Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Plant Science Today (PST)

Research Articles

Vol. 11 No. sp4 (2024): Recent Advances in Agriculture by Young Minds - I

Taste and choice: A comprehensive conjoint analysis of processed mango juice attributes

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.5612
Submitted
7 October 2024
Published
31-12-2014

Abstract

The food processing sector in India is experiencing significant growth, driven by urbanization, population expansion, and evolving consumer lifestyles. Among the various segments, the market for processed mango juice is rapidly expanding, especially in the Asia Pacific region due to the increasing demand of consumers for natural and nutritious beverages. In India, the processed mango juice market is also expected to grow substantially, supported by major brands foreseeing the immense market potential. This is further aided by a favourable climate for mango cultivation. Despite challenges such as seasonal availability and price fluctuations, consumer preferences are shifting towards healthier options, positioning the processed mango juice market for continued expansion in the coming years. This study focuses on consumer preferences towards the major attributes of processed mango drinks. Utilizing a purposive sampling method, data were collected from 150 respondents through questionnaires and interviews, supplemented by secondary data analysis. The research employed percentage analysis to assess consumer preferences, revealing insights into demographic characteristics that can inform marketing strategies. Additionally, a choice-based conjoint analysis was conducted to explore consumer trade-offs among product attributes—flavour, packaging material, sweeteners, and price—highlighting the importance of these factors in shaping consumer choices. The findings indicated that flavour and sweeteners are the primary factors driving consumer preferences, with a significant emphasis on taste over price and packaging considerations, ultimately leading to the identification of the most preferred product combinations based on total utility values.

References

  1. Burton-Freeman BM, Sandhu AK, Edirisinghe I. Mangos and their bioactive components: adding variety to the fruit plate for health. Food and Function. 2017;8(9):3010-32. https://doi.org/10.1039/C7FO00190H
  2. Carmo MCLd, Dantas MIdS, Ribeiro SMR. Caracterização do mercado consumidor de sucos prontos para o consumo. Brazilian Journal of Food Technology. 2014;17:305-09. https://doi.org/10.1590/1981-6723.2914
  3. Amin R, Rahman SS, Hossain M, Choudhury N. Physicochemical and microbiological qualities’ assessment of popular Bangladeshi mango fruit juice. The Open Microbiology Journal. 2018;12:135. https://doi.org/10.2174/1874285801812010135
  4. Gupta AK, Gurjar PS, Beer K, Pongener A, Ravi S, Singh S, et al. A review on valorization of different byproducts of mango (Mangifera indica L.) for functional food and human health. Food Bioscience. 2022;48:101783. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fbio.2022.101783
  5. Keerthika B, Thilagavathi M, Rani CI, Pragadeeswaran M, Vasanthi R. An overview of processed fruits export from India: Growth, status and trend. International Journal of Economic Plants. 2024. https://doi.org/10.23910/2/2024.5278b
  6. Mitra S, editor Mango production in the world–present situation and future prospect. XXIX International Horticultural Congress on Horticulture: Sustaining Lives, Livelihoods and Landscapes (IHC2014): IV 1111; 2014. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2016.1111.41
  7. Galán Saúco V, editor. Worldwide mango production and market: current situation and future prospects. IX International Mango Symposium. 2010;992. http://dx.doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2015.1066.7
  8. Reddy DCR. New education policy 2020 and innovative learning in education system: A critical review. International Journal of Research in Social Sciences and Humanities. 2020. https://doi.org/10.37648/ijrssh.v10i03.047
  9. Kumar K, Babu SC. An analysis of consumers’ preferences for orange juice in India during COVID-19. Studies in Agricultural Economics. 2021;123(3):131-40. https://doi.org/10.7896/j.2151
  10. Bellundagi V, Umesh K, Roopa H, Ravi S. Application of conjoint analysis for consumer preference evaluation in ragi in Karnataka. Indian Journal of Economics and Development. 2016;4(10):2322-0430. http://dx.doi.org/10.5958/2322-0430.2017.00162.7
  11. Mueda JC, Ongy EE. Conjoint analysis of the consumers’ preferences between locally processed root crop-based food products and commercial junk foods. Journal of Educational and Human Resource Development (JEHRD). 2022;10:20-33. https://doi.org/10.61569/hba20509
  12. Cheng C-H, Lin S-Y, Tsai C-C. Investigating consumer preferences in choosing vegetarian restaurants using conjoint analysis. Current Urban Studies. 2014;2(03):279. https://doi.org/10.4236/cus.2014.23026
  13. John S, Ferdinand F, Yingdao D. An analysis of consumers’ preferences between locally grown/processed food and organic food. Curr Inves Agri Curr Res. 2018;4(1):180. https://doi.org/10.32474/CIACR.2018.04.000180
  14. Rodrigues DM, Rodrigues JF, Souza VRd, Carneiro JdDS, Borges SV. Consumer preferences for Cerrado fruit preserves: A study using conjoint analysis. British Food Journal. 2018;120(4):827-38. https://doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-03-2017-0187
  15. Harshini J, Samuel ADV. A conjoint analysis on consumers’ revealed preferences for products from coconuts in Madurai City India. Asian J Agric Ext Econ Sociol. 2019;34(4):1-8. https://doi.org/10.9734/ajaees/2019/v34i430204
  16. Putri FS, Suryantini A, Mulyo JH, editors. Consumer preference towards layer chicken eggs and native chicken eggs in Yogyakarta. 1st International Conference on Sustainable Agricultural Socio-economics, Agribusiness and Rural Development (ICSASARD 2021); 2021: Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/aebmr.k.211214.025
  17. Prasanna Rashmi K, Chengappa P, Achoth L, Mangala P. Consumer preferences for food retail chains in india: an application of conjoint analysis. Advance Management Practices in Business. 24. 2018.
  18. Sapara N, Rosyad A, Wijayanti IKE. Analisis ipreferensi ikonsumen idalam ipembelian ibuah manggai gedongi gincui dii pasari tradisionali kadipaten kabupaten majalengka. Mimbar Agribisnis: Jurnal Pemikiran Masyarakat Ilmiah Berwawasan Agribisnis. 2023;9(2):2370-83. https://doi.org/10.25157/ma.v9i2.10361
  19. Shafira NA, Rasmikayati E, Saefudin BR. Analisis preferensi konsumen terhadap produk olahan mangga analysis of consumer preferences for processed mango products. Mimbar Agribisnis: Jurnal Pemikiran Masyarakat Ilmiah Berwawasan Agribisnis Juli. 2021;7(2):1033-44. https://doi.org/10.25157/ma.v7i2.4985
  20. Dlamini NN, Mayhew EJ, Nolden AA. Unpacking consumer preferences: Perceptions and sustainability of packaging material for orange juice. Sustainability. 2024. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16146202
  21. Zhu Y, Shen M, Sims CA, Marshall MR, House LA, Sarnoski PJ. Consumer preference and willingness to pay for tomato juice. International Food and Agribusiness Management Review. 2018. https://doi.org/10.22434/IFAMR2017.0117
  22. Saraiva A, Carrascosa C, Raheem D, Ramos F, Raposo A. Natural sweeteners: The relevance of food naturalness for consumers, food security aspects, sustainability and health impacts. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2020;17. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17176285
  23. Obilor E, Isaac, editors. Convenience and purposive sampling techniques: Are they the Same?; 2023.
  24. Höher J, Bach T, Münster A, Bouillon B, Tiling T. Does the mode of data collection change results in a subjective knee score?. The American Journal of Sports Medicine. 1997;25:642-47. https://doi.org/10.1177/036354659702500509
  25. Llewellyn C, Cram L, editors. Distinguishing the wood from the trees: Contrasting collection methods to understand bias in a longitudinal brexit twitter dataset. International Conference on Web and Social Media; 2017. https://doi.org/10.1609/icwsm.v11i1.14924
  26. Fishburn PC. Utility theory. Management Science. 1968;14(5):335-78. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.14.5.335
  27. Gustafsson A, Herrmann A, Huber F. Conjoint measurement: Methods and applications. Springer Science and Business Media. 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-24713-5_13
  28. San Cristóbal Mateo JR, Mateo JRSC. Multi-attribute utility theory. Multi Criteria Analysis in the Renewable Energy Industry. 2012;63-72. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-2346-0_10
  29. Colonius H, editor. Complete consensus and order independence: relating ranking and choice. Probability Models and Statistical Analyses for Ranking Data. Springer. 1993. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-2738-0_15
  30. Currim IS. Predictive testing of consumer choice models not subject to independence of irrelevant alternatives. Journal of Marketing Research. 1982;19(2):208-22. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378201900205
  31. McFadden D. Modelling the choice of residential location. 1977.
  32. Schmidt-Leukel P, Steinkellner E, Peck-Kubaczek C. Buddha mind-Christ mind: a Christian commentary on the Bodhicary?vat?ra: Peeters; 2019. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv1q26wkd
  33. Befurt R, Eggers F, Hauser JR. Supply side considerations when using conjoint analysis in litigation. Handbook of Marketing Analytics: Methods and Applications in Marketing, Public Policy and Litigation, (Edward Elgar), Natalie Mizik and Dominique Hanssens, Eds (2024), MIT Sloan Research Paper Forthcoming. 2024. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4700623
  34. Kuzmanovi? M, Kr?evinac S, Vukmirovi? D. The algorithms for constructing efficient experimental designs in Conjoint analysis. 2005. 10.2298/YUJOR0801063K
  35. Siriguppi D, Gnanamkonda V, Koundinya C. The young consumers’ preferences for buying attributes: A conjoint analysis approach. Journal of Critical Reviews. 2020;7(4):3897-910.
  36. Thulasiram RL, Alagumani T, Duraisamy M. Preferences of quality attributes for mango export: A conjoint analysis approach. International Research Journal of Agricultural Economics and Statistics. 2016;7:42-47. https://doi.org/10.15740/HAS/IRJAES/7.1/42-47
  37. Kiloes AM, Nurmalinda, Handayani YI, Pitaloka D. Understanding the importance of fresh mango quality attributes from the perspective of Indonesian domestic consumers. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. 2021;892. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/892/1/012102
  38. Rokka J, Uusitalo L. Preference for green packaging in consumer product choices – Do consumers care? International Journal of Consumer Studies. 2008;32:516-25. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1470-6431.2008.00710.x
  39. Oloyede OO, Lignou S. Sustainable paper-based packaging: A consumer’s perspective. Foods. 2021;10. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods10051035
  40. Verma DP, Gupta SS. Does higher price signal better quality? Vikalpa: The Journal for Decision Makers. 2004;29:67-78. https://doi.org/10.1177/0256090920040206
  41. Hyginus OO, Wabuji DS, Christian A, editors. Pricing strategy as a factor for sales performance of consumable goods: Evidence from consumable goods dealers in Wukari local government; 2019.
  42. Ghusn W, Naik R, Yibirin M. The impact of artificial sweeteners on human health and cancer association: A comprehensive clinical review. Cureus. 2023;15. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.51299

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.