Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Plant Science Today (PST)

Research Articles

Vol. 12 No. sp3 (2025): Advances in Plant Health Improvement for Sustainable Agriculture

Innovative silvicultural strategies for sustainable Casuarina hybrid plantation and bioenergy production

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.8594
Submitted
31 March 2025
Published
26-07-2025

Abstract

This study explored the potential of Casuarina hybrid clone (A-01) as a promising energy crop for dendro-energy plantations, focusing on optimizing silvicultural practices like spacing and biochar application. Energy plantations, designed to produce high biomass on short rotations, play a critical role in sustainable energy solutions by providing renewable raw materials for bioenergy and reducing dependence on fossil fuels. Casuarina species, known for their adaptability to varied soil and climatic conditions, fast growth and high biomass yield, are increasingly favoured for such purposes. The Casuarina hybrid further enhances these traits, offering improved growth rates, higher wood calorific values and potential benefits in soil health and carbon sequestration. The study was conducted by establishing a research plantation trial at a farmer’s field in Coimbatore, India, from December 2023 to August 2024, the experiment utilized a split-plot design over 0.4 acres, featuring five spacing treatments (1 m × 0.5 m, 1 m × 1 m, 1 m × 1.5 m, 1.5 m × 1.5 m and 2 m × 2 m) as main plots and four biochar levels (0, 1, 2 and 3 kg/plant) as subplots, with three replications. Key findings included a maximum survival rate (100 %) under combinations A1B3, A2B2 and A4B3. Plant height after six months ranged from 277.4 cm to 416.8 cm, with the tallest plants observed in A2B4. The largest collar diameter (5.01 cm) and highest biomass (5886.8 g) were recorded in A2B4 and A2B2, respectively, while the lowest biomass (2496.6 g) was associated with A3B1. The study demonstrated the synergistic effects of optimized spacing and biochar application on the growth, biomass production and soil enhancement of Casuarina hybrid, offering valuable insights for its potential as an energy crop.

References

  1. 1. Khorram MS, Zhang Q, Lin D, Zheng Y, Fang H, Yu Y. Biochar: A review of its impact on pesticide behavior in soil environments and its potential applications. Journal of Environmental Sciences. 2016;44:269-79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jes.2015.12.027
  2. 2. Mukherjee A, Zimmerman AR, Hamdan R, Cooper WT. Physicochemical changes in pyrogenic organic matter (biochar) after 15 months of field aging. Solid Earth. 2014;5(2):693-704. https://doi.org/10.5194/se-5-693-2014
  3. 3. Hossain MZ, Bahar MM, Sarkar B, Donne SW, Ok YS, Palansooriya KN, et al. Biochar and its importance on nutrient dynamics in soil and plant. Biochar. 2020;2:379-420. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42773-020-00065-z
  4. 4. Nepal J, Ahmad W, Munsif F, Khan A, Zou Z. Advances and prospects of biochar in improving soil fertility, biochemical qualityand environmental applications. Frontiers in Environmental Science. 2023;11:1114752. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2023.1114752
  5. 5. Tan X, Liu Y, Zeng G, Wang X, Hu X, Gu Y, Yang Z. Application of biochar for the removal of pollutants from aqueous solutions. Chemosphere. 2015;125:70-85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2014.12.058
  6. 6. Schneider F, Haderlein SB. Potential effects of biochar on the availability of phosphorus—mechanistic insights. Geoderma. 2016;277:83-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2016.05.007
  7. 7. Hatchell GE, Berry CR, Muse HD. Nondestructive indices related to aboveground biomass of young loblolly and sand pines on ectomycorrhizal and fertilizer plots. Forest science. 1985;31(2):419-27. https://doi.org/10.1093/forestscience/31.2.419
  8. 8. Nagar B, Rawat S, Rathiesh P, Sekar I. Impact of initial spacing on growth and yield of Eucalyptus camaldulensis in arid region of India. World Applied Sciences Journal. 2015;33(8):1362-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.5829/idosi.wasj.2015.33.08.247
  9. 9. Karim AB, Savill PS. Effect of spacing on growth and biomass production of Gliricidia sepium (Jacq) Walp in an alley cropping system in Sierra Leone. Agroforestry Systems. 1991;16:213-22. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00119318
  10. 10. Rondon MA, Lehmann J, Ramírez J, Hurtado M. Biological nitrogen fixation by common beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) increases with bio-char additions. Biology and fertility of soils. 2007;43:699-708. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-006-0152-z
  11. 11. Liu X, Zhang A, Ji C, Joseph S, Bian R, Li L, et al. Biochar’s effect on crop productivity and the dependence on experimental conditions—a meta-analysis of literature data. Plant and soil. 2013;373:583-94. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-013-1806-x
  12. 12. Berek AK, Hue N. Improving soil productivity with biochars. Annual report, ICGAI, Yogyakarta, Indonesia. 2013 Nov 11:1-23.
  13. 13. Xu H, Cai A, Wu D, Liang G, Xiao J, Xu M, et al. Effects of biochar application on crop productivity, soil carbon sequestrationand global warming potential controlled by biochar C: N ratio and soil pH: A global meta-analysis. Soil and Tillage Research. 2021;213:105125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2021.105125
  14. 14. Schwerz F, Neto DD, Caron BO, Nardini C, Sgarbossa J, Eloy E, et al. Biomass and potential energy yield of perennial woody energy crops under reduced planting spacing. Renewable Energy. 2020;153:1238-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2020.02.074
  15. 15. Gomes IR, dos Santos RC, Castro RV, Vidaurre GB, da Silva GG, Rocha SM, et al. Does spacing affect the production of clones for wood energy planted in the state of Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil?. Scientia Forestalis. 2021;49(131), e3641https://doi.org/10.18671/scifor.v49n131.25
  16. 16. Harris F. The effect of competition on stand, treeand wood growth and structure in subtropical Eucalyptus grandis plantations PhD (dissertation) Australia: Southern Cross University; 2016.
  17. 17. Ríos Saucedo JC, Rubilar Pons R, Cancino Cancino J, Acuña Carmona E, Corral Rivas JJ, Rosales Serna R. Basic density of wood and heating value of shoots of three dendro-energy crops. Revista mexicana de ciencias forestales. 2018;9(47):253-72. https://doi.org/10.29298/rmcf.v9i47.157
  18. 18. Mwadalu RU, Mochoge B, Danga B. Effects of biochar and manure on soil properties and growth of Casuarina equisetifolia seedlings at the coastal region of Kenya. Scientific Research and Essays. 2020;15(3):52-63.
  19. 19. Lefebvre D, Román-Dañobeytia F, Soete J, Cabanillas F, Corvera R, Ascorra C, et al. Biochar effects on two tropical tree species and its potential as a tool for reforestation. Forests. 2019;10(8):678. https://doi.org/10.3390/f10080678
  20. 20. Piccolo EL, Becagli M, Lauria G, Cantini V, Ceccanti C, Cardelli R, et al. Biochar as a soil amendment in the tree establishment phase: What are the consequences for tree physiology, soil quality and carbon sequestration?. Science of the Total Environment. 2022;844:157175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.157175
  21. 21. Schmidt HP, Kammann C, Hagemann N, Leifeld J, Bucheli TD, Sánchez Monedero MA, et al. Biochar in agriculture–A systematic review of 26 global meta‐analyses. GCB Bioenergy. 2021;13(11):1708-30. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.12889
  22. 22. Baiamonte G, Crescimanno G, Parrino F, De Pasquale C. Effect of biochar on the physical and structural properties of a sandy soil. Catena. 2019;175:294-303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2018.12.019

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.