Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Plant Science Today (PST)

Research Articles

Early Access

Impact of seed hardness on quality in variety VBN- 8 of black gram (Vigna mungo L. Hepper) during maturation

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.5104
Submitted
17 September 2024
Published
27-11-2024

Abstract

The present study was performed to record the formation of hard seeds during the development and maturation of Blackgram variety VBN-8 under field conditions, which were then assessed and evaluated under laboratory conditions. It also focused on analyzing the biochemical properties, seed quality parameters and structural characteristics using Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM). The findings could help develop strategies to improve germination rates and overcome seed dormancy. The present study on complex seed formation in black gram variety VBN-8 during the development and maturation stage was carried out using seed samples collected from standing crops 3 to 38 Days after Anthesis. The formation of hard seeds was assessed and evaluated from the seed sample taken from the different stages of development and maturation (3 to 38 DAA) of the black gram variety VBN-8. The physical and physiological parameters were studied as per the ISTA rules. The biochemical properties were estimated using the fractionation method and histological studies were conducted using SEM analysis. The present investigation revealed that a higher percentage of complex seed formation was observed at 33 DAA when the seed attained physiological maturity. The biochemical analyses showed that hard seeds have much higher quantities of pectin (4.68%), cellulose (4.27%), hemicellulose (2.55%), lignin (2.30%) and phenolic contents (5.78%) as compared to non-hard seeds of lower quantities of pectin (2.01%), cellulose (1.27%), hemicellulose (1.87%), lignin (0.54%) and phenolic contents (3.68%). The SEM analysis revealed that hard seeds have a thick cuticle (60.96 µm), a waxy layer, a compartmentalized pattern, amorphous deposits and a rough texture, all hindering water uptake.
In contrast, non-hard seeds exhibit a smoother surface with fewer deposits and thinner cuticles (33.81 µm), enhancing their permeability. Additionally, in hard seeds, water entry points like the micropyle and hilum are often obscured or blocked, making water absorption difficult. Conversely, non-hard seeds feature a more visible hilum and an open micropyle, readily allowing water to enter. Understanding these changes in seed coat qualities can help agricultural experts regulate dormancy, provide suitable germination conditions and plan for sowing seed storage and crop management techniques.

References

  1. Debbarma P, Kant R, Mishra SB, Bharti LJ, et al. Combining ability and heterosis studies in blackgram [Vigna mungo (L.) hepper]. Legume Research-An International Journal. 2022;45(6):676-82. https://doi.org/10.18805/LR-4709
  2. Nair RM, Chaudhari S, Devi N, Shivanna A, et al. Genetics, genomics and breeding of black gram [Vigna mungo (L.) Hepper]. Frontiers in Plant Science. 2024;14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2023.1273363
  3. Rambabu E, Anuradha C, Salman MAS, Sridhar V, et al. Inheritance of resistance to yellow mosaic virus in black gram (Vigna mungo (L.) Hepper). 2022; 136-39.
  4. Jadhav V, Swamy NM, Gracy CP. Supply-demand gap analysis and projection for major pulses in India. Economic Affairs. 2018;63(1):277-85.
  5. Dixit GP, Srivastava AK, Ali H. Scenario of pulses production in India. Indian Farming. 2024;74(2):03-06.
  6. Rampal P. Situational analysis of pulse production and consumption in India. Leveraging Agriculture for Nutrition in South Asia. 2017;20:46.
  7. Government of India, Department of Pulses Development (DOPD). Annual Progress Report 2022-23. Retrieved from Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh (2023).
  8. Adhithya G, Siddaraju R. Evaluation of hard seedness and methods to overcome it in green gram. Mysore Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 2022;56:39-48.
  9. Wen Z, Lu X, Wen J, Wang Z, Chai M. Physical seed dormancy in legumes: Molecular advances and perspectives. Plants. 2024;13. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13111473
  10. Peng DL, Geng BY, Qin YB, Yang LE, et al. Ecophysiology of seed dormancy and germination in the alpine-subalpine medicinal plant species Sinopodophyllum hexandrum (Royle) TS Ying. Journal of Applied Research on Medicinal and Aromatic Plants. 2023;32:10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmap.2022.100448
  11. Sun L, Yuan Z. Seed morphology of soybean. In: Advances in Botanical Research. 2022;102:349-75. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.abr.2022.03.004
  12. Gangaraju N, Balakrishna P. Screening of black gram genotypes for hardseededness and breaking of hardseededness by using various seed treatment methods in black gram (Vigna mungo L. Hepper). Mysore J Agric Sci. 2016;50:434-37.
  13. Acosta Y, Pérez L, Escalante D, Pérez A, et al. Heteromorphic seed germination and seedling emergence in the legume Teramnus labialis (Lf) Spreng (Fabacaeae). Botany. 2020;98(7):371-79..
  14. Long RL, Gorecki MJ, Renton M, Scott JK, et al. The ecophysiology of seed persistence: A mechanistic view of the journey to germination or demise. Biological Reviews. 2015;90:31-59. https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.12095
  15. Klupczy?ska EA, Paw?owski TA. Regulation of seed dormancy and germination mechanisms in a changing environment. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2021;22. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22031357
  16. Ramsay G. Inheritance and linkage of a gene for testa-imposed seed dormancy in faba bean (Vicia faba L.). Plant Breeding. 1997;116:287-89. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0523.1997.tb00998.x
  17. Tyler JM. Effect of impermeable seed coat on germination of seed from early maturing soybean. Seed Technology. 1997;45-50. https://www.jstor.org/stable/23433249
  18. Feurtado JA, Kermode AR. A merging of paths: abscisic acid and hormonal cross-talk in the control of seed dormancy maintenance and alleviation. In: Annual Plant Reviews: Seed Development, Dormancy and Germination. 2007;27:176-223. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470988848
  19. Crop Production Guide. Tamil Nadu Agricultural University. 2020.
  20. Van Beers WFJ. The auger-hole method. Wageningen, Netherlands. 1958.
  21. Thien SJ. A Flow Diagram for Teaching Texture-by-Feel Analysis. Journal of Agronomic Education,1979: 8(1), 54-55. https://doi.org/10.2134/jae.1979.0054
  22. Piper C S. (1942). Soil and Plant Analysis. Interscience Publishers, New York.
  23. Thomas G W. (1996). Soil pH and Soil Acidity. In methods of soil analysis. Part 3: Chemical methods (475-90). Soil Science Society of America, Inc. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssabookser5.3.c16
  24. Rhoades JD. (1996). Salinity: Electrical conductivity and total dissolved solids. In methods of soil analysis. Part 3: Chemical methods (417-35). Soil Science Society of America, Inc. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssabookser5.3.c14
  25. Subbiah BV, Asija GL.. A rapid procedure for the estimation of available nitrogen in soils. Current Science, 1956:25, 259-60.
  26. Olsen SR, Cole CV, Watanabe FS, Dean LA. (1954). Estimation of available phosphorus in soils by extraction with Sodium Bicarbonate. USDA Circular No. 939.
  27. Hanway JJ, Heidel H. (1952). Soil analysis methods as used in Iowa State College soil testing laboratory. Iowa Agriculture, 1952:57, 1-31.
  28. Walkley A, Black IA.. An examination of the degtjareff method for determining soil organic matter and a proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method. Soil Science,1934: 37(1), 29-38. https://doi.org/10.1097/00010694-193401000-00003
  29. Lindsay WL., Norvell WA.. Development of a DTPA soil test for Zinc, Iron, Manganese and Copper. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 1978: 42(3), 421-28. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1978.03615995004200030009x
  30. International Seed Testing Association (ISTA). International rules for seed testing. Bassersdorf, Switzerland. 2020;19-8.
  31. Mullin WJ, Xu W. Study of soybean seed coat components and their relationship to water absorption. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 2001;49:5331-335. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf010303s
  32. Carrier M, Loppinet-Serani A, Denux D, Lasnier JM, et al. Thermogravimetric analysis as a new method to determine the lignocellulosic composition of biomass. Biomass and Bioenergy. 2011;35(1):298-307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2010.08.067
  33. Hillis WE, Swain T. The phenolic constituents of Prunus domestica. II. The analysis of tissues of the Victoria plum tree. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture. 1959;10(2):135-44. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.2740100211
  34. Paul D, Chakrabarty SK, Dikshit HK, Jha SK, et al. Heritability of hardseededness in mung bean [Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek] under varying environments. Indian Journal of Genetics and Plant Breeding. 2019;79(1):197-203. https://www.isgpb.org/journal/index.php/IJGPB/article/view/3157
  35. Panse VG, Sukhatme PV. Statistical methods for agricultural workers. 1954.
  36. El-Tabey Shehata AM. Hard-to-cook phenomenon in legumes. Food Reviews International. 1992;8:191-21. https://doi.org/10.1080/87559129209540938
  37. Sripathy KV, Groot SPC. Seed development and maturation. In: seed science and technology: Biology, Production, quality. Springer Nature. 2023; 17-38. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-5888-5_2
  38. Bewley JD, Black M. Seeds: Physiology of development and germination. Springer science & business media. 2013. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-4693-4
  39. Woodstock LW, Combs MF. A comparison of some possible indices of seedling vigour in corn. In: Proceedings of the Association of official seed analysts. Association of official seed analysts. 1964;54:50-60. https://www.jstor.org/stable/23432035
  40. Martín, Isaura, Laura Gálvez, Luis Guasch, Daniel Palmero. "Fungal pathogens and seed storage in the dry state. Plants 11; 22 (2022): 3167. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11223167
  41. Zhao, Ming, Hongxiang Zhang, Hong Yan, et al. Baskin. "Mobilization and role of starch, protein and fat reserves during seed germination of six wild grassland species. Frontiers in plant science 9 (2018): 234. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2018.00234
  42. Finch-Savage, William E, George W. Bassel. Seed vigour and crop establishment: extending performance beyond adaptation. Journal of Experimental Botany 67, no. 3 (2016): 567-91. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erv490
  43. Shaw RH, Loomis WE. Basis for the prediction of corn yield. Plant Physiology. 1950;25:225-47. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.25.2.225
  44. Heydecker W. Vigour. In: Roberts EH, editor. Viability of Seeds. Chapman and Hall, London. 1972; 209-52.
  45. Andrew WD. Interaction of the moisture and nutritional regimes on hard seed production in barrel medic: Medicago tribuloides Desr. Australian Plant Nutrition Conference. 1956;79-91.
  46. Delouche JC. Germination of Kentucky bluegrass harvested at different stages of maturity. In proceedings of the Association of official seed analysts, Society of Commercial Seed Technologists (SCST), Association of Official Seed Analysts,1958: 48, 81-84. https://www.jstor.org/stable/45136820.
  47. Loeffler Tim. Seed Science and Technology. 50 1 (2022)." Seed Science and Technology 50, no. 1 2022: 163-74. https://doi.org/10.15258/sst.2022.50.1.13.
  48. Afza H, Palupi ER, Ilyas S, Herlina L. Evaluation of hard seed in Indonesia local mungbean (Vigna radiata L.). In: IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. 2023;1255. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1255/1/012015.
  49. Jitender, Punia RC, Hemender, Bhuker A, Singh P. Effect of planting season on hardseededness in mungbean (Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek). International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences. 2020;6(9):2489-494. https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2017.609.306.
  50. Chinnasamy G, Bal AK. The pattern of seed development and maturation in beach pea (Lathyrus maritimus). Canadian Journal of Botany. 2003;81:531-40. https://doi.org/10.1139/b03-049.
  51. Werker E, Marbach I, Mayer AM. Relation between the anatomy of the testa, water permeability and the presence of phenolics in the genus Pisum. Annals of Botany. 1979;43:765-71. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aob.a085691.
  52. Bevilacqua LR, Roti-Michelozzi GR, Modenesi P. The watertight dormancy of Melilotus alba seeds: Further observations on the palisade cell wall. Canadian Journal of Botany. 1989;67:3453-456. https://doi.org/10.1139/b89-422.
  53. Ballard LAT. Physical barriers to germination. In: Seed Biology: Volume 2. 1973; 285-303.
  54. Tran VN, Cavanagh AK. Taxonomic implications of fracture load and deformation histograms and the effects of treatments on the impermeable seed coat of Acacia species. Australian Journal of Botany. 1980;28:39-51. https://doi.org/10.1071/BT9800039.
  55. Russi L, Cocks PS, Roberts EH. Coat thickness and hard-seededness in some Medicago and Trifolium species. Seed Science Research. 1992;2:243-49. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0960258500001434.
  56. Cosgrove DJ. Growth of the plant cell wall. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology. 2005;6(11):850-61. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrm1746.
  57. Khattra S, Gurmit Singh GS. Dessication-induced hardseededness in Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp. 1992; 120-23.
  58. Egley GH, Paul RN, Vaughn KC, Duke SO. Role of peroxidase in the development of water-impermeable seed coats in Sida spinosa L. Planta. 1983;157:224-32. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00405186.
  59. Debeaujon I, Leon-Kloosterziel KM, Koornneef M. Influence of the testa on seed dormancy, germination and longevity in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiology. 2000;122(2):403-14. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.122.2.403
  60. Vu DT, Velusamy V, Park E. Structure and chemical composition of wild soybean seed coat related to its permeability. Pakistan Journal of Botany. 2014;46:1847-857.
  61. Stendahl F. Seed coating for delayed germination: A tool for relay cropping of annual crops. Ecology and Crop Production Science. 2005;6 https://res.slu.se/id/publ/12662
  62. Aldesuquy H. Seed Physiology. Lambert Academic Publishing, 1st ed. 2012;2.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.