Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Plant Science Today (PST)

Research Articles

Vol. 12 No. 3 (2025)

Evaluation of cassava genotypes for hilly areas under rainfed conditions

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.6557
Submitted
5 December 2024
Published
07-04-2025 — Updated on 15-08-2025
Versions

Abstract

In Tamil Nadu, India, cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz) is cultivated under both rainfed and irrigated conditions, primarily for industrial and culinary purposes. Drought poses a significant constraint for cassava cultivation, especially in hilly terrains where water retention is limited. Water scarcity adversely affects cassava growth, leading to reduced leaf area, stunted root development, and ultimately lower yields. Studies have shown that under drought conditions, cassava experiences reductions in leaf water potential, osmotic potential, photosynthesis, and stomatal conductance, all of which contribute to decreased productivity. To address these challenges, high-yielding, high-starch, drought tolerance cassava genotypes (characterized by high relative water content and greater chlorophyll stability index) as well as pest and disease resistant varieties, must be evaluated for their suitability in hilly regions with poor and marginal soils and limited rainfall. The natural resilience of cassava to harsh conditions makes it an essential crop for resources-limited farmers in marginal locations. In Tamil Nadu, the Salem district hosts approximately 800 small-scale sago and starch production facilities. Salem is surrounded by hills where cassava is the primary crop. Farmers face several challenges, such as poor rainfall, low-yielding varieties, pest and disease incidence, and low market prices. Hence, it is very important to evaluate and identify suitable genotypes that can tolerate water deficits, resist disease, yield high, and produce greater starch content. Yield and quality traits have direct impact on economic returns for farmers and determine cassava suitability for various industrial applications. Additionally, plant architecture plays a critical role in enabling cassava to withstand environmental stresses common in hilly areas, such as strong winds and heavy rainfall. This study systematically evaluates these traits, aiming to identify and promote suitable cassava genotypes that can enhance the livelihoods of tribal farmers in hilly regions.

References

  1. 1. Wasonga DO, Kleemola J, Alakukku L, Makela PSA. Growth response of cassava to deficit irrigation and potassium fertigation during the early growth phase. Agron. 2020;10:321. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10030321
  2. 2. CTCRI. Crop Statistics. 2023.
  3. 3. Daryanto S, Wang L, Jacinthe PA. Drought effects on root and tuber production: A meta-analysis. Agricultural Water Management. 2016;176:122–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2016.05.019
  4. 4. Edison S, Anantharaman M, Srinivas T. Status of cassava in India an overall view. Central Tuber Crops Research Institute. Tech Bulletin. 2006;46:172. https://ctcritools.in/cassavaexpert/literature/castat.pdf
  5. 5. Nguyen TT, Nakasathien S, Vichukit V. Enhancing sustainable cassava production in hilly areas of Van Yen, Yen Bai Province, Vietnam. Kasetsart J- Nat Sci. 2013;47:492‒505.
  6. 6. Partap T. Hill agriculture: Challenges and opportunities. Ind J Agric Economics. 2011;66:33‒52.
  7. 7. Osuji EE, Igberi CO, Ehirim NC. Climate change impacts and adaptation strategies of cassava farmers in Ebonyi State, Nigeria. J Agric Extension. 2023;27(1):35‒48. https://doi.org/10.4314/jae.v27i1.4
  8. 8. Koundinya AVV, Hegde V, Sheela MN, Chandra CV. Evaluation of cassava varieties for tolerance to water deficit stress conditions. J Root Crops. 2018;44(1):70‒75.
  9. 9. More SJ, Ravi V, Raju S. The quest for high yielding drought-tolerant cassava variety. J Pharmacog and Phytochem. 2020;SP6:433‒39.
  10. 10. Kaweesi T, Kawuki R, Kyaligonza V, et al. Field evaluation of selected cassava genotypes for cassava brown streak disease based on symptom expression and virus load. Virol J. 2014;11:216. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12985-014-0216-x
  11. 11. Anjum SA, Umair A, Ali Z, Mohsin T, Muhammad N, Iftikhar A, et al. Growth and developmental responses of crop plants under drought stress: A review. Zemdirbyste- Agric. 2017;104:267–76. https://doi.org/10.13080/z-a.2017.104.034
  12. 12. Kirigwi FM, Van Kinkel M, Threthowan R, Sears, RG. Evaluation of selection strategies for wheat adaptation across water regimes. Euphytica. 2004;135:361–71. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023%2FB%3AEUPH.0000013375.66104.04
  13. 13. Koundinya AVV, Nisha A, Ajeesh BR. Early vigour: A key to drought tolerance in cassava based on physiological and biochemical traits including inherent non-enzymatic antioxidant activity. Scientia Horticulturae. 2024;331:11311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2024.113110 .
  14. 14. Ngongo Y, Basuki T, deRosari B, Mau YS, Noerwijati K, daSilva H, et al. The roles of cassava in marginal semi-arid farming in East Nusa Tenggara—Indonesia. Sustain. 2022;14(9):5439. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14095439
  15. 15. Da Costa WG, Bandeira SM, Azevedo CF, Nascimento M, Morgante CV, Borel JC, de Oliveira EJ. Optimizing drought tolerance in cassava through genomic selection. Front Plant Sci. 2024;15. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/plant-science/articles/10.3389/fpls.2024.1483340
  16. 16. Arifalo, Sadiat. Determinants of land-use intensity among cassava farmers in Ondo State, Nigeria. Discovery Agric. 2024;10:1‒7. https://doi.org/10.54905/disssi.v10i21.e13da1571
  17. 17. Wholey DW, Booth RH. A comparison of simple methods for estimating 497 starch content of cassava roots. J Sci Food Agric. 1979;30(2):158‒64. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.2740300210
  18. 18. Soro M, Tiendrebeogo F, Pita J, Traore E, Some K, Tibiri E, et al. Epidemiological assessment of cassava mosaic disease in Burkina Faso. Plant Pathology. 2021;70. https://doi.org/10.1111/ppa.13459
  19. 19. Barr HD, Weatherley PE. A re-examination of the relative turgidity technique for estimating water deficit in leaves. Aust J Biol Sci. 1962;15:413‒28. https://doi.org/10.1071/BI9620413
  20. 20. Rao SS, Sita G. Assessment of stress-induced chlorophyll degradation in plants. Ind J Plant Physiol. 1997;42(4):381‒88.
  21. 21. Gomez KA, Gomez AA. Statistical procedures for agricultural research. John Wiley and Sons: New York, NY, USA; 1984
  22. 22. SPSS Inc. Released 2007. SPSS for Windows, Version 16.0. Chicago, SPSS Inc.
  23. 23. Zhao P, Liu P, Shao J, Li C, Wang B, Guo X, et al. Analysis of different strategies adapted by two cassava cultivars in response to drought stress: ensuring survival or continuing growth. J Exp Bot. 2015;66(5):1477–88. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/eru507
  24. 24. Putpeerawit P, Sojikul P, Thitamade S, Narangajavana J. Genome-wide analysis of aquaporin gene family and their responses to water-deficit stress conditions in cassava. Plant Physiol and Biochem. 2017;121:118–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2017.10.025
  25. 25. Nahar K, Hasanuzzaman M, Suzuki T, Fujita M. Polyamines-induced aluminium tolerance in mung bean: A study on antioxidant defense and methylglyoxal detoxification systems. Ecotoxicol. 2017;26:58‒73. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10646-016-1740-9
  26. 26. George J, Mohankumar CR, Nair GM, Ravindran CS. Cassava agronomy research and adoption of improved practices in India: Major achievements during the past 30 years. Proceedings of the 6th Regional Workshop on Cassava’s Potential in Asia in the 21st Century: Present Situation and Future Research and Development Needs, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam; 2001. 279‒99. https://hdl.handle.net/10568/82438
  27. 27. Laban TF, Kizito EB, Baguma Y, Osiru D. Evaluation of Ugandan cassava germplasm for drought tolerance. Intern J Agric and Crop Sci. 2013;5(3):212–26. https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11951/87
  28. 28. Immanuel S, Jaganathan D, Prakash P. Cassava for food security, poverty reduction and climate resilience: A review. Ind J Ecol. 2024;51:21‒31. 10.55362/IJE/2024/4191
  29. 29. Carvalho L, Filho JF, Anderson JV, Figueiredo PG, Chen S. Storage root of cassava: Morphological types, anatomy, formation, growth, development and harvest time. In Cassava; Waisundara V, Ed.; Intech Open: London, UK; 2017. pp. 55–68 https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.71347
  30. 30. Aina OO, Dixon AGO, Akinrinde EA. Genetic variability in cassava as it influences storage root yield in Nigeria. J Biol Sci. 2007;7:765–70. https://doi.org/10.3923/jbs.2007.765.770
  31. 31. Pugalendhi L, Velmurugan M, Kavitha PS, Kalarani MK, Senthil N, Deivamani M, Venkatachalam SR. Evaluation and characterization of high yielding cassava mosaic resistant variety YTP2. Intern J Plant and Soil Sci. 2021;33(22):198‒208. https://doi.org/10.9734/ijpss/2021/v33i2230696
  32. 32. Manganyi B, Lubinga MH, Zondo B, Tempia N. Factors influencing cassava sales and income generation among cassava producers in South Africa. Sustain. 2023;15(19):14366. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151914366
  33. 33. Turyagyenda FL, Kizito EB, Baguma Y, Osiru D. Evaluation of Ugan dan cassava germplasm for drought tolerance. Int J Agric Crop Sci. 2013;5(3):212–26. https://doi.org/10.1093/aobpla/plt007
  34. 34. Ravindran V. Cassava leaves as animal feed: Potential and limitations. J Sci Food and Agric. 1993;61:141‒50. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.2740610202
  35. 35. Karri VR, Nalluri N. Cassava: meeting the global protein need. Plant Sci Today. 2016;3(3):304‒11. https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.2016.3.3.249
  36. 36. Lola KK, Mukhammadjon M, Mirzakamol A, Abdurakhmon Y, Bekhzod M, Nurdinjon O, et al. Engineering drought tolerance in crops using CRISPR Cas systems. Plant Sci Today. 2023;10(sp2):255‒59. https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.2524

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.