Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Plant Science Today (PST)

Review Articles

Early Access

Nurturing agripreneurship in India through open and distance learning: A comprehensive study

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.7645
Submitted
7 February 2025
Published
27-04-2025
Versions

Abstract

Agriculture remains a primary source of income and livelihood especially in developing nations amid the rapidly changing global economy. However, traditional educational systems often fail to prepare aspiring agricultural entrepreneurs due to limitations such as geographical barriers, rigid curricula and insufficient access to resources. Open and Distance Learning (ODL) emerges as a transformative solution, offering flexible, accessible, scalable education tailored to diverse learner needs and modern agribusiness demands. This study examined a comprehensive review of 192 publications using academic databases such as Google Scholar, Web of Science, Scopus and Education Resources Information Centre (ERIC). India is the leader in ODL research, United States of America (USA), United Kingdom (UK), Australia and China are other countries contributing to ODL research studies. The analysis identified key benefits, including bridging the education access gap in rural areas, fostering an entrepreneurial ecosystem and promoting lifelong learning. The scalability of ODL facilitates widespread reach, impacting a larger audience than traditional education methods and enhancing individual livelihoods. Furthermore, it fosters community engagement and collaboration, strengthening the resilience of the agricultural sector. This review highlights the significant role of ODL in nurturing a new generation of skilled agripreneurs, contributing to sustainable agricultural development, economic growth and global food security. Future research should explore the potential of ODL courses in metropolitan cities and green entrepreneurship.

References

  1. Srivastava M, Mishra B, Rao DK, Abrol N, Varma V, Bhushan B. Recent trends of research in open and distance education in India. Asian Association of Open Universities Journal. 2020;15(2):263-83. https://doi.org/10.1108/aaouj-06-2020-0044
  2. Ayo CK, Odukoya JA, Azeta A. A review of open & distance education and human development in Nigeria. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning. 2014;9(6):63.
  3. Bharathwaaj A, Balasubramaniam P, Sriram N. A study on motivational factors and the constraints faced by distance learners of ODL certificate course tea cultivation technology. Archives of Current Research International. 2024;24(7):30-8. https://dx.doi.org/10.9734/acri/2024/v24i7826
  4. Menon D, Gunasekar S, Dixit SK, Das P, Mandal S. Present and prospective research themes for tourism and hospitality education post-COVID19: A bibliometric analysis. Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sport & Tourism Education. 2022;30:100360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhlste.2021.100360
  5. Ntuli CH, Gumbo MT. Assessing the quality of the integrated tutor model for student support in Open Distance Learning. Journal of Education (University of KwaZulu-Natal). 2023;(93):147-62. https://doi.org/10.17159/2520-9868/i93a07
  6. Erden ?H, Kaya ?A. An online distant learning for agricultural experts and farmers. In: 2015 Fourth International Conference on Agro-Geoinformatics (Agro-geoinformatics). IEEE; 2015 Jul 20. p. 69-72. https://doi.org/10.1109/Agro-Geoinformatics.2015.7248151
  7. Aperribai L, Cortabarria L, Aguirre T, Verche E, Borges Á. Teacher's physical activity and mental health during lockdown due to the COVID-2019 pandemic. Frontiers in Psychology. 2020;11:577886. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.577886
  8. Amir LR, Tanti I, Maharani DA, Wimardhani YS, Julia V, Sulijaya B, et al. Student perspective of classroom and distance learning during COVID-19 pandemic in the undergraduate dental study program Universitas Indonesia. BMC Medical Education. 2020;20:1-8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-020-02312-0
  9. Pokhrel S, Chhetri R. A literature review on impact of COVID-19 pandemic on teaching and learning. Higher Education for the Future. 2021;8(1):133-41. https://doi.org/10.1177/2347631120983481
  10. Bakar RA, Hashim RC, Low MC, Razzak MR, Jayasingam S. Effects of the covid-19 pandemic on employee well-being. Springer Books; 2023. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-0432-7
  11. Saidi RM, Sharip AA, Abd Rahim NZ, Zulkifli ZA, Zain SM. Evaluating students' preferences of Open and Distance Learning (ODL) tools. Procedia Computer Science. 2021;179:955-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2021.01.085
  12. Katakwar S. Agri-entrepreneurship: problems and prospective in India. International Journal of Advanced Research. 2022;10(5):1-4.
  13. Shivacharan G, Rani VS, Vasantha R. Rural young agri entrepreneurs: problems, suggestions and strategy for successful running of their enterprise. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences. 2017;6(11):259-64.
  14. Sharma JP, Bhatt A. Role of agri-business entrepreneurship, innovation and value chains/networks in farmer income improvement: models, policies and challenges. Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics. 2022;77(1):120-32.
  15. Kamatchi KS, Sambandan TG. A CDIO framework on instructor teaching effectiveness using digitized technology concepts. International Journal of Innovative Technology and Exploring Engineering (IJITEE). 2019;8(11):1422-7. https://doi.org/10.35940/ijitee.j9770.0981119
  16. Veni J. Role of startups in entrepreneurship development (Agri Based Sector). Management. 2023;11(S1):94-9.
  17. Osman Z. Determinants of social entrepreneur intention and behavior among online distance learning students in Malaysia. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences. 2020;10(11):1376-84.
  18. Talukder SC, Lakner Z, Temesi Á. Development and state of the art of entrepreneurship education: A bibliometric review. Education Sciences. 2024;14(3):295. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14030295
  19. Calvo S, Morales A, Wade J. The use of MOOCs in social enterprise education: an evaluation of a North–South collaborative Future Learn program. Journal of Small Business & Entrepreneurship. 2019;31(3):201-23. https://doi.org/10.1080/08276331.2018.1453241
  20. Pavankumar K, Salunkhe SR. Attitude of Navsari Agricultural University students towards application of distance education. International Journal of Agriculture Extension and Social Development. 2024;7(9):218-22. https://doi.org/10.33545/26180723.2024.v7.i9d.1034
  21. Lalzuitluangi, Ramswamy R. Entrepreneurship development in Saitual sericulture cluster in Mizoram. SEDME (Small Enterprises Development, Management & Extension Journal). 2019;46(3):141-51. https://doi.org/10.1177/0970846419873753
  22. Haribalaji V, Nirmala DM, Balasubramaniam P, Malarkodi M, Selvi RG. Impact of sericulture certificate courses offered by Tamil Nadu Agricultural University in a distance mode. Madras Agricultural Journal. 2023;110:33-9. https://doi.org/10.29321/MAJ.10.200828
  23. Ali SS, Koshti NR, Deshmukh A. Impact of Cluster Promotion Programme on socio-economic status of sericulturist. International Journal of Extension Education. 2014;10:127-30.
  24. Haldhar SM, Hussain T, Thaochan N, Bana RS, Jat MK, Nidhi CN. Entrepreneurship opportunities for agriculture graduates and rural youth in India: A scoping review. Journal of Agriculture and Ecology. 2023;15:1-13. https://doi.org/10.58628/JAE-2315-101
  25. Guiné RP, Oliveira J, Coelho C, Costa DT, Correia P, Correia HE, et al. Professional training in beekeeping: a cross-country survey to identify learning opportunities. Sustainability. 2023;15(11):8953. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15118953
  26. Singh B, Singh S. Knowledge gain through bee keeping training programme. Journal of Krishi Vigyan. 2019;8(1):306-11. https://doi.org/10.5958/2349-4433.2019.00095.3
  27. Mohammadinezhad S, Sharifzadeh M. Agricultural entrepreneurship orientation: Is academic training a missing link? Education + Training. 2017;59(7/8):856-70. https://doi.org/10.1108/ET-10-2016-0156
  28. Purnima KS, Lalitha A, Bhagyalakshmi K. Computing the effectiveness of skill oriented certificate courses organized through distance learning medium. Journal of Krishi Vigyan. 2021;9(2):16-21. https://doi.org/10.5958/2349-4433.2021.00003.9
  29. de Carvalho CS, Sales-Campos C, de Andrade MC. Mushrooms of the Pleurotus genus: a review of cultivation techniques. Interciencia. 2010;35(3):177-82. https://doi.org/0378-1844/10/03/177-06
  30. Nivedha CK, Sriram N, Balasubramaniam P, Niramala Devi M, Prahadeeswaran M, Patil SG. Attitude of distance learners towards the bachelor of farm technology degree programme and its impact on agricultural knowledge and practices. Plant Science Today. 2025;11(sp4). https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.5846
  31. Guiné R, Costa D, Correia P, Castro M, Guerra L, Costa CA. Contribution for rural development through training in organic farming. In: ICFAPE 2015: 17th International Conference on Food and Agricultural Process Engineering; 2015. p. 1720-6. https://doi.org/1999.1/10002265
  32. Homillano ML. Short-term courses in organic agriculture for home gardens: a potential approach to securing household food supply. Asian Journal of Education and Social Studies. 2023;42(1):1-8. https://doi.org/10.9734/AJESS/2023/v42i1904
  33. Krishnaveni TS, Balasubramaniam P, Anusuya A, Vasanthapriya S. Extent of awareness of distance learners of Tamil Nadu Agricultural University. Journal of Extension Education. 2017;29(4). https://doi.org/10.26725/JEE.2017.4.29.5958-5965
  34. Hegde NG. Forage resource development in India. The Indian Journal of Animal Sciences. 2014;84(7):715-22. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijans.v84i7.42084
  35. Manoj KN, Shekara BG, Sridhara S, Jha PK, Prasad PV. Biomass quantity and quality from different year-round cereal–legume cropping systems as forage or fodder for livestock. Sustainability. 2021;13(16):9414. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13169414
  36. Kimani C. Evaluation of planning and management of distance education: a critical literature review. Journal of Online Distance Learning. 2021;1(1):14-28. https://doi.org/10.47941/jodl.635
  37. Saakha P, Discetti R. Learning to weave through a digital app: women’s empowerment in Artisan Villages of Nepal. Journal of Fair Trade. 2024;5(1):73-101.
  38. Yulianingsih W, Mardliyah S, Susilo H. Impact of handicraft skills training for household assistants. In: 1st International Conference on Education Social Sciences and Humanities. ICESSHum 2019. Atlantis Press; 2019. p. 589-95. https://doi.org/10.2991/icesshum-19.2019.94
  39. Grover K, Sharma P. Food processing and value addition for nutritional and entrepreneurial development in India: opportunities and challenges. Indian Journal of Economics and Development. 2020;16(2s):152-9.
  40. Jraisat L. A network perspective and value added tasks: the case of agri-food value chain. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics. 2016;28(2). https://doi.org/10.1108/APJML-08-2015-0124
  41. Senthilkumar T, Sudeepkumar NK, Thirunavukkarasu M. A study on barriers in distance learning of dairy and goat farming courses. Elixir Social Science. 2012;50:10317-9.
  42. Dash BM, Botcha R. Social work education through open and distance learning: an Indian perspective. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education. 2018;19(2):149-65. https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.415829
  43. Sourabh S, Sumonaojha K, Prakash S, Rao D. Impact of vermicomposting technology training conducted by KVK in acquiring the skills by the respondents. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences. 2018;7(5):3512-21. https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2018.705.406
  44. Dhanushkodi V, Porkodi G. Impact of vermicomposting training programme on production, economics and employment generation of farmer - A case study. Asian Journal of Agricultural Extension, Economics & Sociology. 2018;27(2):1–5. https://doi.org/10.9734/AJAEES/2018/43208
  45. Wang Z, Zhang L, Song M, Luobu S, Peng H. Evaluation on real-time self-organization algorithm of forest cultivation, tea planting and tea processing for sustainable ecosystem management of agricultural water resources. Water Supply. 2023;23(5):2197-209. https://doi.org/10.2166/ws.2023.109
  46. Hammoda B. The impact of educational technologies on entrepreneurial competencies: a systematic review of empirical evidence. Knowledge Management & E-Learning. 2024;16(2):309-33. https://doi.org/10.34105/j.kmel.2024.16.015
  47. Chen L, Ifenthaler D, Yau JY. Online and blended entrepreneurship education: a systematic review of applied educational technologies. Entrepreneurship Education. 2021;4(2):191-232. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41959-021-00047-7
  48. Oksana V, Alina D, Olena T, Iryna Z, Mykhailo S, Tetyana K, et al. Innovative approaches to training specialists in higher education institutions in the conditions of distance learning. International Journal of Computer Science & Network Security. 2022;22(12):116-24. https://doi.org/10.22937/IJCSNS.2022.22.12.15
  49. Nenzhelele TE. Triggering entrepreneurial intensions through experiential learning in an open distance learning institution. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences. 2014;5(16):199-208.
  50. Balan P, Maritz A, McKinlay M. A structured method for innovating in entrepreneurship pedagogies. Education+ Training. 2018;60(7/8):819-40. https://doi.org/10.1108/ET-05-2017-0064
  51. Matoka W, Mwange A. Entrepreneurship education and its impact on informal sector development in Zambia: a theoretical perspective. African Journal of Commercial Studies. 2024;5(4):265-72. https://doi.org/10.59413/ajocs/v5.i.4.8
  52. Xu D, Xu Y. The ambivalence about distance learning in higher education: challenges, opportunities and policy implications. Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research. 2020;35:351-401. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-31365-4_10
  53. Mathew VN, Chung E. University Students' Perspectives on Open and Distance Learning (ODL) Implementation Amidst COVID-19. Asian Journal of University Education. 2020;16(4):152-60. https://doi.org/10.24191/ajue.v16i4.11964
  54. Ferri F, Grifoni P, Guzzo T. Online learning and emergency remote teaching: Opportunities and challenges in emergency situations. Societies. 2020;10(4):86. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc10040086
  55. Kaminskien? L, Ling YC. Challenges of distance education during the school lockdown: the lithuanian school leaders’ perspective. In: society Integration. Education. Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference. Vol. 5; 2021 May 28. p. 127-34. https://doi.org/10.17770/sie2021vol5.6390
  56. Aiken FJ. Overcoming the challenges that students face in distance education. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning. 2025;40(2):113-5. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680513.2025.2473343
  57. Al-Belushi MA, Al-Hooti NA. The Arab strategy for distance education: a review of the ALECSO 2005 proposal and its current implications. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning. 2025;40(2):187-213. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITSE-08-2020-0128
  58. Ntaba A, Jantjies M. Open distance learning and immersive technologies: a literature analysis. International Association for Development of the Information Society; 2019. https://doi.org/10.33965/celda2019_201911l007

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.