Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Research Articles

Vol. 11 No. sp4 (2024): Recent Advances in Agriculture by Young Minds - I

Screening and assessment of PGP and biocontrol properties of Azotobacter species isolated from agriculture soils of North Karnataka

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.5705
Submitted
10 October 2024
Published
24-12-2024

Abstract

Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) are recognized for their ability to produce phytohormones, root-stimulating compounds, anti-fungal compounds and other secondary metabolites, making them potential biocontrol agents in agriculture. In the present study, 85 Azotobacter isolates were isolated from the agricultural soils of Raichur and Chikkabalapura locations. The isolates were further accessed for morphological, biochemical and plant growth-promotion (PGP) properties. All the isolated strains showed brown to black colour colonies on the Waksmann 77 media plate. Similar biochemical results were obtained for all the Azotobacter isolates. The isolates such as Azt-85 recorded the highest N2 fixation (33.36 µgN/mL/Day), Azt-69 produced IAA (24.67 µg/mL), and Azt-51 produced GA (23.7 µg/25mL). The anti-fungal efficacy studies were conducted using the dual culture technique using the efficient PGPR Azotobacter isolates against fungal species (Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lini, Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. ciceris and Aspergillus flavus). After the incubation period, the Azt-41 isolate showed the highest zone of inhibition (18 mm) against Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lini. Similarly, Azotobacter isolates viz., Azt-25, 38 and 41 showed maximum growth inhibition (9 mm) against Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. ciceris. Similarly, the Azt-31 isolate recorded a moderate (13 mm) zone of inhibition against Aspergillus flavus. Integrating sustainable biocontrol strategies by injecting beneficial microbes like Azotobacter can enhance resilient food production systems and reduce reliance on chemical inputs through PGPR properties.

References

  1. McLaughlin D, Kinzelbach W. Food security and sustainable resource management. Water Res Res. 2015;51(7):4966–85. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015WR017053
  2. Kiaya V. Post-harvest losses and strategies to reduce them. Technical Paper on Postharvest Losses, Action Contre la Faim. 2014;25(3):1–25.
  3. Odelade KA, Babalola OO. Bacteria, fungi, and archaea domains in rhizospheric soil and their effects in enhancing agricultural productivity. Int J Environ Res Pub Health. 2019;16(20):3873. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16203873
  4. Sharma P, Sharma MM, Malik A, Vashisth M, Singh D, Kumar R, Singh B, Patra A, Mehta S, Pandey V. Rhizosphere, rhizosphere biology and rhizospheric engineering. In: Heba IM, Mohamed H, El-Din S, Abd-Elsalam KA, editors. Plant growth-promoting microbes for sustainable biotic and abiotic stress management. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2021. p. 577–624. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-66587-6_21
  5. Morgan JA, Bending GD, White PJ. Biological costs and benefits to plant–microbe interactions in the rhizosphere. J Exp Bot. 2005;56(417):1729–39. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/eri205
  6. Yu Y, Gui Y, Li Z, Jiang C, Guo J, Niu D. Induced systemic resistance for improving plant immunity by beneficial microbes. Plants. 30;11(3):386. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11030386
  7. Podile A, Kishore G. Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria. Plant-associated bacteria. 2006:195–230. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-4538-7_6
  8. Correa PA, Nosheen A, Yasmin H, Ansari MJ. Anti-fungal antibiotics biosynthesized by major PGPR. In: Sayyed RZ, Uarrota VG, editors. Secondary metabolites and volatiles of PGPR in plant-growth promotion. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2022. p.199–247. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-07559-9_11
  9. Vacheron J, Desbrosses G, Bouffaud ML, Touraine B, Moënne-Loccoz Y, Muller D, Legendre L, Wisniewski-Dyé F, Prigent-Combaret C. Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria and root system functioning. Front Pl Sci. 2013;4:356. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2013.00356
  10. Ahkami AH, White III RA, Handakumbura PP, Jansson C. Rhizosphere engineering: enhancing sustainable plant ecosystem productivity. Rhizosphere. 2017;3:233–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rhisph.2017.04.012
  11. Gurikar C, Shivaprasad DP, Sabillón L, Gowda NN, Siliveru K. Impact of mycotoxins and their metabolites associated with food grains. Grain Oil Sci Tech. 2023;6(1):1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaost.2022.10.001
  12. Nagaraja H, Chennappa G, Rakesh S, Naik MK, Amaresh YS, Sreenivasa MY. Anti-fungal activity of Azotobacter nigricans against trichothecene-producing Fusarium species associated with cereals. Food Sci Bio. 2016;25:1197–204. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10068-016-0190-8
  13. Aasfar A, Bargaz A, Yaakoubi K, Hilali A, Bennis I, Zeroual Y, Meftah Kadmiri I. Nitrogen fixing Azotobacter species as potential soil biological enhancers for crop nutrition and yield stability. Front Microbio. 2021;12:628379. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2021.628379
  14. Lugtenberg B, Kamilova F. Plant-growth-promoting rhizobacteria. Ann Rev Microbiol. 2009;63(1):541–56. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.micro.62.081307.162918
  15. Sumbul A, Ansari RA, Rizvi R, Mahmood I. Azotobacter: A potential bio-fertilizer for soil and plant health management. Saudi J Bio Sci. 2020;27(12):3634–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sjbs.2020.08.004
  16. Fukami J, Cerezini P, Hungria M. Azospirillum: benefits that go far beyond biological nitrogen fixation. Amb Express. 2018;8(1):73. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13568-018-0608-1
  17. Verma PP, Shelake RM, Das S, Sharma P, Kim JY. Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) and fungi (PGPF): potential biological control agents of diseases and pests. In: Singh DP, Singh HB, Prabha R, editors. Microbial inoculants in sustainable agricultural productivity: research perspectives. Vol. 1. Singapore:Springer; 2016. 2019:281–311. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-8391-5_11
  18. Chennappa G, Adkar-Purushothama CR, Suraj U, Tamilvendan K, Sreenivasa MY. Pesticide-tolerant Azotobacter isolates from paddy-growing areas of northern Karnataka, India. World J Microbio Biotech. 2014;30:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11274-013-1412-3
  19. Naik TA, Earanna N, Suresh CK. Influence of Azotobacter chroococcum strains on growth and biomass of Adathoda vasica Nees. Kar J Agric Sci. 2007;20(3)613–15.
  20. Viscardi S, Ventorino V, Duran P, Maggio A, De Pascale S, Mora ML, Pepe O. Assessment of plant growth promoting activities and abiotic stress tolerance of Azotobacter chroococcum strains for a potential use in sustainable agriculture. J Soil Sci Pl Nutr. 2016;16(3):848–63. http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-95162016005000060
  21. Tarana A, Bhavishya AD, Lekhana SM, Prabhu V, Hanumantharaju KN, Anusha MB, Gurikar C. Extraction and profiling of anti-fungal compounds produced by Azotobacter Species. J Pure App Microbio. 2024;18(1) 269–79. https://doi.org/10.22207/JPAM.17.1.12
  22. Sachin DN, Misra P. Effect of Azotobacter chroococcum (PGPR) on the growth of bamboo (Bambusa bamboo) and maize (Zea mays) plants. Biofrontiers. 2009;1(1):24–31.
  23. Teske A, Cypionka H, Holt JG, Krieg NR. Enrichment and isolation. Methods Gen Mol Microbiol. 2007:215-69. https://doi.org/10.1128/9781555817497.ch11
  24. Zhang X, Tong J, Dong M, Akhtar K, He B. Isolation, identification and characterization of nitrogen-fixing endophytic bacteria and their effects on cassava production. PeerJ. 2022 25;10:e12677. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.12677
  25. Patil V. Production of indole acetic acid by Azotobacter sp. Rec Res Sci Tech. 2011;3(12)14–16 .
  26. Ahmad F, Ahmad I, Khan MS. Indole acetic acid production by the indigenous isolates of Azotobacter and fluorescent Pseudomonas in the presence and absence of tryptophan. Turk J Biol. 2005;29(1):29–34.
  27. Lenin G, Jayanthi M. Indole acetic acid, gibberellic acid and siderophore production by PGPR isolates from rhizospheric soils of Catharanthus roseus. Int J Pharmacy Biol Arch. 2012;3(4):933–8.
  28. Chennappa G, Sreenivasa MY, Nagaraja H. Azotobacter salinestris: a novel pesticide-degrading and prominent biocontrol PGPR bacteria. In: Panpatte DG, Jhala YK, Shelat HS, Rajababu VV, editors. Microorganisms for green revolution: Microbes for sustainable agro-ecosystem. Singapore:Springer; 2018. p. 23–43. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-7146-1_2
  29. Bonartsev AP, Bonartseva GA, Myshkina VL, Voinova VV, Mahina TK, Zharkova II, Yakovlev SG, Zernov AL, Ivanova EV, Akoulina EA, Kuznetsova ES. Biosynthesis of poly (3-hydroxybutyrateco-3-hydroxy-4-methylvalerate) by Strain Azotobacter chroococcum 7B. Acta Naturae. 2016;8(3):77–87.
  30. Bubici G, Kaushal M, Prigigallo MI, Gómez-Lama Cabanás C, Mercado-Blanco J. Biological control agents against Fusarium wilt of banana. Front Microbiol. 2019;10:616. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2019.00616
  31. Chennappa G, Naik MK, Amaresh YS, Nagaraja H, Sreenivasa MY. Azotobacter: a potential biofertilizer and bioinoculants for sustainable agriculture. In: Panpatte DG, Jhala YK, Shelat HS, Rajababu VV, editors. Microorganisms for green revolution: microbes for sustainable crop production. Vol. 1. Singapore:Springer; 2017. p. 87–106. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-6241-4_5
  32. Tolangi P. Nitrogen fixation evaluation of Azotobacter chroococcum isolated from soil of forest. PhD [dissertation]. Dharan:Tribhuvan University; 2022. Available from: http://202.45.146.37:8080/jspui/bitstream/123456789/249/1/thesis%20piskila%20final%202022.pdf
  33. Page WJ, Shivprasad S. Azotobacter salinestris sp. nov., a sodium-dependent, microaerophilic and aeroadaptive nitrogen-fixing bacterium. Int J System Evol Microbiol. 1991;41(3):369–76. https://doi.org/10.1099/00207713-41-3-369
  34. Chennappa G, Naik MK, Adkar-Purushothama CR, Amaresh YS, Sreenivasa MY. PGP potential, abiotic stress tolerance and anti-fungal activity of Azotobacter strains isolated from paddy soils. Ind J Exp Biol. 2016;54(5):322–31.
  35. Deepa N, Chennappa G, Deepthi BN, Naik MK, Ramesha KP, Amaresh YS, Satish S, Sreenivasa MY. Anti-fungal potential of Azotobacter species and its metabolites against Fusarium verticillioides and biodegradation of fumonisin. J App Microbio. 2022 ;133(4):2430–44. https://doi.org/10.1111/jam.15709
  36. Jnawali AD, Ojha RB, Marahatta S. Role of Azotobacter in soil fertility and sustainability–a review. Adv Plants Agric Res. 2015;2(6):1–5.
  37. Chennappa G, Adkar-Purushothama CR, Naik MK, Suraj U, Sreenivasa MY. Impact of pesticides on PGPR activity of Azotobacter sp. isolated from pesticide-flooded paddy soils. Greener J Agric Sci. 2014;4(4):117–29. http://dx.doi.org/10.15580/gjas.2014.4.010314003
  38. Kizilkaya R. Nitrogen fixation capacity of Azotobacter spp. strains isolated from soils in different ecosystems and relationship between them and the microbiological properties of soils. J Environ Biol. 2009;30(1):73–82.
  39. Bundale S, Begde D, Pillai D, Gangwani K, Nashikkar N, Kadam T, Upadhyay A. Novel aromatic polyketides from soil Streptomyces spp.: purification, characterization and bioactivity studies. World J Microbio Biotech. 2018;34:1–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11274-018-2448-1
  40. Gurikar C, Sreenivasa MY, Gowda NN, Lokesh AC. Azotobacter–A potential symbiotic rhizosphere engineer. In: Dubey RC, Kumar P, editors. Rhizosphere Engineering United Kingdom:Academic Press; 2022. p. 97–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-89973-4.00010-7
  41. Noumavo PA, Agbodjato NA, Baba-Moussa F, Adjanohoun A, Baba-Moussa L. Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria: Beneficial effects for healthy and sustainable agriculture. Afr J Biotechnol. 2016;15(27):1452–63. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJB2016.15397
  42. Dar SA, Bhat RA, Dervash MA, Dar ZA, Dar GH. Azotobacter as biofertilizer for sustainable soil and plant health under saline environmental conditions. A Sustainable Continuum for Plant and Soil Health. 2021:231–54. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-48771-3_14
  43. Sumbul A, Ansari RA, Rizvi R, Mahmood I. Azotobacter: A potential bio-fertilizer for soil and plant health management. Saudi J Biol Sci. 2020;27(12):3634–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sjbs.2020.08.004
  44. Hussain T, Akthar N, Aminedi R, Danish M, Nishat Y, Patel S. Role of the potent microbial based bioagents and their emerging strategies for the ecofriendly management of agricultural phytopathogens. Natural Bioactive Products in Sustainable Agriculture. 2020;45–66. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-3024-1_4
  45. Nagaraja H, Chennappa G, Deepa N, Naik MK, Ajithkumar K, Amaresh YS, Achar PN, Sreenivasa MY. Anti-fungal potential of Azotobacter salinestris strain Azt 31 against phytopathogenic Fusarium spp. associated with cereals. J Fungi. 2022;8(5):473. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof8050473
  46. Deepa N, Chennappa G, Deepthi BN, Naik MK, Ramesha KP, Amaresh YS, Satish S, Sreenivasa MY. Anti-fungal potential of Azotobacter species and its metabolites against Fusarium verticillioides and biodegradation of fumonisin. J App Microbiol. 2022;133(4):2430–44. https://doi.org/10.1111/jam.15709
  47. Chennappa G, Naik MK, Amaresh YS, Nagaraja H, Sreenivasa MY. Azotobacter: a potential biofertilizer and bioinoculants for sustainable agriculture. In: Panpatte DG, Jhala YK, Shelat HS, Rajababu VV, editors. Microorganisms for green revolution: microbes for sustainable crop production. Vol. 1. Singapore:Springer; 2017. p. 87–106. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-6241-4_5
  48. Aasfar A, Bargaz A, Yaakoubi K, Hilali A, Bennis I, Zeroual Y, Meftah Kadmiri I. Nitrogen fixing Azotobacter species as potential soil biological enhancers for crop nutrition and yield stability. Front Microbiol. 2021;12:628379. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2021.628379
  49. Chennappa G, Udaykumar N, Vidya M, Nagaraja H, Amaresh YS, Sreenivasa MY. Azotobacter—a natural resource for bioremediation of toxic pesticides in soil ecosystems. In: Gupta VK, editor. New and future developments in microbial biotechnology and bioengineering. Elsevier; 2019. p. 267–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-64191-5.00019-5
  50. Gurikar C, Naik MK, Sreenivasa MY. Azotobacter: PGPR activities with special reference to effect of pesticides and biodegradation. In: Singh DP, Singh HB, Prabha R, editors. Microbial inoculants in sustainable agricultural productivity: research perspectives. Vol. 1. Singapore:Springer; 2016. p. 229–44. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-2647-5_13

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.