Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Plant Science Today (PST)

Research Articles

Vol. 13 No. 1 (2026)

Morpho-physiological differences and responses to source-sink manipulation in Aus rice varieties

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.8639
Submitted
2 April 2025
Published
29-01-2026 — Updated on 05-02-2026
Versions

Abstract

Rice is the staple food crop of Bangladesh, playing a critical role in national food security. This study investigated the morpho-physiological traits and the impact of source-sink manipulations on grain yield in four rice varieties Binadhan-14, Binadhan-19, China IRRI and Kalihatta under field conditions. Various treatments, including partial spikelet and flag leaf removal at different growth stages, were applied to assess their effects on yield components. Among the tested varieties, Binadhan-19 exhibited the highest grain yield under normal conditions, attributed to a greater number of grains per panicle and fewer sterile spikelets. Source-sink manipulations revealed that spikelet removal significantly increased individual grain size and weight, indicating that yield was sink-limited. Conversely, flag leaf removal reduced grain size and weight, emphasizing the importance of source strength for grain filling. These findings highlight that grain yield in rice is co-regulated by both source activity, sink capacity and strategic manipulation of these factors could be a promising approach in breeding programs aimed at enhancing rice productivity.

References

  1. 1. FAO. Global food outlook. Food and Agricultural Organization of Bangladesh; 2021.
  2. 2. Salam AMU, Hossain SMA, Biswas JK, Mridha AJ. Managing the unmanageable: rice variety technology for future challenging food security in Bangladesh. In: Agronomic visions in challenging future. Proceedings of the 13th Conference of the Bangladesh Society of Agronomy. Gazipur: Bangladesh Rice Research Institute; 2014.
  3. 3. Thakur AK, Mandal KG, Mohanty RK, Ambast SK. Rice root growth, photosynthesis, yield and water productivity improvements through modifying cultivation practices and water management. Agric Water Manag. 2018;206:67-77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2018.04.027
  4. 4. Akter MB, Islam MT, Mondal MM, Hoque MI, Kamruzzaman M, Nafis M, et al. Morpho-physiological basis of yield performance of early maturing rice varieties in Bangladesh. Annu Res Rev Biol. 2019;32(5):1-13. https://doi.org/10.9734/arrb/2019/v32i530097
  5. 5. Zhao Q, Hao X, Ali I, Iqbal A, Ullah S, Huang M, et al. Characterization and grouping of all primary branches at various positions on a rice panicle based on grain growth dynamics. Agronomy. 2020;10(2):223. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10020223
  6. 6. Meng T, Wei H, Li X, Dai Q, Huo Z. A better root morpho-physiology after heading contributing to yield superiority of japonica/indica hybrid rice. Field Crops Res. 2018;228:135-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2018.08.024
  7. 7. Liu K, Chen Y, Huang J, Qiu Y, Li S, Zhuo X, et al. Spikelet differentiation and degeneration in rice varieties with different panicle sizes. Food Energy Secur. 2021;11:e320. https://doi.org/10.1002/fes3.320
  8. 8. Zhang H, Chen TT, Liu LJ, Wang ZQ, Yang JC, Zhang JH. Performance in grain yield and physiological traits of rice in the Yangtze River basin of China during the last 60 yr. J Integr Agric. 2013;12:57-66. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2095-3119(13)60205-1
  9. 9. Gao B, Hu S, Jing L, Niu X, Wang Y, Zhu J, et al. Alterations in source-sink relations affect rice yield response to elevated CO₂: a free-air CO₂ enrichment study. Front Plant Sci. 2021;12:700159. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2021.700159
  10. 10. Cheng Y, Xiao F, Huang D, Yang Y, Cheng W, Jin S, et al. High canopy photosynthesis before anthesis explains the outstanding yield performance of rice cultivars with ideal plant architecture. Field Crops Res. 2024;306:109223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2023.109223
  11. 11. Shi W, Xiao G, Struik PC, Jagadish KS, Yin X. Quantifying source-sink relationships of rice under high night-time temperature combined with two nitrogen levels. Field Crops Res. 2017;202:36-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2016.05.013
  12. 12. Parida AK, Sekhar S, Panda BB, Sahu G, Shaw BP. Effect of panicle morphology on grain filling and rice yield: genetic control and molecular regulation. Front Genet. 2022;13:876198. https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2022.876198
  13. 13. Wei C, Jiang J, Liu C, Fang X, Zhou T, Xue Z, et al. Effects of source strength and sink size on starch metabolism, starch properties and grain quality of rice (Oryza sativa L.). Agronomy. 2023;13(5):1288. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13051288
  14. 14. Zhao H, Mo Z, Lin Q, Pan S, Duan M, Tian H, et al. Relationships between grain yield and agronomic traits of rice in southern China. Chil J Agric Res. 2020;80(1):72-9. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-58392020000100072
  15. 15. Chang TG, Wei ZW, Shi Z, Xiao Y, Zhao H, Chang SQ, et al. A critical role of stable grain filling rate in maximizing rice yield revealed by whole plant carbon nitrogen interaction modeling. bioRxiv. 2020;10. https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.10.06.329029
  16. 16. Xiao-Li W, Miao LI, Chao-Su L, McHugh AD, Ming LI, Tao XI, et al. Source–sink relations and responses to sink–source manipulations during grain filling in wheat. J Integr Agric. 2022;21(6):1593-605. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2095-3119(21)63640-7
  17. 17. Jiang Z, Yang H, Zhu M, Wu L, Yan F, Qian H, et al. The inferior grain filling initiation promotes the source strength of rice leaves. Rice. 2023;16(1):41. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12284-023-00656-x
  18. 18. Pan Y, Guo J, Fan L, Ji Y, Liu Z, Wang F, et al. The source–sink balance during the grain filling period facilitates rice production under organic fertilizer substitution. Eur J Agron. 2022;134:126468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2022.126468
  19. 19. Wang H, Xiong R, Zhou Y, Tan X, Pan X, Zeng Y, et al. Grain yield improvement in high-quality rice varieties released in southern China from 2007 to 2017. Front Sustain Food Syst. 2022;6:986655. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2022.986655
  20. 20. Yang J, Peng S, Zhang Z, Wang Z, Visperas RM, Zhu Q. Grain and dry matter yields and partitioning of assimilates in japonica/indica hybrid rice. Crop Sci. 2002;42(3):766-72. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2002.7660
  21. 21. Sarkar S, Monshi FI, Uddin MR, Tabassum R, Sarkar MJ, Hasan AK. Source-sink manipulation influences the grain-filling characteristics associated with the grain weight of rice. J Innov Agric. 2021;8(4):20-9. https://doi.org/10.37446/jinagri/rsa/8.4.2021.20-29
  22. 22. Yan JZ, Hao L, Yang QY, Tian XH. Source-sink relationship during grain filling in response to leaf-cutting treatment for heavy panicle rice cultivars. Chin J Agrometeorol. 2020;41:222-9.
  23. 23. Akter MB, Piao R, Reflinur, Rahman ML, Lee Y, Seo J, et al. Characterization and mapping of d13, a dwarfing mutant gene, in rice. Genes Genom. 2015;37:893. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13258-015-0319-9
  24. 24. Gardner FP, Pearce RB, Mitchell RL. Physiology of crop plants. Iowa: Iowa State University Press; 1985. p. 66.
  25. 25. Gomez KA, Gomez AA. Statistical procedures for agricultural research. New York: John Wiley and Sons; 1984. p. 1-34.
  26. 26. Li G, Zhang J, Yang C, Song Y, Zheng C, Wang S, et al. Optimal yield-related attributes of irrigated rice for high yield potential based on path analysis and stability analysis. Crop J. 2014;2:235-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cj.2014.03.006
  27. 27. Li R, Li M, Ashraf U, Liu S, Zhang J. Exploring the relationships between yield and yield-related traits for rice varieties released in China from 1978 to 2017. Front Plant Sci. 2019;10:41. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2019.00543
  28. 28. Gautam A, Shrestha A. Evaluation of panicle architecture traits in rice genotypes using PTRAP. Nepal Agric Res J. 2023;15(1):115-24. https://doi.org/10.3126/narj.v15i1.51533
  29. 29. Makino Y, Hirooka Y, Homma K, Kondo R, Liu TS, Tang L, et al. Effect of flag leaf length of erect panicle rice on the canopy structure and biomass production after heading. Plant Prod Sci. 2022;25(1):1-10. https://doi.org/10.1080/1343943X.2021.1908152
  30. 30. Sandhu N, Subedi SR, Singh VK, Sinha P, Kumar S, Singh SP, et al. Deciphering the genetic basis of root morphology, nutrient uptake, yield and yield-related traits in rice under dry direct-seeded cultivation systems. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):9334. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-45770-3
  31. 31. Takeda K. Internode elongation and dwarfism in some gramineous plants. Gamma Field Symp. 1977;16:1-18.
  32. 32. Tanaka M, Keira M, Yoon DK, Mae T, Ishida H, Makino A, et al. Photosynthetic enhancement, lifespan extension and leaf area enlargement in flag leaves increased the yield of transgenic rice plants overproducing Rubisco under sufficient N fertilization. Rice. 2022;15(1):10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12284-022-00557-5
  33. 33. Zhou W, Yan F, Chen Y, Ren W. Optimized nitrogen application increases rice yield by improving the quality of tillers. Plant Prod Sci. 2022;25(3):311-9. https://doi.org/10.1080/1343943X.2022.2061538
  34. 34. Akter MB, Piao R, Kim B, Lee Y, Koh E, Koh HJ. Fine mapping and candidate gene analysis of a new mutant gene for panicle apical abortion in rice. Euphytica. 2014;197(3):387-98. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-014-1074-8
  35. 35. Kobata T, Yoshida H, Masiko U, Honda T. Spikelet sterility is associated with a lack of assimilate in high-spikelet-number rice. Agron J. 2013;105(6):1821-31. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2013.0115
  36. 36. Teale WD, Paponov IA, Palme K. Auxin in action: signaling, transport and the control of plant growth and development. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2006;7(11):847-59. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrm2020
  37. 37. Li G, Chen X, Zhou C, Yang Z, Zhang C, Huang Z, et al. Vascular bundle characteristics of different rice variety treated with nitrogen fertilizers and its relation to stem assimilates allocation and grain yield. Agriculture. 2022;12(6):779. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture12060779
  38. 38. Kaushal J, Kongala PR, Lal AM, Srivastava S, Riyazuddin R, Ramteke PW. Pollen viability and associated traits in relation to fertility and yield of popular rice varieties under late sown condition. Indian J Agric Biochem. 2020;33(2):188-92. https://doi.org/10.5958/0974-4479.2020.00029.5
  39. 39. Puteh AB, Mondal MM, Ismail MR, Latif MA. Grain sterility in relation to dry mass production and distribution in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Biomed Res Int. 2014;1:302179. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/302179
  40. 40. Yang W, Peng S, Dionisio-Sese ML, Laza RC, Visperas RM. Grain filling duration, a crucial determinant of genotypic variation of grain yield in field-grown tropical irrigated rice. Field Crops Res. 2008;105(3):221-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2007.10.006
  41. 41. Tsukaguchi T, Iida Y. Effects of assimilate supply and high temperature during grain-filling period on the occurrence of various types of chalky kernels in rice plants (Oryza sativa L.). Plant Prod Sci. 2008;11:203-10. https://doi.org/10.1626/pps.11.203
  42. 42. Nakano H, Yoshinaga S, Takai T, Arai-Sanoh Y, Kondo K, Yamamoto T, et al. Quantitative trait loci for large sink capacity enhance rice grain yield under free-air CO₂ enrichment conditions. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):1827. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-01690-8
  43. 43. Lv X, Zhang Y, Zhang Y, Fan S, Kong L. Source-sink modifications affect leaf senescence and grain mass in wheat as revealed by proteomic analysis. BMC Plant Biol. 2020;20:257. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-020-02447-8

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.