Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Plant Science Today (PST)

Research Articles

Early Access

Assessing the performance of pigeon pea varieties against major pod borer complex from Eastern part of India

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.8063
Submitted
4 March 2025
Published
14-04-2025
Versions

Abstract

Pod borer complex in pigeon pea are the major constraints for successful cultivation with drastically yield reduction. Therefore, varietal evaluation of pigeon pea against major pod borer complex was carried out at the experimental farm of Bidhan Chandra Krishi Viswavidyalaya, Kalyani, West Bengal, India for two consecutive years. A total of 13 pigeon pea varieties such as BAHAR, PUSA-9, MA6, ASHA, PUSA2001, ICPL 87, PUSA992, PUSA991, MARUTI, CORG 9701, UPAS 120, BRG 2, NDA1 were sown in 20 m2 plot with three replication using randomized block design. Number of larvae of Helicoverpa armigera and Maruca vitrata were recorded from 10 randomly selected plants at weekly intervals from flowering to maturity of pods whereas fifty pods were screened for Melanagromyza obtusa at pod formation, pod filling and pod maturity stages. The pooled data of two years results showed a significant variation of pod borer infestation among the varieties of pigeon pea. The study showed that among the screened varieties, Pusa 9, Pusa 991 and MA 6 exhibited the minimum infestation level of H. armigera (0.35, 0.43 and 0.54 larvae/plant), M. vitrata (1.54, 1.69 and 2.08 larvae/plant) at all pods developmental stages. The similar performance of these varieties was also noticed against M. obtusa. Therefore, the study identified some promising varieties which may be useful for future breeding programme and these varieties will be also suitable in the integrated pest management programme of pigeon pea.

 

References

  1. Badvel A, Vadivel N, Sivakumar R, Natarajan S, Arunadevi K. Optimizing land configuration and weed management practices for enhanced productivity of pigeon pea. Plant Science Today.2024;11(sp4):1-10. https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.5468
  2. Saxena KB, Kumar RV, Sultana R. Quality nutrition through pigeon pea - A review. Health. 2010;2:1335-44.
  3. DES, MoAF & W. fourth advanced estimates. 2022. https://pib.gov.in/PressReleasePage.aspx?PRID=1852470
  4. Tridge, 2023, https://www.tridge.com/intelligences/pigeon-pea/IN.
  5. India stat 2021-22, https://www.indiastat.com/data/agriculture/arhar-tur-pigeon-pea-586579.
  6. Lal SS. Host plant resistance in pigeon pea against the pod fly, Melonagromyza obtusa Malloch. Indian Journal of Pulses Research.1998;11:1-14.
  7. Karmakar K, Patra, S. Bio-efficacy of some new insecticide molecules against pod borer complex of red gram. Legume Research. 2015;38 (2):253-59. https://doi.org/10.5958/0976-0571.2015.00061.2
  8. Das BC, Patra S, Dhote VW, Alam SKF, Chatterjee ML, Samanta A. Mix Formulations: An alternative option for management of gram pod borer, Helicoverpa armigera H. and pod fly, Melanagromyza obtusa M. in pigeon pea. Legume Research. 2015;38(3):396-401. https://doi.org/10.5958/0976-0571.2015.00124.1
  9. Das BC, Patra S, Samanta A, Dhar PP. Evaluation of biorational insecticides and bio-pesticides against pod borer complex in pigeon pea. International Journal of Bio-resource and Stress Management. 2022;13(3):261-67. https://doi.org/10.23910/1.2022.2620b
  10. Lateef SS, Reed, W. Review of crop losses caused by insect pests of the pigeon pea internationally and in India. Indian Journal of Entomology (Spl. Issue). 1983;2:284-91.
  11. Patra S, Firake DM, Azad Thakur NS, Roy A. Insect pest complex and crop losses in pigeon pea in medium altitude hill of Meghalaya. The Bioscan. 2016;11(1) (Supplement on Agronomy):297-300.
  12. Lal SS, Yadava CP, Sachan JN. Assessment of pod borer damage on pigeonpea in different agro ecological zones of Uttar Pradesh. Indian Journal of Pulses Research. 1993;5:174-78.
  13. Durairaj C. Ecology and management of tur pod fly, Melanagromyza obtusa Malloch in pigeonpea. Ph. D. Thesis, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore, India 1995.
  14. Patnaik HP, Samolo AP, Samolo BN. Susceptibility of some early varieties of pigeonpea for pod borers under protected conditions. Legume Research. 1986;9:7-10.
  15. Dharmasena CMD, Subasinghe SMC, Lateef SS, Menike S, Saxena KB. Ariyaratne HP. Entomology research. In Pigeonpea Varietal Adaptation and Production Studies in Sri Lanka. Report of Work. Department of Agriculture, Sri Lanka. International Crops Research 224 Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), Patancheru, Andhra Pradesh, 1992;104-08.
  16. Srivastava CP, Nitin J. Insect pest management in pigeon pea in Indian scenario: A critical review. Indian Journal of Entomology. 2011;73 (1):63-75.
  17. Thilagam P, Gopikrishnan A. Integrated Pest management module against pod borer complex in pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan L.). J Krishi Vigyan. 2020;9(1):180-83. https://doi.org/10.5958/2349-4433.2020.00162.2
  18. Vijayakumari N, Shanthi M, Anusha N, Murugan M, Paripoorani S, Varanavasiappan et al. Relative toxicity of subspecies of Bacillus thuringiensis kurstaki HD-1 and HD-73 against the larvae of legume pod borer, Maruca vitrata, F. (Lepidoptera: Crambidae). Plant Science Today. 2025;12(1):1-5. https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.6035
  19. Yadav DK, Sachan SK, Singh G. Singh DV. Insect pests associated with pigeonpea variety upas 120 in western Uttar Pradesh, India. Plant Archives. 2016;16(1):140-42.
  20. Sharma HC. Host plant resistance to insect pests in pigeon pea: Potential and limitations. Legume Perspectives. 2016;11:24-29.
  21. Sachan JN. Present status of Helicoverpa armigera in pulses and strategies for its management. In: Proceedings of first national workshop on Helicoverpa management. Current status and future strategies, Kanpur, 30-31 August, 1990. Kanpur, Indian Institute of Pulses Research, 1992. p. 7-23.
  22. Gomez KA, Gomez AA. Statistical procedures for agricultural research. 1984; John Wiley & Sons.
  23. Das BC, Patra S, Sarkar S, Pramanik S, Dhar PP, Samanta A. Impacts of varieties and their biochemical parameters on pod damage by borer complex in pigeon pea in eastern India. AMA, Agricultural Mechanization in Asia, Africa and Latin America. 2024; 51(1):17073-86.
  24. Raut SB, Nawale RN. Mote UN. Field screening of pigeon pea germplasm against pod borer complex. Agricultural Science Digest Karnal. 1993;13(1):17-19.
  25. Sahoo BK, Senapati B. Relative abundance of pod borer species in different maturing pigeon pea varieties in Coastal Belt of Orissa. Indian Journal of Plant Protection. 2000;28(2):192-94.
  26. Kumar R, Keval R, Yadav A. Srivastava CP. Field screening and evaluation of long duration pigeonpea genotypes against the infestation of pod fly (Melanagromyza obtusa Malloch). The Ecoscan. 2015;VII (Special issue):291-95.
  27. Khan NA, Kumar BP, Husain R, Gyanendra K, Kaushal A, Prasad S, Singh N. Singh KN. Screening of Different Pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan L. Millspough) varieties against pod borer (H. armigera) resistance. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences. 2018; Special Issue-7: 224-29.
  28. Akhauri RK, Sinha MM. Yadav RP. Evaluation of some early pigeon pea genotypes for their susceptibility against pod borers under field conditions of North Bihar. Journal of Entomological Research. 2001;25 (4):315-28.
  29. Prasad R, Singh PP. Extent of Pod Damage by Pod Borer and Pod Fly in Different Genotypes of Pigeonpea. Trends in Biosciences. 2017;10(27):5788-5789.
  30. Kumar R, Keval R, Yadav A. Determination of damage caused by major insect pest in long duration pigeonpea genotypes. Research in Environment and Life Sciences. 2016;9(5):526-27.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.