Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Plant Science Today (PST)

Research Articles

Early Access

Performance of grafted tomato using rootstocks of different eggplant cultivars

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.8709
Submitted
6 April 2025
Published
07-01-2026

Abstract

This study examined grafting as an agronomic strategy to enhance the productivity of hybrid tomatoes cultivated in open-field conditions, with a particular focus on improving fruit size, weight and overall yield. The experiment employed a randomized complete block design (RCBD) with three replicates to ensure robust and statistically valid results. Five treatments were evaluated: (T1) non-grafted tomato, (T2) tomato grafted onto wild eggplant (red), (T3) wild eggplant (green), (T4) open pollinated variety (OPV) eggplant and (T5) hybrid eggplant. Key performance indicators measured included the number of fruits per plant, average fruit size and total yield per treatment. Results showed that plants grafted onto wild green, OPV and Hybrid eggplant rootstocks consistently produced a higher number of fruits compared to the non-grafted control. In terms of fruit size, both wild green and wild red eggplant rootstocks yielded larger fruits, indicating their strong potential for enhancing marketable quality. Furthermore, the highest total yields were obtained from tomatoes grafted onto wild green and hybrid eggplant rootstocks, suggesting their suitability for maximizing production efficiency. These findings highlight that the selection of appropriate rootstocks, particularly wild green and hybrid eggplant, can significantly improve hybrid tomato performance. Beyond productivity gains, grafting offers added benefits such as improved plant vigor, enhanced tolerance to soil borne diseases and greater resilience to environmental stresses. As such, this technique represents a practical and sustainable approach for commercial tomato growers seeking to increase yield and profitability while supporting long-term agricultural sustainability.

References

  1. 1. Padmanabhan P, Cheema A, Paliyath G. Solanaceous fruits including tomato, eggplant and peppers. In: Caballero B, Finglas PM, Toldrá F, editors. Encyclopedia of Food and Health. Elsevier; 2016. p. 24-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-384947-2.00696-6
  2. 2. Freeman B, Reimers K. Tomato consumption and health: Emerging benefits. Am J Lifestyle Med. 2010;5(2):182-91. https://doi.org/10.1177/1559827610387488
  3. 3. Rahman MA, Rashid MA, Hossain MM, Salam MA, Masum ASM. Grafting compatibility of cultivated eggplant varieties with wild Solanum species. Pak J Biol Sci. 2002;5(7):755-7. https://doi.org/10.3923/pjbs.2002.755.757
  4. 4. Upstone ME. The effects of methyl bromide fumigation and grafting on yield and root diseases of tomatoes. Plant Pathol. 1968;17:103-7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3059.1968.tb00429.x
  5. 5. Kubota C, McClure MA, Kokalis-Burelle N, Bausher MG, Rosskopf EN. Vegetable grafting: History, use and current technology status in North America. HortScience. 2008;43:1664-9. https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI.43.6.1664
  6. 6. Palada MC, Wu DL. Increasing off-season tomato production using grafting technology for peri-urban agriculture in Southeast Asia. Acta Hortic (ISHS). 2006;742:125-31. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2007.742.17
  7. 7. Passam HC, Karapanos IC, Bebeli PJ, Savvas D. A review of recent research on tomato nutrition, breeding and post-harvest technology with reference to fruit quality. Eur J Plant Sci Biotechnol. 2007;1(1):1-21.
  8. 8. National Economic and Development Authority (NEDA). Grafted tomato technology for off-season production. Knowledge Emporium; 2006.
  9. 9. Rivard CL, Louws FJ. Grafting for disease resistance in heirloom tomatoes. AG-675; 2006.
  10. 10. Fernandez GN, Martinez V, Cerda A, Carvajal M. Water and nutrient uptake of grafted tomato plants grown under saline conditions. J Plant Physiol. 2002;159(8):899-905. https://doi.org/10.1078/0176-1617-00652
  11. 11. Latifah E, Antarlina SS, Sugiono S, Handayati W, Mariyono J. Grafting technology with locally selected eggplant rootstocks for improvement in tomato performance. Sustainability. 2023;15(1):855. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15010855
  12. 12. Panthee DR, Kressin J, Piotrowski A. Identification of potential rootstocks for tomato grafting from bacterial wilt screening trials in North Carolina. Acta Hortic. 2021;1302:169-76. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2021.1302.23
  13. 13. Manickam R, Chen JR, Cardona PS, Kenyon L, Srinivasan R. Evaluation of different bacterial wilt resistant eggplant rootstocks for grafting tomato. Acta Hortic. 2021;1302:161-8. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10010075
  14. 14. Romano D, Paratore A. Effects of grafting on tomato and eggplant. Acta Hortic. 2001;559:149-53. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2001.559.21
  15. 15. Bureau of Agricultural Statistics. Regional rice statistics handbook (1970-1992). Muñoz, Nueva Ecija, Philippines; 1994.
  16. 16. Iwamoto Y, Ezura H. Efficient plant regeneration from protoplasts of eggplant rootstock cultivar and its wild relatives. Plant Biotechnol. 2006;5(5):525-9. https://doi.org/10.5511/plantbiotechnology.23.525
  17. 17. Kelman A. One hundred and one years of research on bacterial wilt. In: Prior P, Allen C, Elphinstone J, editors. Bacterial wilt disease: molecular and ecological aspects. Berlin: Springer; 1998. p. 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-03592-4_1
  18. 18. Rath S. Lycopene extract from tomato (CTA). In: General standards for food additives CODEX STAN 192-1995 (Rev. 10-2009) Annex B. p. 9-48.
  19. 19. Rivard CL, Louws FJ. Grafting for disease resistance in heirloom tomatoes. AG-675; 2006.
  20. 20. Upstone ME. The effects of methyl bromide fumigation and grafting on yield and root diseases of tomatoes. Plant Pathol. 1968;17:103-7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3059.1968.tb00429.x
  21. 21. Musa I, Rafii MY, Ahmad K, Ramlee SI, Hatta MAM, Magaji U, et al. Influence of wild relative rootstocks on eggplant growth, yield and fruit physicochemical properties under open field conditions. Agriculture. 2021;11(10):943. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture11100943

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.