Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Plant Science Today (PST)

Review Articles

Early Access

Comprehensive and comparative analysis of various rice establishment methods: A review

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.7184
Submitted
12 January 2025
Published
23-07-2025
Versions

Abstract

Rice (Oryza sativa L.) is the most important staple food crop sustaining nearly two third of the world's population. However, rice cultivation faces several challenges, including the use of uncertified seeds, water scarcity, labor shortages and weed infestations. To address these issues, it is essential to adopt appropriate crop establishment methods that enhance growth and yield attributes of rice. In India rice is commonly grown by transplanting seedlings into the puddled soil. Although this method is widely practiced, it demands substantial labor, water, capital and energy making it less profitable which makes the farmers to shift towards direct-seeded rice (DSR). While DSR offers benefits in terms of labor and water savings, its adoption is hindered by poor seedling establishment and increased weed infestation. Under this situation, System of Rice Intensification (SRI) has emerged as a methodology that achieves higher seedling establishment rate (97.3 %) and also reduces water usage, enhancing weed control and increasing the total production. Despite of its advantages, SRI is laborious, requiring skilled workers for transplanting and it is time-consuming which delays the transplanting process. This situation highlights the need for mechanized rice transplanting, which facilitates timely planting and efficient crop establishment. Mechanization reduces labor, time, energy and production costs, ultimately enabling higher yields at a lower cost.

References

  1. 1. Setia BP, Moond V, Ninama J, Singh L, Saharan K, Singh AP. Effect of different organic manures and systems of planting on growth and yield of scented rice. Indian J Agric Sci. 2023;110:41–48.
  2. 2. Samal P, Babu SC, Mondal B, Mishra SN. The global rice agriculture towards 2050: An inter-continental perspective. Outlook Agric. 2022;51(2):164–72. https://doi.org/10.1177/00307270221088338
  3. 3. IndiaStat. Season-wise area, production, productivity of rice in India. Available from: www.indiastat.com/table/agriculture/season-wise-area-production-productivity-rice-indi/7264
  4. 4. Sathyamoorthy NK, Gurusamy A, Ragavan T, Prabhaharan J, Prakash P. Effect of irrigation regime and crop geometry on water use and economics of different rice genotypes under aerobic ecosystem. Agric Res J. 2019;56(1):175–78. https://doi.org/10.5958/2395-146X.2019.00026.7
  5. 5. Kumar V, Gurusamy A, Mahendean PP, Mahendran S. Optimization of water and nutrient requirement for yield maximization in hybrid rice under drip fertigation system. In: 8th International Micro Irrigation Congress; 2009. p. 13–15. https://doi.org/10.5958/0976-4038.2016.00048.8
  6. 6. Vasuki A, Paulpandi V, Gurusamy A, Sivakumar T, Prabakaran K. Influence of deficit irrigation and nano NK application on root dynamics, physiology and WUE of transplanted rice (Oryza sativa). Indian J Agric Sci.
  7. 2024;94(4):339–44. https://doi.org/10.56093/94i4.143367
  8. 7. Midya A, Saren BK, Dey JK, Maitra S, Praharaj S, Gaikwad DJ, Crop establishment methods and integrated nutrient management improve: Part II. Nutrient uptake and use efficiency and soil health in rice (Oryza sativa L.) field in the lower Indo-Gangetic Plain, India. Agronomy. 2021;11(9):1894. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11091894
  9. 8. Mir MS, Singh P, Bhat TA, Kanth RH, Nazir A, Al-Ashkar I, et al. Influence of sowing time and weed management practices on the performance and weed dynamics of direct drum seeded rice. ACS Omega. 2023;8(29):25861–76. https://doi:10.1021/acsomega.3c02825
  10. 9. Bharti J, Singh CS, Singh AK, Kumar R. Performance of rice establishment methods and nutrient management practices on growth, yield and nutrient uptake of rice (Oryza sativa L.). Indian J Ecol. 2022;49(4):1335–40. https://doi.org/10.54894/JISCAR.40.1.2022.117229
  11. 10. Dobermann A. A critical assessment of the system of rice intensification (SRI). Agric Syst. 2004;79(3):261–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0308-521(03)00087-8
  12. 11. Indhirajith S, Gurusamy A, Subramanian E, Kannan P, Vellaikumar S. Response of traditional rice varieties to organic nutrient management practices under an aerobic system. Pharma Innov J. 2021;10(11):187–90.
  13. 12. Kumar NS. Crop establishment techniques on growth, yield and economics of rice. Am Int J Res Form Appl Nat Sci. 2015;12:49–51. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10060888
  14. 13. Sandhu SS, Mahal SS, Vashist KK, Buttar GS, Brar AS, Singh M. Crop and water productivity of bed-transplanted rice as influenced by various levels of nitrogen and irrigation in northwest India. Agric Water Manag. 2012;104:32–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2011.11.012
  15. 14. Muthuramu S, Ragavan T. Dry direct-seeded rice cultivation: A climate-smart technology. In: Climate Change and Agriculture; 2021. 45–45
  16. 15. Preethi S, Gurusamy A, Subramanian E, Indirani R. Screening of rice cultures and mitigation of iron deficiency in aerobic rice. Int J Chem Stud. 2020;8(6):2272–74. https://doi.org/10.22271/chemi.2020.v8.i6ag.11110
  17. 16. Rahman AM, Salam MA, Kader MA, Islam MS, Perveen S. Growth and yield of boro rice (Oryza sativa L.) in response to crop establishment methods and varieties. Arch Agric Environ Sci. 2020;5(2):137–43. https://doi.org/10.
  18. 26832/24566632.2020.050208
  19. 17. Mitchell J, Fukai S, Basnayake J. Grain yield of direct-seeded and transplanted rice in rainfed lowlands of Southeast Asia. In: Proceedings of 4th International Crop Science Congress; 2004.8(23):23861–76.
  20. 18. Baloch MS, Awan IU, Hassan G. Growth and yield of rice as affected by transplanting dates and seedlings per hill under high temperatures of Dera Ismail Khan, Pakistan. J Zhejiang Univ Sci B. 2006;7:572–79. https://doi.org/10.
  21. 1631/jzus.2006.B0572
  22. 19. Kumar R, Batra SC. A comparative analysis of DSR technology vs. transplanted method in Haryana. Econ Aff. 2017;62(1):169. https://doi.org/10.10.5958/2230-7311.2017.00053.8
  23. 20. Bohra JS, Kumar R. Effect of crop establishment methods on productivity, profitability and energetics of rice (Oryza sativa) - wheat (Triticum aestivum) system. Indian J Agric Sci. 2015;85(2):217–23. https://doi.org/10.56093/
  24. ijas.v85i2.46502
  25. 21. Sangeetha C, Baskar P. Influence of different crop establishment methods on productivity of rice – A review. Agric Rev. 2015;36(2):113–24. https://doi.org/10.5958/0976-0741.2015.00013.6
  26. 22. Prakash P, Ragavan T, Geethalakshmi V, Pandian PS, Amutha R. Effect of different land configurations and establishment methods on the productivity of aerobic rice. Indian J Ecol. 2019;46(3):586–89.
  27. 23. Vizzero S. On the sustainability of direct-seeded rice. In: Agro-based bioeconomy: Reintegrating trans-disciplinary research and sustainable development goals. CRC Press, USA; 2021. 93–108 https://doi.org/10.1201/978100303
  28. 3394-7
  29. 24. Vanitha K, Mohandass S. Effect of humic acid on plant growth characters and grain yield of drip fertigated aerobic rice (Oryza sativa L.). Bioscan. 2014;9(1):45–50.
  30. 25. Vijay J, Rao VN, Mahesh L, Reddy SD. Effect of mechanized transplanting on yield, yield attributes and economics of rice (Oryza sativa L.). 2023; https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.21926.91204
  31. 26. Sankavi RJ, Avudaithai S, Somasundaram S, Rajammal SJT. Effect of zinc and iron enriched organic manures on growth and yield of rice under sodic soil. Int J Curr Microbiol App Sci. 2020;9(12):2670‒74. https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2020.912.316
  32. 27. Vanitha K, Rajakumar D, Joseph M, Gomathy M. Effect of silica nutrition on growth and yield of aerobic rice (Oryza sativa L.). J Pharmacogn Phytochem. 2020;9(6):1502–04.
  33. 28. Gangwar S, Gill MS, Tomar K, Pandey DK. Effect of crop establishment methods on growth, productivity and soil fertility of rice (Oryza sativa)-based cropping systems. Indian J Agron. 2008;2–106. https://doi.org/10.59797/ija.v53i2.
  34. 4841
  35. 29. Anbarasu M, Gurusamy A. Water use studies on aerobic rice under drip irrigation system by using daily soil water balance. In: Proceedings of the Virtual National Conference on Strategic Reorientation for Climate-Smart Agriculture; March 2021. 19. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.23086.43848
  36. 30. Jayaraj M, Singh RD, Ragavan T, Hussainy HSA, Subramanian P, Saliha BB, Sivasankari B. Influence of establishment methods and seed coating techniques on the performance of direct-seeded rice (Oryza sativa L.) under Periyar Vaigai Command Area of Tamil Nadu. Res Crops. 2024;25(2):235‒40. https://doi.org/10.31830/2348-
  37. 7542.2024.ROC-1074
  38. 31. Devnani RS. Technology of pre-germinated paddy seeding. J Agric Eng. 2002;39(2):1–8. https://doi.org/10.52151/jae2002392.1001
  39. 32. Xu K, Tang L, Zhang H, Guo B, Huo Z, Dai Q, Wei H. Effect of different mechanical direct seeding methods on tiller characteristics and yield of rice. Indian J Agric Sci. 2014;30(13):43–52. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11030488
  40. 33. Dutta P, Saikia B, Dutta M, Dutta P, Das Y. Comparative assessment of wet direct-seeded rice (drum seeder operated) cultivation technology with traditional rice growing practice in Lakhimpur District of Assam. Ind J Exten Edu. 2021;57(4):175‒77. https://doi.org/10.5958/2454-552X.2021.00152.3
  41. 34. Fanish SA, Ragavan T. Evaluation of growth and yield performance of aerobic rice under different irrigation intervals in furrow irrigated raised bed (FIRB) system of cultivation. Farming Manag. 2018;3(1):13–18. https://doi.org/
  42. 10.31830/2456-8724.2018.0001.3
  43. 35. Mariyappillai A, Arumugam G, Kumaresan M. Water use efficiency and water productivity of aerobic rice under drip irrigation and fertigation system by using daily soil water balance. J Agrometeorol. 2024;26(2):249–52. https://doi.org/10.54386/jam.v26i2.2550
  44. 36. Parameswari YS, Srinivas A, Prakash RT, Narendar G. Effect of different crop establishment methods on rice (Oryza sativa L.) growth and yield – A review. Agric Rev. 2014;35(1):74–77. https://doi.org/10.5958/j.0976-0741.35.
  45. 1.010
  46. 37. Sharma A, Sharma S, Yadav PK, Sodari B. Direct-seeded rice and its prospects in Nepal: A review. Turk J Agric Food Sci Technol. 2021;9(12):2355–64. https://doi.org/10.24925/turjaf.v9i12.2355-2364.4383
  47. 38. Akbar N, Jabran K, Ali MA. Weed management improves yield and quality of direct-seeded rice. Aust J Crop Sci. 2011;5(6):688–94.
  48. 39. Karthika R, Subramanian E, Ragavan T. Effect of weed management practices on crop growth, yield and economics of direct-seeded rice ecosystems. Madras Agric J. 2019;106:162–65. https://doi.org/10.29321/MAJ2019.
  49. 000244
  50. 40. Mahalakshmi M, Subramanian E, Gurusamy A, Senthil K. Irrigation scheduling and intercropping on growth and yield of aerobic rice. Int J Curr Microbiol Appl Sci. 2020;9:2867–72. https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2020.910.345
  51. 41. Mazid MA, Bhuiyan SI, Mannan MA, Wade LJ. Dry-seeded rice for enhancing productivity of rainfed drought-prone lands: lessons from Bangladesh and the Philippines. In: Direct Seeding: Research Strategies and Opportunities. Los Baños, Philippines: International Rice Research Institute; 2002. 185–200
  52. 42. Shekhawat K, Rathore SS, Chauhan BS. Weed management in dry direct-seeded rice: A review on challenges and opportunities for sustainable rice production. Agronomy. 2020;10(9):1264. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10
  53. 091264
  54. 43. Gao X, Zou C, Fan X, Zhang F, Hoffland E. From flooded to aerobic conditions in rice cultivation: consequences for zinc uptake. Plant Soil. 2006;280:41–47. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-004-7652-0
  55. 44. Garg V, Tiwari N, Rajwade OP. Growth and yield losses of direct-seeded rice (Oryza sativa L.) as affected by major dominant weeds in Chhattisgarh plains: A review paper. Int J Chem Stud. 2019;76:876–82.
  56. 45. Reddy AK, Prudhvi N, Mehta CM. Direct-seeded rice: Future of rice (Oryza sativa) cultivation. Int J Res Anal Rev. 2020;7(4):279–91. https://doi.org/10.55694/JISCAR.40.1.2022.112329
  57. 46. Bhandari S, Khanal S, Dhakal S. Adoption of direct-seeded rice (DSR) over puddled-transplanted rice (TPR) for resource conservation and increasing wheat yield. Rev Food Agric. 2020;1(2):44–51. https://doi.org/10.26480/rfna.02.
  58. 2020.44.51
  59. 47. Anbarassan A, Karthick V, Swaminathan B, Arivelarasan T. System of rice intensification (SRI) and its implications over food security and farmer sovereignty. SSRN. 2013. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2239451
  60. 48. Dambale AS, Goswami J, Sharma KK, Kurmi K, Das KN, Das R. Effect of different K management practices on
  61. growth and yield parameters of black rice (Oryza sativa L.) under system of rice intensification. The Pharma Innov J. 2023;12(7):139‒48.
  62. 49. Flora GJ, Rajendran K, Kumar UK, Sharmili K, Pramitha JL. Effect of system of rice intensification practices in increasing the yield of traditional varieties of rice. Int J Environ Clim Change. 2023;13(8):1175–80. https://doi.org/10.
  63. 9734/ijecc/2023/v13i82057
  64. 50. Veeramani P, Singh DR, Subrahmaniyan K. Study of phyllochron-system of rice intensification (SRI) technique. Agric Sci Res J. 2012;2(6):329–34.
  65. 51. Bhargavi G, Sundari A. Effect of nano urea on the growth and yield of rice (Oryza sativa) under SRI in the Cauvery delta zone of Tamil Nadu. Crop Res. 2023;58(1–2):12–17. https://doi.org/10.31830/2454-1761.2023.CR-885
  66. 52. Diedhiou PCC, Sambou A, Ndiaye O, Ndour N, Diedhiou SK. Comparative analysis of rice performance and profitability with the system of rice intensification (SRI) and traditional practices (TP) in Ziguinchor District, Senegal. Senegal For Agric Rev. 2021;2:22–36. https://doi.org/10.47285/far.v2i1.64
  67. 53. Sridevi V, Chellamuthu V, Jeyaraman S. System of rice intensification – A review. Agric Rev. 2011;32(2):120–26.
  68. 54. Praneeth S, Reddy VVD, Kumar MR, Rao RP, Latha PC. Comparison of leaf growth in different crop establishment methods with nitrogen management practices. Int J Pure Appl Biosci. 2017;5(4):1376–81. https://doi.org/10.18782/
  69. 2320-7051.5390
  70. 55. Rajeshwar M, Khan MAAR. Comparison of system of rice intensification (SRI) and conventional method of rice planting under Nagarjuna Sagar project left canal command area of Andhra Pradesh, India. Asian J Soil Sci. 2008;3(1):53–57.
  71. 56. Dass A, Chandra S, Choudhary AK, Singh G, Sudhishri S. Influence of field re-ponding pattern and plant spacing on rice root–shoot characteristics, yield, and water productivity of two modern cultivars under SRI management in Indian Mollisols. Paddy Water Environ. 2016;14:45–59. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10333-015-0477-z
  72. 57. Meena MA, Patel MV, Das T, Verma HP. Effect of organic sources and nitrogen levels on growth and yield of kharif rice (Oryza sativa L.) under SRI technique. Agric Sustain Dev. 2014;2(1):39–42.
  73. 58. Wu W, Ma B, Uphoff N. A review of the system of rice intensification in China. Plant Soil. 2015;393:361–81. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-015-2600-8
  74. 59. Katambara Z, Kahimba FC, Mahoo HF, Mbungu WB, Mhenga F, Reuben P, et al. Adopting the system of rice intensification (SRI) in Tanzania: A review. Agric Sci. 2013. https://doi.org/10.54894/JISCAR.40.1.2022.117229
  75. 60. Toungos MD. System of rice intensification: a review. Int J Innov Agric Sci. 2018;6:27–38.
  76. 61. Mohanty A, Mishra KN, Garnayak LM, Patra AK. Impact of system of rice intensification (SRI) on the water holding capacity (WHC) of soil and water use efficiency (WUE) in a tropical rainfed agro-ecosystem of Odisha. J Pharm Phytochem. 2019;8(4):1576–80.
  77. 62. Berkhout E, Glover D, Kuyvenhoven A. On-farm impact of the system of rice intensification (SRI): evidence and knowledge gaps. Agric Syst. 2015;132:157–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2014.10.001
  78. 63. Rao IVY. Estimation of efficiency, sustainability and constraints in SRI (system of rice intensification) vis-a-vis traditional methods of paddy cultivation in north coastal zone of Andhra Pradesh. Agric Econ Res Rev. 2011;24(2):325–31.
  79. 64. Narbaria S, Sharma ML, Khan MA, Dhruv Y, Painkra VK. System of rice intensification technology: An analysis of constraints perceived by the farmers in adoption of SRI technology. Plant Arch. 2015;15(1):159–62.
  80. 65. Muthayya S, Sugimoto JD, Montgomery S, Maberly GF. An overview of global rice production, supply, trade and consumption. Plant Arch. 2014;1324(1):7–14. https://doi.org/10.54792/JISCAR.40.1.2012.117279
  81. 66. Nath D, Das DK. Constraints encountered by rice farmers of Tripura in adoption of system of rice intensification (SRI) technology. Int J Farm Sci. 2017;7(1):110–15. https://doi.org/10.5958/2322-0430.2019.00058.1
  82. 67. Thomas V, Ramzi AM. SRI contributions to rice production dealing with water management constraints in northeastern Afghanistan. Paddy Water Environ. 2011;9(1):101–09. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10333-010-0228-0
  83. 68. Jat RD, Kakraliya SK, Choudhary KK, Kapoor P, Kakraliya SS, Ram H. Advances in rice production technologies. In: Advances in Crop Production and Climate Change. CRC Press; 2023. p. 1–26, https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003281
  84. 948-1
  85. 69. Zehua L, Xu M, Xiuhao L, Lintao C, Hongwei L, Zhicheng Y. Research progress of rice transplanting mechanization. Trans Chin Soc Agric Mach. 2018;49(5).
  86. 70. Hossen AM, Hossain MM, Haque E, Bell RW. Effect of growing media on mat type seedling raised for mechanical rice transplanting. Res Agric Eng. 2018;64(3):157–67. https://doi.org/10.53894/JISCAR.40.1.2021.146229
  87. 71. He H, You C, Wu H, Zhu D, Yang R, He Q, et al. Effects of nursery tray and transplanting methods on rice yield. Agron J. 2018;110(1):104–14. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2017.06.0334
  88. 72. Kobayashi K, Takahashi Y, Fukuyama T. Studies on the seedling raising method in giant-embryo rice (Oryza
  89. sativa) cultivar 'Koshiguruma' and its adaptability to machine transplanting. Japanese J Crop Sci. 2009;78(1):17‒26. https://doi.org/10.1626/jcs.78.17
  90. 73. Bhatt R, Kukal SS. Direct-seeded rice in South Asia. In: Sustainable agriculture reviews: Volume 18. Springer; 2015. p. 217–52. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21629-4
  91. 74. Yao X, Yang W, Ren W. Effects of seedling raising methods and sowing rates on machine-transplanted long-age rice seedling. Trans Chin Soc Agric Eng. 2009;25(6):152–57. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2017.06.0334
  92. 75. Sravanthi D, Ramanjaneyulu AV, Reddy PR, Jagan P, Rao M. Mechanized transplanting and harvesting in rice: An on-farm study. Pharma Innov J. 2022;11(12):3815–20.
  93. 76. Singh UV, Kumar D, Moses SC. Performance evaluation of manually operated paddy drum seeder in puddled field. J Agric Vet Sci. 2016;9(6):69–83.
  94. 77. Bhagavathi MS, Baradhan G, Suresh Kumar SM, Arivudainambi S. Effect of different crop establishment methods on rice (Oryza sativa L.) A review. Plant Arch. 2020;20:3416–22. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11071280
  95. 78. Saha R, Patra PS, Ahmed AS. Impact of mechanical transplanting on rice productivity and profitability – Review. Int J Econ Plants. 2021;8(4):226–30. https:/doi.org/10.23910/2/2021.0418d
  96. 79. Islam AKMS, Rahman MA, Rahman AKML, Islam MT, Rahman MI. Techno-economic performance of 4-row self-propelled mechanical rice transplanter at farmers' fields in Bangladesh. Prog Agric. 2016;27(3):369–82. https://doi.org/10.3329/pa.v27i3.30834
  97. 80. Devkota KP, Khanda CM, Beebout SJ, Mohapatra BK, Singleton GR, Puskur R. Assessing alternative crop establishment methods with a sustainability lens in rice production systems of Eastern India. J Clean Prod. 2020;244:118835. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118835
  98. 81. Jia X, Li Y, Song J, Liu C, Cao X, Chen L, et al. Effects of different machine transplanting methods on the physiological and yield characteristics of late rice in China. Int J Agric Biol Eng. 2024;16(6):37–47. https://doi.org/10.
  99. 25165/j.ijabe.20231606.7764
  100. 82. Dixit A, Khurana R, Singh J, Singh G. Comparative performance of different paddy transplanters developed in India – A review. Agric Rev. 2007;28(4):262–69.
  101. 83. Umar M, Ali S, Ali A, Bashir MK, Nawaz N, Khan M, Riaz A. Adoption of mechanical transplanting of rice (MTR) among rice growers in the rice-zone of Punjab, Pakistan. J Arable Crops Market. 2022;4(1):21–29. https://doi.org/10.
  102. 33687/jacm.004.01.4435
  103. 84. Haider Z. Pros and cons of mechanized transplanting in basmati rice: A case study. J Rice Sci. 2019;1(1):1–9.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.