Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Research Articles

Vol. 12 No. 3 (2025)

Assessing the genetic diversity in large seeded confectionery groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) and association among grain quality characters

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.7803
Submitted
18 February 2025
Published
25-07-2025 — Updated on 06-08-2025
Versions

Abstract

Groundnut is a principal oilseed crop cultivated in about 24 million ha worldwide mainly for oil purpose. With the arrival of other vegetable oil sources, groundnut cultivation has to be made more profitable by development and promotion of confectionary varieties which fetches better price in the local as well as international markets. The present investigation was conducted at Oilseeds Research Station, Tindivanam during 2022 using 30 bold seeded groundnut germplasm to assess the diversity existing among the germplasm for confectionary characters, association of grain quality characters with pod yield and suitability of the genotypes for improvement of confectionery characters in groundnut varieties. Significant mean performance was noticed in T 64, M522, ICGV05174, ICGV06188 for pod yield/plant, kernel weight, sound mature kernel weight/plant and sound mature kernel percentage, while T 64, TPG 41, ICGV06227, ICGV06229, ICGV06214 had significant mean performance for 100 kernel weight. The diversity analysis grouped the germplasm into eight clusters with cluster II, IV and I showing more inter cluster distance with clusters VIII and VII indicating the diverse nature of the genotypes among these clusters. Cluster Mean analysis indicated the high mean performance of genotypes in cluster IV for pod yield/plant, no. of kernels/plant and sound mature kernel/plant as compared to cluster VII with sole genotype TG 4 having high mean performance for 100 kernel weight, kernel weight per plant, sound mature kernel weight/ plant and pod yield/plant. Among the characters, 100 kernel weight (58.2 %) followed by sound mature kernel weight/plant (21.1 %) contributed maximum for diversity. Character association studies revealed that kernel weight/ plant is the most significantly correlated character followed by sound mature kernel weight/plant and no. of kernels/plant in the positive direction. High direct effect of sound mature kernel weight and indirect effect of it via kernel weight/plant on pod yield was noticed indicating the emphasis to be given on sound mature kernel weight in selection of genotypes for confectionery purposes. Principal Component Analysis (PCA) indicated the importance of first three Principal components in explaining total variation.

References

  1. 1. FAOSTAT. Statistical databases of the Food and Agricultural Organisation (FAO), Rome. 2021. https://www.fao.org/faostat
  2. 2. Agricultural Market Intelligence Centre, PJTSAU. Groundnut Outlook. 2024. https://pjtsau.edu.in/files/AgriMkt/2024/January/groundnut-January-2024.pdf
  3. 3. Sharma D, Joshi A, Jain D, Singh P, Choudhary R. Biochemical characterization of oil from groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) genotypes. Int J Plant Soil Sci. 2017;15(5):1-5.
  4. 4. Dwivedi SL, Thendapani K, Nigam SN. Stability of seed mass in confectionery groundnut. Int Arachis Newslett. 1988;3:14-6.
  5. 5. Patil AS, Salunke MD. Breeding for quality traits in groundnut. Popular Kheti. 2014;2(2):173-8.
  6. 6. Kona P, Mahatma MK, Gangadhara K, Ajay BC, Narendra Kumar, Kiran Kumar Reddy et al. Evaluation and identification of promising advanced breeding lines for quality and yield traits in groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Int J Agric Sci. 2021;17(2):280-6. https://doi.org/10.15740/HAS/IJAS/17.2/280-286
  7. 7. Chunilal, Hariprasanna. Breeding for confectionery groundnut. In: Basu MS, Singh NB, editors. Groundnut research in India. Junagadh: National Research Centre for Groundnut. 2004:48-56.
  8. 8. Singh S, Pawar IS. Theory and application of biometrical genetics. India: CBS Publishers; 2005.
  9. 9. Bhandari HR, Bhanu N, Srivastava A, Singh K, Shreya, Hemantaranjan A. Assessment of genetic diversity in crop plants - an overview. Advances Plants Agric Res. 2017;7(3):279-86.
  10. 10. John K. Correlation and path coefficient analysis for yield and its related traits in groundnut - a review. East African Scholars J Agri Life Sci. 2019;2(1):4-9. https://doi.org/10.36349/easjals.2019.v02i01.002
  11. 11. Dwivedi SL, Nigam SN. Confectionery groundnut: issues and opportunities to promote export and food uses in India. J Oilseeds Res. 2005;22(1):1-4.
  12. 12. Gali Suresh DL, Reddy A, Rajesh P, John K, Sudhakar P, Rao VS. Genetic divergence analysis in confectionery peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Biological Forum. 2023;15(11):218-22.
  13. 13. Ali S, Ahmad R, Hassan MF, Ibrar D, Iqbal MS, Naveed MS et al. Groundnut genotypes’ diversity assessment for yield and oil quality traits through multivariate analysis. SABRAO J Breed Genet. 2022;54(3):565-73. https://doi.org/10.54910/sabrao2022.54.3.9
  14. 14. Deepa G, Laxmi M, Patil C, Nandini B, Motagi BN. Confectionery groundnut genotypes (Arachis hypogaea L.): a study on genetic variability parameters with special reference to confectionery traits improvement. Int J Environ Climate Change. 2023;13(11):332-44. https://doi.org/10.9734/IJECC/2023/v13i113176
  15. 15. Abady S, Shemelis H, Pasupuleti J, Mashilo J, Chaudhari S, Manohar SS. Assessment of the genetic diversity of groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) genotypes for kernel yield, oil and fodder quantity and quality under drought conditions. Crop Sci. 2021;1-18. https://doi.org/10.1002/csc2.20483
  16. 16. Ward JH. Hierarchical grouping to optimize an objective function. J American Stat Assoc. 1963;58:236-44.
  17. 17. Rao RC. Advanced statistical methods in biometric research. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 1952.
  18. 18. Al-Jibouri HA, Miller PA, Robinson HV. Genotypic and environmental variances and co-variances in an upland cotton cross of interspecific origin. Agron J. 1958;50:633-36.
  19. 19. Dewey DR, Lu KH. A correlation and path coefficient analysis of components of crested wheat grass seed products. Agron J. 1959;1:515-20.
  20. 20. Pearson K. On lines and planes of closest fit to systems of point in space. Philos Mag. 1901;2(11). https://doi.org/10.1080/14786440109462720
  21. 21. R Studio Team. R Studio Desktop IDE (Version 2023.06.0-421). 2023. https://posit.co/products/open-source/rstudio
  22. 22. Mumm RH. The process of cultivar development: pure line variety. In: Suza WP, Lamkey KR, editors. Cultivar Development. Iowa State University Digital Press; 2023.
  23. 23. Venkateswara Rao, Pandiyan M, Manivannan M, Chandrasekhar CN, Harisudhan C. Understanding combining ability, heterosis and relationships of pod yield and yield contributing traits in groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.). 2023;15(2):1-10. https://doi.org/10.37992/2024.1502.037
  24. 24. Gangadhara K, Ajay BC, Kona P, Rani K, Kumar N, Bera SK. Performance of some early-maturing groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) genotypes and selection of high-yielding genotypes in the potato-fallow system. PLoS One. 2023;18(4):e0282438. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0282438
  25. 25. Reddy P, Sabara P, Padhiyar SM, Kulkarni GU, Sapara GK, Tomar RS. Correlation and path analysis among agromorphological traits in groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Annals Arid Zone. 2023;62(3):227-34. https://doi.org/10.59512/aaz.2023.62.3.5
  26. 26. Suvarna C, Vasanthi RP, Viswanath K, Kiran Kumar Reddy C, Amaravathi Y. Combining ability analysis for yield, yield attributes and quality traits in groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Electron J Pl Breed. 2024;15(2):496-503. https://doi.org/10.37992/2024.1502.051
  27. 27. Bertan I, Fernando IF, de Carvalho A, Oliveira AC. Parental selection strategies in plant breeding programs. J Crop Sci Biotech. 2014;10(4):211-22.
  28. 28. Habite DN. Principal component analysis and genetic divergence studies for yield and yield-related trait of groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) genotypes at Pawe North Western Ethiopia. EAS J Biotechnol Genet. 2023;5(3):59-63. https://doi.org/10.36349/easjbg.2023.v05i03.005
  29. 29. Allard R. Principles of plant breeding. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 1960:485.
  30. 30. Shoba D, Manivannan N, Vindhiyavarman P. Correlation and path coefficient analysis in groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Madras Agric J. 2012;99(1-3):18-20.
  31. 31. Sukrutha B, Reddy CK, Madhuri KV, Reddy BR, Kumar AR, Vemireddy LN et al. Principal component analysis and path coefficient analysis for groundnut yield and seed quality attributes (Arachis hypogaea L.). Legume Res. LR-5075. https://doi.org/10.18805/LR-5075
  32. 32. Shankar M, Harish Babu BN, Gobu R, Sheshaiah. A study of correlation and path analysis in peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Bull Env Pharmacol Life Sci. 2018;7(12):111-4.
  33. 33. Sandhya Kiranmai M, Venkataravana P, Pushpa HD. Correlation and path analysis studies in groundnut under different environment. Legume Res. 2016;39(6):1048-50. https://doi.org/10.18805/lr.v0iOF.4484
  34. 34. Ravi Kumar D, Sekhar MR. Character association and path analysis in groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Int J Appl Biol Pharma Technol. 2012;3(1):385-9.
  35. 35. Rajesh Kumar S, Sekhar MR. Correlation and path analysis studies on F2 generation of groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) for yield and its attributes. Bioscan. 2016;11(3):1895-8.
  36. 36. Sumathi P, Muralidharan V. Genetic analysis for quality traits in large seeded groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) genotypes. J Res ANGRAU. 2007;37(1/2):26-33.
  37. 37. Dhaliwal GPS, Nagada AK, Mittal VP. Inter trait associations and path analysis studies in groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.). J Crop Improv. 2010;37(1):57-60.
  38. 38. Iezzoni AF, Pritts MP. Applications of principal component analysis to horticultural research. Hort Sci. 1991;26(4):334-8. https://doi.org/10.21273/HORT.SCI.26.4.334
  39. 39. Anderson TW. An introduction to multivariate analysis. New Delhi: Wiley Eastern Private Limited; 1972.
  40. 40. Rajput LS, Sikarwar RS, Ingle SV, Tripathi MK, Prajapati PK, Yadav RK. Principal component analysis for groundnut yield and seed attributes (Arachis hypogaea L.). Int J Res Agron. 2024;SP-7(5):194-7. https://doi.org/10.33545/2618060X.2024.v7.i5Sc.781
  41. 41. Vishnuprabha RS, Viswanathan PL, Manonmani S, Rajendran L, Selvakumar T. Evaluation of variability and principal component analysis in segregating populations of groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Plant Sci Today. 2025;12(1):1-10. https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.4025
  42. 42. Pushpa R, Shanmugam A, Arulmozhi R, Sassikumar D, Suresh R, Subrahmaniyan K. Exploring genetic variability, diversity and trait associations in sunnhemp (Crotalaria juncea L.) accessions for yield improvement. Plant Sci Today. https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.3929

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.