Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Research Articles

Vol. 12 No. 1 (2025)

Sustainability of yield and value in blackgram (Vigna Mungo) through frontline demonstrations

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.6435
Submitted
30 November 2024
Published
28-01-2025 — Updated on 07-03-2025
Versions

Abstract

The present study evaluated the sustainability of yield and value in blackgram cultivation by adopting improved production technologies through frontline demonstrations. These were implemented as sole and rice fallow crop cultivation in Tamil Nadu, India, to reduce yield gaps at farmers' fields. The scientific study was conducted in 2020-2021 with 295 demonstrations (118 hectares) using cluster village methodology to examine the effects of extension gap, technology gap and technology index on yield and economics by demonstrating improved technologies. These include mechanized sowing, use of disease-resistant varieties, integrated pest and weed management, seed treatment, crop nutrient boosters and mechanized harvesting. Yield enhancement of 51.55 % was recorded in a demonstrated package of technologies over farmers' practices, primarily due to the adoption of Yellow Mosaic Virus-resistant varieties, effective weed management strategies, and foliar sprays like TNAU pulse wonder to boost crop growth. The average extension gap (2.89 q/ha), technology gap (0.87 q/ha) and technology index of demonstrations (11.01 %) were documented, which are mainly due to efforts of multidisciplinary scientists’ field visits and farm advisories. A study reported higher weed control efficiency (48–76 %) in demo plots, enhancing demon yield than in control plots. Compared to farmers' plots (Rs. 37075/ha), average net returns in demonstrations were higher at Rs. 66732/ha. The study also disclosed an additional net return (Rs.29657/hectare) with an incremental BCR of 19.95, indicating a significant increase in profitability relative to the investment. The consistently greater Sustainability Yield Index (0.61 to 0.99) and Sustainability Value Index (0.88 to 0.93) in demo plots highlight improved stability and economic value of yields compared to farmer's plots. The latest package of technologies in blackgram paved the way for sustained yield under normal conditions, which are defined as fields with adequate moisture and timely sowing and rice fallow conditions. These advancements improved farmers’ livelihoods by increasing net returns and ensuring more stable and predictable yields.

References

  1. Udawat P. Recent advancements in legumes: next generation sequencing and omics approaches. Indian J Agric Sci. 2023;93(5):467–74. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v93i5.119566
  2. Sinha P, Kumari M, Kumar S, Ray RK. Constraints in pulse cultivation perceived by the farmers of Tal Land in Patna district of Bihar, India. Int J Curr Microbiol App Sci. 2019;8(8):2991–97. https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2019.808.346
  3. Umamageswari C, Manimaran R, Iyanar K. Impact of improved production technologies on yield of rice fallow pulses in Cauvery delta zone. J Pharmacogn Phytochem. 2019;2:963–67.
  4. Behera UK, Mishra AK, Bishoyi BS, Behera SK, Nayak RN, Ronanki S, Singh S. Introduction of pulse crop in rice-fallow system through use of conservation agriculture practices in western Odisha. J Soil Water Conserv. 2014;13(4):318–23.
  5. Subrahmaniyan K, Senthilkumar G, Veeramani P. Impact of conservation tillage practices on the growth and yield of blackgram (Vigna mungo) in rice (Oryza sativa)-blackgram cropping system. Indian J Agric Sci. 2023;93(4):415–19. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v93i4.101263
  6. Khuvung Z, Mishra P, Jaswanth Naik. Constraints faced by the farmers in adoption of recommended cultivation practices of Maize (Zea mays) in the state of Nagaland. J Krishi Vigyan. 2022;11(1):35–38. https://doi.org/10.5958/2349-4433.2022.00101.5
  7. Dipak BJ. Impact assessment. In: National Seminar on Extension Methodology Issues in Impact Assessment of Agricultural and Rural Development Programmes, New Delhi, India; 2005. p. 20–26.
  8. Marlabeedu S, Bharath T, Pallavi S, Himabindu T, Shankaraiah M, Sumalini K. Impact analysis of cluster frontline demonstrations on groundnut in Nalgonda district Telangana. Indian J Ext Educ. 2022;58(4):66–70. http://doi.org/10.48165/IJEE.2022.58414
  9. Mani VS, Mala ML, Gautam KC, Bhagavandas. Weed killing chemicals in potato cultivation. Ind Farm. 1973;23(1):17–18.
  10. Raj AD, Yadav V, Rathod JH. Impact of frontline demonstrations on the yield of pulses. Int J Sci Res. 2013(9):2250–53.
  11. Kamaleshwaran R, Karthiga S. Effect of foliar nutrition on yield and growth parameters of green gram in coastal area of Tamil Nadu (Vigna radiata) cv.Vamban 2. Sabujeema-An International Multidisciplinary e-Magazine. 2021;1(3):22–27.
  12. Singh A, Singh AK, Dubey SK, Chahal VP, Singh R, Mishra A, et al. Ensuring productivity advantages through cluster frontline demonstrations (CFLD)-pulses: nationwide experiences. Indian J Agr Sci. 2023;93(5):561–66. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v93i5.103296
  13. Amuthaselvi G, Anand G, Vijayalakshmi R, Noorjehan AKA Hanif, Dhanushkodi V, Gayathri M, Ravi M. Yield gap analysis through cluster front line demonstration in blackgram at Tiruchirappalli district. Legume Res. 2023;46(7):898–901. https://doi.org/10.18805/LR-5119.
  14. Preety A, Makkar GS. Scaling up of sesame production under cluster frontline demonstration technology transfer programme in Punjab, India. J Ani Plant Sci. 2024; 34(3):681–88. https://doi.org/10.36899/JAPS.2024.3.0754
  15. Rai AK, Khajuria S, Lata K, Jadhav J, Rajkumar K, Khadda BS. Popularization of vegetable pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan) in central Gujarat through demonstration in farmers’ field. Indian J Agric Sci. 2016;85(3):349–53. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v85i3.47117
  16. Dubey SK, Gautam US, Atar Singh. Pulses yield gap minimization: consequences of CFLD-pulses in India. Indian J Ext Educ. 2022;58(3):65–69. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v93i5.119566
  17. Kumar Anjani, Amrendra Kumar, Pushpa Kumari, Sujeet Kumar. Impact assessment of CFLD pulses on pigeon pea productivity and profitability in farmer’s field. Indian J Ext Educ 2023;59(2):36–40. https://doi.org/10.48165/ijee.2023.59208
  18. Lalit M Patil, Modi DJ, Vasava HM, Gomkale SR. Evaluation of front-line demonstration programme on green gram variety Meha (IPM–99–125) in Bharuch district of Gujarat. IOSR J Agri Vet Sci. 2015;8(9):1–3. https://doi.org/10.9790/2380-08910103
  19. Saravanakumar S, Premalatha A, John Prabakaran M, Thirumoorthi M. Evaluation of cluster frontline demonstration on urd for enhancing productivity. Indian J Ext Educ. 2020;56(3):101–03.
  20. Natarajan K, Noorjehan AKA Hanif, Jayakumar J, Senguttuvan K, Gayathry G, BharathiKumar K, et al. A study on yield and value sustainability in groundnut (Arachis hypogea) through cluster frontline demonstrations approach in Cuddalore district of Tamil Nadu. Legume Res. 2024;47(7):1172–18. https://doi.org/10.18805/LR-5292

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.