Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Plant Science Today (PST)

Research Articles

Vol. 12 No. 3 (2025)

Cumulative effect of crop establishment method and herbicides on nutrient uptake, content and productivity of wheat in the Gird region of North India

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.8554
Submitted
27 March 2025
Published
19-06-2025 — Updated on 01-07-2025
Versions

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted during Rabi 2019-20 and 2020-21 to evaluate the cumulative effects of crop establishment methods and herbicides on nutrient uptake and productivity of wheat in the Gird region of North India. Treatments comprised of three crop establishment methods viz., conventional tillage (CT), minimum tillage (MT) and zero tillage (ZT) in main plots along with seven weed control treatments as subplots. Significantly higher grain yield (4.81 t/ha) was recorded under ZT due to reduced weed density and biomass, compared to the other tillage practices. The highest grain and straw yields (5.16 and 7.50 t/ha) were obtained under two hand weeding with ZT, which was statistically at par with the application of clodinafop + metsulfuron (60+4 g/ha) under the ZT system. Significantly higher N, P and K uptake and content by wheat were recorded under CT, followed by MT and ZT. Among herbicide treatments, the lowest nutrient uptake was recorded in the weedy check, while the highest uptake was observed under two hand weeding at 30 and 60 days after sowing (DAS), which was statistically at par with clodinafop + metsulfuron-methyl (60+4 g/ha). However, weeds followed opposing trends. ZT had the highest harvest index (40.08 %) compared to MT and CT. Furthermore, among herbicide treatments the maximum harvest index was observed with two hand weeding at 30 and 60 DAS (40.85 %); which was statistically equal to clodinafop + metsulfuron-methyl (60+4) g/ha (40.30 %). Reduced tillage significantly decreased soil bulk density in ZT (1.33 g/cm³) compared to MT (1.35 g/cm³) and CT (1.36 g/cm³), according to soil analysis. On the other hand, porosity and organic carbon showed the opposite trends. Available nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P) and potassium (K) in soil were recorded significantly higher under CT, followed by MT and ZT. CT recorded lower values of soil available N and higher values of soil P and K, while ZT recorded higher values of soil available N and lower values of soil P and K during the two-year study. Significantly higher values of available soil N and K were recorded under CT, followed by MT and ZT. However, ZT recorded significantly lower values of available soil nitrogen and potash accompanied by higher values of soil phosphorus. On the other hand, ZT recorded significantly lower values of available soil N and K coupled with higher values of available soil K during the pooled analysis.

References

  1. 1. Tripathi A, Mishra AK. The wheat sector in India: production, policies and food security. In The Eurasian wheat belt and food security: Global and regional aspects Cham: Springer International Publishing. 2016;12:275-96. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33239-0
  2. 2. Choudhary J, Nepalia V, Mali H, Sumeria HK. Alleviation of weed stress in wheat (Triticum aestivum) through herbicides and their combinations. Indian Journal of Agronomy. 2017;62(2):180-4. https://doi.org/10.59797/ija.v62i2.4277
  3. 3. Yaduraju NT, Mishra JS. Zero-Tillage in rice–wheat cropping system on vertisols in Madhya Pradesh: Prospects and problems. In Proceedings of International Workshop on Herbicide Resistance Management and Zero-tillage in Rice–wheat Cropping System. 2002; 4:4-6.
  4. 4. Walia US, Brar LS, Mehra SP. Interaction effects of nitrogen levels and weed control measures in wheat. Indian Journal of Weed Science. 1990;22(3&4):28-33.
  5. 5. Pandey IB, Sharma SL, Tiwari S, Bharati V. Effect of tillage and weed management on grain yield and nutrients removal by wheat and weeds. Indian Journal of Weed Science. 2001;33(3&4):107-11.
  6. 6. Johri AK, Singh G, Sharma D. Weed management with respect to nutrients uptake in Wheat. Indian Journal of Weed Science. 1992;24(3&4):60-74.
  7. 7. Afzal F, Chaudhari SK, Gul A, Farooq A, Ali H, Nisar S, et al. Bread wheat under biotic and abiotic stresses: An overview. Crop Production and Global Environmental Issues. 2015;293–317. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23162-4_13
  8. 8. Oerke EC. Crop losses to pests. The Journal of agricultural science. 2006;144(1):31-43. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859605005708
  9. 9. Walia U S. Description of important weeds and their control measures. Weed Management. Kalyani Publishers, Ludhiana. 2006.
  10. 10. Verma SK, Singh SB, Prasad SK, Meena RN, Meena RS. Influence of irrigation regimes and weed management practices on water use and nutrient uptake in wheat (Triticum aestivum L. emend. Fiori and Paol.). Bangladesh Journal of Botany. 2015;44(3):437-42. https://doi.org/10.3329/bjb.v44i3.38551
  11. 11. Mukherjee D. Effect of tillage practices and fertility levels on the performance of wheat (Triticum aestivum) under mid hill condition of West Bengal. The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 2008;78(12);1038-41.
  12. 12. Nichols V, Verhulst N, Cox R, Govaerts B. Weed dynamics and conservation agriculture principles: A review. Field Crops Research.2015;183:56-68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2015.07.012
  13. 13. Mishra R. Ecology Work Book Oxford and IBH Publishing Company Calcutta; 1968.
  14. 14. Gomez KA, Gomez AA. Statistical procedures for agricultural research. John wiley & sons.1984;17.
  15. 15. Donald CM. Competition among crop and pasture plants. Advances in Agronomy. 1963;15:1-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2113(08)60397-1
  16. 16. Donald CM, Hamblin J. The biological yield and harvest index of cereals as agronomic and plant breeding criteria. Advances in Agronomy. 1976;28:361-405. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2113(08)60559-3
  17. 17. Koenig R, Johnson C. Colorimetric determination of phosphorus in biological materials. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Analytical Edition. 1942;14(2):155-6. https://doi.org/10.1021/i560102a026
  18. 18. Jackson ML. Soil chemical analysis, Prentice hall of India Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi, India. 1973;498:151-4.
  19. 19. Panse VG, Sukhatme PV. Statistical methods for agricultural workers, 1954.
  20. 20. Mishra JS, Singh VP. Effect of tillage and weed control methods on weeds and yield of rice-wheat and soybean-wheat cropping systems. Indian Journal of Weed Science. 2005;37(3&4):251-3.
  21. 21. Sinha AK, Singh RP. Influence of cultivars under different tillage and weed management in wheat. Indian Journal of Weed Science. 2005;37(3&4):175-9.
  22. 22. Prasad S, Singh Y, Singh RP, Singh G. Effect of crop establishment, weed control method and time of nitrogen application on late sown wheat. Indian Journal of Weed Science. 2005;37(1&2):93-5.
  23. 23. Yadav A, Malik RK. Herbicide resistant Phalaris minor in wheat–a sustainability issue. Resource Book. Department of Agronomy and Directorate of Extension Education, CCSHAU, Hisar, India. 2005;152.
  24. 24. Barros JF, Basch G, de Carvalho M. Effect of reduced doses of a post-emergence herbicide to control grass and broad-leaved weeds in no-till wheat under Mediterranean conditions. Crop Protection. 2007;26(10):1538-45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2006.12.017
  25. 25. Mann RA, Ashraf MMA, Hassan GGH. Wheat establishment with zero-tillage for integrated weed management. Pakistan Journal of Weed Science Research. 2004;17–24.
  26. 26. Khaliq A, Shakeel M, Matloob A, Hussain S, Tanveer A, Murtaza G. Influence of tillage and weed control practices on growth and yield of wheat. Philippine Journal of Crop Science (PJCS). 2013;38(3):54-62.
  27. 27. Chopra N, Chopra NK. Bioefficacy of Fenoxaprop, Clodinafop, Metribuzin Alone and in combination against weeds in wheat and their residual effect on succeeding crops. Indian Journal of Weed Science. 2005;37(3&4):163-6.
  28. 28. Walia US, Singh M. Influence of application stage of sulfonylurea herbicides for the control of Phalaris minor in wheat. Indian Journal of Weed Science. 2005;37(3&4):184-7.
  29. 29. Singh R, Shyam R, Singh VK, Kumar J, Yadav SS, Rathi SK. Evaluation of bioefficacy of clodinafop-propargyl + metsulfuron-methyl against weeds in wheat. Indian Journal of Weed Science.2012;44(2):81–3.
  30. 30. Lal R. Restoring soil quality to mitigate soil degradation. Sustainability. 2015;7(5):5875-95. https://doi.org/10.3390/su7055875
  31. 31. Hobbs PR, Sayre K, Gupta R. The role of conservation agriculture in sustainable agriculture. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 2008;363(1491):543-55. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2007.2169
  32. 32. Chauhan BS, Mahajan G, Sardana V, Timsina J, Jat ML. Productivity and sustainability of the rice–wheat cropping system in the Indo-Gangetic Plains of the Indian subcontinent: Problems, opportunities and strategies. Advances in Agronomy. 2012;117:315-69. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-394278-4.00006-4
  33. 33. Govaerts B, Verhulst N, Navarrete CA, Sayre KD, Dixon J, Dendooven L. Conservation agriculture and soil carbon sequestration: between myth and farmer reality. Critical Reviews in Plant Science. 2009;28(3):97-122. https://doi.org/10.1080/07352680902776358
  34. 34. Swanton CJ, Nkoa R, Blackshaw RE. Experimental methods for crop- weed competition studies. Weed Science. 2015;63(SP1):2-11. https://doi.org/10.1614/WS-D-13-00062.1
  35. 35. Shrestha A. Conservation tillage and weed management. UCANR Publications; 2006. https://doi.org/10.3733/ucanr.8200
  36. 36. Tomar SK, Tomar TS. Effect of herbicides and their tank mixture on weed dynamics and yield of zero - tilled wheat (Triticum aestivum) under rice (Oryza sativa)–wheat cropping system of eastern Uttar Pradesh. Indian Journal of Agronomy. 2014;59(4):624-8. https://doi.org/10.59797/ija.v59i4.4580
  37. 37. Meena VD, Dotaniya ML, Kaushik MK, Meena BP, Das H. Bio-efficacy of readi-mix herbicides on weeds and productivity in late-sown wheat. Indian Journal of Weed Science. 2018;51(4):344–51. https://doi.org/10.5958/0974-8164.2019.00073.X
  38. 38. Chhokar RS, Sharma RK, Jat GR, Pundir AK, Gathala MK. Effect of tillage and herbicides on weeds and productivity of wheat under rice–wheat growing system. Crop Protection. 2007;26(11):1689-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2007.01.010
  39. 39. Erenstein O, Laxmi V. Zero tillage impacts in India's rice–wheat systems: A review. Soil and Tillage Research. 2008;100(1-2):1-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2008.05.001
  40. 40. Baghestani MA, Zand E, Soufizadeh S, Beheshtian M, Haghighi A, Barjasteh A, et al. Study on the efficacy of weed control in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) with tank mixtures of grass herbicides with broadleaved herbicides. Crop Protection. 2008;27(1):104-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2007.04.013
  41. 41. Chhokar RS, Singh S, Sharma RK. Herbicides for control of isoproturon - resistant Littleseed Canarygrass (Phalaris minor) in wheat. Crop Protection. 2008;27(3-5):719-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2007.10.004
  42. 42. Moolchand SMS, Chandurkar PS, Arun KAK. Weed management in rice based zero tilled sown wheat. Pakistan Journal of Weed Science Research. 2007,13(3& 4)183-9.
  43. 43. Cassel DK, Nelson LA. Spatial and temporal variability of soil physical properties of Norfolk loamy sand as affected by tillage. Soil and Tillage Research. 1985;5(1):5-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-1987(85)80013-1
  44. 44. So HB, Dalal RC, Chan KY, Menzies NM, Freebairn DM. Potential of conservation tillage to reduce carbon dioxide emission in Australian soils. Sustaining the Global Farm. Purdue University, Lafayette, IN. 1999:821-26.
  45. 45. Lal R. Soil quality changes under continuous cropping for seventeen seasons of an alfisol in western Nigeria. Land Degradation & Development. 1998;9(3):259-74.
  46. 46. Franzluebbers AJ, Hons FM. Soil-profile distribution of primary and secondary plant-available nutrients under conventional and no tillage. Soil and Tillage Research. 1996;39(3-4):229-39. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-1987(96)01056-2
  47. 47. Nazir A, Bhat MA, Bhat TA, Fayaz S, Mir MS, Basu U, et al. Comparative analysis of rice and weeds and their nutrient partitioning under various establishment methods and weed management practices in temperate environment. Agronomy. 2022;12(4):816. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12040816
  48. 48. Ghosh D, Brahmachari K, Brestic M, Ondrisik P, Hossain A, Skalicky M, et al. Integrated weed and nutrient management improve yield, nutrient uptake and economics of maize in the rice-maize cropping system of Eastern India. Agronomy. 2020;10(12):1906. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10121906
  49. 49. Piper CS. Soil and plant analysis. Soil Science. 1945;59(3):263. https://doi.org/10.1097/00010694-194503000-00009
  50. 50. Blake GR, Hartge KH. Bulk density. Methods of Soil Analysis: Part 1 Physical and Mineralogical Methods. 1986;5:363-75. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssabookser5.1.2ed.c13
  51. 51. Gupta RP, Dakshinamoorthy C. Procedures for physical analysis of soil and collection of agro meteorological data. Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi. 1980;293.
  52. 52. Subbiah BV, Asija GL. A rapid procedure for the estimation of available nitrogen in soils.1956;25:259-60.
  53. 53. Olsen SR. Estimation of available phosphorus in soils by extraction with sodium bicarbonate. US Department of Agriculture; 1954.
  54. 54. Muhr GR, Datta NP, Shankarasubramoney H, Leley VK, Donahue KL. Soil Testing in India USAID. New Delhi. 1965;120. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1965.03615995002900060010x

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.