Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Plant Science Today (PST)

Special issue on Int Conf Spices

Vol. 11 No. sp3 (2024): International Seminar on Spices KAU - 2024

Primary trader preferences for participating in high-value markets in Black Pepper- A choice analysis

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.4851
Submitted
28 August 2024
Published
25-12-2024
Versions

Abstract

Facilitating the integration of primary traders into modern agricultural value chains, known as high-value markets (HVMs), presents a promising avenue for improving the sustainability of black pepper value chains in Kerala. Due to increased price volatility and risk exposure in trading conditions, primary traders are hesitant to prioritize quality aspects in their procurement decisions. A Best-Worst Scaling (BWS) experiment was employed with traders in the Agro-ecological units (AEUs) 12, 14, 15, 16, 17, 19, 20 and 21 of Kerala to comprehend their preferences regarding quality attributes that could promote sustained participation in HVMs. This study incorporates a unique aspect by examining the consistency of choices between the best and worst options, providing deeper insights into traders' decision-making processes and ensuring an accurate evaluation of preferences by minimizing biases. The choice experiment utilized fractional factorial and balanced incomplete block designs. The results indicate that traders predominantly favour a flexible, incentive-based pricing model and long-term formal relationships with buyers. Conversely, traders consistently rated premium payments and certification as the least favourable market attributes. Preference variations were influenced by traders' experience, income levels and location. The results reveal that primary traders possess the least understanding of factors that may facilitate their entry into HVMs. Our findings underscore the significance of educating traders on crucial market attributes that facilitate their participation in HVMs. Further research on their willingness to adapt to the requirements of HVMs to maximize the benefits to the system.

References

  1. 1. Nchanji EB, Bella Ngoh S, Toywa J, Cosmas L. Analysis of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) trade in Cameroon: A trader’s perspective of preferred varieties and market traits. J Agric Food Res. 2023;14:100839. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafr.2023.100839
  2. 2. Lohr L, Krissoff B. Consumer effects of harmonizing international standards for trade in organic foods. In: Buzby JC, editor. Global food trade and consumer demand for quality. Boston (MA): Springer US; 2002. p.209–28. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-1-4757-5329-5_12
  3. 3. Uebersax MA, Siddiq M, Cramer J, Bales S. Harvesting, postharvest handling, distribution and marketing of dry beans. In: Siddiq M, Uebersax MA, editors. Dry beans and pulses. 2nd ed. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2022. p.81–104. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/9781119776802.ch4
  4. 4. Atilola B, Amanor-Boadu V. Product attributes and consumer preference: the case of common beans in Zambia [doctoral dissertation]. Manhattan (KS): Kansas State University; 2018. http://hdl.handle.net/2097/39205
  5. 5. National Horticulture Board [Internet]. [cited 2024 Aug 17]. Available from: https://www.nhb.gov.in/
  6. 6. Government of Kerala. Official web portal – Government of Kerala [Internet]. [cited 2024 Aug 17]. Available from: https://kerala.gov.in/
  7. 7. Spices Board. Spices Board [Internet]. [cited 2024 Aug 17]. Available from: . https://www.indianspices.com/
  8. 8. Otsuka K, Ali M. Strategy for the development of agro-based clusters. World Dev Perspect. 2020;20:100257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wdp.2020.100257
  9. 9. Hellin J, Dixon J, Higman S, Keleman A. High-value agricultural products and poverty reduction: smallholder farmer access to maize markets. J Crop Improv. 2011;25(4):371–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/15427528.2011.574224
  10. 10. Marcel van der Voort MP, Spruijt J, Potters JI, Elissen HJ. Socio-economic assessment of algae-based PUFA production: the value chain from microalgae to PUFA ('PUFACHAIN'). PUFAChain. 2017. www.pufachain.eu
  11. 11. Baenas N, Belovic M, Ilic N, Moreno DA, Garcia-Viguera C. Industrial use of pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) derived products: technological benefits and biological advantages. Food Chem. 2019;274:872–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2018.09.047
  12. 12. Sabu SS, Kuruvila A, Manojkumar K. Status of production and export of Indian black pepper. Indian J Arecanut Spices Med Plants. 2020;22(4):9–20. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/354776862
  13. 13. Ola O, Menapace L. A meta-analysis understanding smallholder entry into high-value markets. World Dev. 2020;135:105079. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105079
  14. 14. Lambrecht IB, Ragasa C. Do development projects crowd-out private sector activities? Evidence from contract farming participation in Northern Ghana. Food Policy. 2018;74:9–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2017.11.001
  15. 15. Romero Granja C, Wollni M. Dynamics of smallholder participation in horticultural export chains: evidence from Ecuador. Agric Econ. 2018;49(2):225–35. https://doi.org/10.1111/agec.12411
  16. 16. Ola O, Menapace L. Smallholders’ perceptions and preferences for market attributes promoting sustained participation in modern agricultural value chains. Food Policy. 2020;97:101850. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2020.101962
  17. 17. Watson EE. Making a living in the postsocialist periphery: struggles between farmers and traders in Konso, Ethiopia. Africa [Internet]. [cited 2025 Sep 1]. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3366/afr.2006.0006
  18. 18. Sonobe T, Akoten JE, Otsuka K. The growth process of informal enterprises in Sub-Saharan Africa: A case study of a metalworking cluster in Nairobi. Small Bus Econ. 201136(3):323–35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-009-9222-6
  19. 19. Savio M, Fernandez F, Benjamin E. Marketing of spices in Kerala: a comprehensive guide. Int J Multidiscip Res Anal. 2023;6:1965 1965–68. https://doi.org/10.47191/ijmra/v6 v6-i5i5-17
  20. 20. Riordan MH, Williamson OE. Asset specificity and economic organization. Int J Ind Organ. 1985;3(4):365–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-7187(85)90030-X
  21. 21. Gibbons R. Transaction-cost economics: Past, present and future? Scand J Econ. 2010;112(2):263–88. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9442.2010.01609.x
  22. 22. Abebe GK, Bijman J, Kemp R, Omta O, Tsegaye A. Contract farming configuration: Smallholders’ preferences for contract design attributes. Food Policy. 2013;40:14–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2013.01.002
  23. 23. Ochieng DO, Veettil PC, Qaim M. Farmers’ preferences for supermarket contracts in Kenya. Food Policy. 2017;68:100–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2017.01.008
  24. 24. Fischer S, Wollni M. The role of farmers’ trust, risk and time preferences for contract choices: experimental evidence from the Ghanaian pineapple sector. Food Policy. 2018;81:67–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2018.10.005
  25. 25. Granovetter M. The impact of social structure on economic outcomes. In: The Sociology of Economic Life. 3rd ed. Routledge; 2018. p. 46–61.
  26. 26. Fafchamps M. Market institutions in sub-Saharan Africa: Theory and evidence [e-book]. Cambridge (UK): MIT Press; 2003. p. 482–3. https://books.google.com/books/about/Market_Institutions_in_Sub_Saharan_Afric.html?id=kgAYH5uXQfsC
  27. 27. Levin J. Relational incentive contracts. Am Econ Rev. 2003;93(3):835–57.
  28. 28. Barrett CB, Bachke ME, Bellemare MF, Michelson HC, Narayanan S, Walker TF. Smallholder participation in contract farming: comparative evidence from five countries. World Dev. 2012;40(4):715–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2011.09.006
  29. 29. Mishra PK, Dey K. Governance of agricultural value chains: coordination, control and safeguarding. J Rural Stud. 2018;64:135–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2018.09.020
  30. 30. Scott C, Lundgren H, Thompson P. Guide to supply chain management. Berlin: Springer; 2018. http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-319-77185-4
  31. 31. Le Pape N, Wang Y. Can product differentiation mitigate conflicts of interest between principal stakeholders? A cournot-bertrand comparison. Econ Model. 2020;91:341–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2020.06.016
  32. 32. Naruetharadhol P, Ketkaew C, Srisathan WA. Innovative price-setting approaches to high-value products: A pricing method for agribusiness farmers. Heliyon. 2022;8(9). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e10726
  33. 33. Krumbiegel K, Maertens M, Wollni M. The role of fairtrade certification for wages and job satisfaction of plantation workers. World Dev. 2018;102:195–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2017.09.020
  34. 34. Fairtrade launches 2023 annual report [Internet]. [cited 2024 Aug 17]. Available from: https://www.fairtrade.net/news/fairtrade-launches-2023-annual-report
  35. 35. Ngenoh E, Kurgat BK, Bett HK, Kebede SW, Bokelmann W. Determinants of the competitiveness of smallholder African indigenous vegetable farmers in high-value agro-food chains in Kenya: A multivariate probit regression analysis. Agric Food Econ. 2019;7(1):1–17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40100-019-0122-z
  36. 36. Meemken EM, Barrett CB, Michelson HC, Qaim M, Reardon T, Sellare J. . Sustainability standards in global agrifood supply chains. Nat Food. 2021;2(10):758–65. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43016-021-00360-3
  37. 37. Midmore P, Naspetti S, Sherwood AM, Vairo D, Wier M, Zanoli, R, et al. Consumer attitudes to quality and safety of organic and low input foods: a review. Report of EU-funded project Improving Quality and Safety and Reduction of Cost in the European Organic and ‘Low Input’ Food Supply Chains. Univ Wales, Aberystwyth, UK; 2005. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/265191937
  38. 38. Akshitha HJ, Shivakumar MS, Sivaranjani R, Ankegowda SJ, Faisal PM, Asangi H, et al. Effect of different methods of drying on appearance and quality of black pepper. Natl Acad Sci Lett. 2023;46(6):555–57. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40009-023-01311-1
  39. 39. Giardi MT, Rea G, Berra B, editors. Bio-farms for nutraceuticals. 2010;698. http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-1-4419-7347-4
  40. 40. Simon HA. Models of bounded rationality: Empirically grounded economic reason. Cambridge (UK): MIT Press; 1997. p. 1–456. https://books.google.com/books/about/Models_of_Bounded_Rationality_Empiricall.html?id=9CiwU28z6WQC
  41. 41. Fiori S. Forms of bounded rationality: The reception and redefinition of Herbert A. Simon’s perspective. Rev Polit Econ. 2011;23(4):587–612. https://doi.org/10.1080/09538259.2011.611624
  42. 42. Burns T, Roszkowska E. Rational choice theory: toward a psychological, social and material contextualization of human choice behaviour. Theor Econ Lett. 2016;06(02):195–207. https://doi.org/10.4236/tel.2016.62022
  43. 43. Louviere JJ, Flynn TN, Marley AA. Best-worst scaling: theory, methods and applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2015. 342p. https://books.google.com/books/about/Best_Worst_Scaling.html?id=W9uCCgAAQBAJ
  44. 44. Zander KK, Drucker AG, Aluso L, Mengistu DK, Fadda C, Termote C, et al. Using best-worst scaling to inform agroecological interventions in Western Kenya. Environ Dev Sustain. 2024;1–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-024-05173-5
  45. 45. Marley AAJ, Louviere JJ. Some probabilistic models of best, worst and best-worst choices. J Math Psychol. 2005;49(6):464–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmp.2005.05.003
  46. 46. Tamas A, Popescu R. The advantages of using Best-Worst Model for hybrid products. Int J Bus Manag. 2018;6(2):108–21.
  47. 47. Flynn TN, Louviere JJ, Peters TJ, Coast J. Best–worst scaling: what it can do for health care research and how to do it. J Health Econ. 2007;26(1):171–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhealeco.2006.04.002
  48. 48. Gromping U. R package DoE. base for factorial experiments. J Stat Softw. 2018;85:1–41. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v085.i05
  49. 49. Team RC. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2020. https://www.scirp.org/reference/referencespapers?referenceid=3131254
  50. 50. Finn A, Louviere JJ. Determining the appropriate response to evidence of public concern: the case of food safety. J Public Policy Mark. 1992 Sep;11(2):12-25. 1992;11(2):12–25. https://doi.org/101177/074391569201100202
  51. 51. Lee JA, Soutar GN, Louviere J. Measuring values using best-worst scaling: The LOV example. Psychol Mark. 2007;24(12):1043–58. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.20197
  52. 52. Loose SM, Lockshin L. Testing the robustness of best worst scaling for cross-national segmentation with different numbers of choice sets. Food Qual Prefer. 2013;27(2):230–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2012.02.002
  53. 3. Marley AAJ, Pihlens D. Models of best–worst choice and ranking among multiattribute options (profiles). J Math Psychol. 2012;56(1):24–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmp.2011.09.001
  54. 54. Trejo-Pech CO, Servin-Juarez R, Reyes-Duarte A. What sets cooperative farmers apart from non-cooperative farmers? A transaction cost economics analysis of coffee farmers in Mexico. Agric Food Econ. 2023;11(1):14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40100 -023-00256-9
  55. 55. Vieira LV, Juvenato ME, Krause M, Heringer OA, Ribeiro JS, Brandão GP, et al. The effects of drying methods and harvest season on piperine, essential oil composition and multi-e lemental composition of black pepper.Food Chem.2022;390:133148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2022.133148

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.