Age-dependent variations in carbon sequestration in mango orchards on alfisols in tropical climates
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.4660Keywords:
carbon sequestration, litter biomass, mango, root biomass, soil carbon stock, tree biomassAbstract
Understanding carbon fluxes from land-use transitions is vital for climate change mitigation, as activities like deforestation and urban expansion alter carbon storage and emissions. These alterations impact the carbon cycle, affecting the balance between carbon dioxide (CO2) absorption and its emission into the atmosphere. A thorough understanding of land use and land-use change dynamics in a specific region is essential for this analysis. Notably, the growing cultivation of fruit crops on agricultural land greatly enhances carbon sequestration potential. This study found that carbon sequestration in mango orchards increased with age of the trees. On average, 115.57 t C/ha was sequestered in Dhenkanal and 130.48 t C/ha in Rayagada. In these orchards, above-ground carbon constituted 24.45% in Dhenkanal and 27.69% in Rayagada of the total carbon sequestered per hectare, using the recommended 8 m x 8 m tree spacing. Collecting fundamental data on the carbon content of various land-use and land-use change categories at the regional level is crucial for effective climate change mitigation. This study provides novel insights into carbon stocks in mango orchards relative to tree age, enhancing our understanding of the carbon cycle within mango cultivated systems. Subsequent research should encompass mango orchards from many regions around the country, employing higher sample sizes to more accurately measure carbon sequestration in farmed mango orchards countrywide.
Downloads
References
Gitay H, Brown S, Easterling WE, Jallow B, Antle J, Apps MJ, et al. ‘Chapter 5: Ecosystems and Their Services’ in IPCC Working Group II Contribution to the Third Assessment Report on Mitigation of Climate Impacts’, Adaptation and Vulnerability; 2001: 235–342. https://www.ipcc.ch/site/assets/uploads/2018/03/wg2TARchap5.pdf
Achard F, Eva HD, Stibig HJ, Mayaux P, Gallego J, Richards T, et al. Determination of deforestation rates of the world’s humid tropical forests. Science. 2002;297:999- 1002. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1070656
Houghton RA. Revised estimates of the annual net flux of carbon to the atmosphere from changes in land use and land management (1850-2000). Tellus B: Chem Phys Meteorol. 2003;55:378-90. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0889.2003.01450.x
Fearnside PM, Laurance WF. Tropical deforestation and greenhouse gas emissions. Ecol Appl. 2004;14(4):982-86.https://doi.org/10.1890/03-5225
Hudson JM, Gherini SA, Goldstein RA. Modeling the global carbon cycle: nitrogen fertilisation of the terrestrial biosphere and the ``missing'' CO2 sink. Global Biogeochem Cy. 1994;8:307-33.https://doi.org/10.1029/94GB01044
Houghton RA. Tropical deforestation as a source of greenhouse gas emissions. In: Tropical Deforestation and Climate Change. Eds. IPAM - Instituto de Pesquisa Ambiental da Amazônia; Washington DC - USA: Environ. lDef; 2005. https://www.osti.gov/etdeweb/biblio/20880378
Dadhwal VK, Kushwaha SPS, Singh S, Patel NR, Nayak RK, Patil P, et al. Recent results from eo studies on indian carbon cycle assessment. International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences,. 2011; Volume XXXVIII-8/W20. https://doi.org/10.5194/isprsarchives-XXXVIII-8-W20-3-2011
Ravindranath NH, Somasekhar BS, Gadgil M. Carbon flows in Indian forest. Clim Change. 1997;35(3):297-320.https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005303405404
Horticultural statistics at a glance. NHB and Horticulture Statistics Division Department of Agriculture, Cooperation and Farmers Welfare Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare Government of India. 2017. https://nhb.gov.in/statistics/Publication/Horticulture%20At%20a%20Glance%202017%20for%20net%20uplod%20(2).pdf
Production: Horticulture Crops: Fruits: Mango: Odisha. CEIC.: https://www.ceicdata.com/en/india/production-of-horticulture-crops-in-major-states-fruits-mango/production-horticulture-crops-fruits-mango-odisha
Ganeshamurthy AN, Ravindra V, Venugopalan R, Malarvizhi Mathiazhaganand, Bhat RM. Biomass distribution and development of allometric equations for non-destructive estimation of carbon sequestration in grafted mango trees. J Agric Sci. 2016;8:201-11.https://doi.org/10.5539/jas.v8n8p201
Nelson DW, Sommers LE. Total carbon, organic carbon, and organic matter. Methods of soil analysis: Part 3 Chemical methods. 1996;5: 961-1010. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssabookser5.3.c34.
Bernoux M, Carvalho MCS, Volkoff B, Cerri CC. Brazil's soil carbon stocks. Soil Sci Soc Am J. 2002;66:888-96. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2002.8880
Dash PK, Mishra A, Saren S .Characterization and taxonomic classification of soils under a toposequence located in Eastern India. Environment and Ecology. 2019;37:1240-49. https://www.cabidigitallibrary.org/doi/pdf/10.5555/20193520812
Ganeshamurthy AN, Reddy YTN. Fitness of mango for colonization in low fertility soils and dry lands: Examination of leaf life-span, leaf nutrient resorption and nutrient use efficiency in elite mango varieties. Agric Res. 2015;4(3):254-60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40003-015-0164-8
Selvaraj A, Sivasankari J, Dhivya P, Thirunavukkarasu A, Jayaraman, Perumal K. Carbon sequestration potential, physicochemical and microbiological properties of selected trees Mangifera indica L., Manilkara zapota L., Cocos nucifera L. and Tectona grandis L. Biosci disc. 2016;7(2):131-39.https://jbsd.in/Vol%207%20No%202/Ananthi131-139.pdf
Eneji IS, Ofoegbu Obinna, Emmanuel T. Sequestration and carbon storage potential of tropical forest reserve and tree species located within Benue state of Nigeria. J Geosci Environ Prot. 2014;2:157-66.https://doi.org/10.4236/gep.2014.22022
Chavan BL, Rasal GB. Potentiality of carbon sequestration in six year ages young plant from University campus of Aurangabad. Global J Res Eng. 2011;7:15-20. https://globaljournals.org/GJRE_Volume11/3-Potentiality-of-Carbon-Sequestration-in-Six-Year-Ages-Young.pdf
Sureshbhai PJ, Thakur NS, Jha SK, Kumar V. Productivity and carbon sequestration under prevalent agroforestry systems in Navsari district, Gujarat, India. Int J Curr Microbiol App Sci. 2017;6(9):3405-22. https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2017.609.419
Sharma S, Rana VS, Prasad H, Johnson Lakra, Umesh Sharma. Appraisal of carbon capture, storage and utilization through fruit crops. Front Environ Sci. 2021;9:1-10.https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2021.700768
Mitra SK, Gurung MR, Pathak PK. Guava production and improvement in India: An overview: International workshop on tropical and subtropical fruits. Acta Hortic. 2008;4:787.https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2008.787.4
Usuga JCL, Toro JAR, Alzate MVR, Tapias AJL. Estimation of biomass and carbon stocks in plants, soil and forest floor in different tropical forests. For. Ecol Manag. 2010;260(10):1906-13.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2010.08.040
Ganeshamurthy AN, Rupa TR, Alivelu K, Rajendiran S, Laxman RH. A Biomass Estimation Model for Nondestructive Estimation of Guava Tree Biomass. Research Square. 2022 Nov 28;1-15.https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-2310563/v1
Chandran P, Ray SK, Durge SL, Raja P, Nimkar AM, Bhattacharyya T, et al. Scope of horticultural land-use system in enhancing carbon sequestration in ferruginous soils of the semi-arid tropics. Curr Sci. 2009;7:1039-46.https://doi.org/10.13140/2.1.4014.1764
Ganeshamurthy AN. Annual report, IIHR, Bengaluru, India. 2012. https://www.iihr.res.in/sites/default/files/iihr%20annual%20report%202013_0.pdf
Gupta MK. Soil organic carbon pools under different land use in Haridwar district of Uttarakhand. Indian For. 2011;137(1):1-8.https://doi.org/10.54207/bsmps1000-2008-45GJM2
Chhabra A, Palria S, Dadhwal AK. Soil organic carbon pools in Indian forests. For Ecol Manag. 2003;173:187-99.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(02)00016-6
Downloads
Published
Versions
- 01-01-2025 (2)
- 18-12-2024 (1)
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 S Mohapatra, GC Acharya, SC Swain, TR Rupa, DS Kar, A Dash, AN Ganeshamurthy, S Mohapatra, D Gautam
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright and Licence details of published articles
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Open Access Policy
Plant Science Today is an open access journal. There is no registration required to read any article. All published articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC Attribution 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).