Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Plant Science Today (PST)

Research Articles

Vol. 12 No. sp1 (2025): Recent Advances in Agriculture by Young Minds - II

Enhancing soil health and crop growth using seaweed extracts of Gracilaria species in pulp and paper industry effluent-irrigated soil

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.8952
Submitted
18 April 2025
Published
14-10-2025

Abstract

Large amounts of toxic effluents that negatively impact soil health and plant development are released by the pulp and paper industry, making it a major worldwide polluter. To improve crop growth and reduce abiotic stress in soil irrigated with papermill effluents, this pot culture study explores the potential of seaweed extracts from Gracilaria gracilis and Gracilaria edulis as biostimulants. Recommended Dose of Fertilizer (RDF) was applied to soil samples together with different concentrations of seaweed extracts (2.5 %, 5.0 %, 7.5 % and 10 %). The parameters evaluated were soil pH, electrical conductivity, nutrient availability, enzyme activity, plant development metrics and the amount of carotenoid and chlorophyll. The findings showed a notable increase in soil fertility. The application of Gracilaria extracts increased the availability of nutrients, especially nitrogen (up to 145.55 kg/ha in T4 (Gracilaria sp. 1 @ 7.5 % + RDF), phosphorus (up to 28.0 ppm in T4 (Gracilaria sp. 1 @ 7.5 % + RDF) and potassium (up to 143.5 ppm in T4 (Gracilaria sp. 1 @ 7.5 % + RDF) and lowering the pH of the soil (from 7.89 to 6.11). Significant improvement was observed in urease, phosphatase and dehydrogenase enzymatic activity. Concerning plant performance, 7.5 % Gracilaria extract produced the greatest results (T4 (Gracilaria sp. 1 @ 7.5 % + RDF) and T8 (Gracilaria sp. 2 @ 7.5 % + RDF). The height of Maize plants (up to 204.3 cm in T8 (Gracilaria sp. 2 @ 7.5 % + RDF), the number of leaves (12 in T4 (Gracilaria sp. 1 @ 7.5 % + RDF) and T8 (Gracilaria sp. 2 @ 7.5 % + RDF) and the amount of chlorophyll (3.10 mg g-1 in T10) increased. With a high carotenoid level of 0.86 mg/g in T10 (Gracilaria sp. 1 @ 7.5 % + Gracilaria sp. 2 @ 7.5 % + RDF), photosynthetic efficiency and stress tolerance were 10-15 % improved. According to the studys’ findings, seaweed-based biostimulants, particularly at concentrations of 7.5 % seaweed extract from two species, offer an environmentally acceptable approach to mitigating abiotic stress, enhancing soil health and promoting crop growth in polluted areas. Using Gracilaria extracts in sustainable farming methods is suitable for alleviating environmental stress.

References

  1. 1. Sharma P, Kumar S, Pandey A. Bioremediated techniques for remediation of metal pollutants using metagenomics approaches: a review. J Environ Chem Eng. 2021;9(4):105684 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2021.105684
  2. 2. Singh AK, Chandra R. Pollutants released from the pulp paper industry: Aquatic toxicity and their health hazards. Aquat Toxicol. 2019;211:202 16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquatox.2019.04.007
  3. 3. Uğurlu M, Gürses A, Doğar Ç, Yalçın M. The removal of lignin and phenol from paper mill effluents by electrocoagulation. J Environ Manag. 2008;87(3):420–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2007.01.007
  4. 4. Bray EA. Responses to abiotic stresses. BiochemMolr Biol Plants. 2000:1158–203.
  5. 5. Cushman JC, Bohnert HJ. Genomic approaches to plant stress tolerance. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2000;3(2):117–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1369-5266(99)00052-7
  6. 6. Gupta S, Goyal MR, Singh A. Biochemical, physiological and molecular approaches for improving salt tolerance in crop plants: a review. In: Gupta SK, Goyal M, Singh A, editors. Engineering practices for managing soil salinity. New York: Apple Academic Press; 2018. p. 201–50. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781351171083-21
  7. 7. Awana M, Yadav K, Rani K, Gaikwad K, Praveen S, Kumar S, et al. Insights into salt stress-induced biochemical, molecular and epigenetic regulation of spatial responses in pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan L.). J Plant Growth Regul. 2019;38:1545–61. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00344-019-09955-4
  8. 8. Ibrahimova U, Kumari P, Yadav S, Rastogi A, Antala M, Suleymanova Z, et al. Progress in understanding salt stress response in plants using biotechnological tools. J Biotechnol. 2021;329:180–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiotec.2021.02.007
  9. 9. Kauffman GL, Kneivel DP, Watschke TL. Effects of a biostimulant on the heat tolerance associated with photosynthetic capacity, membrane thermostability and polyphenol production of perennial ryegrass. Crop Sci. 2007;47(1):261–7. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2006.03.0171
  10. 10. Du Jardin P. Plant biostimulants: definition, concept, main categories and regulation. Sci Hortic. 2015;196:3–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2015.09.021
  11. 11. Benhamou N, Rey P. Stimulateurs des défenses naturelles des plantes: une nouvelle stratégie phytosanitaire dans un contexte d’écoproduction durable. I. Principes de la résistance induite. Phytoprotection. 2012;92(1):1–23. https://doi.org/10.7202/1012399ar
  12. 12. Ben Salah I, Aghrouss S, Douira A, Aissam S, El Alaoui-Talibi Z, Filali-Maltouf A, et al. Seaweed polysaccharides as bio-elicitors of natural defences in olive trees against Verticillium wilt of olive. J Plant Interact. 2018;13(1):248–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/17429145.2018.1471528
  13. 13. Shukla PS, Mantin EG, Adil M, Bajpai S, Critchley AT, Prithiviraj B. Ascophyllum nodosum-based biostimulants: Sustainable applications in agriculture for the stimulation of plant growth, stress tolerance and disease management. Front Plant Sci. 2019;10:462648. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2019.00655
  14. 14. Baltazar M, Correia S, Guinan KJ, Sujeeth N, Bragança R, Gonçalves B. Recent advances in the molecular effects of biostimulants in plants: an overview. Biomolecules. 2021;11(8):1096. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom11081096
  15. 15. Roy AS. Seaweed extract: a biostimulant in agriculture. Vigyan Varta. 2024;5(1):339–42.
  16. 16. Mannan MA, Yasmin A, Sarker U, Bari N, Dola DB, Higuchi H, et al. Biostimulant red seaweed (Gracilaria tenuistipitata var. liui) extracts spray improves yield and drought tolerance in soybean. PeerJ. 2023;11:e15588. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.15588
  17. 17. Basavaraja P, Yogendra N, Zodape S, Prakash R, Ghosh A. Effect of seaweed sap as foliar spray on growth and yield of hybrid maize. J Plant Nutr. 2018;41(14):1851–61. https://doi.org/10.1080/01904167.2018.1463381
  18. 18. Singh S, Tiwari D, Gautam SS, Singh M, Pal S. Seaweed: an alternative liquid fertilizer for plant growth. Int J Curr Microbio Appl Sci. 2019;8(12):772–81. https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2019.812.101
  19. 19. Jackson M. Soil chemical analysis. New Delhi (India): Prentice Hall of India Pvt. Ltd; 1973. p. 151–4.
  20. 20. Subbiah BV, Asija GL. A rapid procedure for the estimation of available nitrogen in soils. Curr Sci. 1956;25:259–60.
  21. 21. Ma L, Duan T, Hu J. Application of a universal soil extractant for determining the available NPK: a case study of crop planting zones in central China. Sci Total Enviro. 2020;704:135253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.135253
  22. 22. Prasad R. Determination of potentially available nitrogen in soils: a rapid procedure. Plant Soil. 1965;23(2):261–4.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01358352
  23. 23. Cordero I, Snell H, Bardgett RD. High-throughput method for measuring urease activity in soil. Soil Biol Biochem. 2019;134:72–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2019.03.014
  24. 24. Kaczyńska G, Borowik A, Wyszkowska J. Soil dehydrogenases as an indicator of contamination of the environment with petroleum products. Water Air Soil Pollut 2015;226:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-015-2642-9
  25. 25. Lin X-J, Zhang G-N, Wang Z, Han Q-D, Leng P. Phosphatase activities and available nutrients in soil aggregates affected by straw returning to a calcareous soil under the maize–wheat cropping system. Front Environ Sci. 2023;11:1208323. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2023.1208323
  26. 26. Environmental Monitoring Systems Laboratory (EMS). Methods for the determination of inorganic substances in environmental samples [Internet]. Washington (DC): United States Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development; 1993 [cited 2025 Jul 22]. Available from: https://nepis.epa.gov
  27. 27. Doll E, Lucas R. Testing soil for potassium, calcium and magnesium. In: Soil testing and plant analysis. Madison (WI): Soil Science Society of America (SSSA); 1973. p. 133–52.
  28. 28. Porra RJ, Thompson WA, Kriedemann PE. Determination of accurate extinction coefficients and simultaneous equations for assaying chlorophylls a and b extracted with four different solvents: verification of the concentration of chlorophyll standards by atomic absorption spectroscopy. Biochim Biophy Acta (BBA)-Bioenerg. 1989;975(3):384–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0005-2728(89)80347-0
  29. 29. Howe JA, Tanumihardjo SA. Evaluation of analytical methods for carotenoid extraction from biofortified maize (Zea mays sp.). J Agri Food Chem. 2006;54(21):7992–7. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf062256f
  30. 30. Greenacre M, Groenen PJ, Hastie T, d'Enza AI, Markos A, Tuzhilina E. Principal component analysis. Nat Rev Methods Primers. 2022;2(1):100. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43586-022-00184-w
  31. 31. Gong L. Soil electrical conductivity (EC): What’s it, why important, how to measure & more [Internet]. Shenzhen (China): Seeed Studio; 2022 Jul 15 [cited 2025 Jul 22]. Available from: https://www.seeedstudio.com/blog/2022/07/15/soil-electrical-conductivity/
  32. 32. Noor H, Ding P, Ren A, Sun M, Gao Z. Effects of nitrogen fertilizer on photosynthetic characteristics and yield. Agronomy. 2023;13(6):1550. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13061550
  33. 33. Hasanuzzaman M, Bhuyan MB, Nahar K, Hossain MS, Mahmud JA, Hossen MS et al. Potassium: a vital regulator of plant responses and tolerance to abiotic stresses. Agronomy. 2018;8(3):31. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy8030031
  34. 34. Isleib J. Soil calcium-to-magnesium ratios should not concern most farmers [Internet]. East Lansing (MI): Michigan State University Extension; 2016 [cited 2025 Jul 22]. Available from: https://www.canr.msu.edu/news/soil_calcium_to_magnesium_ratios_should_not_concern_most_farmers
  35. 35. Kaviani Rad A, Balasundram SK, Azizi S, Afsharyzad Y, Zarei M, Etesami H, et al. An overview of antibiotic resistance and abiotic stresses affecting antimicrobial resistance in agricultural soils. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(8):4666. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19084666
  36. 36. Adeleke BS, Chaudhary P, Ayilara MS, Ojo FM, Erinoso SM, Upadhayay VK, et al. Rhizosphere microbiomes mediating abiotic stress mitigation for improved plant nutrition. Ecologies. 2024;5(3):375–401. https://doi.org/10.3390/ecologies5030024
  37. 37. Hartemink AE, Barrow N. Soil pH-nutrient relationships: the diagram. Plant Soil. 2023;486(1):209–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-022-05861-z
  38. 38. Zhang G-B, Meng S, Gong J-M. The expected and unexpected roles of nitrate transporters in plant abiotic stress resistance and their regulation. Int J Mol Sci. 2018;19(11):3535. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19113535
  39. 39. Khan F, Siddique AB, Shabala S, Zhou M, Zhao C. Phosphorus plays key roles in regulating plants' physiological responses to abiotic stresses. Plants. 2023;12(15):2861. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12152861
  40. 40. Feng D, Wang X, Gao J, Zhang C, Liu H, Liu P, et al. Exogenous calcium: its mechanisms and research advances involved in plant stress tolerance. Front Plant Sci. 2023;14:1143963. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2023.1143963
  41. 41. Yang Y, Li J. How do plants maintain pH and ion homeostasis under saline-alkali stress? Authorea. 2023. https://doi.org/10.22541/au.168242561.13262405/v1
  42. 42. El Boukhari MEM, Barakate M, Bouhia Y, Lyamlouli K. Trends in seaweed extract-based biostimulants: Manufacturing process and beneficial effect on soil-plant systems. Plants. 2020;9(3):359. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants9030359
  43. 43. Ali O, Ramsubhag A, Jayaraman J. Biostimulant properties of seaweed extracts in plants: Implications towards sustainable crop production. Plants. 2021;10(3):531. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10030531
  44. 44. Kumar G, Nanda S, Singh SK, Kumar S, Singh D, Singh BN, et al. Seaweed extracts: enhancing plant resilience to biotic and abiotic stresses. Front Mar Sci. 2024;11:1457500. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2024.1457500
  45. 45. Feagley SE, Fenn LB. Using soluble calcium to stimulate plant growth [Internet]. College Station (TX): Texas A&M University; 2024 [cited 2025 Jul 22]. Available from: https://oaktrust.library.tamu.edu/server/api/core/bitstreams/72a1516b-c3e3-4da9-84f6-37f68af67469/content
  46. 46. Hauer-Jákli M, Tränkner M. Critical leaf magnesium thresholds and the impact of magnesium on plant growth and photo-oxidative defence: a systematic review and meta-analysis from 70 years of research. Front Plant Sci. 2019;10:766. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2019.00766
  47. 47. Santiago‐Rosario LY, Harms KE, Elderd BD, Hart PB, Dassanayake M. No escape: the influence of substrate sodium on plant growth and tissue sodium responses. Ecol Evol. 2021;11(20):14231–49. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.8138
  48. 48. Tinte MM, Masike K, Steenkamp PA, Huyser J, van der Hooft JJ, Tugizimana F. Computational metabolomics tools reveal metabolic reconfigurations underlying the effects of biostimulant seaweed extracts on maize plants under drought stress conditions. Metabolites. 2022;12(6):487. https://doi.org/10.3390/metabo12060487
  49. 49. Pérez-Gálvez A, Viera I, Roca M. Carotenoids and chlorophylls as antioxidants. Antioxidants. 2020;9(6):505. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox9060505

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.