A study on the promotion of biofertilizer: an application of the plackett-luce model

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.5899

Keywords:

biofertilizers, plackett-luce model, promotion, sustainable agriculture

Abstract

The research focuses on understanding the elements that drive Agro-input dealers to promote biofertilizers and highlights the challenges encountered in their adoption. With increasing environmental concerns over chemical fertilizers, biofertilizers are promoted as a sustainable alternative that improves soil fertility through beneficial microorganisms. The research was conducted in Hassan district, Karnataka, where 40 dealers were surveyed using structured questionnaires. The Plackett-Luce model was employed to analyze ranked data and understand the relative importance of variables. Results show that high promotional activities (worthiness=0.80, P=<0.001), profitability (worthiness=0.42, P=<0.001) and Service by Company Staff (worthiness=0.23, P=<0.001) significantly impact dealers' promotion efforts, whereas brand image (worthiness=-0.56, P=0.349) has minimal influence. Constraints such as farmers' negative attitudes (worthiness=2.65, P=<0.001), insufficient market facilities (worthiness=1.41, P=<0.005) and limited dealer knowledge (worthiness=-2.02, P=<0.001) were identified as significant barriers. Promotional strategies like field trials (worthiness=0.93, P=<0.001), farmers' meetings (worthiness=0.83, P=<0.001) and jeep campaigns (worthiness=0.61, P=<0.001) emerged as the most effective methods for engaging farmers. The study highlights the need for improved dealer training, better market infrastructure and supportive government policies to enhance biofertilizer promotion, fostering sustainable agricultural practices.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Sujanya S, Chandra S. Effect of part replacement of chemical fertilizers with organic and bio-organic agents in ground nut (Arachis hypogea). J Algal Bio Utilizn. 2011;2(4):38-41

Savci S. An agricultural pollutant: chemical fertilizer. Int J Environ Sci Develop. 2012;3(1): 73.

Vessey, J.K. Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria as biofertilizers. Plant and Soil. 2003;255:571–86. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026037216893

Bardi L, Malusà E. Drought and nutritional stresses in plants: alleviating role of rhizospheric microorganisms. abiotic stress. New Research. 2012; 1–57.

Ibáñez A, Garrido-Chamorro S, Vasco-Cárdenas MF, Barreiro C. From lab to field: biofertilizers in the 21st century. Horticulturae. 2023;9(12):1306. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae9121306

Chaudhary P, Singh S, Chaudhary A, Sharma A, Kumar G. Overview of biofertilizers in crop production and stress management for sustainable agriculture. Front Plant Sci. 2002;13:930340. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.930340

Government of India. Press Information Bureau [Internet]. [Accessed on June 26, 2024]. Available from: https://pib.gov.in/PressReleaseIframePage.aspx?PRID=1897011

Finch H. An Introduction to the Analysis of Ranked Response Data. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation. 2022;27:1–20.

Patel SA, Patel JK, Patel VM. Constraints experienced by the input dealers in providing agro services to the farmers. Guj J Ext Edu. 2019; 153-155.

Published

09-12-2024

How to Cite

1.
Horatti RS, Hemalatha S, Lavanya M, Shanthasheela M, Vanitha G. A study on the promotion of biofertilizer: an application of the plackett-luce model. Plant Sci. Today [Internet]. 2024 Dec. 9 [cited 2024 Dec. 22];11(sp4). Available from: https://horizonepublishing.com/journals/index.php/PST/article/view/5899