Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Research Articles

Vol. 12 No. sp1 (2025): Recent Advances in Agriculture by Young Minds - II

Influence of household waste based vermicompost and fertilizer on micronutrient mineralization in calcareous soil

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.7466
Submitted
28 January 2025
Published
18-09-2025 — Updated on 10-10-2025
Versions

Abstract

To address the challenge of increasing household waste generated by global population growth and urbanization, particularly in developing nations such as India, it is imperative to implement effective waste management practices. One such approach gaining recognition is residue recycling, encompassing composting and vermicomposting of organic portion of household waste. Taking this into consideration, an incubation study was undertaken during Kharif 2018 at RPCAU, Pusa, to examine the mineralization of vermicompost in calcareous sandy loam soil at five distinct stages, which match the critical growth stages of the rice crop. The experiment was conducted in Completely Randomized design (3 factors) replicated thrice. Four levels of vermicompost, along with three levels of chemical fertilizers, were used at field capacity in various combinations and alone. The content of available micronutrients (Fe, Mn, Cu and Zn) in soil increased significantly up to 65 DAI, then decreased for all treatments. The treatment combination involving the application of the highest dose of vermicompost (3.75 t ha-1) along with the full recommended dose of fertilizer (RDF) was recorded as significantly superior. As, micronutrients are important for plant growth and health and need to be added to soil to replace what plants take up. Increasing the level of vermicompost application resulted in a significant increase in micronutrient content, whereas the different doses of chemical fertilizer did not exhibit a significant variation. Overall, the findings highlight the potential benefits of combining vermicompost and chemical fertilizer, particularly at higher vermicompost application rates, for enhancing micronutrient content in the soil.

References

  1. 1. Kaza S, Yao L, Bhada-Tata P, Van Woerden F. What a waste 2.0: A global snapshot of solid waste management to 2050. Washington DC: World Bank; 2018. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-1329-0
  2. 2. Pavithra KM. Review: 'Municipal Solid Waste' generated in India set to increase 7 times in the next 30 years [Internet]; 2021 [cited 2025 Jun 5]. https://factly.in/review-municipal-solid-waste-generated-in-india-set-to-increase-7-times-in-the-next-30-years/
  3. 3. Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB). Annual report (2020–2021) [Internet]. Delhi, India: CPCB; 2021 [cited 2025 Jun 5].
  4. 4. Kumar S, Bhattacharyya JK, Vaidya AN, Chakrabarti T, Devotta S, Akolkar AB. Assessment of the status of municipal solid waste management in metro cities, state capitals, class I cities and class II towns in India: an insight. Waste Manag. 2009;29(2):883–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2008.04.011
  5. 5. Baca MT, Fornasier F, Nobili M. Mineralization and humification pathways in two composting processes applied to cotton wastes. J Ferment Bioeng. 1992;74:179–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/0922-338X(92)90080-E
  6. 6. Tognetti C, Laos F, Mazzariono MJ, Hernandez MT. Composting vs vermicomposting: A comparison of end product quality. Compost Sci Util. 2005;13(1):6–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/1065657X.2005.10702212
  7. 7. Dalal P. Municipal solid waste management by vermicomposting. Int J Sci Nat. 2012;3(4):883–85.
  8. 8. Edwards CA, Bohlen PJ. Biology and ecology of earthworms. London: Chapman and Hall. 1996;3:426.
  9. 9. Haiba E, Ivask M, Olle L, Raamets J, Kuu A, Kutti S, Nei L. Transformation of nutrients and organic matter in vermicomposting of sewage sludge and kitchen wastes. J Agric Sci. 2014;6(2):114–18. https://doi.org/10.5539/jas.v6n2p114
  10. 10. Madegowda T. Integrated nutrient management in rabi maize under irrigated conditions [MSc (Agri) Thesis]. University of Agricultural Sciences, Dharwad;1997.
  11. 11. Murugan AV, Swarnam TP. Nitrogen release pattern from organic manures applied to an acid soil J Agric Sci. 2013;5(6):174–84. https://doi.org/10.5539/jas.v5n6p174
  12. 12. Romaniuk R, Giuffré L, Romero R. A soil quality index to evaluate the vermicompost amendments effects on soil properties. J Environ Prot. 2011;2:502–10. https://doi.org/10.4236/jep.2011.25058
  13. 13. Vasanthi D, Kumaraswamy K. Efficacy of vermicompost on the yield of rice and on soil fertility. Abs Sem Org Farm Sustain Agric 1996;9(11):40. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:85831106
  14. 14. Kusum A. Vermicompost from household waste and its effect on soil properties and crop growth [MSc (Agri.) thesis]. Pusa (Bihar): Dr. Rajendra Prasad Central Agricultural University; 2019.
  15. 15. Mengistu T, Gebrekidan H, Kibret K. The integrated use of excreta-based vermicompost and inorganic NP fertilizer on tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) fruit yield, quality and soil fertility. Int J Recycl Org Waste Agric. 2017;6:63–77. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40093-017-0153-y
  16. 16. Lindsay WL, Norvell WA. Development of DTPA soil test for zinc, iron, manganese and copper. Soil Sci Soc Am J. 1978;42:421–28. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1978.03615995004200030009x
  17. 17. Gomez KA, Gomez AA. Statistical procedures for agricultural research. 2nd ed. New York: John Wiley and Sons; 1984. p. 680
  18. 18. Sheoran OP, Tonk DS, Kaushik LS, Hasija RC, Pannu RS. Statistical software package for agricultural research workers. Hisar: Department of Mathematics Statistics, CCS HAU. 1998:139–43. https://www.scirp.org/reference/referencespapers?referenceid=2155184
  19. 19. Washimkar SV. Effect of vermicompost on the availability of nutrients, yield and quality of foliage of mulberry grown on vertisol [MSc (Agri.) thesis]. Rahuri: Mahatma Phule Krishi Vidyapeeth; 1997.
  20. 20. Sharma JK, Jat G, Meena RH, Purohit HS, Choudhary RS. Effect of vermicompost and nutrients application on soil properties, yield, uptake and quality of Indian mustard (Brassica juncea). Ann Plant Soil Res. 2017;19(1):17–22.
  21. 21. Swarup A. Effect of gypsum, green manure, farmyard manure and zinc fertilization on the zinc, iron and manganese nutrition of wetland rice on a sodic soil. J Indian Soc Soil Sci. 1991;39(3):530–36. https://eurekamag.com/research/007/249/007249004.php
  22. 22. Kusum A, Jha S, Prasad SS, Singh SP. Micronutrient availability as influenced by household waste based vermicompost application in calcareous soil of Bihar during rice growth period. Int J Curr Microbiol Appl Sci. 2020;9:960–66. https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2020.902.112

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.