Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Plant Science Today (PST)

Research Articles

Vol. 11 No. 4 (2024)

Tilling by sequencing (TbS) and association analysis in EMS induced M2 population of groundnut TMV (Gn) 13 for higher oleic acid content

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.4973
Submitted
6 September 2024
Published
10-05-2025 — Updated on 24-05-2025
Versions

Abstract

The present investigation was carried out in ground nut TMV (Gn) 13 to increase its oleic acid content. Its seeds were treated with EMS (ethyl methane sulfonate) at different concentration of 10 mM, 20 mM, 30 mM, 40 mM and 50 mM. Probit analysis conducted in the M1 generation revealed an LD50 value of 39 mM. Consequently, the lower (30 mM) and upper (50 mM) limits of the LD50 were forwarded to the M2 generation. Allele-specific primers were used for screening and analysis through TILLING (Target Induced Local Lesions in Genomes), utilizing Sanger sequencing. The analysis revealed mutations in the ahFAD2A and ahFAD2B genes, which are responsible for the conversion of oleic acid to linoleic acid, resulting in improved oleic acid levels in 7 putative mutants. Additional analyses, such as correlation and path analysis, were conducted using 16 yield-contributing traits. The number of pods, pod width, number of primary branches and number of secondary branches showed a positive correlation with pod yield per plant. It was observed that oleic acid had a negative correlation with linoleic acid content. Choosing traits that have a stronger correlation with pod yield per plant would speed up the improvement program for groundnuts. Therefore, potential mutants in M2 with improved pod yield traits, characterized by high oleic and low linolenic levels, would be selected for advancement to the M3 generation.

References

  1. 1. Jung S, Powell G, Moore K, Abbott A. The high oleate trait in the cultivated peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.). II. Molecular basis and genetics of the trait. Mol Gen Genet. 2000;263:806-11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004380000243
  2. 2. Ray TK, Holly SP, Knauft DA, Abbott AG, Powell GL. The primary defect in developing seed from the high oleate variety of peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) is the absence of ?12-desaturase activity. Plant Sci. 1993;91(1):15-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-9452(93)90184-2
  3. 3. Wang ML, Khera P, Pandey MK, Wang H, Qiao L, Feng S, et al. Genetic mapping of QTLs controlling fatty acids provided insights into the genetic control of fatty acid synthesis pathway in peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.). PlosOne. 2015;10(4):e0119454. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0119454
  4. 4. Lopez Y, Nadaf HL, Smith OD, Simpson CE, Fritz AK. Expressed variants of ? 12-fatty acid desaturase for the high oleate trait in Spanish market-type peanut lines. Mol Breed. 2002;9:183-92. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1019767825486
  5. 5. Kurowska M, Daszkowska-Golec A, Gruszka D, Marzec M, Szurman M, Szarejko I, et al. TILLING-a shortcut in functional genomics. J Appl Genet. 2011;52:371-90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13353-011-0061-1
  6. 6. Till BJ, Reynolds SH, Weil C, Springer N, Burtner C, Young K, et al. Discovery of induced point mutations in maize genes by TILLING. Plant Biol. 2004;4:1-8. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2229-4-12
  7. 7. McCallum CM, Comai L, Greene EA, Henikoff S. Targeting Induced Local Lesions in Genomes (TILLING) for plant functional genomics. Plant Physiol. 2000;123(2):439-42. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.123.2.439
  8. 8. Chawade A, Sikora P, Brautigam M, Larsson M, Vivekanand V, Nakash MA, et al. Development and characterization of an oat TILLING-population and identification of mutations in lignin and ?-glucan biosynthesis genes. Plant Biol. 2010;10:1-3. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2229-10-86
  9. 9. Norden A, Gorbet D, Knauft D, Young C. Variability in oil quality among peanut genotypes in the Florida breeding program. Peanut Sci. 1987;14(1):7-11. https://doi.org/10.3146/i0095- 3679-14-1-3
  10. 10. Manjunath NG, Saravanan S, Sushmitha R, Pillai MA, Sheela J, Shoba D. Mutagenic efficiency and effectiveness of gamma rays and EMS in groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Electronic J Plant Breed. 2020;11(3):875-80. https://doi.org/10.37992/2020.1103.143
  11. 11. Jerish JR, Saravanan S, Geetha K, Pillai MA. Genetic Variability Analysis of Gamma Irradiated M2 Populations for Higher Oleic Acid Content in TMV (Gn) 13 (Arachis hypogaea L.). Legume Res Int J. 2025;48(3):393-99. https://doi.org 10.18805/LR-5296
  12. 12. Saghai-Maroof MA, Soliman KM, Jorgensen RA, Allard RW. Ribosomal DNA spacer-length polymorphisms in barley: Mendelian inheritance, chromosomal location and population dynamics. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 1984;81(24):8014-18. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.81.24.8014
  13. 13. Chu Y, Ramos L, Holbrook CC, Ozias-Akins P. Frequency of a loss-of-function mutation in oleoyl-PC desaturase (ahFAD2A) in the mini-core of the US peanut germplasm collection. Crop Sci. 2007;47(6):2372-78. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2007.02.0117
  14. 14. Karaman K, Kizil S, Basak M, Uzun B, Yol E. Development of EMS-induced mutagenized groundnut population and discovery of point mutations in the ahFAD2 and Ara h 1 Genes by TILLING. J Oleo Sci. 2021;70(11):1631-40. https://doi.org/10.5650/jos.ess21075
  15. 15. Guo Y, Abernathy B, Zeng Y, Ozias-Akins P. TILLING by sequencing to identify induced mutations in stress resistance genes of peanut (Arachis hypogaea). Genom. 2015;16:1-3. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-015-1348-0
  16. 16. Hall T, Biosciences I, Carlsbad CJ. BioEdit: an important software for molecular biology. Bull Biosci. 2011;2(1):60-61. http://www.mbio.ncsu.edu/BioEdit/bioedit.html
  17. 17. Deshmukh V, Motwani R, Kumar A, Kumari C, Raza K. Histopathological observations in COVID-19: a systematic review. J Clin Pathol. 2021;74(2):76-83. https://doi.org/10.1136/jclinpath-2020-206995
  18. 18. Swamiappan VA, Rabindra R, Rabindran R. Acute and selective toxicity of diafenthiuron and profenofos against Sciothrips cardamomi Ramk. and Conogethes punctiferalis Guenee of small cardamom. A Biannual Newsletter of the Center for Integrated Plant Systems (CIPS) in Cooperation with the Insecticide Resistance Action Committee (IRAC) and the Western Regional Coordinating Committee (WRCC-60). 2008;18(1):32.
  19. 19. Miller P, Williams J, Robinson H, Comstock R. Estimates of genotypic and environmental variances and covariances in upland cotton and their implications in selection 1. Agron J. 1958;50(3):126-31. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1958.00021962005000030004x
  20. 20. Johnson H, Robinson H, Comostock R. Estimates of genetics and environmental variability in soybeans. Agron J. 1955;47(7):314-18. https://doi.org/10.2134/ agronj1955.00021962004700070009x
  21. 21. Gopinath PP, Prasad R, Joseph B, Adarsh VS. GRAPES: General R shiny based analysis platform empowered by statistics [Internet]; 2020 Available from: https://www.kaugrapes.com/home
  22. 22. Dewey DR, Lu KH. A correlation and path-coefficient analysis of components of crested wheatgrass seed production 1. Agron J. 1959;51(9):515-18. https://dx.doi.org/10.2134/ agronj1959.00021962005100090002x
  23. 23. Sabetta W, Alba V, Blanco A, Montemurro C. sunTILL: a TILLING resource for gene function analysis in sunflower. Plant Methods. 2011;7:1-3. https://doi.org/10.1186/1746-4811-7-20
  24. 24. Hoshino T, Watanabe S, Takagi Y, Anai T. A novel GmFAD3-2a mutant allele developed through TILLING reduces ?-linolenic acid content in soybean seed oil. Breed Sci. 2014;64(4):371-77. https://doi.org/10.1270/jsbbs.64.371
  25. 25. Bovina R, Brunazzi A, Gasparini G, Sestili F, Palombieri S, Botticella E, et al. Development of a TILLING resource in durum wheat for reverse-and forward-genetic analyses. Crop Pasture Sci. 2014;65(1):112-24. https://doi.org/10.1071/CP13226
  26. 26. Ardiarini NR, Puspitasari Y. Correlation and path analysis of 10 promising lines of Bambara groundnut (Vigna subterranea (L.) Verdc.): Correlation and path analysis of 10 promising lines of Bambara groundnut. J Underutilized Crops. 2024;1(1):41-52.
  27. 27. Namo OA, Damfami A. Character associations and path analysis in Bambara groundnut grown in mid-altitude highland of Jos-Plateau, Nigeria. Afr J Food Agri Nutri Develop. 2024;24(1):25190-220. https://doi.org/10.18697/ajfand.126.21275
  28. 28. Vargheese RL, Saravanan S, Hepziba SJ, Kumari SM, Pushpam AK, Pillai MA. Genetic variability, correlation and path analysis in the BC2F2 population of groundnut. Plant Sci Today. 2024;11(2). https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.3282
  29. 29. Gali S, Reddy D, Prasanna RA, John K, Sudhakar P, Rao VS. Correlation and path coefficient analyses in large, seeded peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) for kernel yield. Electron J Plant Breed. 2023;14(1):272-78.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.