Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Plant Science Today (PST)

Research Articles

Vol. 12 No. sp1 (2025): Recent Advances in Agriculture by Young Minds - II

Spatio-temporal analysis of surface water quality on urban tanks in Coimbatore

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.5919
Submitted
17 October 2024
Published
28-01-2025

Abstract

Effective monitoring and predicting surface water quality are vital for sustainable water resource control. Traditional in-situ techniques are regularly constrained by their time-consuming nature and restrained spatial coverage. This study seeks to develop a predictive version that combines physio-chemical water quality parameters with remote sensing indices derived from the Sentinel-2A dataset to enhance accuracy and spatial attainment. The research focuses on four urban tanks in Coimbatore namely Krishnampathy, Selvampathy, Kumaraswamy and Ukkadam Periyakulam. The physio-chemical parameters for assessing the water quality which include pH, Electrical Conductivity (EC), Total Dissolved Solids (TDS), Dissolved oxygen (DO), Calcium (Ca), Magnesium (Mg), Total hardness, Chloride (Cl-), Carbonate (Co3-) and Bicarbonate (HCo3-) have been measured, additionally for the detection of surface water extent using remote sensing indices namely Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI), Normalized Difference Water Index (NDWI), Modified Normalized Difference Water Index (MNDWI), Water Ratio Index, Normalized Difference Chlorophyll Index (NDCI) indices which were extracted from sentinel-2A datasets. The parameters such as EC, TDS, Ca2+, Cl- and Total hardness show a high coefficient of determination (R2). Correlation and regression techniques have been employed to integrate these datasets, resulting in the development of a robust predictive model. By combining these two information sources, the model is constructed using stepwise regression analysis. The model's accuracy turned into established towards ground-truth records, showing large improvements whilst far away Remote sensing indices had been covered.

References

  1. Chalchisa D, Megersa M, Beyene A. Assessment of the quality of drinking water in storage tanks and its implication on the safety of urban water supply in developing countries. Environ Syst Res. 2018;6:1-6. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40068-017-0089-2.
  2. Ma J, Wu S, Shekhar NR, Biswas S, Sahu AK. Determination of physicochemical parameters and levels of heavy metals in food waste water with environmental effects. Bioinorg Chem Appl. 2020;2020(1):8886093. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/8886093.
  3. Bhateria R, Jain D. Water quality assessment of lake water: a review. Sustain Water Resour Manag. 2016;2:161-73. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40899-015-0014-7
  4. Varshney C, Rzóska J. Aquatic weeds in South East Asia: Springer SBM.1976.
  5. Wang Z, Liu J, Li J, Zhang DD. Multi-spectral water index (MuWI): a native 10-m multi-spectral water index for accurate water mapping on Sentinel-2. J Remote Sens. 2018;10(10):1643. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs10101643
  6. Rahul T, Brema J, Wessley GJJ. Evaluation of surface water quality of Ukkadam lake in Coimbatore using UAV and Sentinel-2 multispectral data. Int J Environ Sci Technol. 2023;20(3):3205-20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-022-04029-7.
  7. El-Din MS, Gaber A, Koch M, Ahmed RS, Bahgat I. Remote sensing application for water quality assessment in Lake Timsah, Suez Canal, Egypt. Egypt. J Remote Sens Technol. 2013;1(3):61-74.
  8. Saturday A, Lyimo TJ, Machiwa J, Pamba S. Spatio-temporal variations in physicochemical water quality parameters of Lake Bunyonyi, Southwestern Uganda. SN Appl Sci. 2021;3(7):684. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-021-04672-8
  9. CPCB. Guidelines for Water Quality Monitoring. 2007.
  10. APHA. Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater,
  11. rd Edition 2017. Available from: https://yabesh.ir/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/Standard-Methods-23rd-Perv.pdf.
  12. Ahmed W, Mohammed S, El-Shazly A, Morsy S. Tigris River water surface quality monitoring using remote sensing data and GIS techniques. Egypt. J Remote Sens Technol. 2023;26(3):816-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrs.2023.09.001 .
  13. Kükrer S, Mutlu E. Assessment of surface water quality using water quality index and multivariate statistical analyses in Saraydüzü Dam Lake, Turkey. Environ Monit Assess. 2019;191:1-16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-019-7197-6
  14. Begum A, Ramaiah M, Harikrishna, Khan I, Veena K. Heavy metal pollution and chemical profile of Cauvery River water. J Chem. 2009;6(1):47-52. https://doi.org/10.1155/2009/154610.
  15. Dineshkumar S, Natarajan N. Assessment of water quality status in the inland lakes of Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India. 2020;49(07):1280-1285. Indian J Geo-Mar Sci.
  16. Krishnakumar P, Campus C, Sellakannu M, Athipathy M, Clement M. Assesment of surface water quality in Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu. IJARET. 2019;10(6):398-404. https://doi.org/10.34218/IJARET.10.6.2019.042
  17. Mohan B, Prabha D. Evaluation of trophic state conditions in the three urban perennial lakes of the Coimbatore district, Tamil Nadu: Based on water quality parameters and rotifer composition. HydroRes. 2024;7:360-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hydres.2024.06.003
  18. Jeyaraj M, Ramakrishnan K, Jai A, Arunachalam S, Magudeswaran P. Investigation of physico-chemical and biological characteristics of various lake water in coimbatore district, Tamilnadu, India. Orient J Chem. 2016;32(4):2087-94. http://dx.doi.org/10.13005/ojc/320436
  19. Cruz MAS, Gonçalves AdA, de Aragão R, de Amorim JRA, da Mota PVM, Srinivasan VS, et al. Spatial and seasonal variability of the water quality characteristics of a river in Northeast Brazil. Environ Earth Sci. 2019;78:1-11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-019-8087-5.
  20. Laskar N, Singh U, Kumar R, Meena SK. Spring water quality and assessment of associated health risks around the urban Tuirial landfill site in Aizawl, Mizoram, India. Groundw. Sustain Dev. 2022;17:100726. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsd.2022.100726.
  21. Miruka JB, Getabu A, Sitoki L, James O, Mwamburi J, George O, et al. Water quality, phytoplankton composition and microcystin concentrations in Kisumu Bay (Kenya) of Lake Victoria after a prolonged water hyacinth infestation period. Lakes & Reservoirs: Int J Res Manage. 2021;26(4):e12380. https://doi.org/10.1111/lre.12380
  22. Hamid A, Bhat SU, Jehangir A. Local determinants influencing stream water quality. Appl Water Sci. 2020;10(1):1-16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-019-1043-4
  23. Ravikumar P, Aneesul Mehmood M, Somashekar R. Water quality index to determine the surface water quality of Sankey tank and Mallathahalli lake, Bangalore urban district, Karnataka, India. Appl Water Sci. 2013;3:247-61. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-013-0077-2.
  24. Friedrich J, Janssen F, Aleynik D, Bange HW, Boltacheva N, Çagatay M, et al. Investigating hypoxia in aquatic environments: diverse approaches to addressing a complex phenomenon. Biogeosciences. 2014;11(4):1215-59. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-11-1215-2014.
  25. Mallin MA, Johnson VL, Ensign SH, MacPherson TA. Factors contributing to hypoxia in rivers, lakes, and streams. Limnol Oceanogr. 2006;51(1part2):690-701. https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.2006.51.1_part_2.0690.
  26. Islam M, Shafi S, Bandh SA, Shameem N. Impact of environmental changes and human activities on bacterial diversity of lakes. Freshw Biol. Elsevier; 2019. p. 105-36. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-817495-1.00003-7.
  27. Rahman K, Barua S, Imran H. Assessment of water quality and apportionment of pollution sources of an urban lake using multivariate statistical analysis. Clean Eng Technol. 2021;5:100309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clet.2021.100309
  28. Makepeace DK, Smith DW, Stanley SJ. Urban stormwater quality: summary of contaminant data. Crit. rev. env. sci. tec.1995;25(2):93-139. https://doi.org/10.1080/10643389509388476
  29. Sharma TR, Ravichandran C. Appraisal of seasonal variations in water quality of river Cauvery using multivariate analysis. Water Sci. 2021;35(1):49-62. https://doi.org/10.1080/23570008.2021.1897741.
  30. Ghaemi Z, Noshadi M. Surface water quality analysis using multivariate statistical techniques: a case study of Fars Province rivers, Iran. Environ Monit Assess. 2022;194(3):178. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-022-09811-1
  31. ESA. Copernicus Data Space Ecosystem 2014 [Available from: https://dataspace.copernicus.eu/about.
  32. McFeeters SK. The use of the Normalized Difference Water Index (NDWI) in the delineation of open water features. Int J Remote Sens. 1996;17(7):1425-32. https://doi.org/10.1080/01431169608948714.
  33. Xu H. Modification of normalised difference water index (NDWI) to enhance open water features in remotely sensed imagery. Int J Remote Sens. 2006;27(14):3025-33. https://doi.org/10.1080/01431160600589179.
  34. Mukherjee NR, Samuel C. Assessment of the temporal variations of surface water bodies in and around Chennai using Landsat imagery. Ind J Sci Technol. 2016; 18(9): 1-7 https://doi.org/10.17485/ijst/2016/v9i18/92089
  35. Tucker CJ. Red and photographic infrared linear combinations for monitoring vegetation. Remote Sens Environ. 1979;8(2):127-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/0034-4257(79)90013-0
  36. Mishra S, Mishra DR. Normalized difference chlorophyll index: A novel model for remote estimation of chlorophyll-a concentration in turbid productive waters. Remote Sens Environ. 2012;117:394-406. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2011.10.016

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.