Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Research Articles

Vol. 12 No. sp1 (2025): Recent Advances in Agriculture by Young Minds - II

Geographical indication of Kanyakumari Matti banana: A comprehensive analysis of farmer awareness, perception and constraints

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.5432
Submitted
1 October 2024
Published
21-04-2025 — Updated on 30-04-2025
Versions

Abstract

The present study focuses on the awareness, perception and constraints of farmers about the GI tag of Kanyakumari Matti banana in Tamil Nadu state, India. Using data from 120 farmers across 3 blocks, socio-economic factors that impact GI awareness and perception are analysed through correlation and regression analyses. Constraints has been ranked by Garrett Ranking method. The result shows that the awareness is of a moderate nature, as 47.5% of farmers have medium awareness about GI. Out of 21 variables, 17 variables have been selected as per discussion with extension scientists. The variables like educational status, information-seeking behaviour and attitude towards GI were found to be significantly correlated with both awareness and perception. GI is perceived to be beneficial in protection of product origin and increased demand as per farmers (80.83%), whereas in the case of technological advancement, the percentage is 36.66% and unauthorized use prevention is 35%. Major constraints are lack of GI-specific training (71.86%) and market price fluctuation (98.26%). Targeted capacity building, infrastructure development and supportive policy are suggested for better adoption of GI and enhanced access to its market. These findings provide useful information for policymakers and stakeholders to design focused interventions that might enhance the economic benefit and sustainability of GI-certified agricultural produce.

References

  1. Moschini G, Menapace L, Pick D. Geographical indications and the competitive provision of quality in agricultural markets. American J Agri Economics. 2008;90(3):794-812. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8276.2008.01142.x
  2. Pandit J, Basak N. Constraints faced by the farmers in commercial cultivation of vegetables. J Bangladesh Agri University. 2013;11(2):193-98. https://doi.org/10.3329/jbau.v11i2.19893
  3. Muca E, Pomianek I, Peneva M. The role of GI products or local products in the environment-consumer awareness and preferences in Albania, Bulgaria and Poland. Sustain. 2021;14(1):4. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14010004
  4. Joshi H. E-commerce framework for strategic marketing of Udupi jasmine. AGRIS On-line Pap Econ and Inform. 2019;11(1):17-26. https://doi.org/10.7160/aol.2019.110102
  5. Katerinopoulou K, Kontogeorgos A, Salmas CE, Patakas A, Ladavos A. Geographical origin authentication of agri-food products: A review. Foods. 2020;9(4):489. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods9040489
  6. Lanfranco RC, Rabagliati H, Carmel D. The importance of awareness in face processing: A critical review of interocular suppression studies. Behav Brain Res. 2023;437:114116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2022.114116
  7. Sampalean NI, Rama D, Visent G. An investigation into Italian consumers’ awareness, perception, knowledge of European Union quality certifications and consumption of agri-food products carrying those certifications. Bio-based Appl Econ J. 2021;10(1):35-49. https://doi.org/10.36253/bae-9909
  8. Musdhalifa D, Syaifudin M. Persepsi dan komunikasi dalam organisasi pendidikan. J Al-Kifayah: Ilmu Tarbiyah Dan Keguruan. 2023;2(1):69-83. https://doi.org/10.53398/ja.v2i1.298
  9. Laksono P, Ashari DA, Hanapi S. Smallholder farmers’ perception on coffee production under geographical indication scheme. In: E3S Web of Conferences; EDP Sciences; 2023. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202344402022
  10. Mittal S, Mehar M. Socio-economic factors affecting adoption of modern information and communication technology by farmers in India: analysis using multivariate probit model. J Agri Edu Exten. 2016;22(2):199-212. https://doi.org/10.1080/1389224X.2014.997255
  11. Fahad S, Inayat T, Wang J, Dong L, Hu G, Khan S, et al. Farmers’ awareness level and their perceptions of climate change: A case of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa province, Pakistan. Land Use Policy. 2020;96:104669. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104669
  12. Nirosha R, Mansingh JP. Geographical indication tag for agricultural produces: challenges and methods. Multidiscip Rev. 2024;7(9):2024206. https://doi.org/10.31893/multirev.2024206
  13. Brophy K, Watson A. Perception and experience. The Encyclopedia Archaeol Sci. 2018;1-4. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119188230.saseas0446
  14. Arhin I, Yeboah E, Liu X, Liu A, Chen X, Li X. Integrating farmers’ perception of sustainable agricultural technologies towards the development of sustainable tea production in China. Int J Agri Sustain. 2024;22(1):2303886. https://doi.org/10.1080/14735903.2024.2303886
  15. Das D, Dileep M. Geographical indication and tourism: A study on the awareness, factors influence and the scope of GI tagging in Kerala as a rural tourism development tool. Int J Hosp Tour Syst. 2023;16(4): 25–34.
  16. Swastika DKS, Indraningsih KS. Strategy formulation of farmers capacity building through technological innovation in disadvantaged regions of Indonesia. J Agro Ekonomi. 2020;38 (1):15?27. https://doi.org/10.21082/jae.v38n1.2020.15 v38n1.2020.15-27
  17. Tambunan A, Kusmanto H, Ridho H. The effect of infrastructure development on increasing farmers’ income of main agricultural commodities in Serdang Bedagai regency. In: IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. IOP Publishing; 2024. p. 012138 https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1302/1/012138
  18. Amruddin A, Mahmood MR, Supardjo D, Safruddin S, Susilatun HR. Analysis of climate change impacts on agricultural production and adaptation strategies for farmers: agricultural policy perspectives. Global Int J Innov Res. 2024;2(1):374-83. https://doi.org/10.59613/global.v2i1.50
  19. OnyekaEzealaji NL. Infrastructure for agricultural and rural development in Sub Saharan Africa: need for a comprehensive program and adequate investment. J Sci Res Reports. 2019;23(3):1-8. https://doi.org/10.9734/jsrr/2019/v23i330120
  20. Otekunrin OA. Assessing agricultural commercialization and rural infrastructure development in rural Southwestern Nigeria: evidence from small holder cassava farmers. Acta Agri Slovenica. 2022;118(4):1-17. https://doi.org/10.14720/aas.2022.118.4.2338
  21. Pal S. A review on India's rural development and agricultural infrastructure. J Pharm Negat Results. 2023;682-84. https://doi.org/10.47750/pnr.2023.14.S01.92
  22. Jimenez CJA, Torre MVMG, Millan DMG. Enotourism in Southern Spain: The Montilla-Moriles PDO. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(6):3393. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19063393

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.