Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Plant Science Today (PST)

Research Articles

Vol. 11 No. sp4 (2024): Recent Advances in Agriculture by Young Minds - I

Water footprint and virtual water trade of apples: Insights from India

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.5673
Submitted
9 October 2024
Published
17-12-2024

Abstract

India is a prominent producer and exporter of apples globally. However, apple cultivation requires significant water resources, and the water foot- print associated with apple production and trade in India has not been thor- oughly quantified. This study quantified the water footprint associated with apple production in India from 2000 to 2023, as well as the virtual water trade between 2018 and 2023. State-wise data on Indian apple production was collected and analyzed to assess the domestic water footprint, while trade data was compiled to estimate the virtual water flow associated with apple imports and exports. The results showed that the water footprint of Indian apple production averaged 2,430 million cubic meters (Mm3 ) annual- ly. This substantial footprint was primarily composed of green water (69.9%), along with blue water (23.9%) and grey water (6.2%). In terms of virtual water trade, India was a net importer with 27.8 Mm3 of virtual water embodied in apple imports from major exporters such as Turkey, Iran and Italy. This analysis underscores the considerable water footprint of Indian apple production and the nation's significant net inflow of virtual water re- sources through the apple trade. Additionally, the study highlights the im- portance of considering virtual water flow in agricultural trade policies to achieve sustainable and equitable water resource management.

References

  1. Cornille A, Gladieux P, Smulders MJ, Roldán-Ruiz I, Laurens F, et al. New insight into the history of domesticated apple: secondary contribution of the European wild apple to the genome of cultivated varieties. PLoS genetics. 2012;8(5).https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1002703
  2. Saxena P. Multiplication of apple 'Gala' (Malus domestica L) by thidiazuron (Germination, In vitro root-based regeneration and micrografting) (Doctoral dissertation, University of Guelph):2018.
  3. Allan JA. Fortunately there are substitutes for water otherwise our hydro-political futures would be impossible. Priorities for water resources allocation and management. 1993;13(4):26.
  4. Hoekstra AY. The water footprint assessment manual: Setting the global standard. Routledge; 2011.
  5. Mekonnen MM, Hoekstra AY. The green, blue and grey water footprint of crops and derived crop products. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences. 2011;15(5):1577-600. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-15-1577-2011.
  6. Tamea S, Tuninetti M, Soligno I, Laio F. Virtual water trade and water footprint of agricultural goods: the 1961-2016 CWASI database. Earth System Science Data Discussions. 2020 ;2020:1-23. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2020-226
  7. Mialyk O, Booij MJ, Schyns JF, Berger M. Evolution of global water footprints of crop production in 1990-2019. Environmental Research Letters. 2024;19(11). https://doi.org/10.1088/17489326/ad78e9
  8. Pandey V. Estimation of Crop Water Requirements. Fertigation Technologies for Micro Irrigated Crops. Apple Academic Press. 2021:109-36. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003084136-10
  9. Clothier B. Green, blue and grey waters: Minimising the footprint using soil physics. In 19th World Congress of Soil Science, Soil Solutions for a Changing World. 2010:1-6.
  10. Starr G, Levison J. Identification of crop groundwater and surface water consumption using blue and green virtual water contents at a subwatershed scale. Environmental Processes. 2014;1:497-515. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40710-014-0040-8
  11. Fader M, Gerten D, Thammer M, Heinke J, et al. Internal and external green-blue agricultural water footprints of nations and related water and land savings through trade. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences. 2011;15(5):1641-660. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-15-1641-2011.
  12. Tamea S, Carr J, Laio F, Ridolfi L. Drivers of the virtual water trade. Water Resources Research. 2014;50(1):17-28. https://doi.org/10.1002/2013WR014707
  13. Ahmad L, Parvaze S, Parvaze S, Kanth RH. FAO Reference evapotranspiration and crop water requirement of apple (Malus Pumila) in Kashmir Valley. Journal of Agrometeorology. 2017;19(3):262-64. https://doi.org/10.54386/jam.v19i3.668
  14. Kampman D. The water footprint of India: A study on water use in relation to the consumption of agricultural goods in the Indian states (Master’s Thesis). University of Twente. 2007.
  15. Kokila J. A water footprint analysis for agriculture in India (PhD Thesis). Division of Agricultural Economics ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research. 2016.
  16. Chapagain A, Orr S. UK water footprints: The impact of the UK’s food and fibre consumption on global water resources (Volume one). Godalming, UK: WWF-UK. 2009.
  17. Shivaswamy GP, Kallega HK, Anuja A, Singh K. Assessment of India’s virtual water trade in major food products. Agricultural Economics Research Review. 2021;34:133-41. https://doi.org/10.5958/0974-0279.2021.00021.5

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.