Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Research Articles

Early Access

Optimization of high-density planting configurations for poovan banana (Musa spp.) in coconut-based agroforestry system of the Cauvery delta zone of India

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.7639
Submitted
7 February 2025
Published
25-08-2025
Versions

Abstract

Bananas (Musa spp.) are a crucial global agricultural commodity, playing a vital role in tropical agroecosystems. The Poovan cultivar demonstrates high productivity and adaptability in coconut-based agroforestry systems. This study investigates the influence of planting geometries on crop performance in the Cauvery delta zone, assessing five spatial configurations (2.1 × 2.1 m to 0.9 × 0.9 m) across morphological, physiological and economic parameters. Results indicate that wider spacing (2.1 × 2.1 m) significantly enhances leaf morphological traits, yielding maximum leaf length (148.17 cm), breadth (77.75 cm) and a Leaf Area Index (LAI) of 2.61 m²/plant. Fruit quality is also improved, with increased bunch weights (16 kg), larger fruit dimensions (20 cm length), higher sugar content (22 Brix) and greater firmness (4.5 kg/cm²). Conversely, denser spacing increases plant population per unit area but results in reduced individual plant growth and fruit quality. Economic analysis reveals that the 1.5 × 1.5 m spacing is the most cost-effective, achieving a benefit-cost ratio of 1.14, optimizing yield and revenue potential. These findings highlight the complex relationship between plant density, resource allocation and productivity in tropical agricultural systems. By identifying optimal planting geometries, this study provides practical recommendations for sustainable intensification in coconut-based agroforestry, maximizing land use efficiency while ensuring high-quality banana production. Optimizing spacing helps maximize land productivity, improve microclimate and ensure sustainable farm income. Banana intercropping in coconut gardens is a viable practice to enhance land productivity and farmer income. However, appropriate spacing (2.1 m x 2.1 m) is crucial to minimize resource competition and maximize returns. Continued research and extension services can help optimize these systems for diverse agro-ecological zones. The results offer a valuable framework for improving productivity and economic resilience, aiding farmers in making informed decisions to enhance profitability best economic returns often come from spacing like 2.1 m x 2.1m, balancing yield and input cost in integrated farming systems.

References

  1. 1. Swaminathan MS, Jain A, Reddy KR. Banana cultivation strategies in changing climatic scenarios. Front Plant Sci. 2022;13:945612. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.945612
  2. 2. Nair PKR, Kumar BM, Mudappura R. Agroforestry: A sustainable land use system for tropical regions. J Sustain Agric. 2021;45(3):267–85.
  3. 3. Coffi PMJ, Ama JT, Lekadou TT, Traore S, Agoh CF, Yao DMS. Evaluation of the productivity of intercropping plantain cultivar (PITA 3) fertilized with two types of manure, under coconut tree-based (Cocos nucifera L.) systems, on the tertiary sands of Côte d’Ivoire. Agric Sci. 2023;14:1405–19. https://doi.org/10.4236/as.2023.1410092
  4. 4. Raman S, Krishnamurthy V, Selvam P. Intercropping dynamics in tropical agroforestry systems: A comprehensive review. Agric Ecosyst Environ. 2023;342:108221.
  5. 5. Ibrahim EM, Yusuf. Intercropping of several cultivars of banana and plantain under coconut-based systems in North Sulawesi, Indonesia. E3S Web Conf. 2021;232:03007. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202123203007
  6. 6. Kantharaju TM, Jalawadic S, Naik R, Vijaymahantesh. Influence of different planting methods and high-density planting on yield and economic parameters in banana cv. Williams. J Sci Res Rep. 2024;30(9):816–24. https://doi.org/10.9734/jsrr/2024/v30i92408
  7. 7. Kumar RP, Murthy JS. Innovative approaches in tropical intercropping systems. Agric Syst. 2022;189:103089.
  8. 8. Selvam P, Rajasekar K, Muthukrishnan S. Spatial optimization strategies in agricultural systems. Exp Agric. 2024;60(1):45–62.
  9. 9. Soto-Ballestero M. Bananas: Botany, Production and Uses. Wallingford: CABI Publishing; 2002.
  10. 10. Turner DW, Lahav E. Approaches to banana (Musa spp.) nutrition. Fruits. 1983;38(9):632–7.
  11. 11. Chillet M, de Lapeyre de Bellaire L, Dorel M, Joas J, Marel D. Differentiation of banana ripening patterns in relation to cropping practices and fruit physiological age. J Hortic Sci Biotechnol. 2006;81(3):391–6.
  12. 12. Kumar A, Singh AK, Yadav RP. Effect of spacing and fertility levels on growth, yield and quality of banana (Musa spp.) cv. Grand Naine. Indian J Agric Sci. 2017;87(8):1035–40.
  13. 13. Mohan Kumar B, Kunhamu TK. Nature-based solutions in agriculture: A review of the coconut (Cocos nucifera L.)-based farming systems in Kerala, “the Land of Coconut Trees.” Nat Based Solut. 2022;2:100012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nbsj.2022.100012
  14. 14. Selva Rani A, Subbulakshmi S, Kavitha K, Nazreen Hassan S, Latha R, Suresh S. A review on coconut-based intercropping. Int J Res Agron. 2024;SP-7(9):243–7. https://doi.org/10.33545/2618060X.2024.v7.i9Sd.1475
  15. 15. Dye S. Banana production: Spacing and yield optimization. J Agric Sci. 2017;45(2):233–45.
  16. 16. López LA, et al. Optimizing banana plantation spacing for improved yield and sustainability. Agrofor Syst. 2020;94(5):123–35.
  17. 17. Singh S, Singh DR, Velmurugan A, Jaisankar I, Swarnam TP. Biodiversity and climate change adaptation in tropical islands. In: Academic Press. 2008:623–66. ISBN 9780128130643. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-813064-3.00023-5
  18. 18. Ibrahim EM, Yusuf. Coconut-based intercropping with banana and plantain cultivars in North Sulawesi. E3S Web Conf. 2021;232:03007. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202123203007

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.