Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Plant Science Today (PST)

Review Articles

Vol. 12 No. sp1 (2025): Recent Advances in Agriculture by Young Minds - II

Climatic factors affecting grapevine growth and production

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.5482
Submitted
2 October 2024
Published
05-02-2025

Abstract

Climate resilience plays a critical role in determining the fruitfulness and yield of grapes, one of the most significant fruit crops globally. This review explores the multifaceted impacts of climatic variability on grape productivity, focusing on factors such as temperature fluctuations, rainfall patterns, humidity, and extreme weather events. Grapevines are particularly sensitive to changes in climate, which can alter phenological stages, affect flowering, fruit set, and berry development, and ultimately influence yield and fruit quality. The review synthesizes recent research on the physiological and molecular mechanisms through which grapevines respond to climate stressors, including drought, heat waves, and variable precipitation. It also examines the role of vineyard management practices in enhancing climate resilience, such as the use of drought-resistant rootstocks, canopy management, and precision irrigation. Additionally, the review highlights the potential of genetic and biotechnological approaches in developing grapevine cultivars with enhanced tolerance to climate stressors. Understanding the complex interactions between climatic factors and grapevine biology is essential for developing strategies to maintain and improve grape yield and quality in the face of climate change. The insights provided by this review will be valuable for grape growers, researchers, and policymakers aiming to mitigate the adverse effects of climate variability and ensure sustainable grape production in the future.

References

  1. Nicholas KA, Matthews MA, Lobell DB, Willits NH, Field CB. Effect of vineyard-scale climate variability on Pinot noir phenolic composition. Agric For Meteorol. 2011;151(12):1556-67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2011.06.010
  2. Coombe B, Dry P. Viticulture Volume 1-Resources 2nd edition: Winetitles Pty Ltd; 2004.
  3. Yang J, Xiao YY. Grape phytochemicals and associated health benefits. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2013;53(11):1202-25. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2012.692408
  4. Van LC, Friant P, Chone X, Tregoat O, Koundouras S, Dubourdieu D. Influence of climate, soil and cultivar on terroir. Am J Enol Vitic. 2004;55(3):207-17. https://doi.org/10.5344/ajev.2004.55.3.207
  5. Jones GV, White MA, Cooper OR, Storchmann K. Climate change and global wine quality. Clim Change. 2005;73(3):319-43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-005-4704-2
  6. Zhu J, Fraysse R, Trought MC, Raw V, Yang L, Greven M, et al. Quantifying the seasonal variations in grapevine yield components based on pre-and post-flowering weather conditions. Oeno One. 2020;54(2). https://doi.org/10.20870/oeno-one.2020.54.2.2926
  7. Travadon R, Lawrence DP, Moyer MM, Fujiyoshi PT, Baumgartner K. Fungal species associated with grapevine trunk diseases in Washington wine grapes and California table grapes, with novelties in the genera Cadophora, Cytospora, and Sporocadus. Front Fungal Biol. 2022;3:1018140. https://doi.org/10.3389/ffunb.2022.1018140
  8. Araujo JA, Abiodun BJ, Crespo O. Impacts of drought on grape yields in Western Cape, South Africa. Theor Appl Climatol. 2016;123(1):117-30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-014-1336-3
  9. Dunn GM, Martin SR. Do temperature conditions at budburst affect flower number in Vitis vinifera L. cv. Cabernet Sauvignon?. Aust J Grape Wine Res. 2000;6(2):116-24. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-0238.2000.tb00169.x
  10. Malheiro AC, Santos JA, Fraga H, Pinto JG. Climate change scenarios applied to viticultural zoning in Europe. Clim Res. 2010;43(3):163-77. https://doi.org/10.3354/cr00918
  11. Rogiers SY, Greer DH, Liu Y, Baby T, Xiao Z. Impact of climate change on grape berry ripening: An assessment of adaptation strategies for the Australian vineyard. Front Plant Sci. 2022;13:1094633. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.1094633
  12. Myburgh PA. Water consumption of South African vineyards: A modelling approach based on the quantified combined effects of selected viticultural, soil and meteorological parameters: Stellenbosch: Stellenbosch University; 1998.
  13. Kobayashi Y, Yamamoto T, Ikeda H, Sugihara R, Kaihori H, Kawabata M, et al. Effects of constantly high soil water content on vegetative growth and grape quality in Japan with high rainfall during grapevine growing season. Folia Horticulturae. 2020;32(2):135-45. https://doi.org/10.2478/fhort-2020-0013
  14. Costa JM, Egipto R, Aguiar FC, Marques P, Nogales A, Madeira M. The role of soil temperature in mediterranean vineyards in a climate change context. Front Plant Sci. 2023;14:1145137.
  15. Matthews M, Anderson M, Schult H. Phenologic and growth responses to early and late season. Vitis. 1987;26:147-60.
  16. Robinson AL, Boss PK, Solomon PS, Trengove RD, Heymann H, Ebeler SE. Origins of grape and wine aroma. Part 1. Chemical components and viticultural impacts. Am J Enol Vitic. 2014;65(1):1-24. https://doi.org/10.5344/ajev.2013.12070
  17. Keller M. Managing grapevines to optimise fruit development in a challenging environment: a climate change primer for viticulturists. Aust J Grape Wine Res. 2010;16:56-69. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-0238.2009.00077.x
  18. Hall GE, Bondada BR, Keller M. Loss of rachis cell viability is associated with ripening disorders in grapes. J Exp Bot. 2011;62(3):1145-53. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erq355
  19. Naidu RA, Perry EM, Pierce FJ, Mekuria T. The potential of spectral reflectance technique for the detection of Grapevine leafroll-associated virus-3 in two red-berried wine grape cultivars. Comput Electron Agric. 2009;66(1):38-45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2008.11.007
  20. Medrano H, Pou A, Tomàs M, Martorell S, Escalona J, Gulias J, et al., editors. Improving water use efficiency in grapevines: Agronomic and biotechnological approaches. In Proceedings of XXVIII International Horticultural Congress on Science and Horticulture for People (IHC2010): International Symposium on the 931; 2010.
  21. Van Leeuwen C, Destrac-Irvine A, Dubernet M, Duchêne E, Gowdy M, Marguerit E, et al. An update on the impact of climate change in viticulture and potential adaptations. Agronomy. 2019;9(9):514. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy9090514
  22. Snyder R, Lambert J, editors. Impact of soil variability on evapotranspiration of wine grapes. In Proceedings of XXIX International Horticultural Congress on Horticulture: Sustaining Lives, Livelihoods and Landscapes (IHC2014): 1112; 2014.
  23. Keller M. The science of grapevines: Academic Press; 2020.
  24. Pawsey N. Water management accounting and the wine supply chain: Empirical evidence from Australia. Soc Environ Account J. 2015;35(3):195. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969160X.2015.1093770
  25. Dry P, Loveys B, Düring H. Partial drying of the rootzone of grape. II. Changes in the pattern of root development. Vitis - J Grapevine Res. 2015;39(1):9.
  26. Cooley NM, Clingeleffer PR, Walker RR. Effect of water deficits and season on berry development and composition of Cabernet Sauvignon (Vitis vinifera L.) grown in a hot climate. Aust J Grape Wine Res. 2017;23(2):260-72. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajgw.12274
  27. Jackson DI, Lombard P. Environmental and management practices affecting grape composition and wine quality-a review. Am J Enol Vitic. 1993;44(4):409-30. https://doi.org/10.5344/ajev.1993.44.4.409
  28. Carisse O, Fall M, Vincent C. Using a biovigilance approach for pest and disease management in Quebec vineyards. Can J Plant Pathol. 2017;39(4):393-404. https://doi.org/10.1080/07060661.2017.1366368
  29. Du TS, Kang SZ, Yan BY, Zhang JH. Alternate furrow irrigation: a practical way to improve grape quality and water use efficiency in arid Northwest China. J Integr Agric. 2013;12(3):509-19. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2095-3119(13)60252-X
  30. Chaves MM, Pereira JS, Maroco J, Rodrigues ML, Ricardo CPP, Osório ML, et al. How plants cope with water stress in the field? Photosynthesis and growth. Ann Bot. 2002;89(7):907. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcf105
  31. Tomás M, Medrano H, Escalona JM, Martorell S, Pou A, Ribas-Carbó M, et al. Variability of water use efficiency in grapevines. Environ Exp Bot. 2014;103:148-57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2013.09.003
  32. Hague BS. Seasonal climate summary for Australia and the southern hemisphere (summer 2018–19): extreme heat and flooding prominent. J South Hemisphere Earth Syst Sci. 2021;71(1):147-58. https://doi.org/10.1071/ES20009
  33. Epstein E, Grant W. Soil crust formation as affected by raindrop impact. Physical aspects of soil water and salts in ecosystems: Springer; 1973. p. 195-201. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-65523-4_20
  34. Cabrera JA, Wang D, Schneider SM, Hanson BD. Effect of methyl bromide alternatives on plant parasitic nematodes and grape yield under vineyard replant conditions. Am J Enol Vitic. 2011;62(1):42-48. https://doi.org/10.5344/ajev.2010.10076
  35. Chaïb J, Torregrosa L, Mackenzie D, Corena P, Bouquet A, Thomas MR. The grape microvine–a model system for rapid forward and reverse genetics of grapevines. Plant J. 2010;62(6):1083-92. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-313X.2010.04219.x
  36. Gavazzi F, Braglia L, Mastromauro F, Gianì S, Morello L, Breviario D. The tubulin-based-polymorphism method provides a simple and effective alternative to the genomic profiling of grape. PLoS One. 2016;11(9):e0163335. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0163335
  37. Smith HM, Smith BP, Morales NB, Moskwa S, Clingeleffer PR, Thomas MR. SNP markers tightly linked to root knot nematode resistance in grapevine (Vitis cinerea) identified by a genotyping-by-sequencing approach followed by Sequenom Mass ARRAY validation. PLoS One. 2018;13(2):e0193121. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0193121

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.