This is an outdated version published on 25-12-2024. Read the
most recent version.
Special issue on Int Conf Spices
Vol. 11 No. sp3 (2024): International Seminar on Spices KAU - 2024
Understanding the variation in morphology and rhizome yield of Indian ginger (Zingiber officinale Rosc.) through distinctness, uniformity and stability (DUS) descriptors: A natural marker to enhance crop productivity
Department of Spices and Plantation Crops, Horticultural College and Research Institute, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore-641 003, Tamil Nadu, India
Department of Spices and Plantation Crops, Horticultural College and Research Institute, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore-641 003, Tamil Nadu, India
Department of Spices and Plantation Crops, Horticultural College and Research Institute, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore-641 003, Tamil Nadu, India
Centre for Plant Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore-641 003, Tamil Nadu, India
Department of Plant Pathology, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore-641 003, Tamil Nadu, India
Department of Floriculture and Landscaping, Horticultural College and Research Institute, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore-641 003, Tamil Nadu, India
Abstract
Ginger (Zingiber officinale) is a widely consumed and economically significant plant known for its medicinal and culinary properties. Understanding the diversity within ginger germplasm is vital for its successful use in breeding programs and conservation efforts. Morphological characterization plays a key role in identifying distinct varieties, ensuring uniform traits, protecting breeders' rights and conserving genetic diversity, all of which support commercial production and drive innovation in breeding. The present investigation was carried out at the Hybrid Rice Evaluation Centre, Gudalur, Nilgiris, with 32 genotypes to study the variability for identifying the best performing ginger genotypes. Genotypes were examined for 2 qualitative and 8 quantitative traits using Distinctness, Uniformity and Stability (DUS) parameters. Out of the traits assessed, plant height, number of leaves on the main stem and dry recovery were monomorphic, with no variation within the population. However, 4 characters, normal growth habit, shoot diameter, leaf length and leaf width, exhibited 2 distinct variations within the genotypes, indicating dimorphism. Additionally, 3 traits such as the number of tillers per clump, rhizome thickness and rhizome shapes showed multiple variations among the studied genotypes, illustrating polymorphism within the population. Principal component analysis was conducted on 7 principal components with eigenvalues of more than one accounted for 98.28 % of the total variability. Among these traits, leaf length, rhizome thickness and number of tillers demonstrated the highest variation, while the remaining traits showed lower variability. Based on PCA and cluster analysis, the genotypes Nadia, Manipur Local, Aswathy, Nagaland Local, Bhaise, ACC 578, Himachal Local, Rio De Janeiro, IISR Vajra, Humnabad Local, Hassan Local, Thalavadi Local and Chikkamagalore Local 2 were identified as the most diverse genotypes.
References
- 1. Kress WJ, Prince LM, Williams KJ. The phylogeny and a new classification of the gingers (Zingiberaceae): evidence from molecular data. Am J Bot. 2002;89(10):1682–96. https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.89.10.1682
- 2. Bhatt N, Waly MI, Essa MM, Ali A. Ginger: A functional herb. Food Med. 2013;1:51–71.
- 3. Dhanik J, Arya N, Nand V. A review on Zingiber officinale. J Pharmacogn Phytochem. 2017;6(3):174 174–84.
- 4. Indiastat. Area, production and productivity of ginger in India: 19701970–197 [Internet]. 2023 [cited 2025 Jul 31]. Available from: https://www.indiastat.com/table/agriculture/area area-productionproduction-productivityproductivity-gingerginger-indiaindia-19701970-197/29193
- 5. Shivakumar N. Biotechnology and crop improvement of ginger (Zingiber officinale Rosc.). In: IntechOpen [Internet]. 2019. p. 1–13. Available from: https://www.intechopen.com/chapters/68441
- 6. Nair KP. The agronomy and economy of ginger. In: Turmeric (Curcuma longa L.) and Ginger (Zingiber officinale Rosc.): world's invaluable medicinal spices. Cham: Springer; 2019. p. 245–315. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29189-1_15.
- 7. Protection of Plant Varieties and Farmers’ Rights Authority (PPV and FRA), Government of India. Guidelines for the conduct of test for distinctiveness, uniformity and stability of ginger (Zingiber officinale Rosc.) [Internet]. New Delhi: PPV and FRA; 2007 [cited 2025 Jul 31]. Available from: https://plantauthority.gov.in/pdf/Ginger.pdf
- 8. Akshitha HJ, Umesha K, Prasath D. Morphological characteriza-tion of ginger (Zingiber officinale) using DUS descriptors. Indian J Agric Sci. 2019;89(10):1744–47. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v89i10.94643
- 9. Shakeel AJ, Zehra A, Kazuo NW. Morpho-agronomic characteri-zation and genetic variability assessment in mango-ginger (Curcuma amada; Zingiberaceae). Gomal Univ J Res. 2015;31:30–40.
- 10. Aswathy. Characterization and evaluation of somaclones in ginger (Zingiber officinale Rosc.) [MSc thesis]. Kerala: Kerala Agricultural University; 2013. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/1679
- 11. Nybe EV, Nair PCS, Mohankumar N. Assessment of yield and quality components in ginger. In: Nair MK, Premkumar T, Ravin-dran PN, Sarma YR, editors. Proc Nat Seminar on Ginger and Turmeric. Calicut: CPCRI; 1980. p. 24–9. https://www.cabidigitallibrary.org/doi/full/10.5555/19820309184
- 12. Jatoi SA, Watanabe KN. Diversity analysis and relationships among ginger landraces. Pak J Bot. 2013;45(4):1203–14.
- 13. Nandkangre H, Ouedraogo M, Sawadogo M, Bado S, Sawadogo N, Ouoba A, et al. Morphometric and agronomic characteriza-tion of 56 ginger landraces in Burkina Faso. J Appl Biosci. 2016;100:545–56. https://doi.org/10.4314/jab.v100i1.6
- 14. Ravi Y, Narayanpur VB, Hiremath JS, Ravi JP, Shantappa T. Eval-uation of ginger (Zingiber officinale Rosc.) genotypes for growth and yield attributes under Soppinabetta ecosystem of Karna-taka. Environ Ecol. 2017;35(1B):454–57.
- 15. Chukwudi UP, Agbo CU, Echezona BC, Eze EI, Kutu FR, Ma-vengahama S. Variability in morphological, yield and nutritional attributes of ginger (Zingiber officinale) germplasm in Nigeria. Res Crops. 2020;21(3):634–42. https://doi.org/10.31830/2348-7542.2020.099
- 16. Ravishanker R, Santosh Kumar SK, Baranwal DK, Chatterjee A, Solankey SS. Genetic diversity based on cluster and principal component analyses for yield and quality attributes in ginger (Zingiber officinale Roscoe). Bioscan. 2013;8(4):1383–86 http://scialert.net/fulltext/?doi=ijpbg.2013.159.168&org=10
- 17. Kumar A, Kapoor C, Rahman H, Karuppaiyan R, Rai S, Denzogpa R. Multivariate analysis of ginger (Zingiber officinale Rosc.) germplasm of North Eastern India. Indian J Genet. 2016;76(2):221–23. https://doi.org/10.5958/0975-6906.2016.00021.3
- 18. Basak D, Chakraborty S, Nath S. Genetic divergence and cluster-ing of some elite ginger genotypes in Terai region of West Ben-gal (Zingiber officinale Rosc.). Int Arch Appl Sci Technol. 2019;10(4):185–90. https://doi.org/10.15515/iaast.09764828.10.4.185190
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.