Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Plant Science Today (PST)

Review Articles

Vol. 12 No. 2 (2025)

Synergizing crops and conservation: A comprehensive review of bio-intensive complementary cropping system

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.8365
Submitted
19 March 2025
Published
07-05-2025 — Updated on 19-05-2025
Versions

Abstract

Cropping system represents a holistic approach to farming that emphasizes synergy among plant species, soil organisms and ecological processes. Exploring novel farming techniques has become essential in light of the growing environmental concerns and the increasing demands for sustainable agriculture. Bio-intensive complementary cropping offers promising strategy for a more sustainable and resilient future by integrating conservation agriculture practices. This approach diverges from traditional cropping systems by prioritizing productivity, resource optimization through complementary cropping, strategic resource management and ecological resilience. Key conservation methods include suitable crop intensification for optimum space use, irrigation strategies for minimizing water wastage, weed management for encouraging smothering effect and nutrient management that enhance the soil fertility by prioritizing organic inputs and local resource. By reducing pesticide use, enhancing biodiversity and lowering greenhouse gas emissions through reduced dependence on fossil fuel intensive inputs, bio-intensive systems contribute significantly to environmental sustainability. This review critically analyses soil health, crop productivity, emission profiles and economic outcomes, providing insights that advance scientific understanding and offer practical solutions for farmers. Ultimately, it highlights the potential of bio-intensive cropping systems to synergize crop production with conservation, paving the way for more sustainable agricultural practices.

References

  1. 1. Rajbhandari BP, Shrestha S. Climate change, food production and food security in Rupa Lake wetland area. Nepal J Agric Sci. 2014;12:26-43.
  2. 2. Food and Agriculture Organization. An introduction to the basic concepts of food security. Food Security Information for Action Practical Guides. EC–FAO Food Security Programme. 2008. https://doi.org/10.4236/fns.2011.21004
  3. 3. IPCC. AR4 Climate change: Synthesis Report 2007. https://doi.org/10.1142/9789812834645_0011
  4. 4. Rajbhandari BP. Bio-intensive farming system: validation of its approaches in increasing food production, improving food security and livelihoods. Nepal J Agric Sci. 2011;9:112-22. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.development.1110295
  5. 5. Shanmugam PM. Bio-intensive complementary cropping system with organic amendments to achieve higher productivity in sodic soils of Tamil Nadu. Res Crops. 2021;22(4):778-84.
  6. 6. Shanmugam PM, Sangeetha SP, Varshini SV, Prabu PC. Integrated farming system approach under natural farming. In: Suganthy M, Renuka Rani B, Sharma NR, editors. Natural farming for sustainable agriculture. MANAGE, Hyderabad; 2023, p. 122-38.
  7. 7. Shrestha K, Shrestha G, Pandey PR. Economic analysis of commercial organic and conventional vegetable farming in Kathmandu valley. J Agric Environ. 2014;15:58-71. https://doi.org/10.3126/aej.v15i0.19816
  8. 8. Sen B. Securing the right to health for all in India. Lancet. 2011;377(9765):532-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(10)62182-4
  9. 9. Walia SS, Gill RS, Kaur T, Aulakh CS. Bio-intensive complimentary cropping systems for north-west India. Indian J Agric Sci 2022;92(8):936-41. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v92i8.89317
  10. 10. Yasodha M, Sharmili K, Kumar AT, Chinnusamy C. Prospects of cropping system and nutrient management towards sustainability in agriculture: A review. Agric Rev. 2023;44(2):207-14. https://doi.org/10.18805/ag.R-2165
  11. 11. Panwar AS, Shamim M, Ravisankar N, Ansari MA, Singh R, Prusty AK, et al. Influence of long term fertilization with organic sources on crop productivity and soil quality in rice-wheat system under arid and sub humid conditions. Indian J Fertil. 2021;16:544-54.
  12. 12. Walia SS, Aulakh CS, Dhawan V, Kaur J. Bio-intensive complementary cropping systems to revitalize sustainability and profitability in Punjab agriculture. Indian J Econ Dev. 2017;13(2a):392-96. https://doi.org/10.5958/2322-0430.2017.00101.9
  13. 13. Hauggaard-Nielsen H, Jørnsgaard B, Kinane J, Jensen ES. Grain legume - cereal intercropping: The practical application of diversity, competition and facilitation in arable and organic cropping systems. Renew Agric Food Syst. 2008;23(1):3-12. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1742170507002025
  14. 14. Kumari CP, Sridevi S, Goverdhan M. Enhancement of productivity and profitability of small farmers through bio intensive complimentary cropping systems. Int J Chem Stud. 2019;7(2):334-38.
  15. 15. Maitra S, Ghosh DC, Sounda G, Jana PK. Performance of intercropping legumes in finger millet (Eleusine coracana) at varying fertility levels. Indian J Agron. 2001;46(1):38-44. https://doi.org/10.59797/ija.v46i1.3216
  16. 16. Banik P, Sharma RC. Yield and resource utilization efficiency in baby corn - legume -intercropping system in the Eastern Plateau of India. J Sustain Agric. 2009;33(4):379-95. https://doi.org/10.1080/10440040902834970
  17. 17. Vishwanatha S, Koppalkar BG, Anilkumar SN, Desai BK, Naik V. Economics and yield advantages of pigeon pea and sunflower intercropping system influenced by fertilizer management. Res J Agric Sci. 2011;2(2):248-51.
  18. 18. Shanmugam PM. Production potential and economics of pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan) based intercropping system with different levels and forms of P. J Farm Syst Res Dev. 2008;14:118-22.
  19. 19. Sangeetha SP, Dilip PS, Vanitha K, Somasundaram E, Maragatham S. Studies on castor and nutri cereals based intercropping systems on yield and oil content of castor. Int J Plant Soil Sci. 2023;35(23):544-48. https://doi.org/10.9734/ijpss/2023/v35i234272
  20. 20. Kumari CP, Sridevi S, Goverdhan M. Profitable cropping systems for southern telangana zone of Telangana State, India. Int J Curr Microbiol Appl Sci. 2018;7(1):2518-25. https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2018.701.302
  21. 21. Undie UL, Uwah DF, Attoe EE. Effect of intercropping and crop arrangement on yield and productivity of late season maize/soybean mixtures in the humid environment of south southern Nigeria. J Agric Sci. 2012;4(4):37-50. https://doi.org/10.5539/jas.v4n4p37
  22. 22. Mandal MK, Banerjee M, Banerjee H, Alipatra A, Malik GC. Productivity of maize (Zea mays) based intercropping system during kharif season under red and lateritic tract of west Bengal. Int Q J Life Sci. 2014;9(1):31-5. https://thebioscan.com/index.php/pub/article/view/566
  23. 23. Shanmugam PM, Sangeetha SP, Prabu PC, Varshini SV, Renukadevi A, Ravisankar N, et al. Crop - livestock -integrated farming system: A strategy to achieve synergy between agricultural production, nutritional security and environmental sustainability. Front Sustain Food Syst. 2024;8:1338299. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2024.1338299
  24. 24. Rao KT, Rao AU, Sekhar D, Rao NV. Identification of suitable and profitable rabi crops for high altitude and tribal areas of Andhra Pradesh. J Eco-Friendly Agric. 2015;10(2):139-41.
  25. 25. Kumar B, Sharma RP. Effect of preceding crops and nitrogen rates on growth, yield and yield attributes of wheat. Indian J Agric Res. 2000;34(1):34-8.
  26. 26. Singh RP, Yadav PK, Singh RK, Singh SN, Bisen MK, Singh J. Effect of chemical fertilizer, FYM and biofertilizer on performance of rice and soil properties. Crop Res. 2006;32:283-85.
  27. 27. Sharma RP, Pathak SK, Haque M, Raman KR. Diversification of traditional rice (Oryza sativa) based cropping system for sustainable production in South Bihar alluvial plains. Indian J Agron. 2004;49(4):218-22. https://doi.org/10.59797/ija.v49i4.5202
  28. 28. Reddy KC, Reddy KM. Differential levels of vermicompost and nitrogen on growth and yield in onion (Allium cepa L.) - radish (Raphanus sativus L.) cropping system. J Res. 2005;33:11-7
  29. 29. Rao MR, Mathuva MN. Legumes for improving maize yields and income in semi-arid Kenya. Agric Ecosyst Environ. 2000;78(2):123-37. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-8809(99)00125-5
  30. 30. Sankaranarayanan K, Praharaj CS, Nalayini P, Bandyopadhyay KK, Gopalakrishnan N. Legume as companion crop for cotton. J Cotton Res Dev. 2010;24:115-26.
  31. 31. Adekiya AO, Agbede TM, Aboyeji CM, Dunsin O, Ugbe JO. Green manures and NPK fertilizer effects on soil properties, growth, yield, mineral and vitamin C composition of okra (Abelmoschus esculentus (L.) Moench). J Saudi Soc Agric Sci. 2019;18(2):218-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jssas.2017.05.005
  32. 32. Kharub AS, Chauhan DS, Sharma RK, Chhokar RS, Tripathi SC. Diversification of rice (Oryza sativa) wheat (Triticum aestivum) system for improving soil fertility and productivity. Indian J Agron. 2003;48(3):149-52. https://doi.org/10.59797/ija.v48i3.3065
  33. 33. Choudhary JB, Thakur RC, Bhargava M, Sood RD. Production potential and economics of rice (Oryza sativa) based cropping system on farmers' fields under mid hill conditions of Himachal Pradesh. J Agric Res. 2001;27(1&2):31-5.
  34. 34. Shanmugam PM. Productive and profitable bio-intensive complementary cropping systems. Res Crops. 2015;16(3):472-78. https://doi.org/10.5958/2348-7542.2015.00065.0
  35. 35. Gulati A, Minot N, Delgado C, Bora S. Growth in high-value agriculture in Asia and the emergence of vertical links with farmers. In Global supply chains, standards and the poor: How the globalization of food systems and standards affects rural development and poverty; 2007. p. 91-108. https://doi.org/10.1079/9781845931858.0091
  36. 36. Mamatha Shree CM, Girijsh GK, Ashwini M, Dhananjaya Swamy PS. Biological potential and land use efficiency of Pigeon pea based bio-intensive cropping system. Pharma Innov J. 2023;12:930-34.
  37. 37. Kumar D, Kumar M, Kumar S, Kumar R, Singh RK: Production potential of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) based bio-intensive complementary cropping systems under Indo-gangetic plains of Uttar Pradesh. Pharmacogn Phytochem. 2021;10(1):2628-32.
  38. 38. Gangwar B, Ravisankar N. Diversified cropping systems for food security. Indian Farm. 2013;63(9):3-7. https://epubs.icar.org.in/index.php/IndFarm/article/view/54595
  39. 39. Gangwar B, Tomar OK, Gangwar S. Effect of bio-intensive complimentary cropping systems on crop yield, productivity, profitability and resource use efficiencies. Andaman Sci Assoc. 2018;23(2):98-105.
  40. 40. Dhawan V, Singh JM. Role of farm inputs in sustaining Punjab agriculture. Indian J Econ Dev. 2015;11(1):325-31. https://doi.org/10.5958/2322-0430.2015.00036.0
  41. 41. Yin W, Chai Q, Zhao C, Yu A, Fan Z, Hu F, et al. Water utilization in intercropping: A review. Agric Water Manage. 2020;241:106335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2020.106335
  42. 42. Kumar M, Yaduvanshi NP, Singh YV. Effects of integrated nutrient management on rice yield, nutrient uptake and soil fertility status in reclaimed sodic soils. J Indian Soc Soil Sci. 2012;60(2):132-37.
  43. 43. Rautaray SK, Ghosh BC, Mittra BN. Effect of fly ash, organic wastes and chemical fertilizers on yield, nutrient uptake, heavy metal content and residual fertility in a rice - mustard cropping sequence under acid lateritic soils. Bioresour Technol. 2003;90(3):275-83. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-8524(03)00132-9
  44. 44. Siddeswaran K, Shanmugam PM. Organic nutrient management in chillies - Bengal gram - Baby corn Sequence. Int J Agrl Sc. 2013;1:132-26.
  45. 45. Saini PK, Yadav RK, Yadav GC. Green manures in agriculture: A review. Bhartiya Krishi Anusandhan Patr. 2019;34(1):1-10. https://doi.org/10.18805/BKAP142
  46. 46. Acharya D, Mondal SS, Saha M. Production potential and profitability of different rice. Indian J Agric Sci. 2008;78(6):569-72.
  47. 47. Sangeetha SP, Balakrishnan A, Devasenapathy P. Influence of organic manures on yield and quality of rice (Oryza sativa L.) and blackgram (Vigna mungo L.) in rice - blackgram cropping sequence. Am J Plant Sci. 2013;4(5):1151-57. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/ajps.2013.45141
  48. 48. Ananda MG, Ananda MR, Reddy VC, Ajayakumar MY. Influence of different organic sources on yield and its components and benefit cost ratio of paddy (Oryza sativa L.) and groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) in paddy-groundnut cropping system. Crop Res. 2006;31:329-33.
  49. 49. Rasool R, Kukal SS, Hira GS. Soil organic carbon and physical properties as affected by long-term application of FYM and inorganic fertilizers in maize - wheat system. Soil Till Res. 2008;101(1-2):31-36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2008.05.015
  50. 50. Parmar DK, Sharma V. Studies on long-term application of fertilizers and manure on yield of maize-wheat rotation and soil properties under rainfed conditions in Western-Himalayas. J Indian Soc Soil Sci. 2002;50(3):311-12.
  51. 51. Yaduvanshi NP. Ammonia volatilization losses from Integrated Nutrient Management in Rice fields of Alkali soils. J Indian Soc Soil Sci. 2001;49(2):276-80.
  52. 52. Singh JS, Pandey VC, Singh DP. Efficient soil microorganisms: a new dimension for sustainable agriculture and environmental development. Agric Ecosyst Environ. 2011;140(3-4):339-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2011.01.017
  53. 53. Triveni U, Sandhya Rani Y, Patro TS, Anuradha N, Divya M. Evaluation of different finger millet based intercropping systems in the north coastal zone of Andhra Pradesh. Indian J Chem Stud. 2017;5(5):828-31.
  54. 54. Pavani K, Shanmugam PM. Maximization of rice yield in sodic soil through combined application of gypsum and organic amendments. Res Crops. 2019;20(4):676-84. http://dx.doi.org/10.31830/2348-7542.2019.099
  55. 55. Loria N, Bhardwaj SK, Ndungu CK. Impact of cropping systems on soil properties, nutrient availability and their carbon sequestration potential in Shiwalik hills of Himachal Pradesh. J Appl Nat Sci. 2016;8(3):1479. https://doi.org/10.31018/jans.v8i3.987
  56. 56. Bhan VM, Kumar S. Pollution free weed management - an approach. Pestol. 1996;20:25-35.
  57. 57. Subramanian E, Martin GJ, Ramasamy S. Effect of weed and nitrogen management on weed control and productivity of wet seeded rice. Indian J Weed Sci. 2005;37(1&2):61-4.
  58. 58. Dutta R, Gogoi AK. Evaluation of weed control practices in direct seeded rice. Indian J Weed Sci. 1994;26(3&4):109-11.
  59. 59. Jayakumar M, Ponnuswamy K, Amanullah MM. Effect of sources of nitrogen and intercropping on weed control, growth and yield of cotton. Res J Agric Biol Sci. 2008;4(2):154-8.
  60. 60. Rajagopal N, Velayudham K, Rajendran P, Radhamani S. Efficiency of dual cropping of green manures with maize on weed management. Madras Agric J. 2023;85:393-95. https://doi.org/10.29321/MAJ.10.A00765
  61. 61. Zhang WF, Dou ZX, He P, Ju XT, Powlson D, Chadwick D, et al. New technologies reduce greenhouse gas emissions from nitrogenous fertilizer in China. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2013;110(21):8375-80. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1210447110
  62. 62. Li Y, Zhang J, Chang SX, Jiang P, Zhou G, Fu S, et al. Long-term intensive management effects on soil organic carbon pools and chemical composition in Moso bamboo (Phyllostachys pubescens) forests in subtropical China. For Ecol Manage. 2013;303:121-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2013.04.021
  63. 63. Gattinger A, Skinner C, Müller A, Krause HM, Mäder P. Greenhouse gas fluxes in agricultural soils under organic and non-organic management. Build Org Bridges. 2014;4:1069-72. https://doi.org/10.3220/REP_20_1_2014
  64. 64. Gross A, Glaser B. Meta-analysis on how manure application changes soil organic carbon storage. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):5516. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-82739-7
  65. 65. Stalenga J, Kawalec A. Emission of greenhouse gases and soil organic matter balance in different farming systems. Int Agrophys. 2008;22(3):287-90.
  66. 66. Shah AN, Tanveer M, Shahzad B, Yang G, Fahad S, Ali S, et al. Soil compaction effects on soil health and crop productivity: an overview. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2017;24:10056-67. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-8421-y
  67. 67. Singh RK, Singh SK, Tarafdar JC. Influence of cropping sequence and nutrient management on soil organic carbon and nutrient status of Typic Rhodustalfs. J Indian Soc Soil Sci. 2008;56(2):174-81.
  68. 68. Yadav JS. Agricultural resource management in India: the challenges. Journal of Agric Water Manage. 2002;1(1):61-9.
  69. 69. Kumar R, Turkhede AB, Nagar RK, Nath A. Effect of different intercrops on growth and yield attributes of American cotton under dry land condition. Int J Curr Microbiol Appl Sci. 2017;6(4):754-61. https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2017.604.093
  70. 70. Shanmugam PM, Somasundaram S. Maximization of productivity in sodic Soil through bio-intensive complementary cropping system with organic amendments. Int J Curr Microbiol App Sci. 2020;9(7): 2527-33.https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2020.907.296
  71. 71. Sankaranarayanan K, Solaimalai A, Sankaran N. Intercropping of legumes in fodder sorghum - A review. Agric Rev. 2005;26(3):217-22.
  72. 72. Sangeetha SP, Dilip PS, Vanitha K, Somasundaram E, Maragatham S. Growth and productivity of castor as influenced by millet based intercropping systems. Int J Environ Clim Change. 2023;13:630-35. https://doi.org/10.9734/ijecc/2023/v13i123723
  73. 73. Yogesh S, Halikatti SI, Hiremath SM, Potdar MP, Harlapur SI, Venkatesh H. Light use efficiency, productivity and profitability of maize and soybean intercropping as influenced by planting geometry and row proportion. Karnataka J Agric Sci. 2014;27:1-4.
  74. 74. Borghi E, Crusciol CAC, Nascente AS, Sousa VV, Martins PO, Mateus GP, et al. Sorghum grain yield, forage biomass production and revenue as affected by intercropping time. Eur J Agron. 2013;51:130-139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2013.08.006
  75. 75. Misra BN, Singh B, Rajput AL. Yield, quality and economics as influenced by winter maize (Zea mays) based intercropping system in eastern Uttar Pradesh. Indian J Agron. 2001;46:425-31. https://doi.org/10.59797/ija.v46i3.3285

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.