Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Plant Science Today (PST)

Research Articles

Vol. 12 No. 3 (2025)

Yield potential of oil palm Tenera hybrids in the Cauvery Delta Region of Tamil Nadu

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.7370
Submitted
22 January 2025
Published
25-07-2025 — Updated on 06-08-2025
Versions

Abstract

The oil palm (Elaeis guineensis) is a major oil-bearing crop cultivated  worldwide, remowed for its highest oil yield per unit area among all oil seeds crops. This study was conducted at the Agricultural Research Station, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Pattukkottai, Thanjavur, Tamil Nadu, India, over a period from 2007 to 2024. The objective was to evaluate the yield potential of ten oil palm tenera hybrids, namely NRCOP-1 to NRCOP-10. Key growth and yield parameters included the number of fruit bunches per year, oil content, palm girth, palm height, yearly leaf output, and annual production of female and male inflorescences. Among the evaluated hybrids, NRCOP-7 recorded  the maximum palm girth (3.91 m), while NRCOP-4 had the tallest palms (5.32 m). NRCOP-2 produced the highest number of fronds (25-60 inches). NRCOP-9 had the highest sex ratio (0.78), fresh fruit bunch yield (206.94 kg per plam), and per hectare yield (29.59 t/ha). Although, NRCOP-1 recorded the highest number of fresh fruit bunches (10.62) per palm, NRCOP-9 surprassed all hybrids in mesocarp oil yield (7.96 t/ha),oil recovery (21.90%). kernel yield (2.83 t/ha) and kernel oil output (1161.83 kg/ha). Among the ten hybrids, NRCOP-9 exhibited the highest fresh fruit bunch yield per palm, followed by NRCOP-10 and NRCOP-8.

References

  1. 1. Corley RHV, Tinker PB. The oil palm. 5th ed. 2015. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118953297
  2. 2. Goh KJ, Wong CK, Ng PHC. Oil Palm. In: Brian T, Brian GM, Denis JM, editors. Encyclopaedia of Applied Plant Sciences. 2017;3:382–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-394807-6.00176-3
  3. 3. Johnmartin JJ, Yarra R, Wei L, Cao H. Oil palm breeding in the modern era: challenges and opportunities. Plants. 2022;11(11):1395. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11111395
  4. 4. Rethinam P, Murugesan P. Seven decades of research on oil palm in India. Int J Innovative Hort. 2022;11(2):198–213. http://dx.doi.org/10.5958/2582-2527.2022.00018.5
  5. 5. India, Ministry of Agriculture & Farmers Welfare. Agriculture statistics at a glance. 2022. https://agriwelfare.gov.in/
  6. 6. The Solvent Extractors Association of India. SEA Circular: Import of vegetable oils. 2023. https://seaofindia.com/
  7. 7. Woittiez LS, Vanwijk MT, Slingerland M, Vannoordwijk M, et al. Yield gaps in oil palm: a quantitative review of contributing factors. Eur J Agron. 2017;83:57–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2016.11.002
  8. 8. Phantai H, Brunner G. Extraction of oil and minor compounds from oil palm fruit with supercritical carbon dioxide. Processes. 2019;7(2):107. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr7020107
  9. 9. Pohl C, Loong CK. In-situ data collection for oil palm tree height determination using synthetic aperture radar. IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci. 2016;34(1):12027. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/34/1/012027
  10. 10. Sanjeevraddi G, Reddi MS, Gawankar HP, Maheswarappa P, et al. Initial performance of ten oil palm cross combinations under three agro-climatic conditions in India. J Plantation Crops. 2016;44(3):141–6. http://dx.doi.org/10.19071/jpc.2016.v44.i3.3162
  11. 11. Legros S, Mialetserra I, Caliman JP, Siregar FA, Clementvidal AD, Fabre D, et al. Phenology, growth and physiological adjustments of oil palm (Elaeis guineensis) to sink limitation induced by fruit pruning. Ann Bot. 2009;104:1183–94. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcp216
  12. 12. Vijayabhaskar V, Krishnarao K. Analysis of bunch quality in oil palm hybrid cross combinations under Krishna-Godavari zone of Andhra Pradesh, India. Int J Curr Microbiol App Sci. 2018;7(5):2488–93. https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2018.705.286
  13. 13. Prathapani N, Mathur RK, Murugesan P, Reddy GA, et al. Seasonal variation in fresh fruit bunch production in dura oil palm. Indian J Agr Sci. 2017;87(9):1184–9. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v87i9.74189
  14. 14. Lotte SW, Wijkb MTV, Slingerianda M, Noordwijka MV, Ken C, Giller E. Yield gaps in oil palm: a quantitative review of contributing factors. Eur J Agron. 2017;83:57–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2016.11.002
  15. 15. Sumathi T, Rajendran R, Mathur RK, Maheswarappa HP. Comparative performance of different oil palm hybrid combinations in Cauvery delta region of Tamil Nadu. J Plantation Crops. 2016;44(3):180–2. https://doi.org/10.19071/jpc.2016.v44.i3.3168
  16. 16. Tamilselvan M, Sumitha S, Nithiyadevi A, Maheswarappa HP, et al. Performance of tenera oil palm hybrids in Cauvery delta regions of India. Indian J Hort. 2022;79(1):76–80. http://dx.doi.org/10.5958/0974-0112.2022.00012.3
  17. 17. Madhavilatha P, Thirupathireddy M, Ranganna G, Pratap B, et al. Evaluation of new oil palm crosses for their fresh fruit bunch yield in Andhra Pradesh. J Res ANGRAU. 2023;51(4):88–93. https://doi.org/10.58537/jorangrau.2023.51.4.11
  18. 18. Breure CJ, Menendez T. The determination of bunch yield components in the development of inflorescences in oil palm (Elaeis guineensis). Exp Agric. 1990;26:99–115. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0014479700015441
  19. 19. Nithyadevi A, Tamilselvan M, Sumathi T. Assessing the potential of oil palm tenera hybrids in Cauvery delta region of Tamil Nadu. Pharma Innov J. 2022;SP-11(1):363–5. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/357990288
  20. 20. Gawankar MS, Sumitha S, Maheswarappa HP, Mathur RK, et al. Evaluation of tenera oil palm hybrids in western coastal region of India. Indian J Hort. 2022;79(4):410–4. https://doi.org/10.5958/0974-0112.2022.00057.26

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.