Changes in carbon sequestration with age of trees in guava orchards at different locations in a tropical climate on Alfisols
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.4456Keywords:
carbon sequestration, guava, soil carbon stock, tree biomassAbstract
Understanding changes in carbon (C) fluxes resulting from land-use change patterns is essential for formulating effective climate change mitigation strategies. This study conducted at two different locations focuses on the dynamics of carbon sequestration in guava orchards as a function of tree age, a land-use type that is increasingly prevalent in agricultural regions. Through comprehensive sampling in different agro-climatic zones, the carbon content stored in tree biomass, litter, weeds and soil layers was assessed, the evaluation of which provided insights into carbon levels in different environmental contexts. Carbon sequestration was observed to increase with guava orchard age, with mean carbon stocks of 106.84 t C/ha in Dhenkanal and 114.35 t C/ha in Rayagada. In guava orchards aboveground carbon accounted for 21.22% and 22.38% of total carbon sequestered per hectare at the recommended spacing of 6 × 6 m in Dhenkanal and Rayagada, respectively. Our findings provide critical baseline data on carbon stocks in guava orchards as a function of tree age, contributing to the understanding of the carbon cycle in these cultivated ecosystems. This study highlights the importance of region-specific data, and suggests future research to include guava orchards in other regions with larger sample sizes to comprehensively assess carbon sequestration potential nationwide.
Downloads
References
Mitra SK, Gurung MR, Pathak PK. Guava production and improvement in India: an overview. International workshop on tropical and subtropical fruits. Acta Hortic. 2008;4:787. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2008.787.4
Production: horticulture crops: fruits: guava: Odisha. Department of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare; 2024. https://www.ceicdata.com/en/india/production-of-horticulture-cropsin-major-states-fruits-mango/production-horticulture-cropsfruits-mango-odisha
FAO. Support to national forest assessments. FAO Forestry Department website; 2005.
IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change). Good practice guidance or land use, land-use change and forestry. Institute for Global Environmental Strategies (IGES), Hayama; 2003. https://www.ipcc.ch/site/assets/uploads/2018/03/GPG_LULUCF_FULLEN.pdf
IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change). Guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories. Vol 4, Agriculture, Forestry and other land use (AFLOLU). Institute for Global Environmental strategies, Hayama, Japan; 2006. https://www.ipccnggip. iges.or. jp/public/ 2006gl/vol4.html
Ganeshamurthy AN, Rupa TR, Alivelu K, Rajendiran S, Laxman RH. A biomass estimation model for nondestructive estimation of guava tree biomass. Res Sq. 2022 Nov 28;1-15. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-2310563/v1
Birdsey RA. Carbon storage and accumulation in United States forest ecosystems. Gen Tech Rep WO-59 Washington, DC: US. Department of Agriculture Forest Service; 1992. p. 51. https://doi.org/10.2737/WO-GTR-59
Ganeshamurthy AN, Ravindra V, Venugopalan R, Malarvizhi M, Bhat RM. Biomass distribution and development of allometric equations for non-destructive estimation of carbon sequestration in grafted mango trees. J Agric Sci. 2016;8:201-11. https://doi.org/10.5539/jas.v8n8p201
Nelson DW, Sommers LE. Methods of soil analysis part 3, chemical methods. Soil Science Society of America Book. 1996;5:961-1010. https://doi.org/10. 2136/ sssa books er5.3.c34
Bernoux M, Eschenbrenner V, Cerri CC, Melillo JM, Feller C. LULUCF-based CDM: too much ado for a small carbon market. Clim Policy. 2002;2:379-85. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2002.888
Dash PK, Mishra A, Saren S. Characterization and taxonomic classification of soils under a toposequence located in eastern India. Environ Ecol. 2019;37:1240-49. https://www.cabidigitallibrary.org/doi/pdf/10.5555/20193520812
Chavan BL, Rasal GB. Potentiality of carbon sequestration in sixyear ages young plant from University campus of Aurangabad. Global J Res Eng. 2011;7:15-20. https://globaljournals.org/GJRE_Volume11/3-Potentiality-of-Carbon-Sequestration-in-SixYear-Ages-Young.pdf
Sureshbhai PJ, Thakur NS, Jha SK, Kumar V. Productivity and carbon sequestration under prevalent agroforestry systems in Navsari district, Gujarat, India. Int J Curr Microbiol App Sci. 2017;6(9):3405-22. https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2017.609.419
Sharma S, Rana VS, Prasad H, Johnson L, Umesh S. Appraisal of carbon capture, storage and utilization through fruit crops. Front Environ Sci. 2021;9:1-10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2021.700768
Usuga JCL, Toro JAR, Alzate MVR, Tapias AJL. Estimation of biomass and carbon stocks in plants, soil and forest floor in different tropical forests. For Ecol Manag. 2010;260(10):1906-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2010.08.040
Chandran P, Ray SK, Durge SL, Raja P, Nimkar AM, Bhattacharyya T, et al. Scope of horticultural land-use system in enhancing carbon sequestration in ferruginous soils of the semiarid tropics. Curr Sci. 2009;7:1039-46. https://doi.org/10.13140/2.1.4014.1764
Ganeshamurthy AN. Annual report. IIHR, Bengaluru, India; 2012. https://www.iihr.res.in/sites/default/files/iihr%20annual%20report%202013_0.pdf
Gupta MK. Soil organic carbon pools under different land use in Haridwar district of Uttarakhand. Indian For. 2011;137(1):1-8. https://doi.org/10.54207/bsmps1000-2008-45GJM2
Chhabra A, Palria S, Dadhwal AK. Soil organic carbon pools in indian forests. For Ecol Manag. 2003;173:187-99. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(02)00016-6
Ordonez JAB. Carbon content in vegetation, litter and soil under 10 different land-use and land-cover classes in the Central Highlands of Michoacan, Mexico. For Ecol Manag. 2008;255:2074-84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2007.12.024

Downloads
Published
Versions
- 21-01-2025 (3)
- 12-01-2025 (2)
- 07-01-2025 (1)
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 M Sipra, A C Gobinda, S C Subash, T R Rupa, K S Dibya, D Abhiram, A N Ganeshamurthy, B K Bijay

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright and Licence details of published articles
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Open Access Policy
Plant Science Today is an open access journal. There is no registration required to read any article. All published articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC Attribution 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).