Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Plant Science Today (PST)

Research Articles

Vol. 12 No. 3 (2025)

Impact assessment of IFSU- CHS Extension program: advancing sustainable livelihoods, health and cultural preservation in Barangay Nayon, Ifugao

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.7383
Submitted
23 January 2025
Published
13-07-2025 — Updated on 21-07-2025
Versions

Abstract

The Community Extension and Development Program (CEDP) of Ifugao State University (IFSU), specifically the College of Health Sciences (CHS), aims to improve the socio-economic, health and environmental conditions of its target communities, including Barangay Nayon, Lamut, Ifugao. Foremost, findings reveal that the commercialization of a locally produced herbal product - Lagundi herbal candy - has been instrumental in enhancing community income, health awareness and environmental engagement. This study tested the hypothesis that integrated community development programs combining technology transfer, health education and livelihood support can generate multidimensional benefits regardless of geographic or cultural context. This study employed a descriptive-explanatory research design, using quantitative methods to assess the impact of the CEDP on the community. Data were collected from 20 respondents through surveys and interviews. Using frequency distribution and linear regression analysis, the study analyzed socio-demographic characteristics, organizational involvement, capacity-building outcomes, technology adoption and the program's economic, social and environmental impacts. Economically, the commercialization of Lagundi herbal candy contributed to income generation and entrepreneurial initiatives; however, improvements are needed in business sustainability and market expansion challenges remain in ensuring long-term business sustainability and market access. Socially, the program enhanced community health awareness, promoted herbal medicine knowledge and empowered local women and youth. Environmentally, it promoted sustainable practices and environmental conservation. Technology adoption was perceived as effective, though there is potential for improvement in modern extraction methods to ensure product quality consistency. While the program demonstrated measurable benefits across all domains, strategic efforts to modernize production technologies and scale market penetration are recommended. This case provides a replicable model for global community development stakeholders. The international community may draw transferable insights from integrating culturally grounded health interventions, sustainable enterprise development and local resource utilization as a pathway to holistic well-being.

References

  1. 1. Corpuz DA, Time MJ, Afalla BT. Empowering the community through the extension services of a teacher education institution in the Philippines. Cogent Educ. 2022;9(1):2149225. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2022.2149225
  2. 2. Lenzen M, Murray SA, Korte B, Dey CJ. Environmental impact assessment including indirect effects-a case study using input–output analysis. Environ Imp Assess Rev. 2003;23(3):263–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0195-9255(02)00104-X
  3. 3. Ifugao State University. A composition of herbal candy from Lagundi (Vitex Negundo) extract. Utility Model Publication No. 2/2016/000996. Intellectual Property Philippines; 2016 Dec 15.
  4. 4. De Weger E, Van Vooren N, Luijkx KG, Baan CA, Drewes HW. Achieving successful community engagement: A rapid realist review. Health Serv Res. 2018;18:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-3090-1
  5. 5. Reed MS, Ferre M, Martin-Ortega J, Blanche R, Lawford-Rolfe R, Dallimer M, et al. Evaluating impact from research: A methodological framework. Res Policy. 2021;50(4):104147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2020.104147
  6. 6. Selbst AD. An institutional view of algorithmic impact assessments. Harv J Law Tech. 2021;35:117.
  7. 7. Metcalf J, Moss E, Watkins EA, Singh R, Elish MC. Algorithmic impact assessments and accountability: The co-construction of impacts. Proc ACM Conf Fairness Account Transp. 2021:735–46. https://doi.org/10.1145/3442188.3445935
  8. 8. Maulu S, Hasimuna OJ, Mutale B, Mphande J, Siankwilimba E. Enhancing the role of rural agricultural extension programs in poverty alleviation: A review. Cogent Food Agric. 2021;7(1):1886663. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311932.2021.1886663
  9. 9. Rapp A, Tirassa M, Tirabeni L. Rethinking technologies for behaviour change: A view from the inside of human change. ACM Trans Comput Hum Interact. 2019;26(4):1–30. https://doi.org/10.1145/3318142
  10. 10. Castro-Arce K, Vanclay F. Transformative social innovation for sustainable rural development: An analytical framework to assist community-based initiatives. J Rural Stud. 2020;74:45–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2019.11.010
  11. 11. McNamara KE, Clissold R, Westoby R, Piggott-McKellar AE, Kumar R, Clarke T, et al. An assessment of community-based adaptation initiatives in the Pacific Islands. Nat Clim Chang. 2020;10(7):628–39. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-020-0813-1
  12. 12. Grant GA, Hains BJ. Foundational phases for community development: An expanded conceptual model for community development practice and higher education. Community Dev. 2024;55(2):163–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/15575330.2023.2225085
  13. 13. Beaman L, BenYishay A, Magruder J, Mobarak AM. Can network theory-based targeting increase technology adoption?. Am Econ Rev. 2021;111(6):1918–43. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20200295
  14. 14. Alsiken-Nanglegan MJ. Impact assessment of the organic agriculture production training program in Northern Philippines. Plant Sci Today. 2023;10(3):409–16. https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.2409
  15. 15. Ensor JE, Park SE, Attwood SJ, Kaminski AM, Johnson JE. Can community-based adaptation increase resilience?. Clim Dev. 2018;10(2):134–51. https://doi.org/10.1080/17565529.2016.1223595
  16. 16. Schut M, Leeuwis C, Thiele G. Science of Scaling: understanding and guiding the scaling of innovation for societal outcomes. Agric Syst. 2020;184:102908. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2020.102908

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.