Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Research Articles

Vol. 11 No. sp4 (2024): Recent Advances in Agriculture by Young Minds - I

Energy efficient weed control in high density planting rainfed cotton

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.5133
Submitted
18 September 2024
Published
02-12-2024 — Updated on 05-03-2025
Versions

Abstract

An experiment utilizing a split-plot design was done to ascertain the optimal plant population and weed management strategies for enhancing yield, net income and energy efficiency in high-density rainfed cotton cultivation. The primary plot treatments comprised three spacing configurations: 100x10 cm, 150x50x10 cm and 175x50x10 cm. Six weed management approaches were evaluated as subplot treatments, with each treatment replicated three times throughout the 2023-24 rabi season. These practices included power weeding on 20 and 45 days after sowing (DAS), intercropping with black gram, hand weeding on 20 and 45 DAS, herbicide application of Metolachlor (preemergence) on 5 DAS and a combination of Pyrithiobac sodium plus Quizalofop ethyl (post-emergence) on 20 DAS, along with weedy check and weed-free check.
The 100x10 cm spacing combined with power weeding proved superior, achieving higher yield parameters, greater yield, increased income (Rs. 67238/ha), a benefit-cost ratio of 2.27, energy productivity of 0.38 Kg/MJ, net energy productivity of 30334 MJ/ha and an energy use efficiency of 4.0 in high-density planting (HDP). The narrow-row spacing (100x10 cm) with power weeding also optimized plant population and enhanced per-plant productivity. This configuration also supported proper soil tilling and aeration, enabling a higher uptake of inputs with minimum energy expenditure for weeding, leading to improved overall performance.

References

  1. Radhika E, Kumari RV. An economic analysis of processing of cotton crop produce. Int J Econ Plants. 2015;2(4):162-67. http://ojs.pphouse.org/index.php/IJEP/article/view/4435
  2. Tariq M, Abdullah K, Ahmad S, Abbas G, Rahman MH, Khan MA. Weed management in cotton. In: Ahmad S, Hasanuzzaman M, editors. Cotton production and uses. Singapore: Springer; 2020. p. 145–161. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-1472-2_9
  3. Kumar M, Premalatha N, Mahalingam L, Sakthivel N, et al. High-density planting system of cotton in India: Status and breeding strategies. In: Abdurakhmonov IY, editor. Plant breeding—Current and future views. London: IntechOpen; 2020. p. 145–167. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.94905
  4. Mohanasundaram P. Cultivation of cotton: A study on factors and problems. Int J Arts Humanit Manag Stud. 2015;1(3):1-6. http://ijahms.com/upcomingissue/01.03.2015.pdf
  5. Agarwal I. Dynamics of labour use in cotton farming in India: An economic appraisal. Asian J Agric Ext Econ Sociol. 2023;41(9):887-95. https://doi.org/10.9734/ajaees/2023/v41i92116
  6. Vallal Kannan S, Vengateswari M, Arunachalam P, Balaji T. Rainfall variability and trend assessment for rainfed region of Ramanathapuram district, Tamil Nadu, India. Appl Ecol Environ Res. 2024;22(5):4409-16. http://dx.doi.org/10.15666/aeer/2205_44094416
  7. Singh K, Rathore P. Planting geometry and nutrient levels affecting seed cotton yield, productivity indices and economic parameters of Bt cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). J Environ Biol. 2020;41(6):1550-59. https://doi.org/10.22438/jeb/41/6/mrn-1425
  8. Dixit A, Manes GS, Chandel R. Comparative performance evaluation of weeders for cotton crop. J Inst Eng (India) Agric Eng. 2011;504(92):10-13.
  9. Venugpalan MV, Kranthi KR, Blaise D, Lakde S, Sankaranarayana K. High density planting system in cotton-The Brazil Experience and Indian Initiatives. Cotton Res J. 2013;5(2):172-85.
  10. Celsia S, Babu S. Recent advances and future perspectives of high-density planting system in cotton. In: Vignesh K, Gokul D, Visalakshi M, Sathiya Aravindan V, Lokesh R, editors. Emerging trends in agriculture and allied sciences. Vol. 2. India: Royal Book Publishing – International (Partner of Eleyon Publishers); 2023. p. 46–50.
  11. Anbarasan S, Ramesh S, Sudhakar P. Determining the optimal plant spacing for cotton varieties to enhance the growth and yield of cotton under HDPS in Karaikal region. Journal of Survey in Fisheries Sciences. 2022;9(1):719-25. https://doi.org/10.53555/sfs.v9i1.1867
  12. Mani V, Gautam K, Dass B, Singh Y. Integrated weed management for sustainable agriculture. In: Proceedings of the Third All India Weed Control Seminar. Indian J Weed Sci. 1973: 34–476.
  13. Devasenapathy P, Senthilkumar G, Shanmugam P. Energy management in crop production. Indian J Agron. 2009;54(1):80-90. https://doi.org/10.59797/ija.v54i1.4771
  14. Gomez KA, Gomez AA. Statistical procedures in agricultural research. 2nd ed. New York: Wiley; 1984. p. 680. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0014479700014496
  15. Mayee CD, Singh P, Dongre AB, Rao MRK, Raj S. Transgenic Bt cotton. CICR Technical Bulletin No. 22. Nagpur: Central Institute for Cotton Research; 2011.
  16. Pishgar-Komleh S, Sefeedpari P, Ghahderijani M. Exploring energy consumption and CO2 emission of cotton production in Iran. J Renew Sustain Energy. 2012;4(3). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4727906
  17. Jabran K. Weed flora, yield losses and weed control in cotton crop. Julius-Kühn-Archiv. 2016;452:177-82.
  18. Paslawar AN, Ingole PG, Yenpreddiwar MD, Deotalu AS, Bhale VM, Rathod TH. Weed management in high-density planting system of cotton. Proceedings of the 25th Asian-Pacific Weed Science Society Conference on “Weed Science for Sustainable Agriculture, Environment and Biodiversity”; 2015 Oct 13-16; Hyderabad, India.
  19. Ramasundaram P, Gajbhiye H. Constraints to cotton production in India. Nagpur: Central Institute for Cotton Research; 2001. CICR Technical Bulletin No. 19.
  20. Jabran K, Chauhan BS. Overview and significance of non-chemical weed control. In: Jabran K, Chauhan BS, editors. Non-chemical weed control. London: Academic Press; 2018. p. 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-809881-3.00001-2
  21. Chinnusamy N, Chinnagounder C, Krishnan PN. Evaluation of weed control efficacy and seed cotton yield in glyphosate-tolerant transgenic cotton. Am J Plant Sci. 2013;4:1159-63. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/ajps.2013.46142
  22. Singh K, Singh HP, Singh K. Weed management in cotton with pre-and post-emergence herbicides. Indian J Weed Sci. 2016;48(3):348-350. https://doi.org/10.5958/0974-8164.2016.00090.3
  23. Bajwa AA. Sustainable weed management in conservation agriculture. Crop Prot. 2014;65:105-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2014.07.014
  24. Ofosu R, Agyemang ED, Marton A, Pasztor G, Taller J, Kazinczi G. Herbicide resistance: Managing weeds in a changing world. Agronomy. 2023;13(6):1595. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13061595
  25. Mor A, Bansal N, Parveen KN, Kumar S. Performance evaluation of different weeders in cotton. Int J Agric Eng. 2020;13(2):177-85. https://doi.org/10.15740/has/ijae/13.2/227-236
  26. Pawar SR, Kale MS. Development and design of Min-T8 HP power weeder back rotor. In: Pawar PM, Ronge BP, Gidde RR, Pawar MM, Misal ND, Budhewar AS, et al., editors. Techno-societal 2022. ICATSA 2022. Cham: Springer; 2024. p. 97-103. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-34644-6_11
  27. Malarkodi N. Integrated weed management effect on weeds and seed cotton yield. Int J Environ Agric Biotechnol. 2017;2(2):597-606. https://doi.org/10.22161/ijeab/2.2.6
  28. Deshmukh AS, Mohanty A. Cotton mechanization in India and across globe: A review. Int J Adv Res Eng Sci Technol. 2016;3(1):66-74.
  29. Harisudan C, Senthivel S, Arulmozhiselvan K, Vaidyanathan R, Manivannan V. Blackgram as intercrop in cotton – A review. Agric Rev. 2009;30(3):219-23.
  30. Jayakumar M, Ponnuswamy K, Amanullah MM, Yassin MM, Balasubramanian V. Effect of intercropping and sources of nitrogen on growth, yield and N use efficiency in cotton. Res J Agric Biol Sci. 2007;3(5):398-402.
  31. Sathishkumar A, Srinivasan G, Subramanian E, Rajesh P. Weed management in cotton: A review. Agric Rev. 2022;43(1):1-10. https://doi.org/10.18805/ag.r-2080
  32. Rao CS, Lal R, Prasad JVNS, Gopinath KA, Singh R, Jakkula VS, et al. Potential and challenges of rainfed farming in India. In: Sparks DL, editor. Advances in Agronomy, Volume 133. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2015. p. 113-181. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.agron.2015.05.004
  33. Gokdogan O, Erdogan O, Eralp O, Zeybek A. Energy efficiency analysis of cotton production in Turkey: A case study from Aydin province. Fresenius Environ Bull. 2016;25(11):4959-64.
  34. Maheswari MU, Krishnasamy SM, Kumar M, Sakthivel N. Energy efficiency analysis of machine sown cotton under high density planting system. Res Crops. 2019;20(2):430-37. https://doi.org/10.31830/2348-7542.2019.062
  35. Chen G, Baillie C. Development of a framework and tool to assess on-farm energy uses of cotton production. Energy Conv Manag. 2009;50(5):1256-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2009.01.022
  36. Narayanamoorthy A, Suresh R. An uncovered truth in fixation of MSP for crops in India. Rev Dev Change. 2013;18(1):53-62. https://doi.org/10.1177/0972266120130104

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.