Assessing the carbon footprint of marginal and smallholders farming systems: A typology driven approach
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.5213Keywords:
cool farm tool, enteric fermentation, farm types, greenhouse gases, sustainabilityAbstract
Agriculture is a significant contributor to greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, with practices such as fertilizer application, soil tillage, and livestock management releasing carbon dioxide (CO2), nitrous oxide (N2O), and methane (CH4). To meet the demands of a growing population, it is essential to identify agricultural practices that boost food production while simultaneously reducing greenhouse gas emissions, contributing to climate change mitigation and adaptation. This study aimed to quantify GHG emissions from various farm typologies of marginal and smallholder households in the western regions of Tamil Nadu, India, using the Cool Farm Tool (CFT). Data was collected from 250 households in Coimbatore, Tiruppur, and Erode districts during 2022-2023 and farm typologies were identified through multivariate analysis, revealing four farm types: (i) cereal crop-dominated marginal farms, (ii) livestock-dominated marginal farms, (iii) cash crop-dominated marginal farms, and (iv) plantation crop-dominated small farms. The results show that cash crop and plantation crop dominated farms had the highest emissions, particularly from crop residue burning, fertilizer production and fertilizer application. In contrast, cereal crop-dominated farms recorded lower emissions. Livestock dominated farm type exhibited higher GHG emission from enteric fermentation and manure management due to higher number of livestock. The results of this study highlight the importance of developing farm-specific mitigation strategies to reduce emissions. The study also underscores the value of using tools such as CFT for comprehensive GHG quantification to ensure sustainable agricultural practices.
Downloads
References
Malyan SK, Kumar SS, Fagodiya RK, Ghosh P, Kumar A, Singh R, Singh L. Biochar for environmental sustainability in the energy-water-agroecosystem nexus. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2021;149:111379.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2021.111379
Paul BK, Frelat R, Birnholz C, Ebong C, Gahigi A, Groot JC, et al. Agricultural intensification scenarios, household food availability and greenhouse gas emissions in Rwanda: ex-ante impacts and trade-offs. Agricultural Systems. 2018;163:16-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2017.02.007
Leahy S, Clark H, Reisinger A. Challenges and prospects for agricultural greenhouse gas mitigation pathways consistent with the Paris agreement. Front Sus Food Syst. 2020;22(4):69. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2020.00069
Solinas S, Deligios PA, Sulas L, Carboni G, Virdis A, Ledda L. A land-based approach for the environmental assessment of mediterranean annual and perennial energy crops. Euro J Agro. 2019;3:63-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2018.11.007
Pampolino, MF, Witt CP, Julie M, Johnston A, Fisher MJ. Development approach and evaluation of the Nutrient Expert software for nutrient management in cereal crops. Comp Electr Agri. 2012;88:103-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2012.07.007
Majumdar K, Jat ML, Pampolino M, Satyanarayana T, Dutta S, Kumar A. Nutrient management in wheat: current scenario, improved strategies and future research needs in India. J Cereal Res. 2013;4(1). https://epubs.icar.org.in/index.php/JWR/article/view/35305
Sharma A, Kumar S, Khan SA, Kumar A, Mir JI, Sharma OC, et al. Plummeting anthropogenic environmental degradation by amending nutrient-N input method in saffron growing soils of north-west Himalayas. Scientific Reports. 2021;11(1):2488. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-81739-x
Sapkota TB, Jat ML, Rana DS, Khatri CA, Jat HS, Bijarniya D, et al. Crop nutrient management using Nutrient Expert improves yield, increases farmers’ income and reduces greenhouse gas emissions. Scientific Reports. 2021;11(1):1564. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-79883-x
Kumar A, Medhi K, Fagodiya RK, Subrahmanyam G, Mondal R, Raja P, et al. Molecular and ecological perspectives of nitrous oxide producing microbial communities in agro-ecosystems. Reviews in Environmental Science and BioTechnology. 2020;19(4):717-50. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11157-020-09554-w
Pelster D, Rufino M, Rosenstock T, Mango J, Saiz G, Diaz-Pines E, et al. Smallholder farms in eastern african tropical highlands have low soil greenhouse gas fluxes. Biogeosciences. 201714(1):187-202. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-14-187-2017
Righi E, Dogliotti S, Stefanini FM, Pacini GC. Capturing farm diversity at regional level to up-scale farm level impact assessment of sustainable development options. Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment. 2011;142(2):63-74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2010.07.011
Pacini GC, Colucci D, Baudron F, Righi E, Corbeels M, Tittonell P, Stefanini FM. Combining multi-dimensional scaling and cluster analysis to describe the diversity of rural households. Experimental Agriculture. 2014;50(3):376-97. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0014479713000495
Kaur J, Prusty AK, Ravisankar N, Panwar AS, Shamim M, Walia SS, et al. Farm typology for planning targeted farming systems interventions for smallholders in Indo-Gangetic Plains of India. Scientific Reports. 2021;11(1):20978. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-00372-w
Lata S, Kohli A, Singh YK, Shambhavi S, Ghosh M, Gupta SK. Estimation of greenhouse gas emissions in rice based cropping systems under fertigation using cool farm tool. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation. 2020;19(1):26-31. http://dx.doi.org/10.5958/2455-7145.2020.00004.1
Kumar R, Karmakar S, Minz A, Singh J, Kumar A, Kumar A. Assessment of greenhouse gases emission in maize-wheat cropping system under varied N fertilizer application using cool farm tool. Frontiers in Environmental Science. 2021;16(9):710108. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2021.710108
Innazent A, Jacob D, Bindhu JS, Joseph B, Anith KN, Ravisankar N, et al. Farm typology of smallholders integrated farming systems in southern coastal plains of Kerala, India. Scientific Reports. 2022;12(1):333. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-04148-0
Prusty AK, Natesan R, Panwar AS, Jat ML, Tetarwal JP, López-Ridaura S, et al. Redesigning of farming systems using a multi-criterion assessment tool for sustainable intensification and nutritional security in northwestern India. Sustainability. 2022;14(7):3892. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14073892
Alvarez S, Timler CJ, Michalscheck M, Paas W, Descheemaeker K, Tittonell P, et al. Capturing farm diversity with hypothesis-based typologies: an innovative methodological framework for farming system typology development. PloS One. 2018;13(5):0194757. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0194757
Chopin P, Blazy JM, Doré T. A new method to assess farming system evolution at the landscape scale. Agronomy for Sustainable Development. 2015;35:325-37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-014-0250-5
Sinha A, Basu D, Priyadarshi P, Ghosh A, Sohane RK. Farm typology for targeting extension interventions among smallholders in tribal villages in Jharkhand state of India. Frontiers in Environmental Science. 2022;10:823338. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2022.823338
Shukla R, Agarwal A, Gornott C, Sachdeva K, Joshi PK. Farmer typology to understand differentiated climate change adaptation in Himalaya. Scientific Reports. 2019;9(1):20375. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-56931-9
Lopez-Ridaura S, Frelat R, van Wijk MT, Valbuena D, Krupnik TJ, Jat ML. Climate smart agriculture, farm household typologies and food security: an ex-ante assessment from eastern India. Agricultural Systems. 2018;159:57-68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2017.09.007
Hillier J, Walter C, Malin D, Garcia-Suarez T, Mila-i-Canals L, Smith P. A farm focused calculator for emissions from crop and livestock production. Environmental Modelling and Software. 2011;26(9):1070-78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2011.03.014
Alam MK, Bell RW, Biswas WK. Decreasing the carbon footprint of an intensive rice-based cropping system using conservation agriculture on the Eastern Gangetic Plains. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2019;218:259-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.01.328
Mohammadi A, Rafiee S, Jafari A, Keyhani A, Mousavi-Avval SH, Nonhebel S. Energy use efficiency and greenhouse gas emissions of farming systems in north Iran. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2014;30:724-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2013.11.012
Musafiri CM, Macharia JM, Kiboi MN, Ng’etich OK, Shisanya CA, Okeyo JM, et al. Comparison between observed and denitrification-decomposition model-based nitrous oxide fluxes and maize yields under selected soil fertility management technologies in Kenya. Plant and Soil. 2021;463:395-413. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-021-04924-x
Musafiri CM, Kiboi M, Ng'etich OK, Okoti M, Kosgei DK, Ngetich FK. Carbon footprint of smallholder rain-fed sorghum cropping systems of Kenya: a typology-based approach. Cleaner and Circular Bioeconomy. 2023;6:100060. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clcb.2023.100060
Haileslassie A, Craufurd P, Thiagarajah R, Kumar S, Whitbread A, Rathor A, et al. Empirical evaluation of sustainability of divergent farms in the dryland farming systems of India. Ecological Indicators. 2016;60:710-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.08.014
Sanogo OM, de Ridder N, van Keulen H. Diversité et dynamique des exploitations agricoles mixtes agriculture-elevage au sud du Mali. Cahiers Agricultures. 2010;19(3):185-93. https://doi.org/10.1684/agr.2010.0401
Kaouche-Adjlane SG, Ghozlane F, Mati A. Typology of dairy farming systems in the mediterranean basin (Case of Algeria). Biotechnology in Animal Husbandry. 2015;31(3):385-96. https://doi.org/10.2298/BAH1503385K
Bidogeza JC, Berentsen PB, De Graaff J, Oude Lansink AG. A typology of farm households for the Umutara province in Rwanda. Food Security. 2009;1(3):321-35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12571-009-0029-8
Ponnusamy K, Devi MK. Impact of integrated farming system approach on doubling farmers’ income. Agricultural Economics Research Review. 2017;30:233-40. http://dx.doi.org/10.5958/0974-0279.2017.00037.4
Papic milojevi? R, Bogdanov N. Typology of farms in areas with natural constraints diversity of livelihood strategies and their determinants. Applied Ecology and Environmental Research. 2024;22(2). http://dx.doi.org/10.15666/aeer/2202_10511073
Alemu AW, Amiro BD, Bittman S, MacDonald D, Ominski KH. A typological characterization of canadian beef cattle farms based on a producer survey. Canadian J Animal Sci. 2016;96(2):187-202. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjas-2015-0060
Goswami R, Chatterjee S, Prasad B. Farm types and their economic characterization in complex agro-ecosystems for informed extension intervention: study from coastal West Bengal, India. Agricultural and Food Economics. 2014;2:1-24. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40100-014-0005-2
Kumar S, Craufurd P, Haileslassie A, Ramilan T, Rathore A, Whitbread A. Farm typology analysis and technology assessment: an application in an arid region of south Asia. Land use Policy. 2019;88:104149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104149
Kuivanen KS, Alvarez S, Michalscheck M, Adjei-Nsiah S, Descheemaeker K, Mellon-Bedi S, Groot JC. Characterising the diversity of smallholder farming systems and their constraints and opportunities for innovation: a case study from the northern region, Ghana. NJAS-Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences. 2016;78:153-66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.njas.2016.04.003
Gupta DK, Bhatia A, Kumar A, Chakrabarti B, Jain N, Pathak H. Global warming potential of rice (Oryza sativa)-wheat (Triticum aestivum) cropping system of the Indo-Gangetic Plains. Indian J Agri sci. 2015;85(6):807-16. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v85i6.49243
Svubure O, Struik PC, Haverkort AJ, Steyn JM. Carbon foot printing of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) production systems in Zimbabwe. Outlook on Agriculture. 2018;47(1):3-10. https://doi.org/10.1177/0030727018757546
Halvorson AD, Del Grosso SJ, Reule CA. Nitrogen, tillage and crop rotation effects on nitrous oxide emissions from irrigated cropping systems. Journal of Environmental Quality. 2008;37(4):1337-44. https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2007.0268
Jain N, Arora P, Tomer R, Mishra SV, Bhatia A, Pathak H, et al. Greenhouse gases emission from soils under major crops in northwest India. Science of the Total Environment. 2016;542-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.10.073
Musafiri CM, Macharia JM, Ng'etich OK, Kiboi MN, Okeyo J, Shisanya CA, et al. Farming systems typologies analysis to inform agricultural greenhouse gas emissions potential from smallholder rain-fed farms in Kenya. Scientific African. 2020;8458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sciaf.2020.e00458
Ortiz-Gonzalo D, Vaast P, Oelofse M, de Neergaard A, Albrecht A, Rosenstock TS. Farm-scale greenhouse gas balances, hotspots and uncertainties in smallholder crop-livestock systems in Central Kenya. Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment. 2017;248:58-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2017.06.002
Liu Y, Langer V, Høgh-Jensen H, Egelyng H. Life cycle assessment of fossil energy use and greenhouse gas emissions in chinese pear production. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2010;18(14):1423-30. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2010.05.025
Rosenstock TS, Mpanda M, Pelster DE, Butterbach?Bahl K, Rufino MC, Thiong'o M, et al. Greenhouse gas fluxes from agricultural soils of Kenya and Tanzania. Journal of Geophysical Research. Biogeosciences. 2016;121(6):1568-80. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JG003341
Seebauer M. Whole farm quantification of GHG emissions within smallholder farms in developing countries. Environmental Research Letters. 2014;9(3):035006. http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/9/3/035006
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 N Arivukkumar, PM Shanmugam, B Kannan, CS Sumathi, M Prahadeeshwaran, SP Sangeetha, G Raghavi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright and Licence details of published articles
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Open Access Policy
Plant Science Today is an open access journal. There is no registration required to read any article. All published articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC Attribution 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).