Increasing the shelf life of tomato fruits using physical, chemical and genetic modification methods
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.4631Keywords:
genetic modification, shelf life, Solanum lycopersicum, tomatoAbstract
The tomato is one of the most consumed vegetables and is rich in numerous beneficial and nutritious compounds. As climacteric fruits, tomatoes undergo significant metabolic changes during their growth and ripening. During fruit ripening, irreversible changes occur in the color, taste and appearance of the fruit. Shortly after ripening, the fruit begins to lose its shape and structural integrity. Approximately 50% of ripe tomatoes do not reach consumers. The primary cause of this loss is excessive fruit softening, which compromises the integrity of tomatoes during harvesting and transportation, making them susceptible to fungal and bacterial infections. Generally, fruit softening results from increased enzymatic activity that breaks down the fruit cell wall. Currently, chemical, physical and biotechnological methods are employed to extend tomato shelf life. These methods help reduce or inhibit the enzymatic activity responsible for fruit softening. The review provides a concise overview of these preservation methods. We focus on enhancing fruit preservation through plant genome modifications using modern biotechnological techniques, such as RNA interference (RNAi) and CRISPR/Cas9. Additionally, we will briefly discuss the advantages and limitations of these genetic engineering approaches.
Downloads
References
Causse M, Buret M, Robini K, Verschave P. Inheritance of nutritional and sensory quality traits in fresh market tomato and relation to consumer preferences. Food Sci. 2003;68:2342-350. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.2003.tb05770.x
Banjo TT, Oluwole OR, Nzei VI. Preservation of Lycopersicum esculentum (tomatoes) with extracts of Annona muricata (soursop) and Hibiscus sabdariffa (roselle plant). Trop Life Sci Res. 2022;33(1):1-22. https://doi.org/10.21315/tlsr2022.33.1.1
Ali A, Magbool M, Alderson PG, Zahid N. Effect of gum arabicas an edible coating on antioxidant capacity of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) fruit during storage. Postharvest Biol Techno. 2013;76:119–24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.postharvbio.2012.09.011
Barka EA, Kalantari S, Makhlouf J, Arul J. Impact of UV-irradiation on the cell wall-degrading enzymes during ripening of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum L.) fruit. J Agric Food Chem. 2000;48:667–71. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf9906174
Abou-Aziz AB, Nabaway SME, Adel-Wahab FK, Kader AS. The effect of storage temperature on quality and decay percentage of ‘Pairi’ and ‘Taimour’ mango fruit. Sci Hortic. 1976;5:65–72. http://dx.doi.org/10.9734/AJEA/2015/12174
Hobson GE. The short-term storage of tomato fruit. J Hortic Sci. 1981;56:363–68. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221589.1981.11515014
Auito WR, Bramlage WJ. Chilling sensitivity of tomato fruits in relation to ripening and senescence. J Am Soc Hortic Sci. 1986;111:201–05. http://dx.doi.org/10.21273/JASHS.111.2.201
Majidi H, Minaei S, Almassi M, Mostofi Y. Tomato quality in controlled atmosphere storage, modified atmosphere packaging and cold storage. J Food Sci Technol. 2014;51(9):2155-61. https://doi.org/10.1007%2Fs13197-012-0721-0
Akbudak B, Akbudak N, Seniz V, Eris A. Sequential treatments of hot water and modified atmosphere packaging in cherry tomatoes. J Food Qual. 2007;30:896–910. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-4557.2007.00168.x
Hong JH, Gross KC. Maintaining quality of fresh-cut tomato slices through modified atmosphere packaging and low temperature storage. J Food Sci. 2001;66:960–65. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.2001.tb08219.x
Sandhya S. Modified atmosphere packaging of fresh produce: Current status and future needs–Review. Food Sci Technol. 2010;43:381–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2009.05.018
Meitha K, Pramesti Y, Suhandono S. Reactive oxygen species and antioxidants in postharvest vegetables and fruits. Int J Food Sci. 2020;2020:8817778. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/8817778
Jin TZ, Fan X, Mukhopadhyay S. Antimicrobial coating with organic acids and essential oil for the enhancement of safety and shelf life of grape tomatoes. Int J Food Microbiol. 2022;378:109827. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2022.109827
Meli VS, Ghosh S, Prabha TN, Chakraborty N, Chakraborty S, Datta A. Enhancement of fruit shelf life by suppressing N-glycan processing enzymes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2010;107(6):2413-18. https://doi.org/10.1073%2Fpnas.0909329107
Yu QH, Wang B, Li N, Tang Y, Yang S, Yang T, et al. CRISPR/Cas9-induced targeted mutagenesis and gene replacement to generate long-shelf-life tomato lines. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):11874. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-12262-1
Eckert JW, Sommer NF. Control of diseases of fruits and vegetables by postharvest treatment. Annu Rev Phytopathol. 1967;5:391–432. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.py.05.090167.002135
Thole V, Vain P, Martin C. Effect of elevated temperature on tomato post-harvest properties. Plants (Basel). 2021;10(11):2359. https://doi.org/10.3390%2Fplants10112359
Rodrigues AAZ, Queiroz MELR, Neves AA, Oliveira AF, Prates LHF, Freitas JF, et al. Use of ozone and detergent for removal of pesticides and improving storage quality of tomato. Food Res Int. 2019;125:108626. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2019.108626
Zainuri, Jayaputra, Sauqi A, Sjah T, Desiana RY. Combination of ozone and packaging treatments maintained the quality and improved the shelf life of tomato fruit. International Symposium on Food and Agro-biodiversity (ISFA); 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/102/1/012027
Yadav A, Kumar N, Upadhyay A, Sethi S, Singh A. Edible coating as postharvest management strategy for shelf-life extension of fresh tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.): An overview. J Food Sci. 2022;87(6):2256-90. https://doi.org/10.1111/1750-3841.16145
Gao Y, Zhu N, Zhu X, Wu M, Jiang CZ, Grieson D, et al. Diversity and redundancy of the ripening regulatory networks revealed by the fruit encode and the new CRISPR/Cas9 CNR and NOR mutants. Hortic Res. 2019;6:39. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41438-019-0122-x
Huang W, Hu N, Xiao Z, Qiu Y, Yang Y, Yang J, et al. A molecular framework of ethylene-mediated fruit growth and ripening processes in tomato. Plant Cell. 2022;34:3280–300. https://doi.org/10.1093/plcell/koac146
Li X, Wang X, Zhang Y, Zhang A, You CX. Regulation of fleshy fruit ripening: From transcription factors to epigenetic modifications. Hortic Res. 2022;9:uhac013. https://doi.org/10.1093/hr/uhac013
Baranov D, Timerbaev V. Recent advances in studying the regulation of fruit ripening in tomato using genetic engineering approaches. Int J Mol Sci. 2024;25(2):760. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25020760
Li J, Peng C, Mao A, Zhong M, Hu Z. An overview of microbial enzymatic approaches for pectin degradation. Int J Biol Macromol. 2024;254:127804. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2023.127804
Jiang Y, Shi Z, Liu W, Qi M, Xu T, Wu Y, et al. Silencing SlPP2C expression delayed plant senescence and fruit ripening in tomato. Physiol Plant. 2023;175(3):e13925. https://doi.org/10.1111/ppl.13925
Gupta A, Pal RK, Rajam MV. Delayed ripening and improved fruit processing quality in tomato by RNAi-mediated silencing of three homologs of 1-aminopropane-1-carboxylate synthase gene. J Plant Physiol. 2013;170(11):987-95. https://doi.org/10.1111/ppl.13925
Zhang J, Hu Z, Yao Q, Guo X, Nguyen V, Li F, et al. A tomato MADS-box protein, SlCMB1, regulates ethylene biosynthesis and carotenoid accumulation during fruit ripening. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):3413. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-21672-8
Komor AC, Badran AH, Liu DR. CRISPR-based technologies for the manipulation of eukaryotic genomes. Cell. 2017;169:559. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2016.10.044
Hille F, Richter H, Wong SP, Bratovic M, Ressel S. The biology of CRISPR-Cas: Backward and forward. Cell. 2018;172:1239–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2017.11.032
Asmamaw M, Zawdie B. Mechanism and applications of CRISPR/Cas-9-mediated genome editing. Biologics. 2021;15:353-61. https://doi.org/10.2147/btt.s326422
Tiwari JK, Singh AK, Behera TK. CRISPR/Cas genome editing in tomato improvement: Advances and applications. Front Plant Sci. 2023;14:1121209. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2023.1121209
Nie H, Shi Y, Geng X, Xing G. CRISRP/Cas9-mediated targeted mutagenesis of tomato polygalacturonase gene (SlPG) delays fruit softening. Front Plant Sci. 2022;13:729128. https://doi.org/10.3389%2Ffpls.2022.729128
Liu M, Zhang Z, Xu Z, Wang L, Chen C, Ren Z. Overexpression of SlMYB75 enhances resistance to Botrytis cinerea and prolongs fruit storage life in tomato. Plant Cell Rep. 2021;40(1):43-58. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00299-020-02609-w
Xie Q, Hu Z, Zhu Z, Dong T, Zhao Z, Cue B, et al. Overexpression of a novel MADS-box gene SlFYFL delays senescence, fruit ripening and abscission in tomato. Sci Rep. 2014;4:4367. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep04367
Liu DD, Zhou LJ, Fang MJ, Dong QL, An XH, You CX, et al. Polycomb-group protein SlMSI1 represses the expression of fruit-ripening genes to prolong shelf life in tomato. Sci Rep. 2016;6:31806. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep31806
Osakabe K, Osakabe Y, Toki S. Site-directed mutagenesis in Arabidopsis using custom-designed zinc finger nucleases. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2010;107(26):12034-39. https://doi.org/10.1073%2Fpnas.1000234107
Petolino JF. Genome editing in plants via designed zinc finger nucleases. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Plant. 2015;51:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1007%2Fs11627-015-9663-3
Malzahn A, Lowder L, Qi Y. Plant genome editing with TALEN and CRISPR. Cell Biosci. 2017;7:21. https://doi.org/10.1186%2Fs13578-017-0148-4
Jinek M, East A, Cheng A, Lin S, Ma E, Doudna J. RNA-programmed genome editing in human cells. eLife. 2013;2:e00471. https://doi.org/10.7554%2FeLife.00471
Pan C, Ye L, Qin L. CRISPR/Cas9-mediated efficient and heritable targeted mutagenesis in tomato plants in the first and later generations. Sci Rep. 2016;6:24765. https://doi.org/10.1038%2Fsrep24765
Xie K, Zhang J, Yang Y. Genome-wide prediction of highly specific guide RNA spacers for CRISPR–Cas9-mediated genome editing in model plants and major crops. Mol Plant. 2014;7:923–26. https://doi.org/10.1093/mp/ssu009
Tang X, Lowder LG, Zhang T, Malzahn AA, Zheng X, Voytas DF, et al. A CRISPR–Cpf1 system for efficient genome editing and transcriptional repression in plants. Nat Plants. 2017;3:1–5. https://doi.org/10.1038/nplants.2017.103
Freudhofmaier M. Gene editing of commercially important genes of Jatropha curcas L. CRISPR/Cas9 mediated gene knock-out. Masters [Thesis]. University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences (BOKU); Vienna, Austria; 2018.
Crystal T, Morten, Trine AK. Global regulation of genetically modified crops amid the gene edited crop boom– A review. Front Plant Sci. 2021;12:630396. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2021.630396

Downloads
Published
Versions
- 07-03-2025 (2)
- 27-02-2025 (1)
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 A A Murodov, M S Ayubov, N S H Obidov, B O Mamajonov, A N Yusupov, Z H Bashirxonov, L K Kamalova, S O Kushakov, Z T Buriev, I Y Abdurakhmonov

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright and Licence details of published articles
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Open Access Policy
Plant Science Today is an open access journal. There is no registration required to read any article. All published articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC Attribution 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).