Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Plant Science Today (PST)

Research Articles

Vol. 12 No. 3 (2025)

Perfectly imperfect: Embracing sub-optimal vegetables in Coimbatore farmer’s market

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.7574
Submitted
3 February 2025
Published
22-07-2025 — Updated on 29-07-2025
Versions

Abstract

India is one of the largest producers of vegetables globally, consistently ranking among the top countries in terms of production. However, post-harvest losses continue to be a major problem in the food sector because of poor handling, storage and transportation. Despite these losses, customers frequently ignore vegetables that are not at their best but still have nutritional value due to their aesthetic flaws. This is because consumers and retailers have high expectations in purchasing vegetables. The study explores factors that influence purchasing behavior and consumer preferences in sub-optimal vegetables. Using a well-structured questionnaire data was collected from 250 respondents in Coimbatore farmers market and analyzed by using factor and conjoint analysis. A total of four factors such as buying expectations, attitudes, benefits and price were identified on purchasing behaviour of sub-optimal vegetables. Combination of fresh, firm, without spots with a price discount of 50-75 % has a higher utility score and it is a highly preferred attribute of the consumer in buying sub-optimal vegetables. This study contributing to food waste reduction and supporting sustainable practices.

References

  1. 1. Alexander P, Brown C, Arneth A, Finnigan J, Moran D, Rounsevell MD. Losses, inefficiencies and waste in the global food system. Agricultural Systems. 2017;153:190-200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2017.01.014
  2. 2. Harris J, de Steenhuijsen Piters B, McMullin S, Bajwa B, de Jager I, Brouwer ID. Fruits and vegetables for healthy diets: priorities for food system research and action. Science and Innovations for Food Systems Transformation. 2023:87. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-15703-5
  3. 3. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. The State of Food and Agriculture 2019: Moving forward on food loss and waste reduction. Rome: FAO; 2019. https://www.fao.org/newsroom/detail/A-major-step-forward-in-reducing-food-loss-and-waste-is-critical-to-achieve-the-SDGs/en
  4. 4. Aschemann-Witzel J, De Hooge I, Amani P, Bech-Larsen T, Oostindjer M. Consumer-related food waste: Causes and potential for action. Sustainability. 2015;7(6):6457-77. https://doi.org/10.3390/su7066457
  5. 5. De Hooge IE, Oostindjer M, Aschemann-Witzel J, Normann A, Loose SM, Almli VL. This apple is too ugly for me! Consumer preferences for suboptimal food products in the supermarket and at home. Food Quality and Preference. 2017;56:80-92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2016.09.012
  6. 6. Berscheid E, Walster E. What is beautiful is good. Journal of Personality Social Psychology. 1972;24(3):285-90. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0033731
  7. 7. Helmert JR, Symmank C, Pannasch S, Rohm H. Have an eye on the buckled cucumber: An eye tracking study on visually suboptimal foods. Food Quality and Preference. 2017;60:40-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2017.03.009
  8. 8. Aschemann-Witzel J, Jensen JH, Jensen MH, Kulikovskaja V. Consumer behaviour towards price-reduced suboptimal foods in the supermarket and the relation to food waste in households. Appetite. 2017;116:246-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2017.05.013
  9. 9. Haws KL, Reczek RW, Sample KL. Healthy diets make empty wallets: The healthy expensive intuition. Journal of Consumer Research. 2017;43(6):992-1007. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcr/ucw078
  10. 10. Bunn D, Feenstra GW, Lynch L, Sommer R. Consumer acceptance of cosmetically imperfect produce. Journal of Consumer Affairs. 1990;24(2):268-79. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6606.1990.tb00269.x
  11. 11. Göbel C, Langen N, Blumenthal A, Teitscheid P, Ritter G. Cutting food waste through cooperation along the food supply chain. Sustainability. 2015;7(2):1429-45. https://doi.org/10.3390/su7021429
  12. 12. Helmert JR, Symmank C, Pannasch S, Rohm H. Have an eye on the buckled cucumber: An eye tracking study on visually suboptimal foods. Food Quality and Preference. 2017;60:40-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2017.03.009
  13. 13. White K, Lin L, Dahl DW, Ritchie RJ. When do consumers avoid imperfections? Superficial packaging damage as a contamination cue. Journal of Marketing Research. 2016;53(1):110-23. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmr.12.0388
  14. 14. Rippin HL, Maximova K, Loyola E, Breda J, Wickramasinghe K, Ferreira-Borges C, et al. Suboptimal intake of fruits and vegetables in nine selected countries of the World Health Organization European region. Preventing Chronic Disease. 2023;20. https://doi.org/10.5888/pcd20.230159
  15. 15. Puteri B, Buttlar B, Jahnke B. Take it or leave it? Investigating the ambivalence and willingness to pay for suboptimal fruits and vegetables among organic consumers in Germany. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems. 2022;6:934954.
  16. 16. Carmone FJ Jr, Schaffer CM. Conjoint Designer: Version 3. 1990. https://doi.org/10.2307/3152118
  17. 17. Green PE, Krieger AM, Wind Y. Thirty years of conjoint analysis: Reflections and prospects. Interfaces. 2001;31(3_supplement):S56-73. https://doi.org/10.1287/inte.31.3s.56.9676
  18. 18. Ezell HF, Motes WH. Differentiating between the sexes: A focus on male‐female grocery shopping attitudes and behavior. Journal of Consumer Marketing. 1985;2(2):29-40. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb008
  19. 19. Li Y, Shan B. Exploring the role of health consciousness and environmental awareness in purchase intentions for green-packaged organic foods: an extended TPB model. Frontiers in Nutrition. 2025;12:1528016. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2025.1528016
  20. 20. Gustat J, O'Malley K, Luckett BG, Johnson CC. Fresh produce consumption and the association between frequency of food shopping, car access and distance to supermarkets. Preventive Medicine Reports. 2015;2:47-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmedr.2014.12.009
  21. 21. Solankia S, Inumula KM. Farmers' markets: An analysis of the determinants of consumers' attitudes and behavior. Asian Journal of Agriculture and Rural Development. 2021;11(1):63-70. https://doi.org/10.22004/ag.econ.342313
  22. 22. Yang C, Chen X. Factors affecting consumers’ purchasing of suboptimal foods during the COVID-19 pandemic. Agriculture. 2022;12(1):99. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture12010099
  23. 23. Nosratabadi S, Khazami N, Abdallah MB, Lackner Z, Band S, Mosavi A, et al. Social capital contributions to food security: A comprehensive literature review. Foods. 2020;9(11):1650. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods9111650
  24. 24. Elimelech E, Ert E, Parag Y, Hochman G. Exploring the impact of visual perception and taste experience on consumers’ acceptance of suboptimal fresh produce. Sustainability. 2024;16(7):2698. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16072698
  25. 25. Van Giesen RI, de Hooge IE. Too ugly, but I love its shape: Reducing food waste of suboptimal products with authenticity (and sustainability) positioning. Food Quality and Preference. 2019;75:249-59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2019.02.020
  26. 26. Huang WS, Kuo HY, Tung SY, Chen HS. Assessing consumer preferences for suboptimal food: Application of a choice experiment in citrus fruit retail. Foods. 2020;10(1):15. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods10010015
  27. 27. Wong SL, Hsu CC, Chen HS. To buy or not to buy? Consumer attitudes and purchase intentions for suboptimal food. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2018;15(7):1431. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15071431
  28. 28. Hartmann T, Jahnke B, Hamm U. Making ugly food beautiful: Consumer barriers to purchase and marketing options for suboptimal food at retail level-A systematic review. Food Quality and Preference. 2021;90:104179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2021.104179
  29. 29. Aschemann-Witzel J, de Hooge IE, Almli VL. My style, my food, my waste! Consumer food waste-related lifestyle segments. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services. 2021;59:102353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2020.102353
  30. 30. Jaeger SR, Antúnez L, Ares G, Swaney-Stueve M, Jin D, Harker FR. Quality perceptions regarding external appearance of apples: Insights from experts and consumers in four countries. Postharvest Biology and Technology. 2018;146:99-107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.postharvbio.2018.08.014
  31. 31. Makhal A, Robertson K, Thyne M, Mirosa M. Normalising the “ugly” to reduce food waste: Exploring the socialisations that form appearance preferences for fresh fruits and vegetables. Journal of Consumer Behaviour. 2021;20(5):1025-39. https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.1908
  32. 32. Aschemann-Witzel J, de Hooge IE, Rohm H, Normann A, Bossle MB, Grønhøj A, Oostindjer M. Key characteristics and success factors of supply chain initiatives tackling consumer-related food waste–A multiple case study. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2017;155:33-45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.11.173
  33. 33. Giménez A, Aschemann-Witzel J, Ares G. Exploring barriers to consuming suboptimal foods: a consumer perspective. Food Research International. 2021;141:110106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2021.110106
  34. 34. Aschemann-Witzel J, Jensen JH, Jensen MH, Kulikovskaja V. Consumer behaviour towards price-reduced suboptimal foods in the supermarket and the relation to food waste in households. Appetite. 2017;116:246-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2017.05.013
  35. 35. Cao Y, Miao L. Consumer responses to suboptimal food products. Appetite. 2021;163:105205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2021.105205
  36. 36. Qi D, Roe BE. Household food waste: Multivariate regression and principal components analyses of awareness and attitudes among US consumers. PLOS One. 2016;11(7):e0159250. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0159250
  37. 37. Neubig CM, Roosen J, Karg CA, Moser S. It’s safe and healthy! Increasing consumers’ willingness to consume aging produce. Food Quality and Preference. 2022;101:104608. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2022.104608
  38. 38. Van Giesen RI, de Hooge IE. Too ugly, but I love its shape: Reducing food waste of suboptimal products with authenticity (and sustainability) positioning. Food Quality and Preference. 2019;75:249-59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2019.02.020
  39. 39. Gurbuz IB, Macabangin M. Factors affecting consumer's behaviour on purchasing and consumption of food products.
  40. 40. Steinhart Y, Mazursky D, Kamins MA. The process by which product availability triggers purchase. Marketing Letters. 2013;24:217-28.
  41. 41. Hair JF Jr, Page M, Brunsveld N. Essentials of Business Research Methods. Routledge; 2019. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429203374

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.