Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Review Articles

Vol. 12 No. sp3 (2025): Advances in Plant Health Improvement for Sustainable Agriculture

Exploring soil dynamics, microbial life and nutrient cycling in non-puddled rice: A comparative study

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.8263
Submitted
14 March 2025
Published
23-06-2025

Abstract

Non-puddled rice cultivation is gaining traction as a sustainable alternative to traditional puddled transplanting, particularly due to its potential to enhance soil health, nutrient use efficiency and mitigate environmental impacts. This review synthesizes recent findings from studies conducted in India and other rice-growing nations, comparing the effects of non-puddled and puddled systems on key soil properties and processes. Evidence suggests that non-puddled rice cultivation generally leads to improved soil physical properties, including increased porosity and reduced bulk density, facilitating better water infiltration and root development. These changes promote beneficial soil biota activity, enhancing nutrient cycling and availability. Consequently, non-puddled systems often exhibit higher nitrogen use efficiency by 15-20 % and phosphorus use efficiency 10-20 % thereby reducing losses and increasing overall nutrient use efficiency which further influenced to reduced fertilizer requirement. Non-puddled rice systems increase water productivity by improving soil structure and water infiltration. This enhances root growth, allowing plants to access more water. Reduced percolation and seepage losses, along with efficient water use by plants, further contribute to higher productivity. Non-puddled systems also facilitate alternate wetting and drying irrigation, reducing water consumption efficiency compared to puddled transplanted rice. Nutrient and water use efficiency, requiring lower fertilizer inputs and water, while achieving comparable or even higher yields compared to puddled rice with respect to soil physical and biological characteristics. Furthermore, the reduced flooding associated with non-puddling significantly lowers methane emissions, a potent greenhouse gas. This review highlights the potential of non-puddled rice cultivation to contribute more sustainable and resilient rice production systems while addressing pressing environmental concerns.

References

  1. 1. Chaudhary A, Venkatramanan V, Mishra AK, Sharma S. Agronomic and environmental determinants of direct seeded rice in South Asia. Circular Economy and Sustainability. 2022;3(1):253-90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43615-022-00173-x.
  2. 2. Salahin N, Jahiruddin M, Islam MR, Alam MK, Haque ME, Ahmed S, et al. Establishment of crops under minimal soil disturbance and crop residue retention in rice-based cropping system: yield advantage, soil health improvement, and economic benefit. land. 2021;10(6):581. https://doi.org/10.3390/land10060581.
  3. 3. Shrestha S, Shrestha J, Jha SK, Khadka D, Paneru P, Gyawaly P. Soil chemical properties under conservation agriculture and cereal-based cropping system in eastern Tarai of Nepal. Journal of Nepal Agricultural Research Council. 2020;6:115-26. https://doi.org/10.3126/jnarc.v6i0.28122.
  4. 4. Saha S, Munda S, Singh S, Kumar V, Jangde HK, Mahapatra A, et al. Crop establishment and weed control options for sustaining dry direct seeded rice production in Eastern India. Agronomy. 2021;11(2):389. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11020389.
  5. 5. Zhao C, Chen M, Li X, Dai Q, Xu K, Guo B, et al. Effects of soil types and irrigation modes on rice root morphophysiological traits and grain quality. Agronomy. 2021;11(1):120. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11010120.
  6. 6. Panda S, Majhi PK, Anandan A, Mahender A, Sumanth V, Bastia DK, et al. Proofing direct-seeded rice with better root plasticity and architecture. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2021;22(11):6058. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22116058.
  7. 7. Tsubo M, Fukai S, Basnayake J, Tuong TP, Bouman B, Harnpichitvitaya D. Effects of soil clay content on water balance and productivity in rainfed lowland rice ecosystem in Northeast Thailand. Plant Production Science. 2007;10(2):232-41. https://doi.org/10.1626/pps.10.232.
  8. 8. Sahu K, Pasupalak S, Diwan UK. Evaluation of water use efficiency of rice genotypes under different rice establishment methods and different growing environment. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences. 2018;7(1):2534-8. https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2018.701.304.
  9. 9. Alam MK, Bell RW, Hasanuzzaman M, Salahin N, Rashid MH, Akter N, et al. Rice (Oryza sativa L.) establishment techniques and their implications for soil properties, global warming potential mitigation and crop yields. Agronomy. 2020;10(6):888. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10060888.
  10. 10. Alori ET, Glick BR, Babalola OO. Microbial phosphorus solubilization and its potential for use in sustainable agriculture. Frontiers in Microbiology. 2017;8:971 https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2017.00971
  11. 11. Abduljaleel Y, Demissie Y. Evaluation and optimization of low impact development designs for sustainable stormwater management in a changing climate. Water. 2021;13(20):2889. https://doi.org/10.3390/w13202889
  12. 12. Hossain MA, Rana MM, Al-Rabbi SH, Mitsui T. Management of puddled soil through organic amendments for post-rice mungbean. Asian Journal of Agriculture and Biology. 2021;2021(1):1-11. https://doi.org/10.35495/ajab.2020.04.255
  13. 13. Subrahmaniyan K, Rajavel M, Veeramani P, Parthipan T. Tillage practices on soil penetration resistance, soil infiltration, percolation and yield of rice (Oryza sativa) in rice-based cropping system. The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 2024;94:811. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v94i8.145235
  14. 14. Fujihara Y, Yamada R, Oda M, Fujii H, Ito O, Kashiwagi J. Effects of puddling on percolation and rice yields in rainfed lowland paddy cultivation: Case study in Khammouane province, central Laos. Agricultural Sciences. 2013;4(8):360-8. https://doi.org/10.4236/as.2013.48052
  15. 15. Rahman A, Amin MM. Soil hydraulic properties and field-scale hydrology as affected by land-management options. Sains Tanah - Journal of Soil Science and Agroclimatology. 2023;20(1):124-39. https://doi.org/10.20961/stjssa.v20i1.70504.
  16. 16. Zhang ZB, Zhou H, Lin H, Peng X. Puddling intensity, sesquioxide, and soil organic carbon impacts on crack patterns of two paddy soils. Geoderma . 2016;262:155-64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2015.08.030
  17. 17. Arunrat N, Kongsurakan P, Sereenonchai S, Hatano R. Soil organic carbon in sandy paddy fields of northeast Thailand: A Review. Agronomy. 2020;10(8):1061. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10081061.
  18. 18. Kirchhof G, So HB. Soil puddling for rice production under glasshouse conditions—its quantification and effect on soil physical properties. Soil Research. 2005;43(5):617-22. https://doi.org/10.1071/SR04068
  19. 19. Woldemariam WG, Ghoshal N. Microbial community, biomass and physico-chemical properties of soil in dry tropics. Preprint (Version 1) available at Research Square . 2020. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-36821/v1
  20. 20. Nelson KA, Motavalli PP. Nitrogen source, drainage, and irrigation affects corn yield response in a claypan soil. Applied Engineering in Agriculture. 2013;29(6):875-84. https://doi.org/10.13031/aea.29.9809
  21. 21. Yadav S, Evangelista GK, Faronilo J, Humphreys E, Yamauchi A, Fernandez L. Establishment method effects on crop performance and water productivity of irrigated rice in the tropics. Field Crops Research. 2014;166:112-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2014.06.001
  22. 22. Harun NS, Hanafiah‬ MM, Nizam NU, Rasool A. Water and soil physicochemical characteristics of different rice cultivation areas. Applied Ecology and Environmental Research. 2020;18(5):6775. https://doi.org/10.15666/aeer/1805_67756791
  23. 23. Venkataravana Nayaka GV, Prabhakara Reddy G, Mahender Kumar R . Performance of rice under different systems of cultivation: A Review. Indian Journal of Pure & Applied Biosciences. 2020;8(4):612-30. https://doi.org/10.18782/2582-2845.8204
  24. 24. Kukal SS, Aggarwal G. Percolation losses of water in relation to puddling intensity and depth in a sandy loam rice (Oryza sativa) field. Agricultural Water Management. 2002;57(1):49-59. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0378-3774(02)00037-9
  25. 25. Paul PL, Bell RW, Barrett-Lennard EG, Kabir E. Impact of rice straw mulch on soil physical properties, sunflower root distribution and yield in a salt-affected clay-textured soil. Agriculture. 2021;11(3):264. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture11030264
  26. 26. Devkota KP, Yadav S, Khanda C, Beebout SJ, Mohapatra BK, Singleton GR, et al. Assessing alternative crop establishment methods with a sustainability lens in rice production systems of Eastern India. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2020;244:118835. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118835
  27. 27. Han Z, Li J, Gao P, Huang B, Ni J, Wei C. Determining the shear strength and permeability of soils for engineering of new paddy field construction in a hilly mountainous region of southwestern China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2020;17(5):1555. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17051555
  28. 28. Horn R, Taubner H, Wuttke MW, Baumgartl T. Soil physical properties related to soil structure. Soil and Tillage Research. 1994;30(2-4):187-216. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-1987(94)90005-1
  29. 29. Liu J, Wang Z, Li Y. Efficacy of natural polymer derivatives on soil physical properties and erosion on an experimental loess hillslope. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2017;15(1):9. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15010009
  30. 30. Adebowale AA, Sanni LO, Owo HO, Karim OR. Effect of variety and moisture content on some engineering properties of paddy rice. Journal of Food Science and Technology. 2010;48:551-9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-010-0173-3
  31. 31. Singh KB. Dynamics of hydraulic properties of puddled soils. In: Elango L, editor. Hydraulic conductivity-issues, determination and applications. London: IntechOpen Limited; 2011. p. 29-46. https://doi.org/10.5772/17531
  32. 32. Ding X, Liang X, Zhang Y, Fang Y, Zhou J, Kang T. Capillary water absorption and micro pore connectivity of concrete with fractal analysis. Crystals. 2020;10(10):892. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst10100892
  33. 33. Zhang ZB, Zhou H, Lin H, Peng X. Puddling intensity, sesquioxides, and soil organic carbon impacts on crack patterns of two paddy soils. Geoderma. 2016;262:155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2015.08.030
  34. 34. Kumar N, Chhokar RS, Meena RP, Kharub AS, Gill SC, Tripathi SC, et al. Challenges and opportunities in productivity and sustainability of rice cultivation system: a critical review in Indian perspective. Cereal Research Communications. 2022;50:573-601. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42976-021-00214-5
  35. 35. Prasanthkumar K, Kumar MS, Gunasekar JJ, Sivakumar S, Masilamani P. Comparative evaluation of puddling techniques in sandy loam soil. Current Journal of Applied Science and Technology. 2019:38:1-5. https://doi.org/10.9734/cjast/2019/v38i630474
  36. 36. Zheng K, Cheng J, Xia J, Liu G, Lei X. Effects of soil bulk density and moisture content on the physico-mechanical properties of paddy soil in plough layer. Water. 2021;13(16):2290. https://doi.org/10.3390/w13162290
  37. 37. Perreault S, El Alem A, Chokmani K, Cambouris AN. Development of pedo transfer functions to predict soil physical properties in Southern Quebec (Canada). Agronomy. 2022;12(2):526. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12020526
  38. 38. Deng C, Teng X, Peng X, Zhang B. Effects of simulated puddling intensity and pre-drying on shrinkage capacity of a paddy soil under long-term fertilization. Soil and Tillage Research. 2014;140:135-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2014.02.012
  39. 39. Oo AZ, Sudo S, Inubushi K, Chellappan U , Yamamoto A, Ono K, et al. Mitigation potential and yield-scaled global warming potential of early-season drainage from a rice paddy in Tamil Nadu, India. Agronomy. 2018;8(10):202. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy8100202
  40. 40. Meena GK, Gulati IJ, Yadav SR, Kherawat BS, Singh C. Characterization of soils properties of irrigated fields of Bilara tehsil of Jodhpur district. International Journal of Chemical Studies. 2020;8(4):2195-201. https://doi.org/10.22271/chemi.2020.v8.i4x.9955
  41. 41. Subrahmaniyan K, Rajavel M, Veeramani P, Parthipan T. Tillage practices on soil penetration resistance, soil infiltration, percolation and yield of rice (Oryza sativa) in rice-based cropping system. The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 2024;94:811. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v94i8.145235.
  42. 42. Báťková K, Miháliková M, Matula S. Hydraulic properties of a cultivated soil in temperate continental climate determined by mini disk infiltrometer. Water. 2020;12(3):843. https://doi.org/10.3390/w12030843
  43. 43. Yassine AM, Abdellah EA, Khalid NI. Evaluation of the compaction of a no-till vertisol field using methods of cone index and pedo-transfer function in semi-arid context of Morocco. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology. 2019;9:141-50. https://doi.org/10.17265/2161-6256/2019.03.001
  44. 44. Williams JD, Reardon CL, Wuest SB, Long DS. Soil wet aggregate stability in dryland pacific northwest intensified crop rotations. Soil Science Society of America Journal. 2018;82(2):455-62. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2017.08.0302
  45. 45. Daigh AL, Bly A. Compaction Reaction: Soil compaction and ruts following a wet harvest. Crops & Soils 2020;53(3):24-8. https://doi.org/10.1002/crso.20029
  46. 46. Galaviz-González JR, Rangel J, Limón-Covarrubias P, Avalos D, Cabello-Suárez LY, López-Lara T, et al. Elastoplastic coupled model of saturated soil consolidation under effective stress. Water. 2022;14:2958. https://doi.org/10.3390/w14192958
  47. 47. Selbig WR, Buer NH. Hydraulic, water-quality, and temperature performance of three types of permeable pavement under high sediment loading conditions. Scientific Investigations Report. 2018. https://doi.org/10.3133/sir20185037
  48. 48. Wang ShanShan WS, Sun BaoYang SB, Li ChaoDong LC, Li ZhanBin LZ, Ma Bo MB. Runoff and soil erosion on slope cropland: A review. Journal of Resources and Ecology. 2018;9(5):461-70. https://doi.org/10.5814/j.issn.1674-764x.2018.05.002
  49. 49. Tsegaye B. Effect of land use and land cover changes on soil erosion in Ethiopia. International Journal of Agricultural Science and Food Technology. 2019;5(1):26-34. https://doi.org/10.17352/2455-815x.000038
  50. 50. Kumar B, Dhar S, Paul S, Paramesh V, Dass A, Upadhyay PK, et al. Microbial biomass carbon, activity of soil enzymes, nutrient availability, root growth, and total biomass production in wheat cultivars under variable irrigation and nutrient management. Agronomy. 2021;11(4):669. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11040669
  51. 51. Prasanna R, Nain L, Pandey AK, Saxena AK. Microbial diversity and multidimensional interactions in the rice ecosystem. Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science. 2011;58(7):723-44. https://doi.org/10.1080/03650340.2010.537325
  52. 52. Muthusamy Y, Sengodan K, Arthanari M, Kandhasamy R, Gobianand K. Biofertilizer and consortium development: An updated review. Current Agriculture Research Journal. 2023;11(1):1-17. https://doi.org/10.12944/carj.11.1.01
  53. 53. Peng Y, Fei L, Jie F, Hao K, Liu L, Shen F, et al. Effects of Bio-organic fertilizer on soil infiltration, water distribution, and leaching loss under muddy water irrigation conditions. Agronomy. 2023;13(8):2014. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13082014
  54. 54. Button M, Nivala J, Weber KP, Aubron T, Müller R. Microbial community metabolic function in subsurface flow constructed wetlands of different designs. Ecological Engineering. 2014;80:162-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2014.09.073
  55. 55. Mikha MM, Vigil MF, Benjamin JG. Long‐term tillage impacts on soil aggregation and carbon dynamics under wheat‐fallow in the central great plains. Soil Science Society of America Journal. 2013;77(2):594-605. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2012.0125
  56. 56. Kwiatkowski CA, Harasim E, Feledyn-Szewczyk B, Antonkiewicz J. Enzymatic activity of loess soil in organic and conventional farming systems. Agriculture. 2020;10(4):135. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture10040135
  57. 57. Gómez-Silván C, Arévalo JC, Pérez J, González‐López J, Rodelas B. Linking hydrolytic activities to variables influencing a submerged membrane bioreactor (MBR) treating urban wastewater under real operating conditions. Water Research. 2012;47(1):66-78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2012.09.032
  58. 58. Kim D. Physico-Chemical Conversion of Lignocellulose: Inhibitor effects and detoxification strategies: A Mini Review. Molecules. 2018;23(2):309. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules23020309
  59. 59. Ludewig U. Improving the efficiency and effectiveness of global phosphorus use: focus on root and rhizosphere levels in the agronomic system. Frontiers of Agricultural Science and Engineering. 2019;6(4):357-65. https://doi.org/10.15302/j-fase-2019275
  60. 60. Elyamine AM, Moussa MG, Ismael MA, Wei J, Zhao Y, Wu Y, et al. Earthworms, rice straw, and plant interactions change the organic connections in soil and promote the decontamination of cadmium in soil. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2018;15(11):2398. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15112398
  61. 61. Bertrand M, Barot S, Blouin M, Whalen JK, Oliveira T de, Roger‐Estrade J. Earthworm services for cropping systems. a review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development. 2015;35:553-67. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-014-0269-7
  62. 62. Choosai C, Jouquet P, Hanboonsong Y, Hartmann C. Effects of earthworms on soil properties and rice production in the rainfed paddy fields of Northeast Thailand. Applied Soil Ecology. 2010;45(3):298-303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2010.05.006
  63. 63. Gough EC, Owen K, Zwart RS, Thompson J. A Systematic review of the effects of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on root-lesion nematodes, Pratylenchus spp. Frontiers in Plant Science. 2020;11:923. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2020.00923
  64. 64. Mukkram Ali Tahir R, Noor-us-Sabah, Afzal M, Sarwar G, Rasool Noorka I. Smart Nutrition Management of Rice Crop under Climate Change Environment [Internet]. Protecting Rice Grains in the Post-Genomic Era. IntechOpen; 2019. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.86094
  65. 65. Sinha D, Tandon PK. An overview of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium: Key players of nutrition process in plants. Sustainable solutions for elemental deficiency and excess in crop plants. 2020:85-117. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-8636-1_5
  66. 66. Sainju UM, Ghimire R, Pradhan GP. Nitrogen Fertilization II: Management practices to sustain crop production and soil and environmental quality [Internet]. Nitrogen Fixation. IntechOpen; 2020. Available from: https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.86646
  67. 67. Qi D, Wu Q, Zhu J. Nitrogen and phosphorus losses from paddy fields and the yield of rice with different water and nitrogen management practices. Scientific Reports 2020;10(1):9734. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-66757-5.
  68. 68. Muhammad Aslam M, Akhtar K, Karanja JK, Noor-ul-Ain, Ullah Haider F. Understanding the adaptive mechanisms of plant in low phosphorous soil [Internet]. Plant Stress Physiology. IntechOpen; 2021. Available from: https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.91873
  69. 69. Karamanos RE, Flore NA, Harapiak JT. The impact of phosphorus fertilizer placement on crop production. Agricultural Research & Technology. 2017;11(4):555817. https://doi.org/10.19080/artoaj.2017.11.555817
  70. 70. Oo AZ, Tsujimoto Y, Rakotoarisoa NM, Kawamura K, Nishigaki T. P-dipping of rice seedlings increases applied P use efficiency in high P-fixing soils. Scientific Reports. 2020;10(1):11919. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-68977-1
  71. 71. Chen X, Gao Y, Hong L, Tang H. Effects of phosphorus supply on root morphology and phosphorus uptake in maize seedlings under different water regimes. American Journal of Agriculture and Forestry. 2020;8(1):22-9. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajaf.20200801.14
  72. 72. Bargaz A, Lyamlouli K, Chtouki M, Zeroual Y, Dhiba D. Soil microbial resources for improving fertilizers efficiency in an integrated plant nutrient management system. Frontiers in Microbiology. 2018;9:1606. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2018.01606
  73. 73. Kumar R, Mahajan N, Naresh RK, Dhaliwal SS, Kumar A, Chandra MS, et al. Agro-technological options for scaling up crop productivity, soil health and water footprint in rice based cropping system in sub-humid (purvanchal) region of Uttar Pradesh, India: A Review. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences. 2019;8(7):2679-700. https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2019.807.330
  74. 74. Johannisson J, Hiete M. A structured approach for the mitigation of natural methane emissions—lessons learned from anthropogenic emissions. Journal of Carbon Research.2020;6(2):24. https://doi.org/10.3390/c6020024
  75. 75. Walling E, Vaneeckhaute C. Greenhouse gas emissions from inorganic and organic fertilizer production and use: A review of emission factors and their variability. Journal of Environmental Management. 2020;276:111211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111211
  76. 76. Narayanamoorthy A, Jothi P. Water saving and productivity benefits of SRI: A study of tank, canal and groundwater irrigated settings in South India. Water Policy. 2018;21(1):162-77. https://doi.org/10.2166/wp.2018.199

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.