Press; 2018. 147:239-80.https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.agron.2017.10.005
Hussain M, Farooq S, Merfield C, Jabran K. Chapter 8 - Mechanical weed control. In: Jabran K, Chauhan BS, editors. Non-chemical weed control. Academic Press; 2018. pp. 133-55.https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-809881-3.00008-5
Merfield CN. Chapter 5 - Integrated weed management in organic farming. In: Chandran S, Unni MR, Thomas S, editors. Woodhead Publishing Series in Food Science, Technology and Nutrition, Organic Farming, Woodhead Publishing; 2019. pp. 117-80.https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-813272-2.00005-7
Johnston AM, Tanaka DL, Miller PR, Brandt SA, Nielsen DC, Lafond GP, Riveland NR. Oilseed crops for semiarid cropping systems in the northern Great Plains. Agron J. 2002; 94:231-40.https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2002.2310
Catalano J. Timing is everything for weed management. Available online at: https://news.cornell.edu/stories/2022/06/timing-everything-weed-management (accessed September 10, 2022)
Horowitz M, Regev Y, Herzlinger G. Solarization for weed control. Weed Sci. 1983;31(2):170-79.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043174500068788
Ziska LH, Teasdale JR, Bunce JA. Future atmospheric carbon dioxide may increase tolerance to glyphosate. Weed Sci. 1999;47(5):608-15. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043174500092341
Johnson WG, Davis VM, Kruger GR, Weller SC. Influence of glyphosate-resistant cropping systems on weed species shifts and glyphosate-resistant weed populations. Eur J Agron. 2009;31:162-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2009.03.008
Chauhan B, Gill G. Ecologically based weed management strategies. In: Chauhan B, Mahajan G, editors. Recent Advances in Weed Management. Springer, New York, NY; 2014.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-1019-9_1
Heap I. International survey of herbicide resistant weeds. Available online at: https://www.weedscience.org/Home.aspx (accessed September 10, 2022).
Akhtar MW, Sengupta D, Chowdhury A. Impact of pesticides use in agriculture: their benefits and hazards. Interdiscip Toxicol. 2009;2(1):1-12. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10102-009-0001-7
Marin-Morales MA, de Campos Ventura-Camargo B, Hoshina MM. Toxicity of herbicides: Impact on aquatic and soil biota and human health. In: Price AJ, Kelton JA, editors. Herbicides-current research and case studies in use; 2013. https://doi.org/10.5772/55851
Mishra JS. Chapter 7 - Weed problem in millets and its management. In: Das IK, Padmaja PG, editors. Biotic stress resistance in millets. Academic Press; 2016. pp. 205-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-804549-7.00007-X
Matloob A, Safdar ME, Abbas T, Aslam F, Khaliq A, Tanveer A, et al. Challenges and prospects for weed management in Pakistan: A review. Crop Prot. 2020;134:104724. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2019.01.030
Mehdizadeh M, Mushtaq W. Chapter 9 - Biological control of weeds by allelopathic compounds from different plants: A bioherbicide approach. In: Egbuna C, Sawicka B, editors. Natural remedies for pest, disease and weed control. Academic Press; 2020. pp. 107-17.https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-819304-4.00009-9
Ali HH, Peerzada AM, Hanif Z, Hashim S, Chauhan BS. Weed management using crop competition in Pakistan: A review. Crop Prot. 2017;95:22-30.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2016.07.009
MacLaren C, Storkey J, Menegat A, Metcalfe H, Dehnen-Schmutz K. An ecological future for weed science to sustain crop production and the environment. A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development. 2020;40:24.https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-020-00631-6
Milberg P, Hallgren E. Yield loss due to weeds in cereals and its large-scale variability in Sweden. Field Crops Res. 2004;86(2-3):199-209.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2003.08.006
Oad FC, Siddiqui MH, Buriro UA. Growth and yield losses in wheat due to different weed densities. Asian J Plant Sci. 2017;6(1):173-76.https://doi.org/10.3923/ajps.2007.173.176
Ghosh PK, Mandal KG, Kuntal MH. Allelopathic effects of weeds on groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) in India – A review. Agric Rev. 2000;21(1):66-69. Available online at:https://www.indianjournals.com/ijor.aspx?target=ijor:ar&volume=21&issue=1&article=008
Kumar V, Ladha JK. Chapter Six - Direct seeding of rice: Recent developments and future research needs. In: Sparks DL, editors. Adv Agron, Academic Press; 2011. 111:297-413.https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-387689-8.00001-1
Zimdahl RL. Fundamentals of weed science (Fifth Edition). Academic Press. 2018; 651-81 and 609-49.https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-811143-7.00023-8
Fongod AGN, FochoDA, Mih AM, Fonge BA, Lang PS. Weed management in banana production: The use of Nelsonia canescens (Lam.) Spreng. as a non-leguminous cover crop. Afr J Environ Sci Tech. 2010;4(3):167-73.https://doi.org/10.5897/AJEST09.154
Bailey WA. Herbicides used in tobacco. In: Price AJ, Kelton JA, editors. Herbicides - Current research and case studies in use; 2013.https://doi.org/10.5772/56008
Yano IH, Alves JR, Santiago WE, Mederos BJT. Identification of weeds in sugarcane fields through images taken by UAV and Random Forest classifier. IFAC-Papers OnLine. 2016;49(16):415-20.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2016.10.076
Monks DW, Jennings KM, Meyers SL, Smith TP, Korres NE. Sweet potato: Important weeds and sustainable weed management. In: editors. Weed control, 1st Edition. CRC Press; 2018.https://doi.org/10.1201/9781315155913-31
El-Metwally IM, El-Wakeel MA. Comparison of safe weed control methods with chemical herbicide in potato field. Bull Natl Res Cent. 2019;43:16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42269-019-0053-6
Girolamo-Neto CD, Sanches ID, Neves AK, PrudenteVHR, Körting TS, Picoli MCA, Aragão LEO. Assessment of texture features for bermudagrass (Cynodon dactylon) detection in sugarcane plantations. Drones. 2019;3(2):36.https://doi.org/10.3390/drones3020036
Saha B, Devi C, Khwairakpam M, Kalamdhad AS. Vermicomposting and anaerobic digestion - viable alternative options for terrestrial weed management - A review. Biotechnol Rep (Amst). 2017;17:70-76.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.btre.2017.11.005
Gillaspie AG Jr, Ghabrial SA. First report of peanut stunt cucumovirus naturally infecting Desmodium sp. Plant Dis. 1998;82(12):1402. https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS.1998.82.12.1402A
Singh M, Kaul A, Pandey V, Bimbraw AS. Weed management in vegetable crops to reduce the yield losses. Int J Curr Microbiol Appl Sci. 2029;8(7):1241-58. https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2019.807.148
Chacko SR, Raj SK, Krishnasree RK. Integrated weed management in vegetables: A review. J Pharmacogn Phytochem. 2021;10(2):2694-700. https://doi.org/10.22271/phyto.2021.v10.i1al.13765
Spliid NH, Carter A, Helweg A. Non-agricultural use of pesticides-environmental issues and alternatives. Pest Manag Sci. 2004;60(6):523-612. https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.898
Gordon C, Nukpezah D, Tweneboah-Lawson E, Ofori BD, Yirenya-Tawiah D, Pabi O, et al. West Africa – Water resources vulnerability using a multidimensional approach: Case study of Volta Basin. In: Roger A Pielke, editors. Climate vulnerability. Academic Press; 2013. 283-309.https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-384703-4.00518-9
Vasic V, Konstantinovic B, Orlovic S. Weeds in forestry and possibilities of their control. In: editors. Weed control; 2012.https://doi.org/10.5772/34792
Singh V, Barman K, Singh R, Sharma A. Weed management in conservation agriculture systems. In: Farooq M, Siddique K, editors. Conservation agriculture. Springer, Cham; 2015.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11620-4_3

Downloads
Published
Versions
- 30-01-2025 (2)
- 28-01-2025 (1)
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 A A Kasonta, S S Thakur, Shaifali, B Shukuru

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright and Licence details of published articles
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Open Access Policy
Plant Science Today is an open access journal. There is no registration required to read any article. All published articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC Attribution 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).