Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Research Articles

Early Access

Optimization of zinc oxide nanoparticle dosage in guava (Psidium guajava L.) for enhanced yield, nutritional quality, antioxidant activity and economic performance

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.8851
Submitted
13 April 2025
Published
22-09-2025
Versions

Abstract

Zinc (Zn) is the most deficient micronutrient among all and it also holds importance in human nutrition. The role of nanoparticles in meeting the micronutrient demands of horticultural crops is well known. In view of this, five levels of Zinc oxide nano particles (ZnONP), including a control, were used, with two varieties (i.e., VNR Bihi and Pant Prabhat), in a randomised block design replicated three times. VNR Bihi recorded significantly higher yield attributing characteristics and fruit yield compared to Pant Prabhat, whereas an opposite trend was recorded for the quality and biochemical parameters. Among all the levels of ZnONP, 150 ppm recorded the highest values of fruit yield; however, it remained statistically at par with 100 ppm. Increasing dosage to 200 ppm recorded loss in the fruit yield by 6.3 % reduction compared to 100 ppm. TSS, total sugars, ascorbic acid, total phenols, flavonoids and antioxidant activity were recorded as highest at 150 ppm, comparable to 100 ppm. The economic analysis revealed that a 100 ppm ZnONP spray can earn USD 961 ha-1 more than the control (no spray). B:C ratio (1.69) also recorded markedly highest value with 100 ppm. The study has shown that a ZnONP spray at a dosage of 100 ppm is the most optimal for guava production in India.

References

  1. 1. Gundappa B, Rajkumar MB, Singh S, Rajan S. Pests of guava. In: Omkar, editor. Pests and their Management. Singapore: Springer Nature; 2018. p. 491-516 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-8687-8_15
  2. 2. Bulugahapitiya VP, Kokilananthan S, Manawadu H, Gangabadage CS. Phytochemistry and medicinal properties of Psidium guajava L. leaves: A review. Plant Sci Today. 2021;8(4):963-71. https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.2021.8.4.1334
  3. 3. Rumpf J, Burger R, Schulze M. Statistical evaluation of DPPH, ABTS, FRAP and Folin-Ciocalteu assays to assess the antioxidant capacity of lignins. Int J Biol Macromol. 2023;233:123470. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2023.123470
  4. 4. Sarolia DK, Ameta KD, Sharma SK, Meena RK. Response of Guava cv. L-49 to Urea and Murate of potash fertigation levels. J Agric Ecol. 2020;10:76-82. https://doi.org/10.53911/JAE
  5. 5. Pandey PK, Sarkar S. Guava production in India: Growth and challenges. In: Malik R, Chaudhary SK, Sarkar S, editors. Indian Agriculture. New Delhi: SK Book Agency; 2017. p. 151-57.
  6. 6. Gupta R, Sonawane T, Pai S. An overview on pharmaceutical properties and biotechnological advancement of Withania coagulans. Adv Tradit Med. 2022;22:673-83. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13596-021-00558-7
  7. 7. Kumar M, Tomar M, Amarowicz R, Saurabh V, Nair MS, Maheshwari C, et al. Guava (Psidium guajava L.) leaves: Nutritional composition, phytochemical profile and health-promoting bioactivities. Foods. 2021;10:752. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods10040752
  8. 8. Agricultural and Processed Food Products Export Development Authority (APEDA). Product profile: Indian production of guava [Internet]. 2022 [cited 2025 Jul 24
  9. 9. Singh BP, Yadav RN, Mishra AK, Gupta V, Raghuvanshi T, Kumar A. Constraints faced by them in adoption of guava production technology in Saharanpur District (Uttar Pradesh). Bull Env Pharmacol Life Sci. 2017;6:81-84. https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2017.608.217
  10. 10. Sain V, Luhach V, Singh H, Mehla MS, Jyoti V. Constraints faced by guava growers in production and marketing of districts of Haryana state. J Agric Vet Sci. 2013;5:17-20. https://doi.org/10.9790/2380-0551720
  11. 11. Singh DP, Prakash S, Kumar V, Singh KK, Sharma P. Constraints faced by guava growers in adoption of guava production technology and suggestions for suitable extension strategies to overcome the problem in Bijnor District of UP. Int Res J Pure Appl Chem. 2020;21:41-47. https://doi.org/10.9734/irjpac/2020/v21i2230295
  12. 12. Jayara AS, Pandey S, Kumar R. Micronutrients: Role in plants, their spatial deficiency and management in Indian soils: A review. Agric Rev. 2023;44:199-206.
  13. 13. Shukla AK, Srivastava PC, Tiwari PK, Prakash C, Patra AK, Singh P, et al. Mapping current micronutrient deficiencies in soils of Uttarakhand for precise micronutrient management. Indian J Fert. 2015;11:52-63.
  14. 14. Sau S, Sarkar S, Ghosh B, Ray K, Deb P, Ghosh D. Effect of foliar application of B, Zn and Cu on yield, quality and economics of rainy season guava cultivation. Curr J Appl Sci Technol. 2018;28:1-10. https://doi.org/10.9734/CJAST/2018/42131
  15. 15. Barker AV, Eaton TE. Handbook of Plant Nutrition. 2nd ed. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press; 2015. p. 537-64.
  16. 16. Sadeghzadeh B, Rengel Z. Zinc in soils and crop nutrition. In: Hawkesford MJ, Barraclough P, editors. Molecular Basis of Nutrient Use Efficiency in Crops. 3rd ed. London: Academic Press; 2011. p. 335-76. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470960707.ch16
  17. 17. Zakzouk OA, Gad MM. Improving growth, flowering, fruiting and resistance of malformation of mango trees using nano-zinc. Middle East J Agric Res. 2017;6:673-81.
  18. 18. Amirjani M, Askary M, Askari F. Investigation of change pigment level, metal uptake and growth characteristics of Madagascar periwinkle (Catharantus roseus) by nano zinc oxide. J Plant Proc Func. 2016;14:17-30.
  19. 19. Suman M, Sangma PD, Singh D. Role of micronutrients (Fe, Zn, B, Cu, Mg, Mn and Mo) in fruit crops. Int J Curr Microbiol Appl Sci. 2017;6:3240-50. https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2017.606.382
  20. 20. Khan S, Kumar A, Dahiya DS, Baloda S, Malik A. Significance of nutrient application on growth, yield and quality of guava: A review. Int J Chem Stud. 2018;6:2936-42.
  21. 21. Raha S, Ahmaruzzaman M. ZnO nanostructured materials and their potential applications: progress, challenges and perspectives. Nanoscale Adv. 2022;4:1868-925. https://doi.org/10.1039/D1NA00880C
  22. 22. Das S, Andrew G. Zinc in crops and human health. In: Singh U, Praharaj CS, Singh SS, Singh NP, editors. Bioforti Food Crops. 2016. p. 31-40. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-2716-8_3
  23. 23. Meena RP, Mohammed S, Lakhawat SS. Effect of foliar application of urea and zinc sulphate on fruit quality and yield of pruned guava trees (Psidium guajava L.) cv. Sardar under high density planting system. HortFlora Res Spectr. 2015;4:90-93.
  24. 24. Rawat VRYTJ, Tomar YK, Rawat JMS. Influence of foliar application of micronutrients on the fruit quality of guava cv. Lucknow-49. J Hill Agric. 2010;1:75-78.
  25. 25. Bhoyar MG, Ramdevputra M. Effect of foliar spray of zinc, iron and boron on the growth, yield and sensory characters of guava (Psidium guajava L.) cv. Sardar L-49. J Appl Nat Sci. 2016;8:701-04. https://doi.org/10.31018/jans.v8i2.860
  26. 26. Manzoor MA, Xu Y, Xu J, Wang Y, Sun W, Li X, et al. Nanotechnology-based approaches for promoting horticulture crop growth, antioxidant response and abiotic stresses tolerance: An overview. Plant Stress. 2023;100337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stress.2023.100337
  27. 27. Yadav A, Yadav K, Abd-Elsalam KA. Nanofertilizers: Types, delivery and advantages in agricultural sustainability. Agrochemicals. 2023;2:296-336. https://doi.org/10.3390/agrochemicals2020019
  28. 28. Nongbet AA, Mishra K, Mohanta YK, Mahanta S, Ray MK, Khan M, et al. Nanofertilizers: A smart and sustainable attribute to modern agriculture. Plants. 2022;11:2587. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11192587
  29. 29. Jayara AS, Kumar R, Pandey P. Nanofertilizers in wheat crop nutrition: A review. J Cereal Sci. 2023;15:1. https://doi.org/10.25174/2582-2675/2023/128120
  30. 30. Rana RA, Siddiqui M, Skalicky M, Brestic M, Hossain A, Kayesh E, et al. Prospects of nanotechnology in improving the productivity and quality of horticultural crops. Horticulturae. 2021;7:332. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae7090332
  31. 31. Lakshya, Bakshi M, Verma P, Mirza AA, Singh SK, Mehndi S. Impact of foliar spray of nano-Zn and nano-Cu on biochemical characteristics of guava cv. Allahabad Safeda. J Appl Nat Sci. 2024;16:239-44. https://doi.org/10.31018/jans.v16i1.5243
  32. 32. Patidar S, Kumar S, Patidar K. Effect of nano zinc and nano iron on the vegetative growth of guava (Psidium guajava L.) cv. Allahabad Safeda. J Exp Agric Int. 2024;46:556-69. https://doi.org/10.9734/jeai/2024/v46i62509
  33. 33. Mazaheri-Tirani M, Dayani S. In vitro effect of zinc oxide nanoparticles on Nicotiana tabacum callus compared to ZnO microparticles and zinc sulfate (ZnSO₄). Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2020;140:279-89. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11240-019-01725-0
  34. 34. Jackson ML. Soil chemical analysis. New Delhi: Prentice Hall of India (Pvt.) Ltd.; 1973. p. 98.
  35. 35. Bradfield EG, Spencer D. Leaf analysis as a guide to the nutrition of fruit crops. VI. Determination of Mg, Zn, Cu, by atomic absorption spectroscopy. J Sci Food Agric. 1965;16:13-38. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.2740160105
  36. 36. Khattab MM, Shaban AE, El-Shrief AH, El-Deen Mohamed AS. Growth and productivity of pomegranate trees under different irrigation levels I: Vegetative growth and fruiting. J Hortic Sci Ornamental Plants. 2011;3:194-98.
  37. 37. AOAC. Official methods of analysis. 15th ed. Washington (DC): Benjamin Franklin Station; 2000.
  38. 38. Ranganna S. Handbook of analysis and quality control for fruits and vegetable products. New Delhi: Tata McGraw Hills Publishing Co. Ltd.; 1986. p. 102-03.
  39. 39. Singleton VL, Orthofer R, Lamuela-Raventos RM. Analysis of total phenols, other oxidation substrates and antioxidants by means of Folin-Ciocalteu reagent. Methods Enzymol. 1999;299:152-78. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0076-6879(99)99017-1
  40. 40. Zhishen J, Mengcheng T, Jianming W. The determination of flavonoid content in mulberry and their scavenging effects on superoxide radicals. Food Chem. 1999;64:555-59. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0308-8146(98)00102-2
  41. 41. Huang H, Jian Q, Jiang Y, Duan X, Qu H. Enhanced chilling tolerance of banana fruit treated with malic acid prior to low-temperature storage. Postharvest Biol Technol. 2016;111:209-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.postharvbio.2015.09.008
  42. 42. Gomez KA, Gomez AA. Statistical procedures for agricultural research. New York: John Wiley and Sons; 1984. p. 138.
  43. 43. Singh SN, Singh N, Bains G, Singh O, Singh VP, Kumar R, et al. Effect of foliar application of zinc oxide nanoparticles on biochemical characteristics of guava (Psidium guajava L.) cv. VNR Bihi. J Pharm Innov. 2023;12:575-83.
  44. 44. Shiva B, Nagaraja A, Srivastav M, Kumari S, Goswami AK, Singh R, et al. Characterization of guava (Psidium guajava) germplasm based on leaf and fruit parameters. Indian J Agric Sci. 2017;87:634-38. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v87i5.70172
  45. 45. Yadav RK, Ram RB, Kumar V, Meena ML, Singh HD. Impact of micronutrients on fruit set and fruit drop of winter season guava (Psidium guajava L.) cv. Allahabad Safeda. Indian J Sci Technol. 2014;7:1451-53. https://doi.org/10.17485/ijst/2014/v7i9.30
  46. 46. Pippal R, Lekhi R, Barholia AK, Rana S, Rana P. Response of guava to foliar spray of zinc, boron and magnesium on growth, development and yield. J Pharmacogn Phytochem. 2019;8:942-46.
  47. 47. Broadley M, Brown P, Cakmak I, Rengel Z, Zhao F. Function of nutrients: micronutrients. In: Marschner P, editor. Marschner’s Mineral Nutrition of Higher Plants. London: Academic Press; 2012. p. 191-248. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-384905-2.00007-8
  48. 48. Bhardwaj RL, Meena RR, Mukherjee S. Role of plant growth regulators in guava (Psidium guajava L.) – a review. Agric Rev. 2005;26:281-87.
  49. 49. Lal N, Das RP, Verma LR. Effect of plant growth regulators on flowering and fruit growth of guava (Psidium guajava L.) cv. Allahabad Safeda. HortFlora Res Spectr. 2013;2:54-56.
  50. 50. Gollagi SG, Ravi GK, Veena GL, Muralidhara BM. Role of plant growth regulators in guava (Psidium guajava L.) cultivation: A review. J Pharmacogn Phytochem. 2019;8:805-08.
  51. 51. Ahmed N, Zhang B, Chachar Z, Li J, Xiao G, Wang Q, et al. Micronutrients and their effects on horticultural crop quality, productivity and sustainability. Sci Hortic. 2024;323:112512. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2023.112512
  52. 52. Bisen B, Tiwari JP, Mishra KK, Lal S. Effect of zinc sulphate on vegetative growth, yield and leaf nutrient status of guava (Psidium guajava L.). Int J Curr Microbiol Appl Sci. 2020;9:1265-73. https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2020.907.145
  53. 53. Sharma A, Patni B, Shankhdhar D, Shankhdhar SC. Zinc – an indispensable micronutrient. Physiol Mol Biol Plants. 2013;19:11-20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12298-012-0139-1
  54. 54. Hussein AS, Abeed AH, Usman AR, Abou-Zaid EA. Conventional vs. nano-micronutrients as foliar fertilization for enhancing the quality and nutritional status of pomegranate fruits. J Saudi Soc Agric Sci. 2024;23:112-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jssas.2023.09.008
  55. 55. Laware SL, Raskar S. Influence of zinc oxide nanoparticles on growth, flowering and seed productivity in onion. Int J Curr Microbiol. 2014;3:874-81.
  56. 56. Rossi L, Fedenia LN, Sharifan H, Ma X, Lombardini L. Effects of foliar application of zinc sulfate and zinc nanoparticles in coffee (Coffea arabica L.) plants. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2018;135:160-66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2018.12.005
  57. 57. Baloda S, Sharma JR, Sehrawat SK, Sharma S, Rani S, Mehta A. Effect of soil application of zinc sulphate on growth, yield and quality of guava cv. L-49. Int J Plant Soil Sci. 2023;35:781-87. https://doi.org/10.9734/ijpss/2023/v35i203866
  58. 58. Dash AK, Singh HK, Mahakud T, Pradhan KC, Jena D. Interaction effect of nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium with sulphur, boron and zinc on yield and nutrient uptake by rice under rice-rice cropping system in inceptisol of coastal Odisha. Int J Plant Soil Sci. 2015;7:14-21.
  59. 59. Singh V, Ali J, Kumar A, Chauhan TM. Productivity, nutrient uptake and economics of wheat (Triticum aestivum) under potassium and zinc nutrition. Indian J Agron. 2015;60:426-30. https://doi.org/10.59797/ija.v60i3.4474
  60. 60. Shivay YS, Prasad R, Singh RK, Pal M. Relative efficiency of zinc-coated urea and soil and foliar application of zinc sulphate on yield, nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium, zinc and iron biofortification in grains and uptake by basmati rice (Oryza sativa L.). J Agric Sci. 2015;7:161. https://doi.org/10.5539/jas.v7n2p161
  61. 61. Adak T, Kumar K, Ganeshamurthy AN, Pandey G. Yield sustainability through micronutrient management in guava. J Hortic Sci. 2023;18:2. https://doi.org/10.24154/jhs.v18i2.1860
  62. 62. Lahari S, Hussain SA, Parameswari YS, Sharma S. Grain yield and nutrient uptake of rice as influenced by the nano forms of nitrogen and zinc. Int J Environ Clim Change. 2021;11:1-6. https://doi.org/10.9734/ijecc/2021/v11i730434
  63. 63. Singh S, Rehman MU, Singh SP, Dubey A, Wani AW, Kumar S. Impact of nano-nitrogen and chelated zinc on guava (Psidium guajava L.) quality under subtropical conditions. SSRN. 2024;5000060. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5000060
  64. 64. Patel MK. Pre-harvest spray of NAA, zinc sulphate and borax on guava (Psidium guajava L.) fruits cv. Gwalior-27 for storability [dissertation]. Gwalior (MP): RVSKVV; 2023.
  65. 65. Babu R, Tripathi VK. Impact of foliar application of NAA, zinc and boron on growth, yield and quality parameters of guava (Psidium guajava L.). Prog Agric. 2022;22:190-94. https://doi.org/10.5958/0976-4615.2022.00033.3
  66. 66. Yadav K, Verma M, Yadav SS, Khambalkar PA. Effects of various micronutrient levels on the biochemical and organoleptic attributes of guava cv. 27. Int J Plant Soil Sci. 2023b;35:874-79. https://doi.org/10.9734/ijpss/2023/v35i224199
  67. 67. Arshad I, Ali W. Effect of foliar application of zinc on growth and yield of guava (Psidium guajava L.). Adv Sci Tech Eng Sys J. 2016;1:19-22. https://doi.org/10.25046/aj010103
  68. 68. Jayara AS, Kumar R, Shukla A, Singh AP, Pandey P, Shukla P, et al. Integrating nano-fertilizers with mineral-based nutrients for growth, energy efficiency, economics and environmental sustainability in wheat crop. Int J Plant Prod. 2024;18:1-20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42106-024-00304-4

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.