Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Plant Science Today (PST)

Special issue on Int Conf Spices

Vol. 11 No. sp3 (2024): International Seminar on Spices KAU - 2024

Site-specific online fertilizer recommendations in small cardamom (Elettaria cardamomum (L.) Maton through CardSApp offers fertilizer savings and higher economic returns

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.5995
Submitted
20 October 2024
Published
27-12-2024 — Updated on 09-09-2025
Versions

Abstract

The cultivation of small cardamom in the Indian Cardamom Hill (ICH) region of the Western Ghats, southern India, has become highly intensive, with heavy use of fertilizers and pesticides. The cultivation of small cardamom in the Indian Cardamom Hill (ICH) region of the Western Ghats, Southern India, has become highly intensive, with heavy use of fertilizers and pesticides. The ICH region is one of the world's biodiversity hotspots. Numerous studies have reported that the excessive use of chemical fertilizers has caused soil acidification (lowering of pH) and nutrient imbalances. This has resulted in unsustainable production of cardamom, a high-value spice crop that contributes significantly to India's export earnings. This study aimed to conduct a geo-tagged soil fertility survey in selected cardamom-growing areas within the ICH, assess soil fertility and provide sitespecific fertilizer recommendations to farmers via a mobile- or web-based application. A digital application, CardSApp, designed for the small cardamom sector, offers tailored fertilizer recommendations based on local soil and crop requirements. A representative geo-tagged soil survey was conducted in Udumbanchola taluk, located in Idukki district of Kerala, within the ICH. The surveyed area spanned from 76°59'01.19''- 77°16'11.55'' East longitude and 9° 38'21.54''- 10°04'46.60'' North latitude. Spatial interpolation techniques were used to generate maps showing the distribution of primary, secondary and micronutrients in the soil. The study revealed a high availability of NPK nutrients in cardamom soils. The study also revealed deficiencies in secondary nutrients like magnesium and sulfur, as well as micronutrients such as boron. Most of the soils showed signs of acidification. These findings highlight opportunities to optimize fertilizer usage and improve soil health. Specifically, NPK usage can be reduced or phosphatic fertilizers omitted in 58% of the area, potentially savings of ?12.27 crores annually in the surveyed taluk alone. Additionally, addressing deficiencies in secondary and micronutrients can further enhance soil health and crop productivity. To aid farmers in decision-making, the Android- and web-based application CardSApp leverages interpolated soil fertility data. CardSApp offers site-specific recommendations tailored to the soil nutrient profiles identified in the survey. CardSApp enables farmers to optimize fertilizer use, correct nutrient imbalances and apply amendments for pH correction. These practices can improve both farm productivity and income. The adoption of this online fertilizer recommendation system by farmers in the ICH is expected to rationalize fertilizer usage in cardamom cultivation, improve both soil and plant health and support sustainable production with higher economic returns.

References

  1. 1. Muthusamy M, Panigrahy BK, Shetty PK, Subbiah A, Ravi R. Effect of heavy metal and nutrient uptake by soils in Indian Cardamom Hills. J Soil Sci Environ Manage. 2012;3(8):196–206. https://doi.org/10.5897/jssem11.091
  2. 2. Sen P, Majumdar K, Sulewski G. Spatial variability in available nutrient status in an intensively cultivated village. Better Crops. 2007;91(2):10–11.
  3. 3. Liu X, Xu J, Zhang M, Si B, Zhao K. Spatial variability of soil available Zn and Cu in paddy rice fields of China. Environ Geol. 2008;55(7):1569–76. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00254-007-1107-x
  4. 4. Mali SS, Naik SK, Bhatt BP. Spatial variability in soil properties of mango orchards in eastern plateau and hill region of India. Vegetos. 2016;29(3):74–9. https://doi.org/10.5958/2229-4473.2016.00070.7
  5. 5. Behera SK, Suresh K, Rao BN, Mathur RK, Shukla AK, Manorama K, et al. Spatial variability of some soil properties varies in oil palm (Elaeis guineensis Jacq.) plantations of west coastal area of India. Solid Earth. 2016;7:979–93. https://doi.org/10.5194/se-2016-9
  6. 6. Ramzan S, Wani M, Bhat MA. Assessment of spatial variability of soil fertility parameters using geospatial techniques in Temperate Himalayas. Int J Geosci. 2017;8(10):1251–63. https://doi.org/10.4236/ijg.2017.810072
  7. 7. Brevik EC, Calzolari C, Miller BA, Pereira P, Kabala C, Baumgarten A, et al. Soil mapping, classification and pedologic modeling: History and future directions. Geoderma. 2016;264(B):256–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2015.05.017
  8. 8. Saito H, McKenna A, Zimmerman DA, Coburn TC. Geostatistical interpolation of object counts collected from multiple strip transects: ordinary kriging versus finite domain kriging. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess. 2005;19(1):71–85. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-004-0207-3
  9. 9. Pereira P, Cerda A, Ubeda X, Mataix-Solera J, Martin D, Jordan A, et al. Spatial models for monitoring the spatiotemporal evolution of ashes after fire – a case study of burnt grassland in Lithuania. Solid Earth. 2013;4(1):153–65. https://doi.org/10.5194/se-4-153-2013
  10. 10. Srinivasan V, Murugan M, Dinesh R. Spices. In: Thomas GV, Krishnakumar V, editors. Soil health management for plantation crops. Singapore: Springer; 2024. p. 153–63. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-0092-9_5
  11. 11. Walkley A, Black IA. An examination of the Degtjareff method for determining soil organic matter and a proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method. Soil Sci. 1934;37:29–38. https://doi.org/10.1097/00010694-193401000-00003
  12. 12. Bray RH, Kurtz LT. Determination of total organic and available forms of phosphorus in soils. Soil Sci. 1945;59:39-46. https://doi.org/10.1097/00010694-194501000-00006
  13. 13. Jackson ML. Soil chemical analysis. New York: Prentice Hall Inc; 1973. 498 p.
  14. 14. Vogel AI. Textbook of qualitative inorganic analysis. 4th ed. London, New York: Longman; 1978. 318 p. https://doi.org/10.1080/00103628109367237
  15. 15. Parker DR, Gardner EH. The determination of hot water-soluble boron in some acid Oregon soils using a modified Azomethine-H procedure. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal. 1981;12:1311–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-004-0207-3
  16. 16. Saito H, McKenna SA, Zimmerman DA, Coburn TC. Geostatistical interpolation of object counts collected from multiple strip transects: ordinary kriging versus finite domain kriging. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess. 2005;19(1):71–85. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-004-0207-3
  17. 17. Shit PK, Bhunia GS, Maiti R. Spatial analysis of soil properties using GIS based geostatistics models. Model Earth Syst Environ. 2016;2:2–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-016-0160-4
  18. 18. Environmental Systems Research Institute (ESRI). ArcGIS Geostatistical Analyst. ArcGIS 9 user’s manual. New York, USA: ESRI; 2003. p. 113-20.
  19. 19. Lu GY, Wong DW. An adaptive inverse-distance weighting spatial interpolation technique. Comput Geosci. 2008;34(9):1044-55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2007.07.010
  20. 20. Srinivasan V, Dinesh R, Hamza. Management of acid soils for sustainable production of spice in India. In: Proceedings of the 8th International Symposium on Plant-Soil Interactions at Low pH; 2012 Oct; Bengaluru. p. 153-68.
  21. 21. Karthikakuttyamma M, Joseph M, Nair ANS. Soils and nutrition. In: George PJ, Jacob CK, editors. Natural rubber: agro management and crop processing. Kottayam (India): Rubber Research Institute of India; 2000. p. 171-98.
  22. 22. Prasannakumari P, Jessy MD, Pradeep B, Jacob J, Abraham J, Philip A, et al. Spatial variability of available calcium and magnesium in soils in the rubber growing regions of South India. Rubber Sci. 2020;33(1):18 18-32.
  23. 23. Ananthanarayana R, Mithyantha MS, Perur MG. Fertility status of the acid soils of Karnataka. Mysore J Agric Sci. 1986;8:209-13.
  24. 24. KAU. Ad hoc recommendations for management of secondary and micronutrients in Kerala. Kerala Agricultural University; 2012.
  25. 25. Patil S, Anilkumar KS, Srinivasamurthy CA. Soil fertility status and nutrient index for primary nutrients in Western Ghats and coastal Karnataka under different agro-ecological systems. Asian J Soil Sci. 2017;12(2):314-9. https://doi.org/10.15740/has/ajss/12.2/314-319
  26. 26. Pradeep B, Jacob J, Jessy MD. Rubber soil information system (RUBSIS): A decision-making tool for skipping fertilizer application in rubber plantations. Rubber Sci. 2019;32(1):63-6.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.