Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Plant Science Today (PST)

Research Articles

Vol. 12 No. 4 (2025)

Assessing genetic variability in maize inbred lines and hybrids for enhanced agronomic performance under high density planting conditions

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.5606
Submitted
7 October 2024
Published
10-11-2025 — Updated on 27-11-2025
Versions

Abstract

Planting density plays an important role in enhancing maize productivity, but tolerance to high-density planting remains limited in several commercial hybrids. Therefore, developing hybrids with high-density tolerance is essential to meet global population increase and climate challenges. This study aimed to assess the combining abilities of newly developed maize lines, identify promising hybrids and investigate gene action controlling key traits under low and high-density planting conditions. Seven maize inbred lines were crossed using a half-diallel mating design to develop 21 F1 hybrids, which were evaluated alongside a commercial hybrid (SC-10) over 2 seasons at low (57143 plants/ha) and high (95238 plants/ha) planting densities. Results showed significant differences in traits due to planting density and hybrid type. Highdensity reduced ear length, kernel number, ear diameter and kernel weight by 11.7, 18.2, 6.3 and 13.17 respectively compared to low-density. Otherwise, it increased plant height, days to silking and grain yield per ha by 11.2, 3.7 and 16.0% respectively, compared to low-density. Lines L1, L2, L5 and L6 exhibited strong general combining ability for improving grain yield under high-density conditions, while L1 and L3 were identified as good combiners for early maturity. Hybrids L2 × L6, L3 × L5, L4 × L7 and L6 × L7 demonstrated significant specific combining ability for increasing maize productivity under high-density. Additionally, L3 × L5 and SC-10, showed high tolerance to density stress. These hybrids are recommended for further testing for potential commercial cultivation, offering valuable insights for developing maize hybrids that adapted under dense planting and contribute to sustainable agriculture.

References

  1. 1. Kaushal M, Sharma R, Vaidya D, Gupta A, Saini HK, Anand A, et al. Maize: An underexploited golden cereal crop. Cereal Res Commun. 2023;51(1):3-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcs.2014.04.006
  2. 2. Liu J, He Q, Wu Y, Xiao X, Sun W, Lin Y, et al. The effect of sowing date on the nutritional quality of kernels of various maize varieties in Northeast China. Agron. 2023;13(10):2543. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13102543
  3. 3. Sokan-Adeaga AA, Salami SA, Bolade DO, Aledeh M, Sokan-Adeaga MA, Amubieya OE, et al. Utilization of local corn (Zea mays) wastes for bioethanol production by separate hydrolysis and fermentation. J Hazard Mater. 2024;15:100447. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hazadv.2024.100447
  4. 4. FAOSTAT. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Statistical Database. Accessed on 21 September 2024. http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data 2024
  5. 5. Kamara MM, Mansour E, Khalaf AE, Eid MA, Hassanin AA, Abdelghany AM, et al. Molecular diversity and combining ability in newly developed maize inbred lines under low-nitrogen conditions. Life. 2024;14(5):641. https://doi.org/10.3390/life14050641
  6. 6. Gomiero T. Soil degradation, land scarcity and food security: Reviewing a complex challenge. Sustain. 2016;8(3):281. https://doi.org/doi.org/10.3390/su8030281
  7. 7. Wu X, Tong L, Kang S, Du T, Ding R, Li S, Chen Y. Combination of suitable planting density and nitrogen rate for high yield maize and their source-sink relationship in Northwest China. J Sci Food Agric. 2023;103(11):5300-11. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.1260
  8. 8. Burton AB, Kemanian AR. Maize yield in response to alternating low-and high-density rows of diverse hybrids. Eur J Agron. 2022;135:126472. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2022.126472
  9. 9. Omar M, Rabie HA, Mowafi SA, Othman HT, El-Moneim DA, Alharbi K, et al. Multivariate analysis of agronomic traits in newly developed maize hybrids grown under different agro-environments. Plants. 2022;11(9):1187. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11091187
  10. 10. King KA, Archontoulis SV, Baum ME, Edwards JW. From a point to a range of optimum estimates for maize plant density and nitrogen rate recommendations. Agron J. 2024;116(2):598-611. https://doi.org/10.1002/agj2.21516
  11. 11. Fuksa P, Hrevušová Z, Szabó O, Hakl J. Effect of row spacing and plant density on silage maize growth, dry matter distribution and yield. Agron. 2023;13(4):1117. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13041117
  12. 12. Shah AN, Tanveer M, Abbas A, Yildirim M, Shah AA, Ahmad MI, et al. Combating dual challenges in maize under high planting density: Stem lodging and kernel abortion. Front Plant Sci. 2021;12:699085. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2021.699085
  13. 13. Jafari F, Wang B, Wang H, Zou J. Breeding maize of ideal plant architecture for high-density planting tolerance through modulating shade avoidance response and beyond. J Integr Plant Biol. 2024;66(5):849-64. https://doi.org/10.1111/jipb.13603
  14. 14. Al-Naggar A, Shabana M, Hassanein M, Metwally A. Effects of elevated plant density and reduced nitrogen on agronomic and yield attributes of maize inbred lines and their diallel crosses. SABRAO J Breed Genet. 2023;55(5):1843-54. https://doi.org/10.54910/sabrao2023.55.5.35
  15. 15. Yu X, Zhang Q, Gao J, Wang Z, Borjigin Q, Hu S, et al. Planting density tolerance of high-yielding maize and the mechanisms underlying yield improvement with subsoiling and increased planting density. Agron. 2019;9(7):370. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy9070370
  16. 16. Mandi? V, ?or?evi? S, Brankov M, Živkovi? V, Lazarevi? M, Keški? T, Krnjaja V. Response of yield formation of maize hybrids to different planting densities. Agri. 2024;14(3):351. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture14030351
  17. 17. Wu W, Zhang L, Chu Z, Yue W, Xu Y, Peng C, et al. Improvement of climate resource utilization efficiency to enhance maize yield through adjusting planting density. Agron. 2023;13(3):846. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13030846
  18. 18. Kamara MM, Rehan M, Mohamed AM, El Mantawy RF, Kheir AM, Abd El-Moneim D, et al. Genetic potential and inheritance patterns of physiological, agronomic and quality traits in bread wheat under normal and water deficit conditions. Plants. 2022;11(7):952. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11070952
  19. 19. ElShamey EA, Sakran RM, ElSayed MA, Aloufi S, Alharthi B, Alqurashi M, et al. Heterosis and combining ability for floral and yield characters in rice using cytoplasmic male sterility system. Saudi J Biol Sci. 2022;29(5):3727-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sjbs.2022.03.010
  20. 20. Salem T, Rabie H, Mowafy S, Eissa A, Mansour E. Combining ability and genetic components of Egyptian cotton for earliness, yield and fiber quality traits. SABRAO J Breed Genet. 2020;52(4):369–89. https://sabraojournal.org-524-369-389
  21. 21. Heiba H, Mahgoub E, Mahmoud A, Ibrahim M, Mansour E. Combining ability and gene action controlling chocolate spot resistance and yield traits in faba bean (Vicia faba L.). J Agric Sci. 2023;29(1):77-88. https://doi.org/10.15832/ankutbd.97378
  22. 22. Ezzat MA, Alotaibi NM, Soliman SS, Sultan M, Kamara MM, Abd El-Moneim D, et al. Molecular and agro-morphological diversity assessment of some bread wheat genotypes and their crosses for drought tolerance. Peer J. 2024;12:e18104. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.18104
  23. 23. Galal AA, Safhi FA, El-Hity MA, Kamara MM, El-Din GEM, Rehan M, et al. Molecular genetic diversity of local and exotic durum wheat genotypes and their combining ability for agronomic traits under water deficit and well-watered conditions. Life. 2023;13(12):2293. https://doi.org/10.3390/life13122293
  24. 24. Al-Khayri J, El-Malky M. Genetic parameters and principal component analysis for quantitative traits in rice (Oryza sativa L.). SABRAO J Breed Genet. 2023;55(5):1547-60. https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.4105
  25. 25. Kamara MM, Ghazy NA, Mansour E, Elsharkawy MM, Kheir AM, Ibrahim KM. Molecular genetic diversity and line × tester analysis for resistance to late wilt disease and grain yield in maize. Agron. 2021;11(5):898. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11050898
  26. 26. Sedhom YS, Rabie HA, Awaad HA, Alomran MM, ALshamrani SM, Mansour E, Ali MM. Genetic potential of newly developed maize hybrids under different water-availability conditions in an arid environment. Life. 2024;14(4):453. https://doi.org/10.3390/life14040453
  27. 27. Sultan M, Abdel-Monaem M, Haffez SH. Combining ability and heterosis estimates for yield, yield components and quality traits in maize under two plant densities. J Plant Prod. 2010;1(10):1419-30. https://doi.org/10.21608/jpp.2010.86589
  28. 28. Mansfield BD, Mumm RH. Survey of plant density tolerance in US maize germplasm. Crop Sci. 2014;54(1):157-73. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2013.04.0252
  29. 29. Abd El-Aty M, El-Hity M, Amer E, El-Mouslhy T. Selection of maize (Zea mays) hybrids for plant density tolerance. Indian J Agric Sci. 2019;89(6):951-57. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v89i6.90767
  30. 30. Kamara MM, Rehan M, Ibrahim KM, Alsohim AS, Elsharkawy MM, Kheir AM, et al. Genetic diversity and combining ability of white maize inbred lines under different plant densities. Plants. 2020;9(9):1140. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants9091140
  31. 31. Al-Naggar A, Atta M. Elevated plant density effects on performance and genetic parameters controlling maize (Zea mays L.) agronomic traits. J Adv Biol Biotechnol. 2017;12:1-20. https://doi.org/10.9734/JABB/2017/31550
  32. 32. Gavuzzi P, Rizza F, Palumbo M, Campanile R, Ricciardi G, Borghi B. Evaluation of field and laboratory predictors of drought and heat tolerance in winter cereals. Can J Plant Sci. 1997;77(4):523-31. https://doi.org/10.4141/P96-130
  33. 33. Bouslama M, Schapaugh Jr W. Stress tolerance in soybeans. I. Evaluation of three screening techniques for heat and drought tolerance. Crop Sci. 1984;24(5):933-37. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1984.0011183X002400050026
  34. 34. Rosielle A, Hamblin J. Theoretical aspects of selection for yield in stress and non?stress environment. Crop Sci. 1981;21(6):943-46. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1981.0011183X002100060033x
  35. 35. Griffing B. Concept of general and specific combining ability in relation to diallel crossing systems. Aust J Biol Sci. 1956;9(4):463-93. https://doi.org/10.1100/2012/524873
  36. 36. Kassambara A. Factoextra: extract and visualize the results of multivariate data analyses. R package version. 2016;1:07. https://cloud.r-project.org/package=factoextra
  37. 37. Wehrens R, Mevik BH. The pls package: Principal component and partial least squares regression in R. J Stat Software. 2007;18(2):1–23. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v018.i02
  38. 38. Tokatlidis IS. Crop adaptation to density to optimise grain yield: breeding implications. Euphytica. 2017;213(4):92. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-017-1874-8
  39. 39. Sher A, Khan A, Cai LJ, Ahmad MI, Asharf U, Jamoro SA. Response of maize grown under high plant density; performance, issues and management-a critical review. Adv Crop Sci Technol. 2017;5(3):1-8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2021.699085
  40. 40. Zhang Q, Zhang L, Evers J, van Werf W, Zhang W, Duan L. Maize yield and quality in response to plant density and application of a novel plant growth regulator. Field Crops Res. 2014;164:82-89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2014.06.006
  41. 41. Du X, Wang Z, Lei W, Kong L. Increased planting density combined with reduced nitrogen rate to achieve high yield in maize. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):358. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-79633-z
  42. 42. Mansour E, Moustafa ES, El-Naggar NZ, Abdelsalam A, Igartua E. Grain yield stability of high-yielding barley genotypes under Egyptian conditions for enhancing resilience to climate change. Crop Pasture Sci. 2018;69(7):681-90. https://doi.org/10.1071/CP18144
  43. 43. Kasanaboina K, Prasad BV, Chavan S, Kumar CS, Naik DS, Chary DS, et al. Identification of stable restorers and high-yielding hybrids using diverse sorghum male sterile cytoplasmic sources and established pollen parents under different water regimes. Heliyon. 2024;10(21):e39807. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e39807
  44. 44. Zannat A, Hussain MA, Abdullah AHM, Hossain MI, Saifullah M, Safhi FA, et al. Exploring genotypic variability and interrelationships among growth, yield and quality characteristics in diverse tomato genotypes. Heliyon. 2023;9(8):e18958. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e18958
  45. 45. Sangoi L, Gracietti M, Rampazzo C, Bianchetti P. Response of Brazilian maize hybrids from different eras to changes in plant density. Field Crops Res. 2002;79(1):39-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4290(02)00124-7
  46. 46. Zhu Y, Wang S, Li Y, Wei D, Luo N, Wang P, Meng Q. Enhancing maize yield through understanding the novel shoot-root interaction in morphology among hybrids with dense planting. Field Crops Res. 2023;302:109107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2023.109107
  47. 47. He P, Ding X, Bai J, Zhang J, Liu P, Ren B, Zhao B. Maize hybrid yield and physiological response to plant density across four decades in China. Agron J. 2022;114(5):2886-904. https://doi.org/10.1002/agj2.21124
  48. 48. Edwards JW. Genotype × environment interaction for plant density response in maize (Zea mays L.). Crop Sci. 2016;56(4):1493-505. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2015.07.0408
  49. 49. Sarlangue T, Andrade FH, Calviño PA, Purcell LC. Why do maize hybrids respond differently to variations in plant density?. Agron J. 2007;99(4):984-91. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2006.0205
  50. 50. Gracia M, Mansour E, Casas A, Lasa J, Medina B, Cano JLM, et al. Progress in the Spanish national barley breeding program. Span J Agric Res. 2012;10(3):741-51. https://doi.org/10.5424/sjar/2012103-2613
  51. 51. Habibullah M, Sarkar S, Islam MM, Ahmed KU, Rahman MZ, Awad MF, et al. Assessing the response of diverse sesame genotypes to waterlogging durations at different plant growth stages. Plants. 2021;10(11):2294. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10112294
  52. 52. Ponce-Molina LJ, Casas MA, Gracia PM, Silvar C, Mansour E, Thomas WB, et al. Quantitative trait loci and candidate loci for heading date in a large population of a wide barley cross. Crop Sci. 2012;52(6):2469-80. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2012.01.0029
  53. 53. Abdel-Moneam MA, Attia AN, El-Emery MI, Fayed EA. Combining ability and heterosis for some agronomic traits in crosses of maize. Pak J Biol Sci. 2009;12(5):433-38. https://doi.org/10.3923/pjbs.2009.433.438
  54. 54. Taha MO, Rabie HA, Mowafi SAH, Othman HT, Ali MM. Combining ability analysis in diallel crosses of maize under different planting densities. Neuroquantology. 2022;20(17):915. https://doi.org/10.14704/Nq.2022.20.17.Nq880118
  55. 55. El-Abssi MG, Awaad HA, Qabil N, Mansour E. Assessing agronomic performance, chocolate spot resistance and heat tolerance for diverse Vicia faba genotypes under varying environmental conditions. Sci Rep. 2024;14(1):9224. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-59079-3
  56. 56. Mannan MA, Tithi MA, Islam MR, Al Mamun MA, Mia S, Rahman MZ, et al. Soil and foliar applications of zinc sulfate and iron sulfate alleviate the destructive impacts of drought stress in wheat. Cereal Res Commun. 2022;50(4):1279-89. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42976-022-00262-5
  57. 57. Soliman AA, Ibrahim MA, Mousa MI, Mansour E, He Y, Yu H. Genetic potential and inheritance pattern of agronomic traits in faba bean under free and infested Orobanche soil conditions. BMC Plant Biol. 2024;24(1):301. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-024-05017-4
  58. 58. Ali MA, Mansour E, Awaad HA. Drought tolerance in some field crops: State of the art review. Mitigating environmental stresses for agricultural sustainability in egypt Springer Water Springer, Cham; 2021:17-62. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-64323-2_2
  59. 59. Gaballah MM, Ghazy MI, Abd El salam KM, Abou El-Soud GM, Marei AM, Alomran MM, et al. Assessing productivity and quality potential of promising newly developed rice lines under water deficit and well-watered conditions. Pak J Bot. 2024;56(6):2107-16. http://dx.doi.org/10.30848/PJB2024-6(26)
  60. 60. El-Sanatawy AM, Ash-Shormillesy SM, Qabil N, Awad MF, Mansour E. Seed halo-priming improves seedling vigor, grain yield and water use efficiency of maize under varying irrigation regimes. Water. 2021;13(15):2115. https://doi.org/10.3390/w13152115
  61. 61. Swailam M, Mowafy S, El-Naggar N, Mansour E. Agronomic responses of diverse bread wheat genotypes to phosphorus levels and nitrogen forms in a semiarid environment. SABRAO J Breed Genet. 2021;53(4):592–608. https://doi.org/10.54910/sabrao2021.53.4.4
  62. 62. Moustafa ES, El-Sobky ESE, Farag HI, Yasin MA, Attia A, Rady MO, et al. Sowing date and genotype influence on yield and quality of dual-purpose barley in a salt-affected arid region. Agron. 2021;11(4):717. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11040717
  63. 63. Selem E, Hassan AA, Awad MF, Mansour E, Desoky ESM. Impact of exogenously sprayed antioxidants on physio-biochemical, agronomic and quality parameters of potato in salt-affected soil. Plants. 2022;11(2):210. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11020210
  64. 64. Al-Naggar A, Shabana R, Hassanein M, Elewa T, Younis A, Metwally A. Secondary traits and selection environment of plant density tolerance in maize inbreds and testcrosses. J Adv Biol Biotechnol. 2017;14(3):1-13. https://doi.org/10.9734/JABB/2017/35510
  65. 65. Awaad HA, Alzohairy AM, Morsy AM, Moustafa ES, Mansour E. Genetic analysis of cadmium tolerance and exploration of its inheritance nature in bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Indian J Genet Plant Breed. 2023;83(01):41-51. https://doi.org/10.31742/ISGPB.83.1.6
  66. 66. John BA, Kachapur RM, Naidu G, Talekar SC, Rashid Z, Vivek BS, et al. Maternal effects, reciprocal differences and combining ability study for yield and its component traits in maize (Zea mays L.) through modified diallel analysis. Peer J. 2024;12:e17600. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.17600

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.