Agronomic Performance of Modern Rice Varieties in South-west Bangladesh

Authors

  • Md. Tareq Bin Salam Soil, Water and Environment Discipline, Khulna University, Khulna 9208, Bangladesh
  • Biswajit Karmakar Bangladesh Rice Research Institute, Joydebpur, Gazipur 1701, Bangladesh
  • S.M. Tanzim Hossain Soil, Water and Environment Discipline, Khulna University, Khulna 9208, Bangladesh
  • Mehedi Hasan Robin Soil, Water and Environment Discipline, Khulna University, Khulna 9208, Bangladesh
  • Most. Zannatul Mariam Soil, Water and Environment Discipline, Khulna University, Khulna 9208, Bangladesh
  • Mehjabin Hossain Soil, Water and Environment Discipline, Khulna University, Khulna 9208, Bangladesh

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.2019.6.4.632

Keywords:

Rice, Salinity, Harvest index, Yield, Growth

Abstract

An experiment was carried out in Boro season during November 2018 to April 2019 at two farmer’s fields of Batiaghata and Dumuria sub-district under Khulna district of Bangladesh with the objective of testing agronomic status and adaptability of four modern rice varieties in comparison with the popular mega variety BRRI dhan28. The varieties were BRRI dhan67, BRRI dhan81, BRRI dhan84 and BRRI dhan86. BRRI dhan28 was chosen as a control due to its wide acceptability among the farmers. The soil of the studied area was moderately alkaline and medium to moderately saline. In Batiaghata and Dumuria field, initial soil EC was 3.19 and 3.29 dS/m, respectively and it was 4.7 and 4.8 dS/m, accordingly at maturity stage. It was observed that germination rate, plant height, effective tiller number were significantly higher in BRRI dhan67 than the other varieties but insignificant with BRRI dhan28 (p?0.05) for both fields. All the yield components spikelets per panicle, filled grain and 1000-grain weight were also significantly higher in BRRI dhan67 in compared to the other varieties but insignificant with BRRI dhan28 (p?0.05) for both fields as well. The highest grain yield was observed in BRRI dhan67 in both plots (7.89 and 7.29 t/ha) and showed significant differences among all other varieties (p?0.05). Harvest Index of BRRI dhan67 (51.02±4.2, 57.84±8.6)% indicated that this variety is the best yielder among the varieties. Considering overall performances and facts, BRRI dhan67 showed better agronomic performance and adaptation than the other modern varieties in compare with popular mega BRRI dhan28.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Bangladesh: A Country Study: “Rice". Library of Congress, Washington, D.C. September 1988; Retrieved March 21, 2009.

2. Khatun M, Shuvo MAR, Salam MTB, Rahman SMH. Effect of organic amendments on soil salinity and the growth of maize (Zea mays L.). Plant Science Today 2019; 6(2): 106-11. https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.2019.6.2.49

3. McWilliam JR. The national and international drought and salinity effects on agricultural production. Aust. J. Plant Phsiol. 1986; 13: 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1071/PP9860001

4. Khatun S, Rizzo CA, Flowers TJ. Genotypic variation in the effect of salinity on fertility in rice. Plant Soil 1995; 173:239–50.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00011461

5. Ashraf MY, Khan MA, et al. Effect of salinity on seedling growth and solute accumulation in two wheat genotypes. Rachis 1991; 10: 30-31.

6. Khan AHM, Ashraf Y, et al. Growth ion and solute contents of sorghum grown under NaCl and Na2SO4 salinity stress. Acta Physiol. Plant 1995; 17: 261-68.

7. Bangladesh Rice Research Institute. Official webpage: www.brri.gov.bd

8. Gomez KA and Gomez AA. Statistical Procedures for Agricultural Research (2nd edition) International Rice Research Institute, John Willey and Sons, Inc. Singapore1984; pp. 139-240.

9. Flowers TJ. Effect of sodium chloride on enzyme activity of four halophytic species of Chenopodiaceae.Phytochem 1972; 11: 1881-86. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0031-9422(00)90147-X

10. Waisel Y. Biology of halophytes. Academic Press, New York 1972; ISBN: 0127308504.

11. Islam MZ, Baset Mia MA, et al.Effect of different saline levels on growth and yield attributes of mutant rice. J. Soil. Nature 2007; 1(2): 18-22.

12. Ullah MA, Zaid SAR, et al. Effect of Planting Techniques (Direct seeding Vs. Transplanting) on Paddy Yield in Salt-affected Soil. Intl. J. Agric. Biol. 2007; 9(1): 179-80.

13. Munns R. Comparative physiology of salt and water stress. Plant Cell Environ. 2002; 25: 239-50. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0016-8025.2001.00808.x

14. Sarkar SC. Performance of five selected hybrid rice varieties in aman season. M.S. Thesis, Dept of Agricultural Botany, Sher-e-Bangla Agricultural University, Dhaka 2014; Pp. 25-26, 44-46. Retrieved from http://archive.saulibrary.edu.bd:8080/bitstream/handle/123456789/342/Bot-SAU201401_12-08-02835.pdf?sequence=1

15. Zaman SK, Chowdhury DAM, et al. The effect of salinity on germination, growth, yield and mineral composition of rice. Bangladesh J. Agric. Sci. 1997; 24(1): 103-09.

16. Kiani G, Nematzadeh G. Correlation and path coefficient studies in F2 populations of rice. Notulae Scientia Biological 2012; 4(2): 124-27. https://doi.org/10.15835/nsb427366

17. Roy SK, Ali MY, Jahan MS, Saha UK, Ahmad-Hamdan MS, Hassan MM and Alam MM. Evaluation of growth and yield attributing characteristics of indigenous boro rice varieties. Life Sci. J. 2014; 11: 122-26.

18. Biswas JK, Hossain MA, Sarker BC, Hassan M and Haque MZ. Yield performance of several rice varieties seeded directly as late aman crops. Bangladesh J. Life Sci. 1998; 10: 47–52.

19. Dutta RK, Baset Mia MA and Khanam S. Plant architecture and growth characteristics of fine grain and aromatic rice and their relation with grain yield. Intl. Rice Comm. Newsletter 2002; 51: 51–56.

20. Zeng L, Shannon MC. Salinity effects on seedling growth and yield components of rice. Crop Sci. 2000; 40(4): 996-1003. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2000.404996x

21. Gain P, Mannan MA, Pal PS, Hossain MM and Pervin S. Effect of salinity on some yield attributes of rice. Pak. J. Biol. Sci. 2004; 7(5): 760-62. https://doi.org/10.3923/pjbs.2004.760.762

22. Hossain MZ. Performance of BRRI dhan32 in the SRI and conventional methods and their technology Mixes. MS Thesis, Department of Agronomy, BAU, Mymensingh, 2002; pp. 28-71.

23. Pheloung PC and Siddique KHM. Contribution of system dry matter to grain yield in wheat cultivars. Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 1991; 18(1): 53-64.https://doi.org/10.1071/PP9910053

24. Kusutani A, Tovata M, Asanuma K and Cui J. Studies on the varietal differences of harvest index and morphological characteristics of rice. Japanese J. Crop Sci. 2000; 69: 359-64.https://doi.org/10.1626/jcs.69.359

25. Miah MHN, Karim MA, Rahman MS and Islam MS. Performance of Nizersail mutants under different row spacing. Bangladesh J. Train and Dev. 1990; 3(2): 31-34.

26. Jisan MT, Paul SK and Salim M. Yield performance of some transplant Aman rice varieties as influenced by different levels of nitrogen. J. Bangladesh Agril. Univer. 2014; 12(2): 321–24. https://doi.org/10.3329/jbau.v12i2.28691

27. Tyeb A, Paul SK and Samad MA. Performance of variety and spacing on the yield and yield contributing characters of transplant Aman rice. J. Agrof. Environ. 2013; 7(1): 57-60.

Downloads

Published

27-10-2019

How to Cite

1.
Salam MTB, Karmakar B, Hossain ST, Robin MH, Mariam MZ, Hossain M. Agronomic Performance of Modern Rice Varieties in South-west Bangladesh. Plant Sci. Today [Internet]. 2019 Oct. 27 [cited 2024 Nov. 24];6(4):528-32. Available from: https://horizonepublishing.com/journals/index.php/PST/article/view/632

Issue

Section

Research Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)