Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Plant Science Today (PST)

Review Articles

Vol. 13 No. sp1 (2026): Recent Advances in Agriculture

Microbial biofertilizers: A sustainable agricultural approach to augment crop resilience against biotic and abiotic stresses

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.8837
Submitted
12 April 2025
Published
05-03-2026

Abstract

Increasing plant growth and yield with the aid of plant growth-promoting bacteria is a widely accepted, eco-friendly and economic approach in modern agriculture. Their use as an alternative to widely used harmful chemical fertilizers and pesticides can improve overall soil health and fertility, thereby enhancing crop yield. The positive modulation of genes related to growth and development, fruit formation, stress tolerance and phytohormone production helps plants significantly during maturation. Furthermore, the enhanced production and expression of defence-related hormones aid in survival under various stress conditions, such as drought, pH fluctuations, salinity and water stress. In addition, the application of growth-promoting bacteria, mainly from species such as Azospirillum, Bacillus, Klebsiella, Enterobacter, Pseudomonas, Azotobacter, Burkholderia, Rhizobium, Alcaligenes, Arthrobacter and Serratia supports plant growth and development by improving soil porosity, pH and salinity conditions. This review briefly outlines the role of the plant growth-promoting bacteria as microbial biofertilizers that enhance crop resilience under both biotic and abiotic stress conditions. By highlighting recent advances in understanding the mechanisms of microbe-plant interactions under these stresses, it also provides unique insights into how microbial biofertilizers can be employed for sustainable agriculture. This has direct relevance for policymakers and farmers by reducing dependence on chemical fertilizers, which have various negative impacts, thereby promoting long-term environmental sustainability and improved agricultural practices.

References

  1. 1. Passioura JB. Soil conditions and plant growth. Plant Cell Environ. 2002;25(2):311–8. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0016-8025.2001.00802.x
  2. 2. Mishra J, Singh R, Arora NK. Plant growth-promoting microbes: diverse roles in agriculture and environmental sustainability. In: Kumar V, Kumar M, Sharma S, Prasad R, editors. Probiotics plant health. Singapore: Springer; 2017. p. 71–111. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-3473-2_4
  3. 3. Ab Rahman SF, Singh E, Pieterse CM, Schenk PM. Emerging microbial biocontrol strategies for plant pathogens. Plant Sci. 2018;267:102–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plantsci.2017.11.012
  4. 4. Singh HB. Management of plant pathogens with microorganisms. Proc Indian Natl Sci Acad. 2014;80(2):443–54. https://doi.org/10.16943/ptinsa/2014/v80i2/55120
  5. 5. Rani L, Thapa K, Kanojia N, Sharma N, Singh S, Grewal AS, et al. An extensive review on the consequences of chemical pesticides on human health and environment. J Clean Prod. 2021;283:124657. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124657
  6. 6. Abdel Bagi AO, Ahmed AA, Elhindi M, Ali AM. Impact of pesticides and other chemicals on the environment. In: Workshop on Post Conflict National Plan for Environmental Management in Sudan; 2006. p. 18–20.
  7. 7. Pahalvi HN, Rafiya L, Rashid S, Nisar B, Kamili AN. Chemical fertilizers and their impact on soil health. In: Dar GH, Bhat RA, Mehmood MA, Hakeem KR, editors. Microbiota and biofertilizers. Vol. 2. Cham.: Springer; 2021. p. 1–20.
  8. 8. Baligar VC, Fageria NK, He ZL. Nutrient use efficiency in plants. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal. 2001;32(7-8):921–50. https://doi.org/10.1081/CSS-100104098
  9. 9. Kumar S, Kumar S, Mohapatra T. Interaction between macro- and micro-nutrients in plants. Front Plant Sci. 2021;12:665583. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2021.665583
  10. 10. Kudoyarova GR, Arkhipova TN, Melent’ev AI. Role of bacterial phytohormones in plant growth regulation. In: Maheshwari D, editor. Bacterial metabolites sustainable agroecosystem. Vol. 12. Cham.: Springer; 2015. p. 69–86. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24654-3_4
  11. 11. Perrig D, Boiero ML, Masciarelli OA, Penna C, Ruiz OA, Cassán FD, et al. Plant-growth-promoting compounds produced by two agronomically important strains of Azospirillum brasilense, and implications for inoculant formulation. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2007;75:1143–50. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-007-0909-9
  12. 12. Miljaković D, Marinković J, Balešević-Tubić S. Significance The significance of Bacillus spp. in disease suppression and growth promotion of field and vegetable crops. Microorganisms. 2020;8(7):1037. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms8071037
  13. 13. Hashem A, Tabassum B, Abd_Allah EF. Bacillus subtilis: A plant-growth promoting rhizobacterium that also impacts biotic stress. Saudi J Biol Sci. 2019;26(6):1291–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sjbs.2019.05.004
  14. 14. Mukherjee T, Banik A, Mukhopadhyay SK. Plant growth-promoting traits of a thermophilic strain of the Klebsiella group with its effect on rice plant growth. Curr Microbiol. 2020;77(10):2613–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00284-020-02032-0
  15. 15. Gopalakrishnan S, Sathya A, Vijayabharathi R, Varshney RK, Gowda CL, Krishnamurthy L. Plant growth promoting rhizobia. 3 Biotech. 2015;5:355–77. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13205-014-0241-x
  16. 16. Patil A, Kale A, Ajane G, Sheikh R, Patil S. Plant growth-promoting Rhizobium: mechanisms and biotechnological prospective. In: Hansen A, Choudhary D, Agrawal P, Varma A, editors. Rhizobium biology and biotechnology. Cham.: Springer; 2017. p. 105–34. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64982-5_7
  17. 17. Gul N, Wani IA, Mir RA, Nowshehri JA, Aslam S, Gupta R, et al. Plant growth promoting microorganisms mediated abiotic stress tolerance in crop plants: a critical appraisal. Plant Growth Regul. 2023;100(1):7–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10725-022-00951-5
  18. 18. Wei X, Xie B, Wan C, Song R, Zhong W, Xin S, et al. Enhancing soil health and plant growth through microbial fertilizers: Mechanisms, benefits, and sustainable agricultural practices. Agronomy. 2024;14(3):609. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy14030609
  19. 19. Prashar P, Kapoor N, Sachdeva S. Rhizosphere: its structure, bacterial diversity and significance. Rev Environ Sci Biotechnol. 2014;13:63–77. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11157-013-9317-z
  20. 20. Santoyo G, Urtis-Flores CA, Loeza-Lara PD, Orozco-Mosqueda MD, Glick BR. Rhizosphere colonization determinants by plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR). Biology. 2021;10(6):475. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology10060475
  21. 21. Hou J, Liu W, Wang B, Wang Q, Luo Y, Franks AE. PGPR enhanced phytoremediation of petroleum contaminated soil and rhizosphere microbial community response. Chemosphere. 2015;138:592–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2015.07.025
  22. 22. Hassani MA, Durán P, Hacquard S. Microbial interactions within the plant holobiont. Microbiome. 2018;6:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40168-018-0445-0
  23. 23. Berg G. Plant–microbe interactions promoting plant growth and health: perspectives for controlled use of microorganisms in agriculture. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2009;84(1):11–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-009-2092-7
  24. 24. Amaresan N, Murugesan S, Kumar K, Sankaranarayanan A, editors. Microbial mitigation of stress response of food legumes. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2020. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003028413
  25. 25. Hartmann A, Schmid M, Tuinen DV, Berg G. Plant-driven selection of microbes. Plant Soil. 2009;321:235–57. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-008-9814-y
  26. 26. Schirawski J, Perlin MH. Plant–microbe interaction 2017—the good, the bad and the diverse. Int J Mol Sci. 2018;19(5):1374. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19051374
  27. 27. Nadeem SM, Naveed M, Zahir ZA, Asghar HN. Plant–microbe interactions for sustainable agriculture: fundamentals and recent advances. In: Arora N, editor. Plant microbe symbiosis: fundamentals and advances. New Delhi: Springer; 2013. p. 51–103. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-1287-4_2
  28. 28. Niu B, Wang W, Yuan Z, Sederoff RR, Sederoff H, Chiang VL, et al. Microbial interactions within multiple-strain biological control agents impact soil-borne plant disease. Front Microbiol. 2020;11:585404. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2020.585404
  29. 29. Ortíz-Castro R, Contreras-Cornejo HA, Macías-Rodríguez L, López-Bucio J. The role of microbial signals in plant growth and development. Plant Signal Behav. 2009;4(8):701–12. https://doi.org/10.4161/psb.4.8.9047
  30. 30. Baker B, Zambryski P, Staskawicz B, Dinesh-Kumar SP. Signaling in plant-microbe interactions. Science. 1997;276(5313):726–33. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.276.5313.726
  31. 31. Köhl J, Kolnaar R, Ravensberg WJ. Mode of action of microbial biological control agents against plant diseases. Front Plant Sci. 2019;10:845. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2019.00845
  32. 32. Balachandran S, Hurry VM, Kelley SE, Osmond CB, Robinson SA, Rohozinski J, et al. Concepts of plant biotic stress. Some insights into the stress physiology of virus-infected plants, from the perspective of photosynthesis. Physiol Plantarum. 1997;100(2):203–13. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-3054.1997.tb04776.x
  33. 33. Amirsadeghi S, Robson CA, Vanlerberghe GC. The role of the mitochondrion in plant responses to biotic stress. Physiol Plantarum. 2007;129(1):253–66. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-3054.2006.00775.x
  34. 34. Sergeant K, Renaut J. Plant biotic stress and proteomics. Curr Proteomics. 2010;7(4):275–97. https://doi.org/10.2174/157016410793611765
  35. 35. Bhar A, Chakraborty A, Roy A. Plant responses to biotic stress: Old memories matter. Plants. 2021;11(1):84. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11010084
  36. 36. Zhao D, Wang H, Chen S, Yu D, Reiter RJ. Phytomelatonin: an emerging regulator of plant biotic stress resistance. Trends Plant Sci. 2021;26(1):70–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2020.08.009
  37. 37. Ruiz-Ferrer V, Voinnet O. Roles of plant small RNAs in biotic stress responses. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2009;60:485–510. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.arplant.043008.092111
  38. 38. Miller RN, Costa Alves GS, Van Sluys MA. Plant immunity: unravelling the complexity of plant responses to biotic stresses. Ann Bot. 2017;119(5):681–7. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcw284
  39. 39. Bilgin DD, Zavala JA, Zhu J, Clough SJ, Ort DR, DeLucia EH. Biotic stress globally downregulates photosynthesis genes. Plant Cell Environ. 2010;33(10):1597–613. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3040.2010.02167.x
  40. 40. Zogli P, Libault M. Plant response to biotic stress: Is there a common epigenetic response during plant-pathogenic and symbiotic interactions? Plant Sci. 2017;263:89–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plantsci.2017.07.008
  41. 41. Großkinsky DK, van der Graaff E, Roitsch T. Regulation of abiotic and biotic stress by plant hormones. In: Collinge DB, editor. Plant pathogen resistance biotechnology. Wiley; 2016. p. 131–54. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118867716.ch7
  42. 42. Suzuki N, Rivero RM, Shulaev V, Blumwald E, Mittler R. Abiotic and biotic stress combinations. New Phytol. 2014;203(1):32–43. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.12797
  43. 43. Wang L, Ning C, Pan T, Cai K. Role of silica nanoparticles in abiotic and biotic stress tolerance in plants: a review. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23(4):1947. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23041947
  44. 44. Gupta A, Bano A, Rai S, Mishra R, Singh M, Sharma S, et al. Mechanistic insights of plant-microbe interaction towards drought and salinity stress in plants for enhancing the agriculture productivity. Plant Stress. 2022;4:100073. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stress.2022.100073
  45. 45. Pettersson M, Bååth E. Temperature-dependent changes in the soil bacterial community in limed and unlimed soil. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2003;45(1):13–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-6496(03)00106-5
  46. 46. Khalilpour M, Mozafari V, Abbaszadeh-Dahaji P. Tolerance to salinity and drought stresses in pistachio (Pistacia vera L.) seedlings inoculated with indigenous stress-tolerant PGPR isolates. Sci Hortic. 2021;289:110440. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2021.110440
  47. 47. Hardoim PR, van Overbeek LS, van Elsas JD. Properties of bacterial endophytes and their proposed role in plant growth. Trends Microbiol. 2008;16(10):463–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tim.2008.07.008
  48. 48. Abd El-Ghany TM, Masrahi YS, Mohamed A, Abboud A, Alawlaqi MM, Elhussieny NI. Maize (Zea mays L.) growth and metabolic dynamics with plant growth promoting rhizobacteria under salt stresses. J Plant Pathol Microbiol. 2015;6(9):305.
  49. 49. Gusain YS, Singh US, Sharma AK. Bacterial mediated amelioration of drought stress in drought tolerant and susceptible cultivars of rice (Oryza sativa L.). Afr J Biotechnol. 2015;14(9):764–73. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJB2015.14405
  50. 50. Grover M, Madhubala R, Ali SZ, Yadav SK, Venkateswarlu B. Influence of Bacillus spp. strains on seedling growth and physiological parameters of sorghum under moisture stress conditions. J Basic Microbiol. 2014;54(9):951–61. https://doi.org/10.1002/jobm.201300250
  51. 51. Belimov AA, Dodd IC, Safronova VI, Shaposhnikov AI, Azarova TS, Makarova NM, et al. Rhizobacteria that produce auxins and contain 1-amino-cyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid deaminase decrease amino acid concentrations in the rhizosphere and improve growth and yield of well-watered and water-limited potato (Solanum tuberosum). Ann Appl Biol. 2015;167(1):11–25. https://doi.org/10.1111/aab.12203
  52. 52. Sharma M, Shilpa, Kaur M, Sharma AK, Sharma P. Influence of different organic manures, biofertilizers and inorganic nutrients on performance of pea (Pisum sativum L.) in North Western Himalayas. J Plant Nutr. 2023;46(4):600–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/01904167.2022.2071735
  53. 53. Kumar M, Mishra S, Dixit V, Kumar M, Agarwal L, Chauhan PS, et al. Synergistic effect of Pseudomonas putida and Bacillus amyloliquefaciens ameliorates drought stress in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Plant Signal Behav. 2016;11(1):e1071004. https://doi.org/10.1080/15592324.2015.1071004
  54. 54. Tiwari S, Lata C, Chauhan PS, Nautiyal CS. Pseudomonas putida attunes morphophysiological, biochemical and molecular responses in Cicer arietinum L. during drought stress and recovery. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2016;99:108–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2015.11.001
  55. 55. Bresson J, Varoquaux F, Bontpart T, Touraine B, Vile D. The PGPR strain Phyllobacterium brassicacearum STM 196 induces a reproductive delay and physiological changes that result in improved drought tolerance in Arabidopsis. New Phytol. 2013;200(2):558–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.12383
  56. 56. Yao L, Wu Z, Zheng Y, Kaleem I, Li C. Growth promotion and protection against salt stress by Pseudomonas putida Rs-198 on cotton. Eur J Soil Biol. 2010;46(1):49–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejsobi.2009.11.002
  57. 57. Zhou C, Ma Z, Zhu L, Xiao X, Xie Y, Zhu J, et al. Rhizobacterial strain Bacillus megaterium BOFC15 induces cellular polyamine changes that improve plant growth and drought resistance. Int J Mol Sci. 2016;17(6):976. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms17060976
  58. 58. Zhang G, Sun Y, Sheng H, Li H, Liu X. Effects of the inoculations using bacteria producing ACC deaminase on ethylene metabolism and growth of wheat grown under different soil water contents. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2018;125:178–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2018.02.005
  59. 59. Vafadar F, Amooaghaie R, Otroshy M. Effects of plant-growth-promoting rhizobacteria and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus on plant growth, stevioside, NPK, and chlorophyll content of Stevia rebaudiana. J Plant Interact. 2014;9(1):128–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/17429145.2013.779035
  60. 60. Kumar V, Khare T, Sharma M, Wani SH. ROS-induced signaling and gene expression in crops under salinity stress. In: Khan M, Khan N, editors. Reactive oxygen species and antioxidant systems in plants: role and regulation under abiotic stress. Singapore: Springer; 2007. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5254-5_7
  61. 61. Glick BR, Cheng Z, Czarny J, Duan J. Promotion of plant growth by ACC deaminase-producing soil bacteria. In: Bakker PAHM, Raaijmakers JM, Bloemberg G, Höfte M, Lemanceau P, Cooke BM, editors. New perspectives and approaches in plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria research. Dordrecht: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6776-1_8
  62. 62. Serrano R, Gaxiola R. Microbial models and salt stress tolerance in plants. Crit Rev Plant Sci. 1994;13(2):121–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/07352689409701911
  63. 63. Numan M, Bashir S, Khan Y, Mumtaz R, Shinwari ZK, Khan AL, et al. Plant growth promoting bacteria as an alternative strategy for salt tolerance in plants: a review. Microbiol Res. 2018;209:21–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micres.2018.02.003
  64. 64. Hong Z, Lakkineni K, Zhang Z, Verma DP. Removal of feedback inhibition of Δ1-pyrroline-5-carboxylate synthetase results in increased proline accumulation and protection of plants from osmotic stress. Plant Physiol. 2000;122(4):1129–36. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.122.4.1129
  65. 65. Chakraborty K, Sairam RK, Bhattacharya RC. Differential expression of salt overly sensitive pathway genes determines salinity stress tolerance in Brassica genotypes. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2012;51:90–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2011.10.001
  66. 66. Gao M, Tao R, Miura K, Dandekar AM, Sugiura A. Transformation of Japanese persimmon (Diospyros kaki Thunb.) with apple cDNA encoding NADP-dependent sorbitol-6-phosphate dehydrogenase. Plant Sci. 2001;160(5):837–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-9452(00)00458-1
  67. 67. Abebe T, Guenzi AC, Martin B, Cushman JC. Tolerance of mannitol-accumulating transgenic wheat to water stress and salinity. Plant Physiol. 2003;131(4):1748–55. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.102.003616
  68. 68. Inbaraj MP. Plant-microbe interactions in alleviating abiotic stress—a mini review. Front Agron. 2021;3:667903. https://doi.org/10.3389/fagro.2021.667903
  69. 69. Munir N, Hanif M, Abideen Z, Sohail M, El-Keblawy A, Radicetti E, et al. Mechanisms and strategies of plant microbiome interactions to mitigate abiotic stresses. Agronomy. 2022;12(9):2069. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12092069

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.