Screening for drought stress tolerance in traditional mango (Mangifera indica L.): biochemical and physiological approaches

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.6050

Keywords:

Biochemical Analysis, biochemical markers, drought, mango, physiological analysis

Abstract

This study assessed the ability of 34 mangoes (Mangifera indica L.) accessions and one control to tolerate drought by measuring several physiological and biochemical characteristics. There were notable variations in the relative water content among the accessions. KLM37, PTA01, and ALA23 had the highest values, suggesting that they had higher drought tolerance. Furthermore, KLM37, ALA15, and PTA01 exhibited the greatest saturated water content (SWC), indicating improved water retention during periods of drought. The analysis of specific leaf area (SLA) showed significant differences among the accessions studied. KLM37, ALA23, KLM12, and PTA01 exhibited the greatest SLA values. The accessions also showed a significant increase in epicuticular wax content (EWC). This indicates that they have improved drought adaptation by reducing water loss. The accessions exhibited an increased cell membrane stability index (CMSI), which further demonstrates their ability to withstand drought stress. The biochemical markers revealed that ALA27, ALA23, and KLM37 exhibited a noteworthy increase in proline concentration, suggesting their capacity for drought tolerance. PTA01, TVM02, and ALA27 exhibited high chlorophyll concentrations, indicating enhanced photosynthetic efficiency in drought conditions. Principal Component Analysis (PCA) revealed that RWC, CMSI, and EWC are the primary characteristics that contribute to drought tolerance. PC1 accounts for 76.913% of the overall variation. The levels of proline and chlorophyll had a significant impact on the second principal component (PC2), explaining 10.556% of the variation. A drought study conducted as part of abiotic stress tolerance thus identified several mango accessions with superior drought tolerance traits, particularly KLM37, PTA01, ALA23, and KLM12. These mango accessions are promising candidates for breeding programs aimed at improving drought resilience in mangoes.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Barrs H, Weatherley P. A re-examination of the relative turgidity technique for estimating water deficits in leaves. Aust J Biol Sci. 1962;15(3):413?28. https://doi.org/10.1071/BI9620413

Wright IJ, Reich PB, Westoby M, Ackerly DD, Baruch Z, Bongers F. The worldwide leaf economics spectrum. Nature. 2004;428(6985):821?27. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature02403

Samuels L, Kunst L, Jetter R. Sealing plant surfaces: cuticular wax formation by epidermal cells. Ann Rev Plant Biol. 2008;59(1):683?07. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.arplant.59.103006.093219

Abhilasha A, Choudhury SR. Molecular and physiological perspectives of abscisic acid mediated drought adjustment strategies. Plants. 2021;10(12):235?44. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10122769

Verbruggen N, Hermans C. Proline accumulation in plants: A review. Amino Acids. 2008;35(4):753?59. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00726-008-0061-6

Hernandez B, Grajal MJ, Gonzalez AM. Assessment of drought stress tolerance in Mangifera indica L. Agron. 2023;13(1):277?93. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13010277

Farooq M, Wahid A, Kobayashi N, Fujita D, Basra SMA. Plant drought stress: Effects, mechanisms and management. Agron Sustain Dev. 2009;29(2):185–12. https://doi.org/10.1051/agro:2008021

Bates LS, Waldren RP, Teare ID. Rapid determination of free proline for water-stress studies. Plant Soil. 1973;39(1): 205?07. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00018060

Shinozaki K, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K. Gene networks involved in drought stress response and tolerance. J Exp Bot. 2007;58(2):221?27.https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erl164

Peng Y, Lin W, Cai W, Arora R. Overexpression of a panax ginseng tonoplast aquaporin alters salt tolerance, drought tolerance and cold acclimation ability in transgenic Arabidopsis plants. Planta. 2007;226(3):729?40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00425-007-0520-4

Ashraf M, Foolad MR. Roles of glycine betaine and proline in improving plant abiotic stress resistance. Environ Exp Bot. 2007;59(2):206?16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2005.12.006

Ebercon A, Blum A, Jordan WR. A rapid colorimetric method for epicuticular wax contentt of sorghum leaves. Crop Sci. 1977;17(1):179?80. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1977.0011183x001700010047x

Gopinath PP, Parsad R, Joseph B, Adarsh VS. Grapes Agri1: Collection of shiny apps for data analysis in agriculture. J Open Sou Softw. 2021;6(63):34?37. https://doi.org/10.32614/CRAN.package.grapesAgri1

Blum A, Ebercon A. Cell membrane stability as a measure of drought and heat tolerance in wheat. Crop Sci. 1981;21(1):43?47. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1981.0011183X002100010013x

Anjum SA, Xie X, Wang C, Saleem MF, Man C, Lei W. Morphological, physiological and biochemical responses of plants to drought stress. African J Agric Res. 2011;6(9):2026?32. https://doi.org/10.21921/jas.5.3.7

Flexas J, Galmés J, Gallé A, Gulías J, Pou A, Ribas-Carbo M. Improving water use efficiency in grapevines: potential physiological targets for biotechnological improvement. Aust J Grape Wine Res. 2010;16(1):106?21. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-0238.2009.00057.x

Kosma DK, Bourdenx B, Bernard A, Parsons EP, Lü S, Joubès J. The impact of water deficiency on leaf cuticle lipids of Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2009;151(4):1918?29.https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.109.141911

Alam P, Balawi TA, Faizan M. Salicylic acid’s impact on growth, photosynthesis and antioxidant enzyme activity of Triticum aestivum when exposed to salt. molecules. 2023;28(1):100?110. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28010100

Bajji M, Kinet JM, Lutts S. The use of the electrolyte leakage method for assessing cell membrane stability as a water stress tolerance test in durum wheat. Plant Growth Regul. 2002;36(1):61?70. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014732714549

Blum A. Drought resistance is it really a complex trait? Fun Plant Biol. 2011;38(10):753?58. https://doi.org/10.1071/FP11101

Chaves MM, Maroco JP, Pereira JS. Understanding plant responses to drought - from genes to the whole plant. Fun Plant Biol. 2003;30(3):239?64. https://doi.org/10.1071/FP02076

Szabados L, Savoure A. Proline: a multifunctional amino acid. Trends Plant Sci. 2010;15(2): 89?97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2009.11.009

Awasthi R, Kaushal N, Vadez V, Turner NC, Berger J, Siddique KHM. Individual and combined effects of transient drought and heat stress on carbon assimilation and seed filling in chickpea. Fun Plant Biol. 2014; 41(11):1148?67. https://doi.org/10.1071/FP13340

Published

03-03-2025 — Updated on 18-03-2025

Versions

How to Cite

1.
Bindu B, Renjan B, Shelvy S, Mathew A. Screening for drought stress tolerance in traditional mango (Mangifera indica L.): biochemical and physiological approaches. Plant Sci. Today [Internet]. 2025 Mar. 18 [cited 2025 Mar. 21];12(1). Available from: https://horizonepublishing.com/journals/index.php/PST/article/view/6050

Issue

Section

Research Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)