Marketing channel assessment of natural rubber: Insights from Kanyakumari district, Tamil Nadu

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.5646

Keywords:

Kanniyakumari, marketing channel, marketing efficiency, natural rubber, production efficiency, value chain

Abstract

The study investigates the marketing dynamics of natural rubber in Kanyakumari district, Tamil Nadu, a traditional region for rubber cultivation in India. Utilizing a multistage random sampling method, data were collected from 150 respondents, including 120 rubber growers and 30 intermediaries, through structured questionnaires and personal interviews conducted between November 2023 and August 2024. The research aims to map the value chain of natural rubber, analyze marketing costs, margins, and price spreads, and identify production and marketing constraints faced by farmers. The findings revealed four primary marketing channels: direct sales to primary dealers, rubber producer societies, collection agents, and processing units. Each channel exhibited distinct marketing costs and efficiencies; notably, channels involving direct sales to dealers were more cost-effective for producers compared to those utilizing collection agents. However, intermediaries achieved higher margins in the latter. Key constraints identified include adverse weather conditions, fragmented landholdings, high production costs, lack of government subsidies, and inadequate access to technology. Marketing challenges such as poor standardization and grading practices exacerbate price volatility and reduce farmers' earnings. The study emphasized the need for improved marketing strategies and infrastructure to enhance the profitability of smallholder rubber farmers. By addressing these constraints through targeted interventions, stakeholders could foster a more sustainable and economically viable natural rubber sector in Kanyakumari district, ultimately benefiting the livelihoods of thousands reliant on this critical agricultural industry.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Prasada IY, Dhamira A. The competitiveness of natural rubber by exporting countries in the global market. E3S Web of Conferences; 2021:305:02006

Ashokkumar K. A study on marketing pattern of natural rubber in the state of Kerala. International Journal of Agriculture Sciences. 2019;11(4)7920-22

Singh SS, Chauhan JK, Devarani L. Review on rubber producers' societies in North East India. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences. 2021;10(1):2814-9. https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2021.1001.326

Sunil Justus TF, Ramesh M. Rubber plantations: growth and prospects of small holders. Small Enterprises Development, Management & Extension Journal. 2007;34(3):43-52. https://doi.org/10.1177/0970846420070305

Mathew S. Rubber production and marketing with emphasis on the small scale growers and the Rubber Producer's Societies (RPSs): A literature Review. SSRN 4068111. 2019. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4068111

Shammy T, Rani SJ. Return on investent by rubber plantation by small rubber holders in Kanyakumari District. Journal of Survey in Fisheries Sciences. 2023:2808-12.

Roselyn J, Ravichandran S, Ruban JS. Trend in rubber price and marketing of natural rubber in Kanyakumari District. Indian Journal of Agricultural Marketing. 2019;33(3s):131-40.

Murphy S, Rose ME. The sustainable agriculture transition: How to make the most of transformative technology. International Institute for Sustainable Development. 2021; 1-11

Jergin J, Somasundaram S. Adoption of recommended technologies by rubber growers in Kanyakumari district of Tamil Nadu. Journal of Plantation Crops. 2018;46(2):118-23. https://doi.org/10.25081/jpc.2018.v46.i2.3724

AnujaA R, Kar A, JhaG K, Kumar R. Price dynamics and market integration of natural rubber under major trade regimes of India and abroad. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 2013; 83(5)555-60.

Mathew SG. Rubber Production and marketing with emphasis on the small scale growers and the rubber producer's societies ( rpss): a literature review. SSRN Electronic Journal. 2019. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4068111

Palanichamy NV, Kumar KD, Kalpana M, Kumar MS. A study on price spread analysis and marketing efficiency of ragi in Krishnagiri and Dharmapuri districts of Tamil Nadu, India. Asian Research Journal of Agriculture. 2024;17(2):249-58.

Abad A, Maaz MAM, Shamsi MS. A new method for assessing the marketing efficiency of agricultural marketing channels. Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal. 2024; 10(2):143-66. https://doi.org/10.51599/are.2024.10.02.06

Gunarathne PKKS, Thennakoon TMSPK, Edirisinghe JC. Identification and prioritization of the constraints of rubber farming in Moneragala District. Journal of the Rubber Research Institute of Sri Lanka. 2022;102:55-68. https://doi.org/10.4038/jrrisl.v102i1.1914

Varghese S. Challenges and opportunities of cooperative marketing with respect to small rubber growers in Kerala. IOSR Journal of Business and Management. 2012;3:37-9. https://doi.org/10.9790/487X-0363739

Kumar V, Kumar V, Kumar A, Kochewad S, Singh M. Marketing channels, marketing cost, margin and producer's share in consumer's rupee in paddy marketing. Agro Economist - An International Journal. 2017; 4(1):21-7. https://doi.org/10.5958/2394-8159.2017.00005.6

Khaswarina S, Maharani E, Kausar K, Andriani Y. Implementation of effective distribution channels in the marketing of traditional rubber plantation in Tambang District, Kampar Regency, Riau. E3S Web of Conferences. 2023; 373:04023. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202337304023

Kalidas K, Ravikumar R. Assessing marketing efficiency in the coconut value chain: a case study of Western Tamil Nadu's Coconut landscape. Journal of Scientific Research and Reports. 2024;30(5):625-32. https://doi.org/10.9734/jsrr/2024/v30i51981

Thakur S, Murthy C, Kumar S, editors. Marketing channels of different timber species in Uttara Kannada district of Karnataka. International Journal of Science and Research. 2020. 9(8): 1198-202

Ghosh M. Climate-smart agriculture, productivity and food security in India. Journal of Development Policy and Practice. 2019;4(2):166-87. https://doi.org/10.1177/2455133319862404

Deininger K, Monchuk D, Nagarajan HK, Singh SK. Does land fragmentation increase the cost of cultivation? Evidence from India. The Journal of Development Studies. 2017;53(1):82-98. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220388.2016.1166210

Acharya S. Effective Implementation of agricultural price and marketing policy for doubling farmers incomes: doable priority actions. Agricultural Economics Research Review. 2017;30:1-12. https://doi.org/10.5958/0974-0279.2017.00017.9

Onumah G, Davis J, Kleih U, Proctor F. Empowering smallholder farmers in markets: Changing agricultural marketing systems and innovative responses by producer organizations. Munich Personal RePEc Archive. 2007; 25984:1-38.

Pingali P, Aiyar A, Abraham M, Rahman A. Transforming food systems for a rising India: Springer Nature; 2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14409-8

2024

Published

31-12-2024

How to Cite

1.
Theoslin BT, Deepa N, Rohini A, Prahadeeswaran M, Kavitha PS. Marketing channel assessment of natural rubber: Insights from Kanyakumari district, Tamil Nadu. Plant Sci. Today [Internet]. 2024 Dec. 31 [cited 2025 Jan. 10];11(sp4). Available from: https://horizonepublishing.com/journals/index.php/PST/article/view/5646

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>