Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Plant Science Today (PST)

Research Articles

Vol. 12 No. sp4 (2025): Recent Advances in Agriculture by Young Minds - III

Seed priming with chitosan and its nanoparticles improve physiological, biochemical and crop performances in lentil (Lens culinaris L.)

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.7873
Submitted
22 February 2025
Published
31-10-2025

Abstract

Chitosan, a derivative of chitin, is a natural elicitor known for its biocompatibility, biodegradability and non-toxic properties, offering significant yet underexplored potential in advancing sustainable agriculture. Its application enhances plant physiological responses and mitigates the detrimental effects of both abiotic and biotic stresses across various growth stages. This study evaluated the effects of seed priming with chitosan and chitosan nanoparticles (CNPs) on the germination and seedling development of lentil (Lens culinaris L.). Seeds were primed with varying concentrations of chitosan (0.5 %, 1.0 %, 1.5 % and 2.0 %) and CNPs (50, 100, 150, 200 and 300 ppm). The priming duration was optimized for each treatment based on water uptake kinetics and initial radical emergence. Seed priming with a low concentration of chitosan (0.5 %) significantly improved seedling growth parameters, hydrolytic enzyme activities (amylase, protease), dehydrogenase and phytase activity, as well as yield-associated traits. In contrast, CNPs priming at 200 ppm showed superior enhancement across most laboratory and field parameters. Primed seeds treated with CNPs showed marked improvements, including a 12.6 % increase in germination potential, a 65.9 % increase in root length, a 97.4 % increase in shoot length, a 73 % increase in total seedling length, a 19.7 % rise in seedling dry weight and significant increases in vigor indices (94.8 % and 34.8 %) compared to non-primed seeds. Additionally, hydrolytic enzyme activities, including amylase, protease, dehydrogenase and phytase, were substantially elevated in primed seeds relative to untreated controls. To corroborate these findings, field experiments were conducted to assess the crop performance upon priming. Results revealed that seed priming with chitosan (0.5 %) and CNPs (200 ppm) significantly (P ≤ 0.05) enhanced seedling emergence, field establishment, plant height, pod and seed counts per plant, seed weight, overall yield and harvest index. These findings suggest that seed priming with 0.5 % chitosan or 200 ppm CNPs enhances seedling development, plant growth and yield by improving enzymatic activities and mobilization of food reserves. 

References

  1. 1. Kumar S, Barpete S, Kumar J, Gupta P, Sarker A. Global lentil production: constraints and strategies. SATSA Mukhapatra Annu Tech Issue. 2013;17. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/259760680
  2. 2. Wimalasekera R. Role of seed quality in improving crop yields. In: Hakeem K, editor. Crop Production and Global Environmental Issues. Cham: Springer; 2015. p. 331–64. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23162-4_6
  3. 3. Reddy AA, Malik DP, Devi M. Global status of lentil production with special reference to India. Indian J Agric Sci. 2022;92(4):46–50. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v92i4.123972
  4. 4. McDonald MB. Seed priming. In: Seed Technology and Its Biological Basis. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press; 2000. p. 287–325. https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.2828
  5. 5. Arun MN, Hebbar SS, Senthivel T, Nair AK, Padmavathi G, Pandey P, et al. Seed priming: the way forward to mitigate abiotic stress in crops. London: IntechOpen; 2022. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.102033
  6. 6. Kaushal K, Rajani K, Kumar RR, Ranjan T, Kumar A, Ahmad MF, et al. Physio-biochemical responses and crop performance analysis in chickpea upon botanical priming. Sci Rep. 2024;14(1):9342. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-59878-8
  7. 7. Amir M, Prasad D, Khan FA, Khan A, Ahmad B. Seed priming: an overview of techniques, mechanisms and applications. Plant Sci Today. 2024;11(1):553–63. https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.2828
  8. 8. Hadwiger LA, Fristensky BW, Riggleman R. Chitosan, a natural regulator in plant-fungal pathogen interactions, increases crop yield. In: Zikakis JP, editor. Advances in Chitin, Chitosan and Related Enzymes. New York: Academic Press; 1984. p. 291–302. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-780950-2.50024-1
  9. 9. Chandra S, Chakraborty N, Dasgupta A, Sarkar J, Panda K, Acharya K. Chitosan nanoparticles: a positive modulator of innate immune responses in plants. Sci Rep. 2015;5(1):15195. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep15195
  10. 10. Chun SC, Chandrasekaran M. Chitosan and chitosan nanoparticles induced expression of pathogenesis-related protein genes enhances biotic stress tolerance in tomato. Int J Biol Macromol. 2019;125:948–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.12.167
  11. 11. Jogaiah S, Satapute P, De Britto S, Konappa N, Udayashankar AC. Exogenous priming of chitosan induces upregulation of phytohormones and resistance against cucumber powdery mildew disease is correlated with localized biosynthesis of defense enzymes. Int J Biol Macromol. 2020;162:1825–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.08.124
  12. 12. Pongprayoon W, Siringam T, Panya A, Roytrakul S. Application of chitosan in plant defense responses to biotic and abiotic stresses. Appl Sci Eng Prog. 2022;15(1). https://doi.org/10.14416/j.asep.2020.12.007
  13. 13. Hidangmayum A, Dwivedi P, Katiyar D, Hemantaranjan A. Application of chitosan on plant responses with special reference to abiotic stress. Physiol Mol Biol Plants. 2019;25(2):313–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12298-018-0633-1
  14. 14. Carmona SL, Villarreal-Navarrete A, Burbano-David D, Gómez-Marroquín M, Torres-Rojas E, Soto-Suárez M. Protection of tomato plants against Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici induced by chitosan. Rev Colomb Cienc Hortíc. 2021;15(3). https://doi.org/10.17584/rcch.2021v15i3.12822
  15. 15. Qiu C, Bao Y, Yan M, Li G, Liu K, Wu M, et al. Transcriptome analysis reveals the humic acids and chitosan suppressing Alternaria solani growth. J Appl Microbiol. 2024;135(6). https://doi.org/10.1093/jambio/lxae131
  16. 16. Manjunatha G, Roopa SK, Prashanth NG, Shetty SH. Chitosan enhances disease resistance in pearl millet against downy mildew caused by Sclerospora graminicola and defence-related enzyme activation. Pest Manag Sci. 2008;64:1250–7. https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.1626
  17. 17. Guan Y, Hu J, Wang X, Shao C. Seed priming with chitosan improves maize germination and seedling growth in relation to physiological changes under low temperature stress. J Zhejiang Univ Sci B. 2009;10(6):427–33. https://doi.org/10.1631/jzus.B0820373
  18. 18. Janmohammadi M, Mostafavi H, Kazemi H, Mahdavinia GR, Sabaghnia N. Effect of chitosan application on the performance of lentil genotypes under rainfed conditions. Acta Technol Agric. 2014;17(4):86–90. https://doi.org/10.2478/ata-2014-0020
  19. 19. Al-Tawaha AR, Al-Ghzawi AL. Effect of chitosan coating on seed germination and salt tolerance of lentil (Lens culinaris L.). Res Crops. 2013;14(2):489–91.
  20. 20. Li R, He J, Xie H, Wang W, Bose KS, Sun Y, et al. Effects of chitosan nanoparticles on seed germination and seedling growth of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Int J Biol Macromol. 2019;126:91–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.12.118
  21. 21. The International Seed Testing Association (ISTA). 2017. https://www.seedtest.org/en/home.html
  22. 22. Abdul-Baki AA, Anderson JD. Relationship between decarboxylation of glutamic acid and vigour in soybean seed. Crop Sci. 1973;13:227–32. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1973.0011183X001300020023x
  23. 23. Bernfeld P. Amylases, α and β. Methods Enzymol. 1955;149–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/0076-6879(55)01021-5
  24. 24. Cupp-Enyard C. Sigma's non-specific protease activity assay: casein as a substrate. J Vis Exp. 2008;19. https://doi.org/10.3791/899
  25. 25. Kittock DL, Law AG. Relationship of seedling vigor to respiration and tetrazolium chloride reduction by germinating wheat seeds. Agron J. 1968;60(3):286–8. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1968.00021962006000030012x
  26. 26. Heinonen JK, Lahti RJ. A new and convenient colorimetric determination of inorganic orthophosphate and its application to the assay of inorganic pyrophosphatase. Anal Biochem. 1981;113(2):313–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-2697(81)90082-8
  27. 27. Meyer CJ, Steudle E, Peterson CA. Patterns and kinetics of water uptake by soybean seeds. J Exp Bot. 2007;58(3):717–32.
  28. 28. Shao CX, Hu J, Song WJ, Hu WM. Effects of seed priming with chitosan solutions of different acidity on seed germination and physiological characteristics of maize seedling. J Zhejiang Univ Agric Life Sci. 2005;31(6):705–8. https://doi.org/10.1631/jzus.B0820373
  29. 29. Nitar NW, Moe SN, Lay NK, Suwalee CH. Application of chitosan in the agricultural sector. Chitin Chitosan Res. 2006;12(2):239.
  30. 30. Samarah NH, Wang H, Welbaum GE. Pepper (Capsicum annuum) seed germination and vigour following nanochitin, chitosan or hydropriming treatments. Seed Sci Technol. 2016;44(3):609–23. https://doi.org/10.15258/sst.2016.44.3.18
  31. 31. Ma L, Li Y, Yu C, Wang Y, Li X, Li N, et al. Alleviation of exogenous oligochitosan on wheat seedlings growth under salt stress. Protoplasma. 2012;249:393–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00709-011-0290-5
  32. 32. Malarkodi K, Divya V, Natarajan K, Navamaniraj KN, Ganesan K. Assessing the effects of chitosan on groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) growth and productivity. Legume Res. 2024;1:7. https://doi.org/10.18805/LR-5266
  33. 33. Mahdavi B, Rahimi A. Seed priming with chitosan improves the germination and growth performance of ajwain (Carum copticum) under salt stress. Eurasian J Biosci. 2013;7:69–76. https://doi.org/10.5053/ejobios.2013.7.0.9
  34. 34. Sen SK, Mandal P. Solid matrix priming with chitosan enhances seed germination and seedling invigoration in mung bean under salinity stress. J Cent Eur Agric. 2016;17(3):749–62. https://doi.org/10.5513/JCEA01/17.3.1773
  35. 35. Hidangmayum A, Dwivedi P, Kumar P, Upadhyay SK. Seed priming and foliar application of chitosan ameliorate drought stress responses in mungbean genotypes through modulation of morpho-physiological attributes and increased antioxidative defense mechanism. J Plant Growth Regul. 2023;42(10):6137–54. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00344-022-10792-1
  36. 36. Gürsoy M. Importance of priming application times on growth, relative water content and photosynthetic pigments of rapeseed (Brassica napus ssp. oleifera L.) cultivars under salinity stress. Selcuk J Agric Food Sci. 2022;36(3):349–55. https://doi.org/10.15316/SJAFS.2022.044
  37. 37. Attaran Dowom S, Karimian Z, Mostafaei Dehnavi M, Samiei L. Chitosan nanoparticles improve physiological and biochemical responses of Salvia abrotanoides (Kar.) under drought stress. BMC Plant Biol. 2022;22(1):364. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-022-03689-4
  38. 38. Shinde NA, Kawar PG, Dalvi SG. Chitosan-based nanoconjugates: a promising solution for enhancing crop drought-stress resilience and sustainable yield in the face of climate change. Plant Nano Biol. 2024;100059. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plana.2024.100059
  39. 39. Farooq T, Nisa ZU, Hameed A, Ahmed T, Hameed A. Priming with copper-chitosan nanoparticles elicit tolerance against PEG-induced hyperosmotic stress and salinity in wheat. BMC Chem. 2022;16(1):23. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13065-022-00813-1
  40. 40. Ali AS, Elozeiri AA. Metabolic processes during seed germination. Adv Seed Biol. 2017;141–66. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.70653
  41. 41. Hameed A, Sheikh AM, Farooq T, Basra AMS, Jamil A. Chitosan priming enhances the seed germination, antioxidants, hydrolytic enzymes, soluble proteins and sugars in wheat seeds. Agrochimica. 2013;57(2):97–110.
  42. 42. Shehzad MA, Nawaz F, Ahmad F, Ahmad N, Masood S. Protective effect of potassium and chitosan supply on growth, physiological processes and antioxidative machinery in sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) under drought stress. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2020;187:109841.
  43. 43. Sen SK, Das D. A sustainable approach in agricultural chemistry towards alleviation of plant stress through chitosan and nano-chitosan priming. Discov Chem. 2024;1(1):44. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44371-024-00046-2
  44. 44. Gomes DG, Pelegrino MT, Ferreira AS, Bazzo JH, Zucareli C, Seabra AB, et al. Seed priming with copper‐loaded chitosan nanoparticles promotes early growth and enzymatic antioxidant defense of maize (Zea mays L.) seedlings. J Chem Technol Biotechnol. 2021;96(8):2176–84. https://doi.org/10.1002/jctb.6738
  45. 45. Li J, Han A, Zhang L, Meng Y, Xu L, Ma F, et al. Chitosan oligosaccharide alleviates the growth inhibition caused by physcion and synergistically enhances resilience in maize seedlings. Sci Rep. 2022;12(1):162. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-04153-3
  46. 46. Saadat H, Sedghi M. The effect of seed priming with chitosan on the improvement of physiological and biochemical traits of soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merrill) under salinity stress. Russ J Plant Physiol. 2024;71(6):187. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1021443724605858
  47. 47. Azeke MA, Egielewa SJ, Eigbogbo MU, Ihimire IG. Effect of germination on the phytase activity, phytate and total phosphorus contents of rice (Oryza sativa), maize (Zea mays), millet (Panicum miliaceum), sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) and wheat (Triticum aestivum). J Food Sci Technol. 2010;48(6):724–9.
  48. 48. Saharan V, Kumaraswamy RV, Choudhary RC, Kumari S, Pal A, Raliya R, et al. Cu-chitosan nanoparticle mediated sustainable approach to enhance seedling growth in maize by mobilizing reserved food. J Agric Food Chem. 2016;64(31):6148–55. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jafc.6b02239
  49. 49. Yasmeen A, Basra SM, Farooq M, Rehman HU, Hussain N, Athar HU. Exogenous application of moringa leaf extract modulates the antioxidant enzyme system to improve wheat performance under saline conditions. Plant Growth Regul. 2013;69:225–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10725-012-9764-5
  50. 50. Khan MN, Khan Z, Zhu L, Li Y, Wu H. Impact of chitosan and chitosan-based metallic nanoparticles on the regulation of plant hormones. In: Role of Chitosan and Chitosan-Based Nanomaterials in Plant Sciences. 2022;343–56. Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-85391-0.00009-5
  51. 51. Behboudi F, Sarvestani ZT, Kassaee MZ, Modares Sanavi SAM, Sorooshzadeh A, Ahmadi SB. Evaluation of chitosan nanoparticles effects on yield and yield components of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) under late season drought stress. J Water Environ Nanotechnol. 2018;3(1):22–39. https://doi.org/10.22090/jwent.2018.01.003
  52. 52. Jahanbani A, Asghari Zakaria R, Ashrafi V, Ghasemi Kalkhoran M, Shahriary R. Effect of foliar application of chitosan and humic acid on yield and yield components of bread wheat under end-season drought stress. Environ Stresses Crop Sci. 2023;16(4):905–18. https://doi.org/10.22077/escs.2023.5127.2111
  53. 53. Wang M, Chen Y, Zhang R, Wang W, Zhao X, Du Y, et al. Effects of chitosan oligosaccharides on the yield components and production quality of different wheat cultivars (Triticum aestivum L.) in Northwest China. Field Crops Res. 2015;172:11–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2014.12.007
  54. 54. Sharma K, Sharma R, Kumari S, Kumari A. Enhancing wheat crop production with eco-friendly chitosan encapsulated nickel oxide nanocomposites: a safe and sustainable solution for higher yield. Int J Biol Macromol. 2023;253:127413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2023.127413
  55. 55. Rahman A, Ahammed R, Roy J, Mia ML, Kader MA, Khan MA, et al. Investigating the impact of oligo-chitosan on the growth dynamics and yield traits of Oryza sativa L. ‘BRRI dhan29’ under subtropical conditions. Heliyon. 2024;11(1):e41552. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e41552

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.