Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Plant Science Today (PST)

Research Articles

Vol. 12 No. 4 (2025)

Forest structure and conservation status of tree species in Gunung Inas Forest Reserve, Kedah, Peninsular Malaysia

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.7500
Submitted
19 February 2025
Published
23-09-2025 — Updated on 10-10-2025
Versions

Abstract

This study explored the floristic composition, diversity and biomass in Gunung Inas Forest Reserve (GIFR), Kedah, an area facing potential threats from large-scale monoculture durian plantations. Three 0.53 ha plots were established to assess trees with a diameter at breast height ≥ 5 cm. As a result, a total of 53 individuals were identified, representing 16 species, 16 genera and 12 families. The Shannon-Weiner Diversity Index was recorded at H’=2.77 and Margalef’s Richness Index at DMG=8.7, indicating low level of diversity and richness of tree in the forest. Moderate Evenness Index of E=0.71 portrayed the almost equal distribution of the tree species in the forest. Anacardiaceae had the highest FIVi at 24.79 % while Swintonia schewenkii was the most important species with SIVi = 12.48. Total tree biomass was estimated at 76.3 t/ha which was contributed by 66.04 t/ha and 10.22 t/ha of above ground biomass and below ground biomass, respectively. Furthermore, the study identified 2 of the 16 recorded tree species within the study area as threatened, highlighting the potential conservation concerns within this ecosystem. Overall, this study provides baseline data for future ecological research and calls for conservation efforts to protect this forest's biodiversity against potential threats.

References

  1. 1. Shahrudin S. On some additions to the amphibians of Gunung Inas Forest Reserve, Kedah, Peninsular Malaysia. Journal of Threatened Taxa. 2021;13(11):19527–39. https://doi.org/10.11609/jott.7072.13.11.19527-19539
  2. 2. Mardan M, Faridah-Hanum I, Saari NS, Hakeem K. Tree species composition and diversity in one-hectare of Ulu Muda Forest Reserve, Kedah. Sains Malaysiana. 2013;42(10).
  3. 3. Aman S, Ismail P. Construction of local volume table for natural mangroves in Peninsular Malaysia: case study of Sungai Merbok Forest Reserve, Kedah. World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews. 2020;7(2):264–73. https://doi.org/10.30574/wjarr.2020.7.2.0305
  4. 4. Ibrahim J, Hafizah I, Dalila AR, Choimmber T, Muin M. Amphibian biodiversity of Gunung Inas Forest Reserve, Kedah, Malaysia. Pertanika Journal of Tropical Agricultural Science. 2012;35: 249–56.
  5. 5. Husch B, Beers TW, Kershaw J. Forest Mensuration. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons Inc. 2003:443.
  6. 6. Bridson D, Forman L. The Herbarium Handbook. Revised ed. Kew: Royal Botanic Garden, Whitstable Litho Printers Ltd. 1992.
  7. 7. Symington CF. Foresters’ Manual of Dipterocarps. Revised by Ashton PS, Appanah S. Malayan Forest Record. 2004;16:411–83.
  8. 8. Wyatt Smith J, Vincent AJ. The swing from qualitative to quantitative assessment of individual tree crown parameters in the Malayan Forest Service. 1962.
  9. 9. Whitmore TC. Influence of tree population dynamics on forest species composition. In: Symposium of the British Ecological Society. 1988.
  10. 10. The International Plant Name Index. 2015.
  11. 11. Deng C, Daley T, Smith A. Applications of species accumulation curves in large-scale biological data analysis. Quantitative Biology. 2015;135–44. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40484-015-0049-7
  12. 12. Curtis JT, McIntosh RP. An upland forest continuum in the prairie-forest border region of Wisconsin. Ecology. 1951;32(3):476–96. https://doi.org/10.2307/1931725
  13. 13. Magurran AE. Ecological diversity and its measurement. Springer Science & Business Media; 2013. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-7358-0
  14. 14. Hammer Ø. PAST (Paleontological Statistics) var. 2.17c Reference Manual. University of Oslo, Natural History Museum; 2012.
  15. 15. Kato R, Tadaki Y, Ogawa H. Plant biomass and growth increment studies in Pasoh Forest. Malayan Nature Journal. 1978;30(2):212–24.
  16. 16. Niiyama K, Kajimoto T, Matsuura Y, Yamashita T, Matsuo N, Yashiro Y, et al. Estimation of root biomass based on excavation of individual root systems in a primary dipterocarp forest in Pasoh Forest Reserve, Peninsular Malaysia. Journal of Tropical Ecology. 2010;26(3):271–84. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266467410000040
  17. 17. IUCN Red List. IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. 2024. https://www.iucnredlist.org/
  18. 18. Fitri Z, Nizam M, Latiff A, Kassim AR, Christine FS, Ibrahim S. Floristic composition and biomass of trees in Temengor Forest Reserve, Perak, Peninsular Malaysia. Malaysian Forester. 2017;80:178–97.
  19. 19. Norazlinda M, Nizam MS, Latiff A, Fitri ZA, Sani M. Tree species composition, diversity and biomass of Bukit Panchor State Park, Pulau Pinang, Malaysia. AIP Conf Proc. 2016;1784:28. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4966866
  20. 20. Zolkfilee NZ, Bakray NM, Pardi F. The influence of physical and chemical properties of soil on community structure of tree species in Bukit Lagong Forest Reserve, Selangor. Journal of Sustainability Science and Management. 2022;17(1):151–76. https://doi.org/10.46754/jssm.2022.01.010
  21. 21. Norafida NN, Nizam MS, Juliana WW, Faezah P. Edaphic relationships among tree species in the kapur (Dryobalanops aromatica Gaertn. f.) forests of Peninsular Malaysia. Advances in Environmental Biology. 2018;12(2):11–7. https://doi.org/10.22587/aeb.2018.12.2.4
  22. 22. Mahmud K. Edaphic influences on tree species composition and community structure in a tropical watershed forest in Peninsular Malaysia. Journal of Tropical Forest Science. 2014;26(2):284–94. https://jtfs.frim.gov.my/jtfs/article/view/284
  23. 23. Ruziman HH, Ismail A, Pardi F, Mohd Hatta SK. Edaphic influences on tree species composition and community structure in a secondary-lowland dipterocarp forest of Kota Damansara Forest Reserve, Selangor. Malaysian Applied Biology. 2022;51(4):11–21. https://doi.org/10.55230/mabjournal.v51i4.06
  24. 24. Sharma A, Patel SK, Singh GS. Variation in species composition, structural diversity and regeneration along disturbances in tropical dry forest of Northern India. Journal of Asia-Pacific Biodiversity. 2023;16(1):83–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.japb.2022.11.004
  25. 25. Bose A, Weiskittel A, Wagner R, Kuehne C. Assessing the factors influencing natural regeneration patterns in the diverse, multi-cohort and managed forests of Maine, USA. Journal of Vegetation Science. 2016:27. https://doi.org/10.1111/jvs.12433
  26. 26. Condit R, Hubbell SP, Foster RB. Assessing the response of plant functional types to climatic change in tropical forests. Journal of Vegetation Science. 1996;7(3):405–16. https://doi.org/10.2307/3236284
  27. 27. Norafida N, Nizam MS, Juliana WAW. Community structure, diversity and total biomass of tree species at kapur dominated forests in Peninsular Malaysia. AIP Conf Proc. 2013;1571:302–7. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4858673
  28. 28. Faezah P, Nizam MS, Rohaiza D. Species richness and floristic vegetation of tree communities in island forests of Langkawi Archipelago, Peninsular Malaysia. Advances in Environmental Biology. 2017;11(5):70–8.
  29. 29. Faezah P, Asmida I, Khairiyah MS, Norrizah JS, Nuraini CA. Diversity and tree species community at Bukit Nanas Forest Reserve, Kuala Lumpur. In: 2013 IEEE Business Engineering and Industrial Applications Colloquium (BEIAC). 2013:846–50. https://doi.org/10.1109/BEIAC.2013.6560255
  30. 30. Lajuni JJ, Latiff A. Biomass and floristic composition of Bangi Permanent Forest Reserve, a twice-logged lowland dipterocarp forest in Peninsular Malaysia. Sains Malaysiana. 2013;42(10):1517–21.
  31. 31. Nor Azra M, Mohd Noor MI, Pau Tan M, Dawood M, Amin M, Zekker I, et al. Zebrafish and medaka as model organisms for climate change research: global literature scientometric analysis. Frontiers in Earth Science. 2022;10:988710. https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2022.988710
  32. 32. Richter HG, Gottwald H. Wood structure and properties diversity in commercial dipterocarp timbers of South-east Asia. In: Dipterocarp Forest Ecosystems: Towards Sustainable Management. 1996:526–77. https://doi.org/10.1142/9789814261043_0023

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.