Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Plant Science Today (PST)

Research Articles

Vol. 12 No. sp4 (2025): Recent Advances in Agriculture by Young Minds - III

Effect of drought stress on physiological, biochemical and antioxidant activity of wheat genotypes at booting stage

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.8842
Submitted
13 April 2025
Published
28-10-2025

Abstract

Drought is a major abiotic stress affecting wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cultivation, particularly in arid and semi-arid regions. This study was conducted on three wheat genotypes PBW644, WH1080 and PBW175 under controlled conditions at the Division of Plant Physiology, Sher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology, Jammu. The experiment involved withholding irrigation for 10 days during the booting stage, with sampling carried out at the onset of wilting and leaf rolling symptoms. The objective was to investigate drought-induced changes in physiological, biochemical and antioxidant responses and their impact on yield-related traits. PBW644 exhibited superior drought tolerance, maintaining higher chlorophyll stability, water use efficiency and osmotic adjustment (proline and sugar accumulation). Antioxidant activity (SOD and CAT) was significantly upregulated, with PBW644 showing the strongest ROS scavenging capacity. Principal component analysis (PCA) identified key physiological and biochemical traits, including chlorophyll stability index, proline accumulation and antioxidant enzyme activities, as significant contributors to drought tolerance. Strong correlations between these parameters and grain yield highlight the critical role of oxidative stress mitigation and osmotic adjustment in maintaining stability of yield under drought scenarios. These findings emphasize the importance of physiological, biochemical and antioxidant mechanisms in enhancing drought resilience and provide valuable insights for breeding drought-tolerant wheat genotypes to ensure global food security in the face of climate change.

References

  1. 1. Sharma KD, Kumar A. Physiological processes associated with grain yield of wheat under restricted soil moisture. Indian J Plant Physiol. 2009;14:55-59. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/286956893
  2. 2. FAS. International Production Assessment Division. US Department of Agriculture; 2021.
  3. 3. Stuart ME, Gooddy DC, Bloomfield JP, Williams AT. A review of the impact of climate change on future nitrate concentrations in groundwater of the UK. Sci Total Environ. 2011;409(15):2859-73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2011.04.016
  4. 4. Yordanov I, Velikova V, Tsonev T. Plant responses to drought, acclimation and stress tolerance. Photosynthetica. 2000;38:17186. http://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007201411474
  5. 5. Ji X, Shiran B, Wan J, Lewis DC, Jenkins CL, Condon AG, et al. Importance of pre-anthesis anther sink strength for maintenance of grain number during reproductive stage water stress in wheat. Plant Cell Environ. 2010;33(6):926-42. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3040.2010.02130.x
  6. 6. Dat J, Vandenabeele S, Vranova EV, Van Montagu M, Inzé D, Van Breusegem F. Dual action of the active oxygen species during plant stress responses. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2000;57:779-95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s000180050041
  7. 7. Medrano H, Tomás M, Martorell S, Flexas J, Hernández E, Rosselló J, et al. From leaf to whole-plant water use efficiency (WUE) in complex canopies: Limitations of leaf WUE as a selection target. Crop J. 2015;3(3):220-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cj.2015.04.002
  8. 8. Giuliani MM, Nardella E, Gagliardi A, Gatta G. Deficit irrigation and partial root-zone drying techniques in processing tomato cultivated under Mediterranean climate conditions. Sustainability. 2017;9(12):2197. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9122197
  9. 9. Gunes A, Inal A, Alpaslan M, Eraslan F, Bagci EG, Cicek N. Salicylic acid induced changes on some physiological parameters symptomatic for oxidative stress and mineral nutrition in maize (Zea mays L.) grown under salinity. J Plant Physiol. 2007;164(6):728-36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jplph.2005.12.009
  10. 10. Kaloyereas SA. A new method of determining drought resistance. Plant Physiol. 1958;33(3):232. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.33.3.232
  11. 11. Lichtenthaler HK. Chlorophylls and carotenoids: Pigments of photosynthetic biomembranes. Methods in Enzymol. 1987;148:350-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/0076-6879(87)48036-1
  12. 12. Bates LS. Rapid determination of free proline for water-stress studies. Plant Soil. 1973;39:205-07. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00018060.
  13. 13. Albalasme AA, Berhe AA, Ghezzehei TA. A new method for rapid determination of carbohydrate and total carbon concentrations using UV spectrophotometry. Carbohyd Polymers. 2013;97(2):253–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2013.04.072
  14. 14. Beauchamp C, Fridovich I. Superoxide dismutase: Improved assays and an assay applicable to acrylamide gels. Analyt Biochem. 1971;44(1):276-87. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-2697(71)90370-8
  15. 15. Aebi HE. Catalase. In: Bergmeyer HU, editor. Methods of Enzymatic Analysis. Academic Press; 1983. p. 673-86 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-091302-2.50032-3.
  16. 16. Bogale A, Tesfaye K. Response of Ethiopian durum wheat genotypes to water deficit induced at various growth stages. Afr J Plant Sci. 2011;5(15):855-61. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJPS10.198
  17. 17. Gadallah MA. Effect of water stress, abscisic acid and proline on cotton plants. J Aarid Environ. 1995;30(3):315-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-1963(05)80006-0
  18. 18. Tas S, Tas B. Some physiological responses to drought stress in wheat genotypes with different ploidy in Turkey. World J Agric Sci. 2007;3:178-83. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11738-018-2651-6
  19. 19. Gholamin R, Khayatnezhad M. Study of bread wheat genotype physiological and biochemical responses to drought stress. Helix. 2020;10(05):87-92. http://doi.org/10.29042/2020-10-5-87-92
  20. 20. Ahmed CB, Rouina BB, Sensoy S, Boukhris M, Abdallah FB. Changes in gas exchange, proline accumulation and antioxidative enzyme activities in three olive cultivars under contrasting water availability regimes. Environ Exp Bot. 2009;67(2):345-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2009.07.006
  21. 21. Martı̀nez JP, Lutts S, Schanck A, Bajji M, Kinet JM. Is osmotic adjustment required for water stress resistance in the Mediterranean shrub Atriplex halimus L?. J Plant Physiol. 2004;161(9):1041-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jplph.2003.12.009
  22. 22. Khan N, Naqvi FN. Alterations in reducing sugar in Triticum aestivum under irrigated and non-irrigated condition. Afr J Biotech. 2012;11(21):4849-52.
  23. 23. Kumari A, Sairam RK, Singh SK. Effect on physiological, growth and yield parameters of wheat genotypes under drought stress. Int J Agric Stat Sci. 2014;10:167-74.
  24. 24. Osipova SV, Permyakov AV, Permyakova MD, Pshenichnikova TA, Börner A. Leaf dehydroascorbate reductase and catalase activity is associated with soil drought tolerance in bread wheat. Acta Physiol Plant. 2011;33:2169-77. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11738-011-0756-2
  25. 25. Møller IM, Jensen PE, Hansson A. Oxidative modifications to cellular components in plants. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2007;58(1):459-81. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.arplant.58.032806.103946
  26. 26. Farooq M, Wahid A, Kobayashi NS, Fujita DB, Basra SM. Plant drought stress: Effects, mechanisms and management. Agron Sustain Dev. 2009;29:185-212. https://doi.org/10.1051/agro:2008021
  27. 27. Siddiqui MH, Al-Khaishany MY, Al-Qutami MA, Al-Whaibi MH, Grover A, Ali HM, et al. Role of osmolytes in plants exposed to abiotic stress. Acta Physiol Plant. 2015;37:171. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms160510214
  28. 28. Gill SS, Tuteja N. Reactive oxygen species and antioxidant machinery in abiotic stress tolerance in crop plants. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2010;48(12):909-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2010.08.016
  29. 29. Miller GA, Suzuki N, Ciftci-Yilmaz SU, Mittler RO. Reactive oxygen species homeostasis and signalling during drought and salinity stresses. Plant Cell Environ. 2010;33(4):453-67. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3040.2009.02041.x
  30. 30. Hasanuzzaman M, Bhuyan MB, Zulfiqar F, Raza A, Mohsin SM, Mahmud JA, et al. Reactive oxygen species and antioxidant defense in plants under abiotic stress: Revisiting the crucial role of a universal defense regulator. Antioxidants. 2020;9(8):681. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox9080681
  31. 31. Farooq M, Gogoi N, Barthakur S, Baroowa B, Bharadwaj N, Alghamdi SS, et al. Drought stress in grain legumes during reproduction and grain filling. J Agron Crop Sci. 2017;203(2):81-102. https://doi.org/10.1111/jac.12169

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.